Joel Stein is a well-known writer and columnist for the Los Angeles Times, Time Magazine and many other mainstream media.
In an article for LA Times titled “Who runs Hollywood? C’mon” Stein writes:
I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League…sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.
(Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008)
Stein goes on to identify the name and the tribe of just about all the leading moguls of Hollywood.
It’s worth quoting this part where he proves the total dictatorial rule of Jews over Hollywood.
How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.
He speaks of a meeting with Abe Foxman, then head of the ADL, who tells Stein it is dangerous to say that “Jews Control Hollywood.”
“That’s a very dangerous phrase, ‘Jews control Hollywood.’ What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood,” he [ADL head Foxman] said. Instead of “control,” Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry “happen to be Jewish,” as in “all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.”
Stein then writes,
I appreciate Foxman’s concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.
The brash Jewish writer just can’t help but arrogantly boast about the Jewish control over the most powerful mind shaping media in the world, the Hollywood film industry. Not only does Stein boast of Jewish supremacy in Hollywood, he hatefully ridicules the non-Jews as inferior to the “chosen.”
As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day.
Yeah, Joel, we Gentiles could never write great books or plays or poems, even though the greatest libraries since the time of the first those of the ancient Greeks burst with European wisdom and genius. Gentiles obviously cannot write great plays or poems or books, in contrast to the supposedly superior Jews who produce the bottomless trashbin of Hollywood.
Just the Greeks alone since 2,500 years ago have produced more truly magnificent playwrights then this arrogant, ultra racist minority. Aristophanes, Aeschylus, Phrynichus, Achaeus of Eretria, Sophocles, Euripides and so many more. And let’s not forget the philosophers, the novelists, the historians, the scientists of the ancient and modern world.
And perhaps there is one huge middle finger to these Jewish racist supremacists, the greatest playwright of all history: William Shakespeare.
Leo Rosten in The Joys of Yiddish defines unique Jewish character trait of Chutzpah as something so uniquely Jewish, that only the Jewish word “chutzpah” can truly capture it. He writes that chutzpah represents,
…gall, brazen nerve, effrontery, incredible ‘guts’, presumption plus arrogance such as no other word and no other language can do justice to.
Rosten goes on to define the term as described in famous old Jewish joke as,
that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan…
Ironically, even the humor of the joke shows not just the banality of evil it portrays, but also the Jewish psychopathological response to the Jewish man who commits murder of his mother and father. He dares to ask for mercy because he is an orphan. There is psychopathy both in the actions of the parricidal perpetrator and psychopathy in the not so subtle Jewish admiration of the murderer’s chutzpah.
Chutzpah is in its essence an utter lack of human morality, of human empathy, or human rights. Jewish Chutzpah is utterly vacant of any human traits such as guilt, shame, sympathy for its victims, or even cognizance of the disgust felt by non-Jews who witness it.
Many Gentile and Jewish observers of Jewish supremacism note the incredible hypocritical lack of Jewish self-inspection and analysis.
Instead of the Jewish establishment condemning the uniquely Jewish psychopathy of chutzpah, they enshrine it as something for which to be proud, that only their word for it, “chutzpah” can adequately express a trait that certainly some gentiles can express, but for a trait which Jews are the world champions.
Ironically, when Gentiles express the truth about Chutzpah or the undeniable reality of a type of Jewish mafia control and manipulation of the most powerful means of manipulation of human emotions and opinions –the modern film and media — they will be labeled anti-Semites.
When gentiles like me simply quote Joel Stein and the irrefutable facts of the absolute domination of Hollywood, as well as the suggestion that the Jewish elite has tremendous power in politics, Wall Street, and banking (such as Goldman Sachs), the Jewish dominated media will simply end all argument by calling the speaker anti-semitic.
The media will never acknowledge the threat or the injustice of a powerful, tribalist Jewish establishment having such a disproportionate amount of power in setting political policy regarding Israel and the wars for Israel in the Mideast, nor the fact that Jewish power is so ubiquitous and is the one power that cannot be acknowledged. And it is only members of the Jewish privileged class with unrestrained chutzpah that can get away with talking about it!
Two additional examples illustrating the irresistible Jewish trait of chutzpah should be given to goyim who still have not taken the red-pill on who really rules the American establishment.
The NY Times, America’s and perhaps the worlds’ most influential newspaper, is owned and completely controlled by eight Jewish-supremacists of the Ochs-Sulzberger Family Trust. Everyone is a rich, dedicated supporter of Israel and Jewish “advocacy” organizations that fight for “Jewish Interests” and the “Jewish people.”
One of the leading pundits of the NY Times is David Brooks. Like Stein, Brooks is a Jew who cannot restrain his Chutzpah.
In an article in 2005 Brooks wrote an article about the complete “Jewish takeover of America.” He boasts of the takeover of the Ivy League and the “American elite.”
This is something of which Jews are keenly aware but the goyim are not supposed to realize or to understand the implications of.
…A woman came up to me after one of my book talks and said, “You realize what you’re talking about is the Jews taking over America.”
My eyes bugged out, but then I realized that she was Jewish and she knew I was, too, and between us we could acknowledge there’s a lot of truth in that statement. For the Jews were the vanguard of a social movement that over the course of the 20th century transformed the American university and the nature of the American elite.”
Another excellent example is an article in Haaretz, the oldest daily in Israel, and a newspaper that at first glance seems to be the most liberal defender of Palestinian rights, but still revels in Jewish supremacism and Jewish cultural and ethnic warfare against Gentile values in the West.
Haaretz proudly ran an article called, “Dirty Jews and the Christian Right,” by a Jew, Josh Lambert, who wrote a book, “Unclean Lips,” about the leading Jewish tribal advancement of pornography in the Western world.
The subtitle for the article says it all.
‘Dirty Jews’ and the Christian Right
Brilliant actors like Larry David and Sarah Silverman are challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity
The article boasts about the dominant Jewish role in promoting obscenity and the destruction of America’s “family friendly culture.” It even goes to assert boldly that Jews are “asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.”
Strange, isn’t it? If a Gentile would dare to say that Jews are “asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity,” it would be labeled the most vicious hate-filled anti-Semitic person imaginable.
Why is this? It is because saying that leading Jews were consciously trying to destroy the family friendly culture of America, or any nation, would be considered an evil thing. Yet it is true in America and true in other countries. The one exception? Israel. The rabbinically-controlled state of Israel even forbids skimpy Bikinis to be shown on Israeli TV until after 10pm, that outlaws Jewish intermarriage with non-Jews and outlaws Homosexual marriages. Israel doesn’t let Hollywood Jews like Larry David and Sarah Silverman destroy their family-friendly culture!
Yet, as I have discussed, Jewish Chutzpah is psychopathic, totally oblivious to their destructive moral attacks on their ethnic competitors around the world.
The final example I will offer today, since Thanksgiving and Christmas are right around the corner, is cultural war being waged on Christian America.
Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Committee have for decades have been working feverishly to outlaw any expression of the Christian faith in public institutions, schools, or even on public ground at times like Christmas.
From the creation of Constitution of the United States in 1789 Americans, who are overwhelmingly Christian, could celebrate Christian Christmas on public ground. For two hundred years a nativity scene could be displayed in front of the White House or any public property. It was perfectly constitutional.
All that changed in 1989 when the Supreme Court outlawed the display of any Christian crosses, nativity scene, or any overt display of Jesus Christ on public ground.
At the same time, Jewish groups worked for the banning of Christian symbols at Christmas, a number worked for the rights of Jewish religious organizations like Chabad Lubavitch to put up Jewish menorahs.
The same year the Supreme Court banned Christian crosses, it ruled that the oldest and most revered symbol of Judaism, the Menorah, could be displayed in front of the White House and on any public ground.
To add insult to injury, menorahs are erected to commemorate the Jewish Holiday of Hanukah, which is actually a Jewish celebration of the massacre of Greeks and Jews in Jerusalem who dared to assimilate and love one another.
So, the 80 percent Christian people of America can’t celebrate their faith and values on public ground, but a 2 percent minority can have their religious symbols of ethnic and cultural supremacism displayed on thousands of American public grounds.
If that doesn’t symbolize what the NY Times’ David Brooks calls “the Jewish takeover of America” what does?
And if that is not the living reality of hypocritical, powerful Jewish racist psychopathology, what is?
But, thank God for Jewish chutzpah!
For history is full of examples in which unrestrained Jewish chutzpah led to the liberation of peoples from the world’s ultimate racial supremacists.
— David Duke
It is easy to know who rules over you, just identify those who you can’t criticize.
Source Article from https://davidduke.com/thank-god-for-jewish-chutzpah/
Dr. Duke & Mark Collett – Thank God for Jewish Chutzpah Redpilling the World & Why It is OK to be White!
Today Dr. Duke had British author and activist Mark Collett as his guest for the hour. They talked about the Jewish chutzpah in bragging about their own power and promoting the most over-the-top anti-white propaganda, which is finally waking up people to the uncomfortable reality that they are being ruled over by a hostile alien elite.
They went on to talk about the brilliance of the “It’s okay to be white” campaign. Even this most innocuous and minimal pro-white statement cannot be tolerated in this era where tolerance for everything non-white and non-traditional is a religion. Such chutzpah!
This is another powerful show filled with information. Please share this show widely.
Please keep us on the air and on-line. Please visit our contribution page or send your contribution to:
P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LA 70470
Click here and look for the show dated 11-10-17.
Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern
Below is a Duke Video that exposes the impact of Jews such as Weinstein on the mores and values of the West.
Here is Mark Collett’s latest video:
In the aftermath of the coming crisis, FEMA will be all to happy to give you a roof over your head as well as food and water. I just cannot believe why people would denigrate FEMA. They only want to give us a place to stay.
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaveHodges-TheCommonSenseShow/~3/SmN7PqWbI90/
Jeffrey Koishor, 25, took his first steps after sustaining two gunshot wounds to his leg and hip during the nightmarish Las Vegas shooting earlier this week.
As the bullets began to rain down on the crowd from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino hotel room where shooter Stephen Paddock was holed up, Koishor immediately shielded his girlfriend from the spray. But as hysteria gripped the concertgoers amid the chaos, he decided they should quickly move before getting trampled.
“I was running on my right leg for about 50 yards until I got to the House of Blues bar where it had a covered roof,” Koishor said.
The decision to move locations during the shooting would become a life-saving decision for the San Diego man, as his wounds began to profusely bleed down his leg and pool blood into his shoes.
RELATED: Las Vegas shooting survivor wants to thank good Samaritans who saved him
Inside the bar, he met several good Samaritans. Koishor recollected that the first man cut off his shirt and used it as a tourniquet to help stop the excessive bleeding from his severely injured leg, as another man carried him out of the bar and into the back parking lot where he would be placed into a car and transported to the hospital.
“When they threw me in the vehicle I was in excruciating pain,” he recalled.
As Koishor recovers and begins to finally walk again after the tragic incident, he has only one wish — to thank the three men and one woman that came to his aid in what could have been his last moments.
“I’m trying to find them to thank them for saving my life,” Koishor said. “I can’t be grateful enough. I really think they saved my life. I don’t know if I would’ve made it or bled out.”
The shooting survivor is expected to leave the Las Vegas hospital on Thursday. His family has set up an online fundraiser, where Koishor has received support from many strangers, to help pay his medical bills.
Source Article from https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-wants-thank-good-samaritans-170213261.html
The 1850s was a golden decade for household cleanliness. It witnessed the birth of both the dishwasher and the washing machine. But neither invention was quite as revolutionary as that of Joseph C. Gayetty of New York City. In an advert in Scientific American, he declared it to be a ‘grand and unapproachable discovery’ and ‘the greatest blessing of our age’. The small print revealed what it was: Gayetty’s Medicated Paper, America’s first commercial toilet paper.
Gayetty’s announcement proved to be surprisingly provocative. Loo roll may now be considered an essential home comfort, but in the 1850s the idea of paying good money for mere ‘bum fodder’ was greeted by a chorus of mocking laughter. What was wrong with the corn husks and pages torn from newspapers, magazines and catalogues that had served so well and cost so little? Some catalogue publishers in the US had even started piercing a hole in the corner, as if tacitly accepting that their pages were destined to be hung in a latrine and used as toilet paper.
Gayetty’s paper hit an especially bum note among medics. According to Richard Smyth, the author of Bum Fodder: An absorbing history of toilet paper, they were particularly concerned by the assertion that the new paper could cure piles, and soon took to the pages of leading medical journals to complain.
Despite his grandiose claims, Gayetty was not the first to invent toilet paper. The Chinese had got there hundreds of years earlier. Paper had been circulating in China since the second century and it didn’t take long for people to stop reading and start wiping. Even the Emperor Hongwu, a brutal despot ruling in the fourteenth century, showed his sensitive side by ordering 15,000 sheets of extra-soft, perfumed toilet paper for his imperial household.
The Chinese also seem to have been first with another essential tool of personal hygiene, the toothbrush. Many ancient cultures used chew sticks to keep their teeth clean – in fact, all civilised people seem to have used some sort of instrument for dental hygiene – but it wasn’t until the fifteenth century, during the Ming Dynasty, that actual brushes appear. They were made from coarse pig bristles attached to a wooden or bone handle. European travellers to China brought toothbrushes home with them, and the technology spread to the west.
Toothpaste was an even earlier invention. The ancient Egyptians, Romans and Greeks used various substances to keep their teeth clean, though the ingredients were rather basic and abrasive: ashes, eggshells, pumice, powdered charcoal, tree bark, salt, crushed bones and oyster shells have all been found.
Soap – invented in Babylon around 2800 BC – was another common ingredient. The Romans added flavouring to help with bad breath. The Chinese appear to have invented the first minty toothpaste long before the toothbrush came about.
A fistful of leaves
The Chinese preference for toilet paper, however, did not travel well. The people of Britain were content with fistfuls of wool or leaves. Aristocrats would deploy scraps of linen. Or rather, they’d have someone deploy them on their behalf: a servant’s manual from the fourteenth century advises the ‘groom of the stool’ to be ready with an ‘arse-wipe’ at the critical moment.
With the advance of the printing press, people soon turned to the disused pages of pamphlets and books. As the seventeenth-century author Thomas Browne wrote: ‘He that writes abundance of books, and gets abundance of children, may in some sense be said to be a benefactor to the public, because he furnishes it with bumfodder and soldiers.’
Gayetty was not alone in his attempt to commercialise toilet paper. But it was his product that caused the biggest storm. The sheets, Gayetty declared, were ‘delicate as a bank-note and as stout as foolscap’. But what really riled the medical establishment was his claim that printer’s ink was poisonous and caused haemorrhoids, and that his paper could ‘cure and prevent piles’. There’s no truth in the claim, but that did not stop many companies from pushing loo roll as a remedy until the 1930s.
Medical journals soon went on the attack. The New Orleans Medical News and Hospital Gazette declared: ‘Mr Gayetty of New York City has found that the public mind is prepared for anything whatever in the shape of humbuggery.’ The Medical and Surgical Reporter also accused Gayetty of taking advantage of the public, drolly saying that he was attempting to ‘catch them with their breeches down’. The Lancet was less worried about the general public than the fate of the surgeons who made a good living curing piles. ‘Their occupation is now gone to the wall. All that is required is a simple piece of paper with the name “Gayetty” stamped on it.’
Where there’s muck there’s brass
But even if it didn’t cure piles, the public appreciated the comfort of toilet tissue, and it soon spawned a host of me-too products. However, consumer expectation does not seem to have been high. In the 1930s Northern Tissue was able to make a selling point of the fact that its paper was ‘splinter free!’
Today, the toilet paper industry is worth $3.5 billion annually in the US alone, with the average individual working their way through more than 20,000 sheets a year. Add that to the $3 billion spent on toothpaste and mouthwash, and it is clear that personal hygiene is big business at both ends of the alimentary canal.
Source Article from https://worldtruth.tv/who-invented-toilet-paper-thank-goodness-somebody-did/