“Comrade Jew”: Vienna Jewish Museum Highlights Jewish Role in Soviet Communism

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,941 other followers

Source Article from https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/comrade-jew-vienna-jewish-museum-highlights-jewish-role-in-soviet-communism/

Dr Duke & Eric Striker – The Kangaroo Conviction of Jacob Goodwin – full speed to a Soviet America!

Dr Duke & Eric Striker – The Kangaroo Conviction of Jacob Goodwin – full speed to a Soviet America!

Download

Today Dr. Duke and Eric Striker had a lively conversation about the Kangaroo Kourt Konviction of Jacob Goodwin. Goodwin, a participant in the United the Right rally last August in Charlottesville, interceded when two violent blacks assaulted an older rally participant in an attempt to steal his flag. Goodwin and other forced DeAndre Harris off the man, whom he had just clubbed in the head. Goodwin now faces ten years in prison.

We have come to a point where all someone has to do is say “White supremacist,” “neo-Nazi,” or “KKK” and all your rights are taken away. They also talked about Prime Minister Bibi being challenged on Israel’s nuclear weapons by Chris Cuomo.

This show is a powerful show. Please share it widely. And please keep us on the air and on-line. Please visit our contribution page or send your contribution to:

P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LA 70470

Thank you.

Click here and look for the show dated 5-3-18.

Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern

Hear Dr. Duke’s Liftwaffe podcasts:

Part 1

Part 2

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Here is Mark Collett’s most recent video:

Be sure to check out Mark’s Twitter feed. And follow him while you’re at it.

Source Article from https://davidduke.com/dr-duke-eric-striker-the-kangaroo-conviction-of-jacob-goodwin-full-speed-to-a-soviet-america/

EXPOSED: Britain’s Soviet Style Hate Crime Laws: Mark Collett video

This podcast explains how the police investigate so-called ‘hate crimes’ and how these investigations are totally subjective and based on feelings, not facts. But worse still, the British police are now building a database of people who have been accused of ‘hate incidents’ – non-criminal incidents where individuals are accused of being motivated by hate and the accused is considered guilty without their accuser having to present any-evidence what-so-ever! Please share this podcast and help draw attention to this insane legislation.

My Minds.com Account https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/777920…

Source Article from https://davidduke.com/exposed-britains-soviet-style-hate-crime-laws-mark-collett-video/

Soviet Communism Was Dependent on Western Technology

Philip Vander Elst–Despite the central role played by State-controlled central banks and financial institutions in bringing about the conditions which led to the global credit crunch of 2008, free markets and capitalism rather than government failure have taken all the blame for that complex crisis, and Marxism and other varieties of socialism are once again attracting the enthusiastic support of many young people in our universities and colleges.

Unfortunately, however well-intentioned, this renewed interest in hard-core socialism, and the belief that it offers relevant solutions to our existing problems, ignores the lessons taught by the many failed socialist experiments of the 20th century, some of which are described by two American economists: Kevin D. Williamson, in his recent paperback The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialismand Thomas J. D. Lorenzo, in his equally informative and well-documented new study The Problem with Socialism.

What—in this context, but on a narrower front—I wish to do in this article, is to draw the attention of open-minded Left-wing readers to the significant but little-known and highly-relevant fact that for decades, Western capitalist technology sustained the failed economic experiment of Soviet Communism, rescuing it from the full consequences of its inherent systemic weaknesses, until its final collapse in 1991.

“Western Interference”

This failure of the Marxist model in post-1917 revolutionary Russia, and its subsequent parasitical dependence on Western capitalism, was set out in detail in my paper, Capitalist Technology for Soviet Survival, published in 1981 by the Institute of Economic Affairs. All I have room for here, a generation later, is to provide a brief summary of some of the relevant arguments and evidence presented in that paper. That this should be necessary nearly 30 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall was recently underlined by the views expressed by Fiona Lali, president of the Marxist Society at London University’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), during a recent interview on Radio 4’s Today program.

Asked about the failure of Soviet Communism following her previous comment that capitalism had outlived its usefulness, “she claimed that it had ‘never had the chance to develop’ because of interference from the West.”

Not surprisingly, the British historian Dominic Sandbrook, from whose article in the Daily Mail this quotation is taken, commented: “My real thoughts about Ms. Lali’s version of history are not fit for publication,” and one can easily understand his incredulity.

To begin with, the widespread belief on the Left that Soviet Communism took over an oppressive society and a backward rural economy that it subsequently and heroically transformed into an advanced and powerful industrial state, improving workers’ rights and the living standards of the mass of the population in the process, is the very opposite of the truth.

Pre-Revolutionary Russia

While pre-revolutionary Russia was backward compared to Britain, Germany, and the United States, her economy was developing rapidly and her society was undergoing significant liberalization in the last decades of Tsarist rule. During 18 of the last 25 years before the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, Tsarist Russia enjoyed the highest rate of industrial growth in the world, and by 1913 was overtaking France as the world’s fourth industrial power.

As for the progress of liberalization, here below is a summary of what had been achieved that will startle many readers, coming as it does from the pen of a great Russian historian and political scientist of Hungarian origin, the late Professor Tibor Szamuely, a former Red Army veteran imprisoned by Stalin, and a former Vice-Rector of Budapest University and Lecturer in Politics at Reading University until his untimely death in 1971.

To quote from his pamphlet, Communism and Freedom, published by the Conservative Political Centre in September 1969:

“Few people in the West realise to what extent before the Revolution, in the early years of the 20th century, Tsarist Russia had full freedom of the press—no censorship: even Bolshevik papers and books were freely printed—full freedom of foreign travel, independent trade unions, independent courts, trial by jury, a fairly advanced system of social legislation, etc. Tsarist Russia had a parliament, a Dumawith MPs elected from various parties, including the Bolsheviks. This was not a full parliament in the English sense of the word (the executive was not responsible to parliament), but today, on the whole, pre-revolutionary Russia would be regarded as a model democracy, and compared to most of the hundred and twenty-odd countries inhabiting the United Nations Organisation, one of the fifteen or twenty most liberal states in the world.”

After decades of Communist rule, by contrast, with its concentration of all power, ownership, and resources in the hands of the omnipotent Marxist State, tens of millions of people had died in internal repression under Lenin and his successors, the seeds of liberty and democracy had been totally stamped out, trade unions had become the passive and subservient organs of the Communist Party, corruption had become universal, and the mass of the population had been reduced to a condition of penury, misery, and serfdom.

Post-Revolutionary Russia

Here are just a few key facts about the material conditions of life under Soviet Communism.

According to such scholars as Professor Sergei Propokovich, Dr. Naum Jasny, and Mrs. Janet Chapman, for instance, the real wages of Soviet industrial workers in 1970 were hardly higher than in 1913. Similarly, the Swiss economist Jovan Pavlevski calculated in 1969 that the real wages of Soviet industrial workers attained the level of 1913 only in 1963. Pavlevski also found that the real incomes of Soviet agricultural workers in 1969 were only 1.2 percent higher than in 1913.

In addition, let it be remembered—unlike the pampered Communist elite, with their posh apartments, countryside villas, and privileged access to imported luxury goods—Soviet citizens had to endure the daily misery of constant shortages of the most basic necessities like washing powder, razor blades, meat and vegetables, and many other items we take for granted in the West.

This picture of the generally low living standards suffered under Soviet Communism between 1917 and 1991 darkens further when one includes the evidence of the widespread poverty that existed among old people and the inhabitants of some of the most backward former Soviet republics. Thus, according to Ilja Zemstov, a former professor of sociology at the Lenin Institute of Baku (Azerbaijan), writing in 1976, one in two retired persons in the Soviet Union lived in poverty, and in the Soviet republic of Azerbaijan, 75 percent of the population lived below the poverty line and there were more homes without water, electricity, and toilets than in the whole of Western Europe. Other scholars, also writing in the 1970s, calculated that about half of all housing in the Soviet Union was without running water or sewerage, and living space per person was only about half that available in Western Europe.

But perhaps the most telling single fact revealing the economic bankruptcy of Soviet Communism was the spectacular failure of its inefficient and unproductive collectivized agricultural sector. Despite only representing about 3 percent of the total agricultural area of the Soviet Union, the tiny private holdings cultivated in their spare time by Soviet collective farmers provided one-third of the country’s total agricultural output.

The “Brain Drain” and the Problem with Central Planning

Far from Soviet Communism never having “had the chance to develop” because of interference from the West as Fiona Lali believes, the endemic economic failure and oppressive character of the Soviet Union flowed inevitably from its Marxist model of economic and social development. A society in which the State owns and controls every sector of the economy, and is the sole landlord, employer, doctor, educator, and welfare provider, cannot fail to be destructive of freedom, personal incentives, creativity, and entrepreneurship, while monopolistic government central planning, reflecting the limited knowledge and political priorities of the ruling bureaucracy, inevitably stifles innovation and technical progress. That is why the negative experience of Soviet Communism was repeated in every other Communist revolution and country during the last century.

Given these truths, the idea that Western interference hindered the outworking and therefore the success of the Communist experiment in the Soviet Union is absurd. As will be shown below, the exact opposite was the case. In one form or another, Western capital, “know-how,” and technology actually pulled Soviet Communism’s chestnuts out of the fire in nearly every decade of the Soviet Union’s existence, principally by compensating it for its above-mentioned systemic inability to generate significant levels of indigenous technological innovation.

While there was nothing inherently lacking in the quality of Soviet scientific research, the limitations of central planning and the absence of market mechanisms and incentives prevented the systematic testing of the fruits of research against competing alternatives. Instead of allowing the dispersed knowledge, opinions, and talents of millions of individuals freely co-operating in the marketplace to determine the success or failure of new ideas and discoveries, nearly all economic activity in the Soviet Union was narrowly constrained within the developmental straitjacket imposed by its all-powerful Communist rulers; hence the need to import skilled personnel, know-how, and technology from the freer and more dynamic societies of Western Europe and North America.

And this need, moreover, was all the greater given the entrepreneurial and skills gap created by the physical liquidation of so many of pre-revolutionary Russia’s most productive and educated citizens, and by the “brain drain” of all those who, by fleeing abroad, managed to escape imprisonment and execution at the hands of Lenin’s killer squads and secret police.

The incredible but little-known story of the manner and extent to which Western Capitalism came to the rescue of Soviet Communism was told in abundant and fascinating detail half a century ago by American scholar Dr. Anthony Sutton, a former Research Fellow of the prestigious Hoover Institution in California, in his massive three-volume study, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917-1965.

Technological Nursing by the West

The key finding of this exhaustively documented historical survey, based on literally hundreds of official and unofficial Western and Soviet sources and abounding in statistical charts, tables, footnotes, and appendices was that 90 percent of all Soviet technology was of Western origin.

To explain this finding in more detail, Dr. Sutton examined 75 major technological processes in such crucial and diverse sectors as mining, oil, chemicals, machine building, aircraft, communications, agricultural equipment, etc. and estimated the percentage that originated in Russia. The startling results were: between 1917 and 1930, 0 percent; between 1930 and 1945, only 10 percent; and between 1945 and 1965, a mere 11 percent.

While there were some indigenous Soviet advances between 1930 and 1945 in the development of machine guns (!), synthetic rubber, oil drilling techniques, and boilers, such advances were temporary and later abandoned in favor of foreign designs and processes. Between 1946 and 1965 most of the progress of Soviet innovation depended on the “scaling up” of existing plants and technologies imported and copied from the West. This was particularly the case in iron and steel making, electricity generation and rocket technology.

Western capitalism’s breastfeeding of Soviet Communism began in the 1920s during the period of Lenin’s “New Economic Policy” when more than 350 foreign concessions were employed within all sections of the Russian economy except furniture and fittings. Among the foreign firms that flocked to the Soviet Union with their technicians, machinery, and capital were famous names like General Electric, Westinghouse, Singer, Du Pont, Ford, Standard Oil, Siemens, International Harvester, Alcoa, Singer, Krupp, Otto Wolf, and many others, including important British, French, Swedish, Danish, and Austrian companies. And their beneficial impact on the Soviet economy was dramatic.

Thus, for example, by the end of the 1920s, 80 percent of Soviet oil drilling was conducted by the American rotary technique and all refineries were built by foreign corporations. As a result of this transfusion of Western capital and expertise, there was a recovery of Soviet production from almost zero in 1922 in the wake of the civil war provoked by the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917 to pre-First World War figures in 1928.

The same pattern carried over into the decade and a half of 1930 to 1945. During these years, the huge industrial plants built for the machine-tool, automobile, aircraft, and tube mill industries were erected by foreign companies, and 300,000 high-quality foreign machine-tools were imported between 1929 and 1940. Throughout the Second World War, moreover, the Soviets (despite their previous treachery in cementing the 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact) received $11 billion of resources and equipment from the United States under Lend-Lease.

The defeat of Hitler subsequently enabled the Soviet Union to plunder Eastern Europe for her post-war needs. Two-thirds of the German aircraft industry, the major part of her rocket production industry, about two-thirds of her electrical industry, and tons of military equipment were seized by Stalin. The German rocket installations acquired by the Russians, moreover, included the huge underground V-2 plant at Nordhausen, and laid the foundation of the Soviet “Sputnik” program—so even the much-heralded Soviet space effort owed much of its success to the forcible acquisition of Western technology. As an added bonus, the Russians received plants dismantled in the American zone, including such strategic goodies as aircraft plants, ball-bearing facilities, and munition plants.

The technological breastfeeding of Soviet Communism by Western capitalism continued even during the period of the Cold War. From 1959 to 1963, for example, the Soviet Union bought at least 50 complete chemical plants for chemicals not previously produced in the Soviet Union, and Soviet imports increased ten-fold between 1946 and 1966—from 692 million roubles to 7,122 million. In addition to all this, two-thirds of the Soviet merchant fleet had been constructed in the West by 1967.

Not Because, but Despite

The evidence, then, is overwhelming. Soviet Communism did not fail because it wasn’t given enough time to pursue its totalitarian and murderous objectives free of “Western interference.” It failed precisely because of those objectives and despite repeated infusions of Western capital, know-how, and technology, spanning at least five decades.

As always, the central truth of the matter was stated most lucidly and clearly by Russia’s greatest 20th-century writer and dissident, the late Alexander Solzhenitsyn, in a speech in 1975 to American trade unionists:

“The Soviet economy has an extremely low level of efficiency… It cannot deal with every problem at once: war, space (which is part of the war effort), heavy industry, light industry, and at the same time the necessity to feed its own population. The forces of the entire Soviet economy are concentrated on war… everything which is lacking… they get from you. So indirectly you are helping them to rearm. You are helping the Soviet police state.”

Let those embracing Marxism in our colleges and universities ponder these things and ask themselves whether the cause they are now embracing is truly worthy of their energy and idealism.

“);
loadedTextAds299127[sparkCounter299127] = false;
loadTextAd(sparkCounter299127, id299127, setID299127);



Source Article from http://govtslaves.info/2018/03/soviet-communism-was-dependent-on-western-technology/

"Women’s Day" is Old Soviet Propaganda Ploy

By Henry Makow Ph.D (re-posted every year for new readers)

International Women’s Day  ( March 8) is a longtime Communist propaganda tool. What does it say when an official Soviet holiday is enshrined in our mainstream culture? Clearly, Communism isn’t dead; it has just morphed into other forms like Feminism.

It confirms Norman Dodd’s famous claim that Ford Foundation President Rowan Gaither told him, in 1954,  that the agenda was to “socially engineer” US life so that “that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union” as part of banker-controlled world government.

Every year the supposedly capitalist media echo the old Soviet bromides about women’s oppression, and every year I post this rebuttal. 

CELEBRATING WOMYN

hammer2.jpg“Women’s Day” pretends to celebrate women but the poster near my Winnipeg home shows an ugly, surly shrew brandishing a hammer. She looks demonically possessed. The caption reads, “if I only had a hammer..” 

She’d what? Hit men over the head? Tear down society?  Smash women who want husbands and children? 

This isn’t far-fetched. Under the dance notice, the poster actually says: “Come smash patriarchy at midnight!”  She doesn’t look like she has much to fear from a man.

Women participating in the march are asked to bring “your hardhats, tool belts, safety vests and ideas for change.”  Typically Communists celebrate women by redefining them out of existence, as males i.e. carpenters.

Through its feminist surrogate, Communists have stripped women of a secure and honored social identity as wives and mothers and made them workers and sexual commodities, hostages of the economy and the ravages of age.

Obviously, this event is not about recognizing women for their grace, beauty, charm, and intelligence. It is about cultivating a false sense of grievance and entitlement in order to manipulate them.

They used the same tactic with Jews, Blacks, students and workers and harnessed these groups to their agenda. The ultimate goal is to concentrate all wealth and power in the Illuminati (Masonic) central banking cartel which is colonizing the whole world. The real meaning of “change the world” is the establishment of a totalitarian New World Order. 

“USEFUL IDIOTS”

International Women’s Day is hate against women and society perpetrated by the traitorous banker colonial establishment, which includes most “feminist” politicians, educators and the mass media. Women who participate are dupes and “useful idiots.”
 
It is a vestige of Communist “popular front” movements first organized in the 1930’s to ensnare naive idealistic people using feel-good platitudes like “equality,” “peace” and “human rights.”  These rubes didn’t know that the movements were funded and run by Moscow. The purpose was to alienate the intelligentsia from their own society and make them amenable to the Communist agenda, ultimately “world government.” This seems to have largely succeeded.

Communism is about divide and rule. International Women’s Day began in Copenhagen by “The Socialist International” (i.e. Communists) to promote “women’s rights.” As the poster on the right indicates, it was celebrated in Soviet Russia.

Here is a Manifesto for International Women’s Day published in the German “Die Kommunistin” March 2, 1921:

“To all working women! You who make demands and struggle count in the millions….In all countries where the disinherited surge forward under the sign of Communism against the exploiting and subjugating power of capitalism. On International Women’s Day, mothers filled with pain, housewives bent with worry, exhausted working women, clerical workers, teachers and small property holders flow together.” (Wiemar Republic Sourcebook, 1995) 

“AGITPROP”

Women’s Day is designed to make women feel oppressed.  For example, a page of gender facts tells them that “women do 2/3 of the world’s work but get only 10% of the world’s income.”  Thus, western women, the most favored generation in history, get a chip on their shoulder vicariously.

Women are brainwashed to think their interests are separate from their own fathers, husbands, brothers and sons.

Thousands of events are planned around the world. For example, at the Unitarian Church in London Ont. an organization for Afghanistan women and girls “will honor and celebrate our local women with music, singing, dancing, and refreshments. All women and girls are welcome. Free event!” Sounds lesbian to me.

In San Francisco, there will be a cocktail party and movie to highlight the plight of the women of Gaza. What about the men and boys of Afghanistan and Gaza? Don’t they count? In the name of equality, these Communist dupes are practicing inequality. By breaking up families,they will leave Muslim women and girls more vulnerable than ever.

CONCLUSION

The fact that Communist-inspired agitprop is part of mainstream culture is an example of how society has been subverted. Most people are not socialist, let alone Communist.

As long as a secret Illuminati clique (Communists, Zionists, Freemasons) is allowed to control government credit, subvert nations and plot world government, society is complicit in its own destruction. We will have no one to blame but ourselves.

Related: History of Women’s Day

First Comment from Dan:

Vladimir Lenin, Satanist and Feminist:

“Our demands are practical conclusions which we have drawn from the burning needs, the shameful humiliation of women, defenseless and without rights. We demonstrate thereby that we recognize these needs, and are sensible of the humiliation of the woman, the privileges of the man. That we hate, yes, hate everything, and will abolish everything which tortures and oppresses the woman worker, the housewife, the peasant woman,  It wins us the confidence of the masses of women who feel themselves exploited, enslaved, suppressed, by the domination of the man, by the power of the employer, by the whole of society.”

bombgirls.jpg(“Freedom for the woman from the old household drudgery and dependence on man.”)

“Could there be a more damning proof of this than the calm acquiescence of men who see how women grow worn out In petty, monotonous household work, their strength and time dissipated and wasted, their minds growing narrow and stale, their hearts beating slowly, their will weakened! The home life of the woman is a daily sacrifice to a thousand unimportant trivialities. “

“In law, there is naturally complete equality of rights for men and women. And everywhere there is evidence of a sincere wish to put this equality into practice. We are bringing the women into the social economy, into legislation and government. All educational institutions are open to them so that they can increase their professional and social capacities.  That will mean freedom for the woman from the old household drudgery and dependence on man.”

Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/why_we_celebrate_communist_fes.html

"Russian Meddling?" FDR’s Soviet Spies Sodomized the US

MajJordan.jpg

(Maj. George Racey Jordan, Lend-Lease expediter and liaison with the Russians during World War II.)

Russian “meddling” in 2016 election is a farce considering the US has been

Communist-controlled since the FDR Administration when KGB Agent  

Working out of the White House, using Lend-Lease as a smokescreen,


by Diana West 

(henrymakow.com) 


A book called American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character (St. Martin’s Press, 2013) doesn’t promise uplift and renewal. I know. I wrote it.

That said, the story of “betrayal” my new book lays out – betrayal enabled by a de facto Communist occupation of Washington by American traitors loyal to Stalin, which would solidify in the 1930s under FDR and be covered up by successive U.S. administrations and elites – is not without inspiration. I am talking about the inspiration of the truth-tellers.

“American Betrayal” presents a rewrite of most of World War II and Cold War history, something I never imagined doing when I first began writing the book. This is simply the story that took shape from my research. And it takes shape in the book in a first-person narrative exactly as I stumbled across the revelations and put them together according to two basic mechanisms.

One relates to revelations from secret archives in Moscow and Washington that opened, briefly and partially, after the USSR dissolved in 1991. I discovered that the treason documented in these archives, treason committed by Americans in government, some in the very highest positions of power, had not been incorporated into our general historical understanding of such defining events as World War II and the Cold War. So I did my best to incorporate them. What emerges makes our history look completely different – even our near-sacred history of World War II.

The other stream of new information that I was able to reweave into the American story came from those I think of as the truth-tellers. These are the forgotten and/or maligned witnesses and investigators who told and sought the truth about the massive penetration and infiltration by Americans serving a hostile foreign power. (Yes, among them is Sen. Joe McCarthy.)

Their truth-seeking example is inspiring, particularly in an age of routine, serial lying and obfuscation in Washington. If there is one thing I hope my book does, it is to reintroduce us to these great Americans. Because they contradicted the official narrative – the “court histories” as author and historian M. Stanton Evans calls it – these Americans were smeared, marginalized and lost to us, their rudderless descendants.

Diana West .jpg

We need them back in our historical and moral consciousness. To that end, I am embarking on an occasional series devoted to truth-tellers highlighted in “American Betrayal.”

I will begin with Maj. George Racey Jordan, who in 1949 and 1950 came forward to testify under oath before Congress that one big reason the Soviet Union had recently surprised the world by exploding an atomic bomb was that he, Jordan, the top “expediter” shipping thousands of tons of U.S. war supplies and aircraft through an airfield in Great Falls, Mont., to the Soviet Union under Lend-Lease during World War II, had personally overseen the shipment of uranium to Moscow.

Really? Sure enough, as a congressional investigator would testify, two specific shipments of uranium oxide and nitrate were “completely documented to include even the number of the plane that the flew the uranium … out of Great Falls.” This postwar revelation before Congress would shock and anger Gen. Leslie Groves, head of the Manhattan Project, because he had slapped an embargo on the wartime export of uranium from the U.S. Of course, the shipments in question came from Canadian stocks. How did that happen? Therein lies a tale – a tale of betrayal.

Meanwhile, it wasn’t just uranium Jordan expedited, as he testified. Heavy water, too.

The congressional committee was able to document the shipment of heavy water, too.

In all, Jordan “expedited” 23 atomic materials through the big airbase in Montana to Moscow during the war, along with nearly 14 million pounds of aluminum tubes, also essential to atomic experimentation.

Findings in Soviet archives would later confirm that possession of the atomic bomb was what emboldened Stalin to trigger the Korean War in 1950. The implications of the theft of U.S. atomic secrets, then, becomes staggering.

After Jordan went public, all manner of witnesses stepped forward to corroborate different aspects of his story. There was the pilot who flew the uranium shipment (and said he handled brown grains of uranium that spilled from a box). There was the GI who recognized in Moscow-bound blueprints the chemical structure of uranium. 

RUSkravchenko.jpg

Soviet defector Victor Kravchenko celebrated author of “I Chose Freedom,” would himself testify before Congress and corroborate specific allegations by Jordan attesting to Lend-Lease as a giant conduit of Soviet espionage.

What even this skeletal synopsis of a tale that unfolds in detail in “American Betrayal” should make clear is that it wasn’t just the Rosenberg atomic spy ring that enabled the Soviet theft of U.S. atomic secrets. There was a massive looting effort underway inside the U.S. government overseen by senior Washington officials. 

———————-

hopkins1.jpg

Chief among these powers was Harry Hopkins, (left) FDR’s very top, very enigmatic, very sinister (I have concluded) adviser. Hopkins was the power behind Lend-Lease – often the power behind Roosevelt, too – and a central figure in my book. [The KGB confirmed he was their agent. p. 147]

I knew none of this “lost” history going into my research more than four years ago. Precious few Americans, I’ve since learned, do. Hopkins, once famously known as Roosevelt’s “co-president,” is as absent from our national history lessons as Jordan, a credible eyewitness to what might well have been treason. Why do we have such blanks? Why isn’t Jordan’s earth-shaking testimony, most of it corroborated by documentation and supporting eyewitness accounts, ever taught? How did Hopkins, once the most powerful man in Washington next to FDR (and maybe more so) slip out of our collective memory? Who stole our history – and why?

These are the questions I set out to unravel in American Betrayal. On this quest, I learned there was nothing like seeking out, dusting off and listening to history’s truth-tellers.

RelatedYouTube Lecture by Diana West 

Excerpts from American Betrayal re. Lend Lease- 

Singapore fell because 200 US fighter jets earmarked for the British enclave were diverted to Russia. As result, more than 100,000 British soldiers were interned.  p. 45

“War supplies didn’t just “flow” to the Soviet Union, they flooded it, with half a million trucks and jeeps, nearly 1$ billion (1940 dollars) of ordinance and ammunition, thousands of fighter aircraft, bombers and tanks, 13 million pairs of winter boots, 1.7 million tons of petroleum products. a merchant fleet, 1000 steam locomotives, 581 naval vessels including minesweepers, landing craft, sub chasers, frigates, torpedo boats… icebreakers and a light cruiser. ” p.43

“Non-military supplies included diesel engines, entire prefab factories, and hydroelectric plants…hundreds of thousands of patents were stolen including secret military blueprints, pip-fabricating works, nearly a million miles of copper wire (sent after the war), tens of millions worth of switchboard panels, lathes and power tools for metalworking, machinery for textiles, woodworking, and typesetting, cranes, hoists, serricks, elevators, drills, not to mention $152 milion in women’s dress goods, 18.4 million pounds of writing opaper and assorted cigarette cases, compacts, jewelled watches, lipstick, liquor. …217,660,666 pounds of butter were shipped to the USSR at a time of strict rationing state-side.

planes for Russia were prioritized over US Airforce. ” p. 44

“This was a national looting far and above the exigencies of war supply.”  Jordan opened a few of the hundreds of black suitcases being transferred to Russia through the Great Falls MT airbase and found espionage of the highest order, including the location and blueprints of key US factories and infrastructure, patents, and plans and materiel for the atomic bomb. He also witnessed 481 Russian agents jump off the planes from Russia, and enter the USA no questions asked. ( pp. 138-142) 

—-

Makow Note– Diana West is Jewish, and a conservative like myself. She has taken a lot of flack for her lucid portrayal of Communist influence although she does not understand how the central banking system, Organized Jewry, and Freemasonry are behind it. She wrote another book about the reaction to the truth she told in American Betrayal. Her acceptance in establishment conservative circles is partly due to her espousal of radical Islam as a genuine threat and not something conjured up by the CIA and Mossad. See her talks on YouTube.


RelatedFDR – Dupe or Fellow Traveller? 

—————– FDR Turned Blind Eye to Soviet Spies 

———–FDR Controlled by his (((Braintrust)))  

———–McCarthy & the Khazar Curse

First Comment from James C:

In response to your article, I would cite the testimony of Antony C. Sutton before Subcommittee VII of the Platform Committee of the Republican Party at Miami Beach, Florida, August 15, 1972:

 “I have spent ten years in research on Soviet technology.  What it is–what it can do–and particularly where it came from.  I have published three books and several articles summarizing the work

 In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology.  Almost all–perhaps 90-95 percent–came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies.  In effect, the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union.  Its industrial and its military capabilities.  This massive construction job has taken 50 years.  Since the Revolution in 1917.  It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance” (Antony C. Sutton, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy [Billings, MT:  Liberty House Press, 1986], pp. 200-201).

 

Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/02/Soviets-Sodomized-the-US-from-FDR-White-House.html

"Russian Meddling?" FDR’s Soviet Spies Sodomized the US

MajJordan.jpg

(Maj. George Racey Jordan, Lend-Lease expediter and liaison with the Russians during World War II.)

Russian “meddling” in 2016 election is a farce considering the US has been

Communist-controlled since the FDR Administration when KGB Agent  

Working out of the White House, using Lend-Lease as a smokescreen,


by Diana West 

(henrymakow.com) 


A book called American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character (St. Martin’s Press, 2013) doesn’t promise uplift and renewal. I know. I wrote it.

That said, the story of “betrayal” my new book lays out – betrayal enabled by a de facto Communist occupation of Washington by American traitors loyal to Stalin, which would solidify in the 1930s under FDR and be covered up by successive U.S. administrations and elites – is not without inspiration. I am talking about the inspiration of the truth-tellers.

“American Betrayal” presents a rewrite of most of World War II and Cold War history, something I never imagined doing when I first began writing the book. This is simply the story that took shape from my research. And it takes shape in the book in a first-person narrative exactly as I stumbled across the revelations and put them together according to two basic mechanisms.

One relates to revelations from secret archives in Moscow and Washington that opened, briefly and partially, after the USSR dissolved in 1991. I discovered that the treason documented in these archives, treason committed by Americans in government, some in the very highest positions of power, had not been incorporated into our general historical understanding of such defining events as World War II and the Cold War. So I did my best to incorporate them. What emerges makes our history look completely different – even our near-sacred history of World War II.

The other stream of new information that I was able to reweave into the American story came from those I think of as the truth-tellers. These are the forgotten and/or maligned witnesses and investigators who told and sought the truth about the massive penetration and infiltration by Americans serving a hostile foreign power. (Yes, among them is Sen. Joe McCarthy.)

Their truth-seeking example is inspiring, particularly in an age of routine, serial lying and obfuscation in Washington. If there is one thing I hope my book does, it is to reintroduce us to these great Americans. Because they contradicted the official narrative – the “court histories” as author and historian M. Stanton Evans calls it – these Americans were smeared, marginalized and lost to us, their rudderless descendants.

Diana West .jpg

We need them back in our historical and moral consciousness. To that end, I am embarking on an occasional series devoted to truth-tellers highlighted in “American Betrayal.”

I will begin with Maj. George Racey Jordan, who in 1949 and 1950 came forward to testify under oath before Congress that one big reason the Soviet Union had recently surprised the world by exploding an atomic bomb was that he, Jordan, the top “expediter” shipping thousands of tons of U.S. war supplies and aircraft through an airfield in Great Falls, Mont., to the Soviet Union under Lend-Lease during World War II, had personally overseen the shipment of uranium to Moscow.

Really? Sure enough, as a congressional investigator would testify, two specific shipments of uranium oxide and nitrate were “completely documented to include even the number of the plane that the flew the uranium … out of Great Falls.” This postwar revelation before Congress would shock and anger Gen. Leslie Groves, head of the Manhattan Project, because he had slapped an embargo on the wartime export of uranium from the U.S. Of course, the shipments in question came from Canadian stocks. How did that happen? Therein lies a tale – a tale of betrayal.

Meanwhile, it wasn’t just uranium Jordan expedited, as he testified. Heavy water, too.

The congressional committee was able to document the shipment of heavy water, too.

In all, Jordan “expedited” 23 atomic materials through the big airbase in Montana to Moscow during the war, along with nearly 14 million pounds of aluminum tubes, also essential to atomic experimentation.

Findings in Soviet archives would later confirm that possession of the atomic bomb was what emboldened Stalin to trigger the Korean War in 1950. The implications of the theft of U.S. atomic secrets, then, becomes staggering.

After Jordan went public, all manner of witnesses stepped forward to corroborate different aspects of his story. There was the pilot who flew the uranium shipment (and said he handled brown grains of uranium that spilled from a box). There was the GI who recognized in Moscow-bound blueprints the chemical structure of uranium. 

RUSkravchenko.jpg

Soviet defector Victor Kravchenko celebrated author of “I Chose Freedom,” would himself testify before Congress and corroborate specific allegations by Jordan attesting to Lend-Lease as a giant conduit of Soviet espionage.

What even this skeletal synopsis of a tale that unfolds in detail in “American Betrayal” should make clear is that it wasn’t just the Rosenberg atomic spy ring that enabled the Soviet theft of U.S. atomic secrets. There was a massive looting effort underway inside the U.S. government overseen by senior Washington officials. 

———————-

hopkins1.jpg

Chief among these powers was Harry Hopkins, (left) FDR’s very top, very enigmatic, very sinister (I have concluded) adviser. Hopkins was the power behind Lend-Lease – often the power behind Roosevelt, too – and a central figure in my book. [The KGB confirmed he was their agent. p. 147]

I knew none of this “lost” history going into my research more than four years ago. Precious few Americans, I’ve since learned, do. Hopkins, once famously known as Roosevelt’s “co-president,” is as absent from our national history lessons as Jordan, a credible eyewitness to what might well have been treason. Why do we have such blanks? Why isn’t Jordan’s earth-shaking testimony, most of it corroborated by documentation and supporting eyewitness accounts, ever taught? How did Hopkins, once the most powerful man in Washington next to FDR (and maybe more so) slip out of our collective memory? Who stole our history – and why?

These are the questions I set out to unravel in American Betrayal. On this quest, I learned there was nothing like seeking out, dusting off and listening to history’s truth-tellers.

RelatedYouTube Lecture by Diana West 

Excerpts from American Betrayal re. Lend Lease- 

Singapore fell because 200 US fighter jets earmarked for the British enclave were diverted to Russia. As result, more than 100,000 British soldiers were interned.  p. 45

“War supplies didn’t just “flow” to the Soviet Union, they flooded it, with half a million trucks and jeeps, nearly 1$ billion (1940 dollars) of ordinance and ammunition, thousands of fighter aircraft, bombers and tanks, 13 million pairs of winter boots, 1.7 million tons of petroleum products. a merchant fleet, 1000 steam locomotives, 581 naval vessels including minesweepers, landing craft, sub chasers, frigates, torpedo boats… icebreakers and a light cruiser. ” p.43

“Non-military supplies included diesel engines, entire prefab factories, and hydroelectric plants…hundreds of thousands of patents were stolen including secret military blueprints, pip-fabricating works, nearly a million miles of copper wire (sent after the war), tens of millions worth of switchboard panels, lathes and power tools for metalworking, machinery for textiles, woodworking, and typesetting, cranes, hoists, serricks, elevators, drills, not to mention $152 milion in women’s dress goods, 18.4 million pounds of writing opaper and assorted cigarette cases, compacts, jewelled watches, lipstick, liquor. …217,660,666 pounds of butter were shipped to the USSR at a time of strict rationing state-side.

planes for Russia were prioritized over US Airforce. ” p. 44

“This was a national looting far and above the exigencies of war supply.”  Jordan opened a few of the hundreds of black suitcases being transferred to Russia through the Great Falls MT airbase and found espionage of the highest order, including the location and blueprints of key US factories and infrastructure, patents, and plans and materiel for the atomic bomb.e also witnessed 481 Russian agents jump off the planes from Russia, and enter the USA no questions asked. ( pp. 138-142) 

—-

Makow Note– Diana West is Jewish, and a conservative like myself. She has taken a lot of flack for her lucid portrayal of Communist influence although she does not understand how the central banking system, Organized Jewry, and Freemasonry are behind it. She wrote another book about the reaction to the truth she told in American Betrayal. Her acceptance in establishment conservative circles is partly due to her espousal of radical Islam as a genuine threat and not something conjured up by the CIA and Mossad. See her talks on YouTube.


RelatedFDR – Dupe or Fellow Traveller? 

—————– FDR Turned Blind Eye to Soviet Spies 

———–FDR Controlled by his (((Braintrust)))  

———–McCarthy & the Khazar Curse

Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/02/Soviets-Sodomized-the-US-from-FDR-White-House.html

Ron Paul Issues Dire Warning: U.S. ‘On the Verge of 1989’s Soviet System Collapse’

sovietsoviet

Washington, D.C. – Never one to shy away from controversy, but often accurate assessments of fact, Ron Paul—who rose to prominence with presidential runs in both 2008 and 2012, running on an anti-war, pro-civil liberties message—made a monumental statement about the current state of the extremely dysfunctional U.S. political system, during an interview with the Washington Examiner, and noted how that could benefit libertarians in 2020.

“The big opening for us is the fact that this system is coming apart. We’re on the verge of something like what happened in ‘89 when the Soviet system just collapsed,” Paul said. “I’m just hoping our system comes apart as gracefully as the Soviet system.”

The “us” Paul is talking about is the libertarian movement, as Paul is perhaps the most prominent ideologically libertarian voice in the world.

The libertarian thought leader told the Washington Examiner that while he does not foresee the United States breaking into separate countries like the Soviet Union did, he does expect the coming systemic collapse to include an end to our currently unsustainable monetary policy and an end to the global “empire” maintained by the U.S. military—with over 800 bases operating in over 70 countries.

“We have ownership of these countries, but it’s not quite like the Soviets did,” Paul said. “I think our stature in the world and our empire will end, and that’s when, hopefully, the doors will be open and [people will] say, ‘Hey, maybe these libertarians have some answers to this.’”

Paul presciently noted that “the country’s feeling a lot better, but it’s all on borrowed money” and that the whole system’s an illusion” built on corporate, personal, and governmental debt that will never be paid back.

“It’s a bubble economy in many many different ways and it’s going to come unglued,” he said.

Paul calls the Federal Reserve “the chief culprit” in the financial crisis of 2008, and says the Fed’s willful printing of more currency under the guise of “quantitative easing,” or whatever other fancy name they use for printing money out of thin air, creates “boom” and “bust” scenarios which have eroded the value of the U.S. dollar to record lows amounting to a total loss of 96 percent of its value.

Paul went on to note that he disapproves of Trump’s foreign policy, in particular, his handling of the North Korean nuclear crisis and his staunch support for Saudi Arabia—who Trump, prior to becoming President, intimated on video was possibly behind the 9/11 WTC attacks.

“I think the foreign policy is a total disaster. Trump’s approach sounds good one day but the next day he’s antagonizing everyone in the world and thinks we should start a war here and there,” Paul told the Washington Examiner.

In a tweetstorm during a Trump speech back in February, Ron Paul laid waste to Trump’s warmongering and hypocrisy.

After running for the presidency on a platform that included getting the U.S. out of NATO, Trump—like all politicians do—switched his stance and began to promote it as a historic alliance.

“We strongly support NATO, an alliance forged through the bonds of two World Wars that dethroned fascism,” Trump said.

The former congressman has a way of presenting the facts in a clear and compelling manner that is often extremely difficult to refute.

Paul said that he continues to view the U.S. as on a steady path to fascism.

“This time when we have a permanent war on terrorism there’s no backing off—and with the war on immigrants, and the borders,” Paul said. “Anybody who thinks we’re not doing too badly has not been flying on an airplane lately. That’s about as authoritarian-fascism as you can get.”

Sadly, many former Ron Paul supporters jumped on the Trump bandwagon, as they perceived him to be an outsider running against the status quo. As Paul describes it, the appearance of Trump has been a setback for the libertarian movement, but he maintains hope for the near future.

“The appearance of the libertarian movement has been set back partially because of Trump, but intellectually we’ve been doing well,” Paul told the Examiner, noting a substantial “hardcore nucleus.”

“We as libertarians have some work to do before [voters] are going to accept a true-blue libertarian,” he said, “but I think moving in that direction and having a popular candidate [in 2020] is very possible.”

“If they only hear our message, I know they would choose liberty and sound money and freedom and peace over the mess we have today,” Paul said.

Perhaps breaking up like the former Soviet Union is not that bad of an idea after all.

Source Article from http://thefreethoughtproject.com/ron-paul-issues-dire-warning-america-verge-1989s-soviet-collapse/

Cold War fun: Pilot reveals Soviet bomber crews asked US jets to barrel-roll & took pics (PHOTO)

The picture was published by the popular military aviation blog The Aviationist on December 4 as an illustration of how the definition of recklessness has changed since the Cold War. Maneuvers like barrel rolls or aggressive turns during interception missions are now usually branded by the Pentagon as “unprofessional” or “unsafe” if performed by Russian or Chinese pilots responding to American aircraft.

But a few decades ago such stunts were quite routine and not perceived as anything dangerous. Military aviation blogger David Cenciotti cited a US spy plane veteran pilot calling such episodes “ho-hum.” He added that American pilots actually behaved in the same manner, as evidenced by the photo with the ‘Phantom’ flying upside down alongside the ‘Bear.’

The image went viral, and its owner Robert M. Sihler contacted the blog and revealed he took it during his deployment to Iceland in the 1970s, a period of reduced tension known as detente.

“Generally, we did these barrel rolls at the request of the Soviet crew members. They photographed us as well. The Cold War was winding down and the attitudes on both sides had improved,” Sihler said.

When asked whether he considered the barrel roll a difficult or an unsafe maneuver, Sihler replied frankly: “Not really! The Soviets, at the time, gave us hand signals asking us to ‘perform’ for them. The rolls were not dangerous at all.”

The mood surrounding Russia and the US has recently been quite different, with both sides complaining about the other’s conduct over Syria. This week the Russian Defense Ministry accused the US of trying to interfere with Russian bombing missions and thus defending terrorists. The accusation came in response to controversial remarks from a US Air Force spokesman, who claimed that “unsafe behavior” by Russian pilots may prompt the Americans to shoot the Russian warplanes down.

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/news/412631-cold-war-air-fun/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Flynn investigation PROVES once and for all that the FBI has been transformed into a Soviet-style secret police force

Image: Flynn investigation PROVES once and for all that the FBI has been transformed into a Soviet-style secret police force

(Natural News)
If in fact former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn did lie to an FBI agent as he pleaded guilty to doing last week, then that’s on him: There was no reason for him to do so because he hadn’t done anything illegal or even improper.

But because the agent he lied to — Peter Strzok — has since been removed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s staff for being a pro-Hillary Clinton hack, Flynn’s admission and, indeed, the entire reason why he was questioned about his conversations with a Russian diplomat in the first place, go a long way towards proving without a doubt just how corrupt and politicized the FBI has become.

In other words, the FBI has been transformed into the kind of political secret police force that used to terrorize Soviet citizens: The KGB.

That’s a very strong statement to make, but believe me when I tell you I do not make it lightly. (Related: Mueller’s entire “Russian collusion” probe of Team Trump is a politically motivated SCAM and must be shut down.)

Consider all that we’ve learned in recent weeks regarding just this one agent, Strzok:

— Though Flynn was charged with lying to the FBI, two of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides — Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills — also made false statements to Strzok, denying that they knew anything about their boss’ email server. Emails from long before Strzok interviewed them both indicate that they did know, meaning they lied to the FBI. But they were never charged.

— He was fingered by the Justice Department’s inspector general for having exchanged “anti-Trump sentiments and other comments that appeared to favor [Hillary] Clinton” with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, with whom he was also having an extramarital affair.

— He was the lead investigator in the criminal probe of Hillary Clinton’s illegal mishandling of classified materials via her home-brew email server — crimes she most definitely committed, according to numerous legal experts but for which she was never even recommended for charges.

— He was also the one who softened language in a statement then-FBI Director James Comey read to the press in July 2016. The original language in Comey’s statement described Clinton’s behavior as “grossly negligent,” which is taken directly from the statute, to “extremely careless,” which has no legal weight.

— And again, let’s not forget that he was on Mueller’s staff and that Mueller is investigating Team Trump and the president himself as a special counsel for “collusion,” though that’s not even a violation of the law.

There are more examples of FBI malfeasance and politicization: Enter, once again, James Comey:

— During his July 2016 press conference to lay out the Clinton criminal investigation — which in and of itself was outside of standard FBI procedure to not publicly discuss an ongoing case — he laid out a list of criminal activities she had engaged in, but then refused to characterize the activities as criminal in nature (hence the Strzok language alteration). Comey was a career Justice Department and FBI official; he knew the statute that Clinton had violated. He knew that her behavior was “grossly negligent” (as he himself wrote in his first draft) but then permitted that language (taken directly from the criminal code) to be changed into something no one had ever heard of.

— We have also discovered that Comey was never going to recommend Clinton be charged in the first place. Reports earlier this year noted that Comey’s memo exonerating her months in advance, while the investigation was still underway. The drafting of the memo occurred even before Comey and FBI agents had interviewed Clinton herself.

In addition to the FBI, the Office of Special Counsel and the Justice Department have also been shown to be utterly corrupt.

“The agencies have, in the past, gone light on Democrats such as Hillary Clinton, but laid perjury traps for Trump officials like Flynn, who served as national security adviser for President Donald Trump for less than a month,” Lifezette reports.

J.D. Heyes is editor of The National Sentinel and a senior writer for Natural News and News Target.

Sources include:

Lifezette.com

FoxNews.com

TheNationalSentinel.com

<!–

–>

Source Article from http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12-06-flynn-investigation-proves-once-and-for-all-that-the-fbi-has-been-transformed-into-a-soviet-style-secret-police-force.html