The dead zone in the Arabian Sea is now the world’s biggest Oxygen Minimum Zone (OMZ). About the size of Scotland or Florida, the dead zone almost covers the entire Gulf of Oman, which borders Iran, Oman, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates.
What is a dead zone?
A dead zone is an area of the sea or a large body of water that’s almost entirely devoid of oxygen. The low-oxygen areas are called dead zones as they can’t sustain marine life. Fish, animals and plant life in the zones suffocate as a result of low oxygen levels, while some marine life manages to swim away from the area, leaving it empty.
Scientists began noticing increasing areas of dead zones in the 1970s. In 2008, 405 dead zones around the world were noted by Sweden’s Göteborg University.
Conditions in Gulf of Oman
The existence of the Gulf of Oman dead zone has been known for about 50 years, but the extent of the area has only recently been confirmed thanks to the use of underwater robots, called Seagliders.
“The Arabian Sea is the largest and thickest dead zone in the world. But until now, no-one really knew how bad the situation was because piracy and conflicts in the area have made it too dangerous to collect data,” Dr Bastien Queste from UEA’s School of Environmental Sciences said. “We barely have any data collected for almost half a century because of how difficult it is to send ships there.”
The remote-controlled submarines are the size of a small person and can spend months underwater at 1km. They were deployed by researchers from the University of East Anglia to the Gulf of Oman for eight months.
The team’s findings have now been published in Geophysical Research Letters. They found a strong decrease of oxygen in the afflicted zone compared to pre-1990 levels, and also charted how the oxygen is spread around the area across different seasons.
“Our research shows that the situation is actually worse than feared – and that the area of dead zone is vast and growing. The ocean is suffocating,” Queste said.
What causes dead zones?
Dead zones can occur naturally, but also grow as a result of excessive nutrient pollution from human activities, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration explains. Many chemical, physical and biological factors combine to create dead zones, but nutrient pollutions are the primary culprit. Nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilizers run into the water, and then act as nutrients which fertilize algae.
The algae eventually dies and decomposes in the water. This then feeds bacteria which consume oxygen around them, depleting the supply. Climate change has exacerbated the issue, as warmer waters contain less oxygen.
The Gulf of Mexico is home one of the largest dead zones, which occurs each spring when farmers fertilize their land and the rain washes the fertilizer into rivers and into the sea. An area in the Baltic Sea is another large dead zone.
Why are dead zones bad?
Dead zones are “a real environmental problem, with dire consequences for humans too who rely on the oceans for food and employment.” Guete said.
More worryingly, dead zones produce nitrous oxide, which is more damaging to the environment than carbon dioxide.
Scientists warn that computer simulations of ocean oxygen reveal levels will decrease over the next 100 years, with oxygen minimum zones growing. The next step for researchers is further study to determine all of the contributing causes of the increasing dead zone.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!
Nanoparticles are seeing use in an increasingly large number of medical procedures and treatment methods. However, Irish researchers are concerned that their use might be doing far more harm than good. They report that metal nanoparticles could be damaging the DNA of developing brain cells like neurons, according to an article by NanoWerk.
According to researchers from the Trinity College Dublin and the University of Bristol, when metal nanoparticles come into contact with cellular barriers, they unleash cellular messengers that trigger the destruction of cells. Their paper on this matter can be found in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.
This unforeseen side effect comes as a massive blow to drugs that rely on nanoparticles to treat neurodegenerative conditions. These heavy use of metal nanoparticles might be aggravating Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease instead of treating them. (Related: Antibacterial book made from nanoparticles of silver and copper cleans water in Third World.)
Nanoparticles are so tiny that they can fit inside the cellular pathways of organisms. This ability to take quick and precise shortcuts to their targets makes them perfect for drug treatment, chemotherapy, medical diagnostics, and imaging.
However, nanoparticles inadvertently change the signaling pathways and processes of the cells that they directly enter and pass through. Furthermore, their potential negative effects are not limited to the cells directly exposed to them. Nearby cells start exhibiting the same degraded effects as the affected cells.
Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results, videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly from the source! Download here.
Small but terrible metal nanoparticles trigger DNA damage
In their experiment, the researchers grew a layer of BeWo cells on a pore-laden membrane. BeWo cells are often used as a way to simulate the placental barrier of pregnant women.
Cobalt chromium nanoparticles were applied to this cell barrier model. The medium beneath the barrier was gathered up and put on cultures of human brain cells. According to reports, the brain cells exhibited damaged DNA.
Furthermore, the researchers also exposed pregnant mice to the metal nanoparticles in order to determine the specific part of the brain affected by the particles. When they analyzed the brains of the newly born offspring, they discovered damage to the baby rats’ hippocampi, the part of the brain that governs learning and memory.
According to their analysis, the nanoparticles passed through a certain cellular pathway in the cells in the human and rat barriers associated with autophagy. While a normal physiological process, autophagy also involves the destruction of old cells to make way for new ones.
When the nanoparticles used that pathway, they triggered messenger molecules like IL-6 that harmed the DNA of astrocytes and neurons, two types of important brain cells. Blocking either the autophagy process or the IL-6 molecule reduced the damage to the DNA, confirming the ultimate source of the problem are the nanoparticles.
The experiment results show that nanoparticles exert hitherto unknown indirect effects on cells. This should be kept in mind by health professionals who have been evaluating their safety based on their direct effects.
Astrocytes might be key to neuron health
Astrocytes took on even more importance during the nanoparticle experiment. The most numerous type of cell in the brain, astrocytes perform numerous roles in the central nervous system. Their ubiquitous presence gave them significant influence over nearby neurons.
According to lead author and neuroscience expert Maeve Caldwell, media from nanoparticle-affected cell barriers only caused damage to neurons if there were astrocytes nearby. She also notes that stressed astrocytes showed themselves capable of damaging the DNA of neighboring neurons.
Caldwell believes astrocytes are an important factor in neuron health. She suggests that future studies could consider these star-shaped cells as possible targets for treatment procedures of neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s disease.
Stay alert about potentially hazardous medicines by visiting DangerousMedicine.com.
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell has a reputation as a liberal bomb thrower (and hater of hammering). And during Wednesday’s edition of The Last Word, he had his claws out for House Speaker Paul Ryan who earlier that day announced he was retiring.
According to the MSNBC host, Ryan was a worse speaker than pedophile Dennis Hastert and the pre-Civil War speakers who owned slaves; all because “they were all more effective in their job as speaker than Paul Ryan,” who wouldn’t oppose Trump.
O’Donnell kicked off his diatribe by smearing Ryan and mocking how “Donald Trump has destroyed Paul Ryan’s life.” “And as Paul Ryan so clearly realizes, Donald Trump is on his way to destroying Republican control of the House of Representatives,” he continued. “The big blue wave is looking so big, so overwhelming to Paul Ryan that he has formally publically finally given up even pretending he might run for re-election to Wisconsin House seat.”
“And so, Paul Ryan will take his seat as simply the worst of this country’s speakers of the House of Representatives,” O’Donnell declared. He asserted that Ryan had “earned that place in history” because of his “unrelenting cowardice” in not using his power to stand up against President Trump, who was out of control.
“But Paul Ryan surrendered all of his powers to the Trump presidency. Previous speakers of the House have relished their powers over the president, have turned the presidents into beggars for legislative favors,” he bemoaned. It was completely hypocritical because O’Donnell would whine when the Ryan controlled House would oppose President Obama.
O’Donnell lambasted Ryan for looking “into his political soul and [finding] nothing. Nothing but weakness and subservience when faced with a President Donald Trump and rampant Trumpism in the House of Representatives.”
As if it was some kind of defense for the vile smear that was coming next, he noted that “Paul Ryan is not even close to being the worst person who has been Speaker of the House.” With his pathetic preface out of the way, O’Donnell maligned Ryan as lower than the low in our society:
Pedophile Dennis Hastert served eight years as the Republican speaker of the house, only to be revealed in his retirement to be a criminal. And before the Civil War, of course, we had slave owning as speakers of the House. But they were all more effective in their job as speaker than Paul Ryan.
After O’Donnell had gone off on Ryan for comparing his retirement to that of Tip O’Neil, he besmirched Ryan’s credibility as an economic policy wonk. “I never fell for the Washington media picture of Paul Ryan as a real policy wonk because I know that very few members of the House or the Senate actually qualify for that description on any subject,” he chided.
According to the bitter O’Donnell, “Paul Ryan had done a better job than most Republicans at memorizing policy talking points.” And as an underhanded compliment, he admitted “every once in a great while he actually showed a tiny bit of hope that he might actually be thinking about policy.”
This kind of vilification is what’s breaking down the civil discourse in America. O’Donnell couldn’t just criticize Ryan on policy. He had to go for the lowest of blows and suggest Ryan was beneath a pedophile and slave owners. Disgusting.
The relevant portions of the transcript are below, click “expand” to read:
MSNBC’s The Last Word
April 11, 2018
10:01 PM Eastern
LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: Well, Donald Trump has destroyed Paul Ryan’s life. And as Paul Ryan so clearly realizes, Donald Trump is on his way to destroying Republican control of the House of Representatives. The big blue wave is looking so big, so overwhelming to Paul Ryan that he has formally publically finally given up even pretending he might run for re-election to Wisconsin House seat.
And so Paul Ryan will take his seat as simply the worst of this country’s speakers of the House of Representatives. And he has earned that place in history through unrelenting cowardice of the speaker of the House. An office that is constitutionally capable of containing and controlling an out of control president. But Paul Ryan surrendered all of his powers to the Trump presidency. Previous speakers of the house have relished their powers over the president, have turned the presidents into beggars for legislative favors.
But Paul Ryan looked into his political soul and found nothing. Nothing but weakness and subservience when faced with a President Donald Trump and rampant Trumpism in the House of Representatives. Paul Ryan is not even close to being the worst person who has been speaker of the house. Pedophile Dennis Hastert served eight years as the Republican speaker of the house, only to be revealed in his retirement to be a criminal. And before the Civil War, of course, we had slave owning as speakers of the House. But they were all more effective in their job as speaker than Paul Ryan.
Last Word viewers have known since December 14, 2017, that Paul Ryan was not going to run for reelection to his seat. That was the night I announced it for Paul Ryan at this hour simply because he refused to deny a Politico story that day that he was thinking about not running for reelection. A speaker never does that. A speaker can never allow any doubt about that. Allowing that doubt, that doubt that he might not run for reelection is the same thing as just announcing that you’re not going to run. And so it was very easy for me to say back in December, with certainty, that Paul Ryan was not going to run.
And today, when he finally said it, he actually had the audacity to compare himself to one of the most successful and beloved speakers in history.
And I am one of the many congressional observers who is deeply disappointed in Paul Ryan. I never fell for the Washington media picture of Paul Ryan as a real policy wonk because I know that very few members of the House or the Senate actually qualify for that description on any subject. They are always guided by their staffs on policy. The staffs always know more than the elected members. But Paul Ryan had done a better job than most Republicans at memorizing policy talking points and every once in a great while he actually showed a tiny bit of hope that he might actually be thinking about policy.
“Our relationship with Russia is worse now than it has ever been, and that includes the Cold War. There is no reason for this. Russia needs us to help with their economy, something that would be very easy to do, and we need all nations to work together. Stop the arms race?” Trump tweeted.
Our relationship with Russia is worse now than it has ever been, and that includes the Cold War. There is no reason for this. Russia needs us to help with their economy, something that would be very easy to do, and we need all nations to work together. Stop the arms race?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 11, 2018
Shortly afterwards Trump also blamed the Democrats, tweeting that “much of the bad blood with Russia” has been caused by the “fake and corrupt” Russia investigation. The tweet referenced the probe which continues despite no evidence being found that there was any collusion between the US president and Moscow during the 2016 presidential election campaign.
This, however, came just minutes after Trump said in a separate tweet that Moscow should “get ready” to shoot down missiles aimed at Syria after the Russian ambassador to Lebanon stated that his country would do so.
Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and “smart!” You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 11, 2018
The two tweets left the Twittersphere confused, with many noting that one minute Trump was accusing Russia of being friends with the “gas killing animal” Bashar Assad, and the next saying there is “no reason” that the relationship between Moscow and Washington is so bad.
Twitter user @BlueWaveAhead was quick to point out the irony. “First you threaten Russia, then you hurry up to try and make nice. This is crazier than usual…you seem nervous,” she wrote.
WTF…First you threaten Russia, then you hurry up to try and make nice. This is crazier than usual…you seem nervous.
— Mallory (@BlueWaveAhead) April 11, 2018
“Between the last tweet and this one, you’re off the rails,” Brock from near Washington, DC, tweeted.
Political analyst Bill Palmer was quick to accuse Trump of being the reason for the bad relationship between Washington and Moscow. “Gee, whose fault is that?” he asked.
“Our relationship with Russia is worse now than it ever has been.” – gee, whose fault is that?
— Palmer Report (@PalmerReport) April 11, 2018
Another person told Trump to “make your mind up,” asking whether he wants war or to work together with Russia.
Jesus wept… make up your mind is it war or working together you sad fragmenting imploding piece of garbage?
Bluster bluster divert
— Old Lefty (@CharMac50) April 11, 2018
Meanwhile, Frank Warwick from Cheshire, UK, said that Trump’s military advisers are “breaking their bollocks to start a war with Russia.” He went on to ask why the US president needs to pretend he is the “world police,” adding that such behavior didn’t work in Iraq or Afghanistan.
You need to behave! You military advisers are breaking their bollocks to start a war with Russia and more why risk the future of millions? Why do you have to pretend your the world police? It didn’t work in Iraq or Afghanistan
— Frank Warwick (@HeffW) April 11, 2018
Others took the opportunity to remind people that although Trump is threatening to send missiles to Syria, he tweeted in 2013 to “foolish leader” Barack Obama that “many bad things would happen” if the US attacked the Middle Eastern state. “From that fight the US gets nothing!” he said at the time.
AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA – IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013
Others pointed to a 2013 tweet in which Trump said that he “would not go into Syria, but if I did it would be by surprise and not blurted all over the media like fools.”
@walaa_3ssaf No, dopey, I would not go into Syria, but if I did it would be by surprise and not blurted all over the media like fools.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013
Trump has been quick to place blame on President Bashar Assad for being behind an alleged chemical attack in Syria, without waiting for the results of an official investigation by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The allegations also come despite the fact that the Russian military traveled to the scene and found no evidence of a chemical attack, and that the initial report on the alleged incident came from the rebel-linked White Helmets.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
The Most Perilous Time in World History Got Worse
by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)
Events ongoing should terrify everyone – things likely heading for greater war than already.
Most Americans, Brits, and others in NATO countries are unaware of the danger posed by hardline Western extremists in charge of policymaking – notably in Washington, London and Israel, the Jewish state an alliance Mediterranean Dialogue member.
Businessman Trump was co-opted to be a warrior president – neocon generals in charge of geopolitical policies, their agenda hardened by Mike Pompeo replacing Rex Tillerson at State, along with torturer-in-chief Gina Haspel appointed new CIA director.
An unholy alliance of US extremist policymakers allied with likeminded ones in partner countries risks war winds reaching gale force, a terrifying prospect if confrontation with Russia, Iran or North Korea occurs – the possibility increased by recent events.
Earlier this week, US Defense Secretary Mattis and UN envoy Haley threatened Russia and Damascus.
Russia vowed to retaliate against US attacks on Syrian forces in East Ghouta or elsewhere endangering its personnel in the country.
Anti-Russia hysteria in Britain over the Sergey Skripal poisoning affair, most certainly Moscow had nothing to do with, soured bilateral relations more than already.
In response to British PM Theresa May demanding swift Russian answers to questions posed about the incident, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman (speaking for her government) replied sharply saying:
“One does not give 24 hours notice to a nuclear power,” adding the “Skripal poisoning was not an incident but a colossal international provocation,” adding:
Not a “single international legal mechanism (exists) to probe the Skripal case.”
Russia’s embassy in London said “Moscow will not respond to London’s ultimatum until it receives samples of the chemical substance to which the UK investigators are referring.”
“Britain must comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention which stipulates joint investigation into the incident, for which Moscow is ready.”
“Without that, there can be no sense in any statements from London. The incident appears to be yet another crooked attempt by the UK authorities to discredit Russia.”
“Any threat to take ‘punitive’ measures against Russia will meet with a response. The British side should be aware of that.”
“Not only is Russia groundlessly and provocatively accused of the Salisbury incident, but apparently, plans are being developed in the UK to strike Russia with cyber weapons.”
“Judging by the statements of the Prime Minister, such a decision can be taken at tomorrow’s meeting of the National Security Council.”
Given the gravity of the situation, the above comments by Russian diplomats were uncharacteristically strong.
Sergey Lavrov warned Washington that “(i)f a new (US) strike…takes place (against Syrian forces), the consequences will be very serious,” adding:
“I simply don’t have any normal terms left to describe all this.”
What’s coming remains to be seen. Hostile rhetoric from US and UK officials, along with hawkish extremists Pompeo in charge at State and Haspel appointed new CIA chief likely signal more war, not less.
What’s ongoing assures no possibility of improving dismal bilateral relations with Russia, China, Iran and other sovereign independent countries.
Talks with North Korea could either be scuttled or confrontational if they take place.
Given very disturbing ongoing events, the perilous state of world conditions reached a new low.
Be scared about what may follow – be very scared!
VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at firstname.lastname@example.org.
My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
The Physicians for Informed Consent is a group of doctors dedicated educate their patients and the public on infectious disease, the immune system, and informed consent. The group was founded in response to mandatory vaccination laws across the country which remove the rights of parents to informed consent. The group is not anti-vaccine, they are pro-freedom.
It is no question that the subject of vaccines is profoundly controversial. On both sides of the argument exists truth and lies that can hinder the ability of some to make rational decisions.
While we have everyone from attorneys to biologists, to political scientists who write for the Free Thought Project, none of us are doctors, so we do not make recommendations about what you and your family should do in regards to vaccination. It is important to note, however, that everyone deserves the right to make informed decisions on their own personal health and the health of their children.
Recently, the Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) reported in the British Medical Journal that every year, approximately 5,700 U.S. children suffer from seizures as a direct result of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.
Physicians for Informed Consent Finds MMR Vaccine Causes Seizures in 5,700 U.S. Children Annually https://t.co/pCrbmdOkx1
— Physicians for Info (@picphysicians) December 22, 2017
According to PIC, this finding is derived from results of the most statistically powered safety study ever to measure the association between MMR vaccination and febrile seizures. More than half a million children were evaluated, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, from a Danish population that is relied upon globally to examine vaccine safety. The results showed that seizures from the MMR vaccine occur in about 1 in 640 children up to two weeks following MMR vaccination. Applying this risk of seizures to the 3.64 million U.S. children vaccinated with a first dose of MMR every year results in about 5,700 annual MMR-vaccine seizures.
“To make accurate and ethical public health decisions, the risks of a vaccine must be compared to the risks of the disease one is trying to prevent,” said Dr. Shira Miller, PIC president and founder. “When considering the MMR vaccine to prevent measles, the risks of the MMR vaccine need to be compared to the risks of measles.”
While there is a risk of seizure from contracting measles, according to the data, the risk of developing seizures from the vaccine to combat measles is five times higher.
What’s more, the seizures from the MMR vaccine are far worse, according to the study and can cause permanent harm.
“For example, 5% of febrile seizures result in epilepsy, a chronic brain disorder that leads to recurring seizures. Annually, about 300 MMR-vaccine seizures (5% of 5,700) will lead to epilepsy,” PIC points out.
PIC notes that the government reporting system for vaccine injuries, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), receives only fraction of the those reported seizures from the MMR vaccination. According to PIC, this could mean that there is an underreporting of other serious vaccine adverse events from MMR, including permanent neurological harm and death.
“In the United States, measles is generally a benign, short-term viral infection; 99.99% of measles cases fully recover,” said Dr. Miller. “As it has not been proven that the MMR vaccine is safer than measles, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that mandatory measles mass vaccination results in a net public health benefit in the United States.”
According to the report, the measles vaccine was introduced in the U.S. in 1963 and is now only available as a component of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. It has significantly reduced the incidence of measles; however, the vaccine is not capable of preventing all cases of measles, as failures have been reported. The manufacturer’s package insert contains information about vaccine ingredients, adverse reactions, and vaccine evaluations. For example, “M-M-R II vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.” Furthermore, the risk of permanent injury and death from the MMR vaccine has not been proven to be less than that of measles.
In regard to the question of whether or not the MMR vaccine is safer than measles, the group of physicians has this to say, “Because permanent sequalae (aftereffects) from measles, especially in individuals with normal levels of vitamin A, are so rare, the level of accuracy of the research studies available is insufficient to prove that the vaccine causes less death or permanent injury than measles.”
Source Article from http://thefreethoughtproject.com/researchers-data-vaccine-worse-disease/
Since last Tuesday, CNN has on and off been preoccupied with the case of a non-citizen from Poland, Dr. Lukasz Niec, who was recently detained by ICE and is in danger of deportation because of a combination of two misdemeanors he committed in 1992, combined with more recent brushes with police, including a child abuse accusation from last year.
After initially making it sound like his detention was entirely about the two misdemeanors from 25 years go when he was 17 years old, the liberal news network on Wednesday finally informed viewers of some of his other brushes with the law, downplaying them as mostly “minor traffic violations,” but never did get around to mentioning the child abuse accusations from just last year.
As of the weekend, instead of improving their coverage by giving viewers additional information on why he was detained, CNN got worse as host Ana Cabrera on Saturday’s CNN Newsroom made it sound like Dr. Niec was detained solely because of his legal problems from 1992.
On Saturday evening at 8:47 p.m. Cabrera introduced a segment by bringing up President Donald Trump’s latest offer on how to deal with illegal immigration, as she fretted: “The President has presented a deal that is said to reshape U.S. immigration dramatically — a deal all sides are up in arms about. It’s easy to forget, though, that there are real lives at stake here. Families have already been torn apart.”
After recalling the case of Jorge Garcia — who entered the country illegally at age 10 and was recently deported to Mexico — Cabrera then moved to the case of Dr. Niec.
A Kalamazoo doctor was enjoying a day with his family when ICE agents showed up, taking him away in handcuffs.. Lukasz Niec was just five years old when his parents left Poland with their two children in 1979. And now, he faces deportation to a country he’s never known. … Niec was arrested over administrative immigration violations — two misdemeanors from 1992. His new wife still in shock.
Cabrera informed viewers of Loyola University’s efforts to help DACA students, and then brought aboard two guests from the university — medical student Cesar Montelongo Hernandez and Professor Mark Kuczewski. Addressing Hernandez, Cabrera began by sympathetically posing: “Your thoughts about what’s happening in Washington right now with the negotiations on immigration — do you feel like you were a bit of a political football?”
So far, CNN’s New Day morning show has covered the story twice — once on Tuesday and again Wednesday. Also on Wednesday afternoon, CNN Newsroom with Brooke Baldwin picked up on correspondent Jason Carroll’s report from Wednesday morning which was a slight improvement from Tuesday’s coverage in that it informed viewers of the DUI and other infractions but downplayed them as “minor traffic violations.” But the report did not mention the child abuse accusation from last year which other news outlets have cited as playing a major role in the decision to target Dr. Niec.
Additionally, early Wednesday morning on CNN’s Early Start show, CNN political commentator Errol Louis had also neglected to mention recent legal problems as he referred to Dr. Niec as a “five-year-old.”
On Thursday evening, Fox News at Night notably ran a full report by correspondent Trace Gallagher calling out CNN for misleading its viewers on the story.