In Their Own Words: Was Every Israeli Prime Minister a Racist?

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,963 other followers

Source Article from https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/06/17/in-their-own-words-was-every-israeli-prime-minister-a-racist/

PolitiFact Rules It’s ‘True’ That Democrats Are Near ‘Their Lowest Representation’ in 100 Years

Please support NewsBusters today! (a 501c3 non-profit production of the Media Research Center)

DONATE


Source Article from https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2018/06/18/politifact-rules-its-true-democrats-are-near-their-lowest

Feminist college professor says women should hate men based on their gender … This is called “inclusiveness”

A radical feminist man-hater who heads up Northeastern University’s“Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies” program, recently wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post that calls on all men everywhere to “step away” from pretty much every position of power in society in order to pacify the demands of feminist women like herself who hate men.

Couching her blatant sexism as “inclusivity” and “equality,” Suzanna Danuta Walters, who also teaches sociology at NU, argues that all women have an inherent right to hate all men because of the “millennia of woe” that men – all of them – have apparently inflicted upon all women since the beginning of time.

Unless a man agrees to only vote for feminist women, to not ever run for office, and to never “be in charge of anything,” then he can freely be hated upon by women, according to Walters, who in her commentary describes the United States as “the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity.”

Citing a few recent alleged cases of sexual abuse against women by males like Eric Schneiderman and Harvey Weinstein, Walters feels justified in painting a broad brush of hate across all men. Because of her personal feelings about the opposite sex, Walters feels as though it’s completely “logical to hate men,” and she even goes so far as to scoff at women who don’t.

“My edge has been crossed for a long time,” the genderless-looking school employee writes. “Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men.”

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate “survival” water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.

Dear, men: It’s completely logical for you to hate all feminists

Walters even takes issue with Michelle Obama, who’s actually among those arguing that not all men are responsible for the types of abuses that feminists like Walters are stereotypically accusing them of committing. In Walters’ view, all men are evil, and all of them need to emasculate themselves in order to meet her demands.

“Start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down,” Walters writes, denigrating the dignity of men.

“Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this,” she elaborated. “And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.”

Based on the looks of Walters in her NU staff photo, there’s certainly not a chance that any self-respecting man would ever want to get anywhere near her, let alone try to take advantage of her. It’s a laughable notion that Walters obviously expects men everywhere to take seriously as they sustain this mutant’s litany of verbal abuse.

But more than likely almost none of them will – and that’s obviously a good thing. In fact, it would be completely illogical for any man to not hate all insane feminists like Walters and laugh in their faces whenever they spew this type of nonsense. Any so-called man who receives this message and says, “Yeah, she’s right,” would be almost as nutty as she is.

In responding to this nationally publicized hate monologue, another of the school’s employees, Northeastern University Media Relations Specialist, Shannon Nargi, told Campus Reform the following:

“Northeastern University steadfastly supports a safe and inclusive learning and working environment in which hate has no place. The university has more than 1,000 faculty members whose viewpoints span the entire political spectrum. Consistent with our unwavering commitment to academic freedom, the opinions of an individual professor do not reflect the views of the university or its leadership. Northeastern is committed to fostering an environment in which controversial ideas can be discussed, debated, and challenged.”

Read more stories about deranged, lunatic liberal mobs at LiberalMob.com.

Sources for this article include:

CampusReform.org

NaturalNews.com

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaveHodges-TheCommonSenseShow/~3/FXc1QTKKjs8/

Feminist college professor says women should hate men based on their gender … This is called "inclusiveness"


Image: Feminist college professor says women should hate men based on their gender … This is called “inclusiveness”

(Natural News)
A radical feminist man-hater who heads up Northeastern University’s “Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies” program, recently wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post that calls on all men everywhere to “step away” from pretty much every position of power in society in order to pacify the demands of feminist women like herself who hate men.

Couching her blatant sexism as “inclusivity” and “equality,” Suzanna Danuta Walters, who also teaches sociology at NU, argues that all women have an inherent right to hate all men because of the “millennia of woe” that men – all of them – have apparently inflicted upon all women since the beginning of time.

Unless a man agrees to only vote for feminist women, to not ever run for office, and to never “be in charge of anything,” then he can freely be hated upon by women, according to Walters, who in her commentary describes the United States as “the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity.”

Citing a few recent alleged cases of sexual abuse against women by males like Eric Schneiderman and Harvey Weinstein, Walters feels justified in painting a broad brush of hate across all men. Because of her personal feelings about the opposite sex, Walters feels as though it’s completely “logical to hate men,” and she even goes so far as to scoff at women who don’t.

“My edge has been crossed for a long time,” the genderless-looking school employee writes. “Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men.”

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate “survival” water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.

Dear, men: It’s completely logical for you to hate all feminists

Walters even takes issue with Michelle Obama, who’s actually among those arguing that not all men are responsible for the types of abuses that feminists like Walters are stereotypically accusing them of committing. In Walters’ view, all men are evil, and all of them need to emasculate themselves in order to meet her demands.

“Start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down,” Walters writes, denigrating the dignity of men.

“Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this,” she elaborated. “And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.”

Based on the looks of Walters in her NU staff photo, there’s certainly not a chance that any self-respecting man would ever want to get anywhere near her, let alone try to take advantage of her. It’s a laughable notion that Walters obviously expects men everywhere to take seriously as they sustain this mutant’s litany of verbal abuse.

But more than likely almost none of them will – and that’s obviously a good thing. In fact, it would be completely illogical for any man to not hate all insane feminists like Walters and laugh in their faces whenever they spew this type of nonsense. Any so-called man who receives this message and says, “Yeah, she’s right,” would be almost as nutty as she is.

In responding to this nationally publicized hate monologue, another of the school’s employees, Northeastern University Media Relations Specialist, Shannon Nargi, told Campus Reform the following:

“Northeastern University steadfastly supports a safe and inclusive learning and working environment in which hate has no place. The university has more than 1,000 faculty members whose viewpoints span the entire political spectrum. Consistent with our unwavering commitment to academic freedom, the opinions of an individual professor do not reflect the views of the university or its leadership. Northeastern is committed to fostering an environment in which controversial ideas can be discussed, debated, and challenged.”

Read more stories about deranged, lunatic liberal mobs at LiberalMob.com.

Sources for this article include:

CampusReform.org

NaturalNews.com

<!–

–>

Source Article from http://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-15-liberal-college-professor-says-you-should-hate-people-based-on-their-gender-inclusiveness.html

Dr Duke & Andy Hitchcock — Exposing the Zio lie that Iran was behind 911 – Israel & their Saudi servants did it!

Dr Duke & Andy Hitchcock — Exposing the Zio lie that Iran was behind 911 – Israel & their Saudi servants did it!

Download

Today Dr. Duke address the new Zio lie circulating, which contends that Iran was behind the 9-11 attack on the World Trade Center. This is preposterous, of course, as was the original Zio lie that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq was responsible. Al Qaida, a Wahabi Sunni extremist organization with origins in Saudi Arabia, had notoriously bad relations with Iran, the leader of the rival Shiite branch of Islam.

Moreover, Iran has spent the past several years helping the Syrian government fight against Al Qaida, which invaded Syria with the help of Zio America and Israel. Andy Hitchcock provided additional information and analysis.

Please share this show widely. And please keep us on the air and on-line. Please visit our contribution page or send your contribution to:

P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LA 70470

Thank you.

Click here and look for the show dated 6-11-18.

Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern

Check out this classic Duke video:

Here is Mark Collett’s recent viral video:

Be sure to check out Mark’s Twitter feed. And follow him while you’re at it.

Source Article from https://davidduke.com/dr-duke-andy-hitchcock-exposing-the-zio-lie-that-iran-was-behind-911-israel-their-saudi-servants-did-it/

‘One MP will not vote with their conscience’ because of threats of violence, Anna Soubry claims

The biggest moment in Brexit kicked off on Tuesday afternoon with a debate, followed by a vote on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. The amendment could effectively hand control of the Brexit process to parliament if it goes ahead. MPs would then be permitted to vote on the final Brexit deal, igniting fear in Brexiteer MPs, as parliament could also halt the Brexit process entirely.

Raising a point of order in the House of Commons, Soubry – who is a Remainer and has herself suffered abuse in the lead-up to Tuesday’s Brexit vote – told the House: “To my knowledge at least one honourable member on these benches will today and tomorrow not vote in accordance with their conscience because of threats to their personal safety, to members of their parliamentary staff and members of their family.”

Soubry then asked Speaker of the House John Bercow if he would condemn any abuse dished out to MPs throughout the course of the Brexit bill’s vote. Bercow said that no member of parliament should be threatened because over their views or vote on the Brexit bill.

“I would hope and am confident that today’s debates and tomorrow’s debates will take place in an atmosphere of mutual respect in which opinions sincerely held will be robustly articulated,” he said.

READ MORE: ‘Great Britain or Great Betrayal’: UK tabloid headlines attack MPs hours before critical Brexit vote

“No one in this place, under any circumstances, should be under threat.” Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom echoed Bercow, adding that “any threats of violence and intimidation are utterly unacceptable to the Government.”

The MP’s move of solidarity comes on the same day that Lancashire resident Jack Renshaw, 23, admitted in court to plotting to kill Labour MP Rosie Cooper with a machete, and two years after the murder of Remainer Labour MP Jo Cox.

Cox was shot and stabbed multiple times in West Yorkshire in 2016. Witnesses testified during her murderer’s trail that, during the attack, killer Thomas Alexander Mair cried out “This is for Britain”, “keep Britain independent”, and “Put Britain first”.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/uk/429496-brexit-threat-soubry-cox/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Donald Trump And Kim Jong-Un Sign A Historic Agreement At Their Summit In Singapore – But All The Mainstream Media Can Do Is Whine And Complain

Michael Snyder–Donald Trump just did what no other president in U.S. history was able to do. He actually sat down with the leader of North Korea, and at the conclusion of the approximately four hour summit meeting they both signed an agreement which calls for the United States to provide “security guarantees” to North Korea and which calls for the “complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula”. It was a truly historic day and a truly historic outcome, and yet all the mainstream media in the United States could do was whine and complain. Throughout their coverage, mainstream media reporters continually tried to put an anti-Trump spin on things. They claimed that the agreement did not have the “specific wording” that experts were looking for, they pointed out that other agreements in the past have failed, and they continually insisted that the Trump administration was giving Kim Jong-Un too much respect.

Even when something positive was reported, it had to be immediately followed up with a downer.

For example, this is how a Reuters article on the summit began…

U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pledged on Tuesday to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean peninsula while Washington committed to provide security guarantees for its old enemy.

But a joint statement signed at the end of their historic summit in Singapore gave few details on how either goal would be achieved.

Of course there are more details to work out. There always are, but why can’t we just be happy that the president of the United States and the leader of North Korea sat down together to talk peace for the first time ever?

Many Americans will never forget the moment when the two leaders first shook hands

At the start of the summit, the two leaders shook hands on a red carpet in front of the island resort hotel chosen for the meeting.

At one point, reporters overheard a translator, apparently interpreting Kim’s words, as saying that “many people in the world will think of this as a … form of fantasy … from a science fiction movie.”

If this process is ultimately successful, this is one of those iconic moments that will be remembered for decades.

So much is riding on these negotiations. Should they fail, we could end up with a nuclear war in Asia. It would be nice if the mainstream media would cut Trump a little slack on this one, but instead they repeatedly tried to pepper both leaders with unhelpful questions.

For instance, CNN’s Jim Acosta loudly fired off questions whenever he was in earshot of either Donald Trump or Kim Jong-Un. At one point, Trump finally answered one of his questions

He said he would “absolutely” extend an invitation to the White House to Kim, who also heralded a new era.

“Today, we had a historic meeting and decided to leave the past behind,” Kim said through a translator. “The world will see a major change.”

Later, during a solo news conference after the summit, Trump said he does indeed “trust” Kim.

“I do,” he said when asked by CNN’s Jim Acosta if he trusts Kim. “I do. I think he wants to get it done.”

Other reporters fixated on the fact that Kim Jong-Un is a really bad guy.

Yes, Kim Jong-Un has done some really horrible things. But if he really wants to change and really wants a lasting peace, shouldn’t we make an effort?

Instead, the mainstream media kept hammering the Trump administration for showing any respect to Kim at all. The following comes from USA Today

Critics said all the pomp and ceremony — American and North Korean flags stood side-by-side to form the backdrops for many of the photo opps — lent too much prestige to Kim, a dictator who imprisons and murders his opponents, all while pursuing long-range nuclear weapons.

Why can’t the “critics” just be quiet for once?

Trump is trying to prevent a nuclear war, and it would be really nice if the entire country could get behind him on this one thing.

CBS News took things even farther. They actually ran an entire article talking about how horrifying the cost would be if North Korea and South Korea were to reunify someday…

Analysts say unifying North and South Korea could cost a trillion dollars under the best of circumstances and take several decades. The final price tag would also depend largely on what the catalyst for reunification is.

Some analyses put the cost of reunification at far more — closer to $3 trillion. Experts argue that much of the cost surrounding any scenario for Korean unification would depend on whether the countries decided to converge gradually or if a chaotic event occurs. If the reform were carefully planned and followed by a peaceful union, it would be far less expensive than if North Korea’s economy collapsed or a war broke out, requiring massive reconstruction costs.

Oh the humanity!

How about the cost of a nuclear war in Asia in which entire cities are flattened and millions upon millions of people end up dead?

Would that be preferable?

Thankfully, Trump is taking the high road on this one, and he posted a very inspirational video with footage of the summit on Twitter

And for those that have not read it yet, the following is the complete joint statement that Donald Trump and Kim Jong-Un signed at the conclusion of the summit…

President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) held a first, historic summit in Singapore on June 12, 2018.

President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un conducted a comprehensive, in-depth, and sincere exchange of opinions on the issues related to the establishment of new U.S.-DPRK relations and the building of a lasting and robust peace regime on the Korean Peninsula. President Trump committed to provide security guarantees to the DPRK, and Chairman Kim Jong Un reaffirmed his firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

Convinced that the establishment of new U.S.-DPRK relations will contribute to the peace and prosperity of the Korean Peninsula and of the world, and recognizing that mutual confidence building can promote the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un state the following:

1. The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.

2. The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.

3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work towards complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

4. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.

Having acknowledged that the U.S.-DPRK summit — the first in history — was an epochal event of great significance and overcoming decades of tensions and hostilities between the two countries and for the opening of a new future, President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un commit to implement the stipulations in this joint statement fully and expeditiously. The United States and the DPRK commit to hold follow-on negotiations led by the U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, and a relevant high-level DPRK official, at the earliest possible date, to implement the outcomes of the U.S.-DPRK summit.

President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea have committed to cooperate for the development of new U.S.-DPRK relations and for the promotion of peace, prosperity, and security of the Korean Peninsula and of the world.

June 12, 2018

Sentosa Island

Singapore

Source Article from http://govtslaves.info/2018/06/donald-trump-and-kim-jong-un-sign-a-historic-agreement-at-their-summit-in-singapore-but-all-the-mainstream-media-can-do-is-whine-and-complain/

A Mall in China Put in a Traffic Lane Just for People Staring at Their Phones






A Mall in China Put in a Traffic Lane Just for People Staring at Their Phones


June 9th, 2018

Reader DF sent in this video a few days ago.

Via: FastCompany:

According to the New York Times, the new lane of traffic was intended to address the needs of the so-called “heads down tribe,� people who find the world around them so dull that they can’t bear to look up from their phones, even when crossing the street. Their distracted walking is part of a growing number of traffic-related deaths with the World Health Organization estimating that around 68,000 pedestrians are killed every year in China. While there are undoubtedly large-scale solutions to the problem (education campaigns, fines, etc.) the easiest solution might be the one used at the mall: Pedestrian lanes specifically for cellphone users.















<!–

–>



One Response to “A Mall in China Put in a Traffic Lane Just for People Staring at Their Phones”





  1. dale Says:




    It is sad. Reminds me of this image.

    http://img.phonandroid.com/201…..-coule.jpg









<!– AD CAN GO HERE

Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices

END: AD CAN GO HERE –>

Leave a Reply


You must be logged in to post a comment.







Source Article from http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=52917