Edward Snowden: Facebook Is A Surveillance Company Rebranded As “Social Media”

Tyler Durden–NSA whistleblower and former CIA employee Edward Snowden slammed Facebook in a Saturday tweet following the suspension of Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL) and its political data analytics firm, Cambridge Analytica, over what Facebook says was imporoper use of collected data.

In a nutshell, in 2015 Cambridge Analytica bought data from a University of Cambridge psychology professor, Dr. Aleksandr Kogan, who had developed an app called “thisisyourdigitallife” that vacuumed up loads of information on users and their contacts. After making Kogan and Cambridge Analytica promise to delete the data the app had gathered, Facebook received reports (from sources they would not identify) which claimed that not all the data had been deleted – which led the social media giant to delete Cambridge Analytica and parent company SCL’s accounts.

“By passing information on to a third party, including SCL/Cambridge Analytica and Christopher Wylie of Eunoia Technologies, he violated our platform policies. When we learned of this violation in 2015, we removed his app from Facebook and demanded certifications from Kogan and all parties he had given data to that the information had been destroyed. Cambridge Analytica, Kogan and Wylie all certified to us that they destroyed the data.” –Facebook

Of note, Cambridge Analytica worked for Ted Cruz and Ben Carson during the 2016 election before contracting with the Trump campaign. Cruz stopped using CA after their data modeling failed to identify likely supporters. 

Cambridge Analytica has vehemently denied any wrongdoing in a statement.

In response to the ban, Edward Snowden fired off two tweets on Saturday criticizing Facebook, and claimed social media companies were simply “surveillance companies” who engaged in a “successful deception” by rebranding themselves.

Snowden isn’t the first big name to call out Silicon Valley companies over their data collection and monitoring practices, or their notorious intersection with the U.S. Government.

In his 2014 book: When Google Met WikiLeaks, Julian Assange describes Google’s close relationship with the NSA and the Pentagon.

Around the same time, Google was becoming involved in a program known as the “Enduring Security Framework” (ESF), which entailed the sharing of information between Silicon Valley tech companies and Pentagon-affiliated agencies “at network speed.” Emails obtained in 2014 under Freedom of Information requests show Schmidt and his fellow Googler Sergey Brin corresponding on first-name terms with NSA chief General Keith Alexander about ESF Reportage on the emails focused on the familiarity in the correspondence: “General Keith . . . so great to see you . . . !” Schmidt wrote. But most reports overlooked a crucial detail. “Your insights as a key member of the Defense Industrial Base,” Alexander wrote to Brin, “are valuable to ensure ESF’s efforts have measurable impact.” –Julian Assange

Kim Dotcom has also opined on social media’s close ties to the government, tweeting in February “Unfortunately all big US Internet companies are in bed with the deep state. Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. are all providing backdoors to your data.”

In 2013, the Washington Post and The Guardian revealed that the NSA has backdoor access to all major Silicon Valley social media firms, including Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, and Apple – all through the notorious PRISM program which began in 2007 under the Protect America Act. PRISM’s existence was leaked by Edward Snowden before he entered into ongoing asylum in Moscow. Microsoft was the first company to join the PRISM program.

The NSA has the ability to pull any sort of data it likes from these companies, but it claims that it does not try to collect it all. The PRISM program goes above and beyond the existing laws that state companies must comply with government requests for data, as it gives the NSA direct access to each company’s servers — essentially letting the NSA do as it pleases. –The Verge

After PRISM’s existence was leaked by Snowden, the Director of National Intelligence issued a statment which stated that the only people targed by the programs are “outside the United States,” and that the program “does not allow” the targeting of citizens within US borders.

In 2006, Wired magazine published evidence from a retired AT&T communications technician, Mark Klein, that revealed a secret room used to “split” internet data at a San Francisco office as part of the NSA’s bulk data collection techniques used on millions of Americans.

During the course of that work, he learned from a co-worker that similar cabins were being installed in other cities, including Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego, he said.

The split circuits included traffic from peering links connecting to other internet backbone providers, meaning that AT&T was also diverting traffic routed from its network to or from other domestic and international providers, Klein said. –Wired

“They are collecting everything on everybody,” Klein said.

Source Article from http://govtslaves.info/2018/03/edward-snowden-facebook-is-a-surveillance-company-rebranded-as-social-media/

China to bar people with bad ‘social credit’ from planes, trains

SHANGHAI (Reuters) – China said it will begin applying its so-called social credit system to flights and trains and stop people who have committed misdeeds from taking such transport for up to a year.

People who would be put on the restricted lists included those found to have committed acts like spreading false information about terrorism and causing trouble on flights, as well as those who used expired tickets or smoked on trains, according to two statements issued on the National Development and Reform Commission’s website on Friday.

Those found to have committed financial wrongdoings, such as employers who failed to pay social insurance or people who have failed to pay fines, would also face these restrictions, said the statements which were dated March 2.

It added that the rules would come into effect on May 1.

The move is in line with President’s Xi Jinping’s plan to construct a social credit system based on the principle of “once untrustworthy, always restricted”, said one of the notices which was signed by eight ministries, including the country’s aviation regulator and the Supreme People’s Court.

China has flagged plans to roll out a system that will allow government bodies to share information on its citizens’ trustworthiness and issue penalties based on a so-called social credit score.

However, there are signs that the use of social credit scoring on domestic transport could have started years ago. In early 2017, the country’s Supreme People’s Court said during a press conference that 6.15 million Chinese citizens had been banned from taking flights for social misdeeds.

Reporting by SHANGHAI Newsroom and Brenda Goh; Editing by Kim Coghill

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-credit/china-to-bar-people-with-bad-social-credit-from-planes-trains-idUSKCN1GS10S

University of Texas Students Are Out of Control-Where Are Their Social Justice Warriors?


Not since the days of the inhumane “Jim Crow” have we seen this kind of bias from a public institution. You will not believe what the University of Texas is permmitting on their campus.

For more stories like these, visit The Common Sense Show

Please donate to offset the costs of The Common Sense Show




 Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer.  Listeners to The Common Sense Show will receive 10% off their next order by mentioning “Hodges10” in the coupon code box.  Don’t wait until it is too late. Click Here for more information.


If the bad guy has night vision and you don't he wins. Don't be a victim, find out more by CLICKING HERE

If the bad guy has night vision and you don’t he wins. Don’t be a victim, find out more by  CLICKING HERE  


From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com. Take 5% off the cost of your order with coupon code DAVE5

From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com. 




Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaveHodges-TheCommonSenseShow/~3/K4uB8MDQ0lc/

Experiment Demonstrates The Deadly Power Of Social Compliance

By Dylan Charles, Waking Times

In his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram discusses in detail the findings of his now famous experiment. Milgram demonstrated just how easy it is to convince an ordinary person to commit torture and murder under the instruction of an authority figure.

Intrigued by the role of Nazi military personnel in concentration camps during WWII, Milgram wanted to know how much coercion people needed in order to willingly inflict harm on another person.

“He asked volunteers to deliver an electric shock to a stranger. Unbeknownst to the volunteers, there was no shock—and the people they were shocking were actors pretending to be terribly hurt, even feigning heart attacks. Milgram found that most people would keep delivering the shocks when ordered by a person in a lab coat, even when they believed that person was gravely injured. Only a tiny percentage of people refused.” [Source]

The suggested conclusion is that people are inherently unable to think for themselves when given a subordinate role in some authoritarian hierarchy, such as the role of the ordinary citizen in a state-controlled world. A documentary of this experiment can be seen here.

The Milgram study was controversial in that some felt the results were skewed in favor of a predetermined bias. In the fifty-plus years since the experiment, there have been no other major research studies to confirm Milgram’s findings. Nevertheless, the presumption that normal people will go as far as to commit murder if they are relieved of responsibility by an authority figure feels inherently truthful in a world of so many organized atrocities.

The question is:

“Can we be manipulated through social pressure to commit murder?” ~Derren Brown

It’s an important question at a time when the converging technologies of AI and social media are affecting individual and group psychology in not yet understood ways. British illusionist Derren Brown recently conducted a similar experiment, this time in a feature documentary for Netflix entitled, The Push.

“This show is about how readily we hand over authorship of our lives, everyday, and the dangers of losing that control,” says Brown, who organized the reality TV-like experiment in which ordinary people were duped into doing things most of us would never even consider.

At the heart of the experiment lies the powerful effects of social pressure and social compliance, along with the individual’s inherent need to belong and fit into society. It also questions the nature of individuality, while demonstrating that many of us simply don’t have the courage to assert our own moral courage when faced with even a slight amount of authoritarian pressure.

The Push begins with a phony police officer calling a cafe worker on the phone and in a quick minute, without even a face-to-face interaction, convinces this person to steal a woman’s baby. Interestingly, the worker carries out the abduction even while expressing significant hesitance.

The main experiment picks up from there, involving unwitting subjects who are gradually convinced of the need to push another person off of a high-rise building. It’s an elaborate setup, which builds upon one small act of compliance after another until the subject is put into a situation where they are encouraged to kill a man they just met.

It’s a rather theatrical and unscientific presentation, but the results are noteworthy as three out of four participants actually shove an actor off of a building, believing they are committing murder, after being pressured into it by a small group of others. It’s a shocking act of compliance and subservience to the pressures of a peer group and a persistent authority figure.

What we don’t know about society today, though, is just how many people are this extremely socially compliant, capable of doing anything to appease the directives of others. As Brown notes, “the more socially compliant a person is, the more likely they are to look to others for signs on how to behave. And the more people, the greater the pressure to join in.”

This says a great deal about humans. Are we somehow wired to abandon our own morals and sense of self-integrity for the false belief that fitting into a group is necessary for survival?

A trailer for this show is seen below.

Read more articles by Dylan Charles.

About the Author

Dylan Charles is the editor of Waking Times and co-host of Redesigning Reality, both dedicated to ideas of personal transformation, societal awakening, and planetary renewal. His personal journey is deeply inspired by shamanic plant medicines and the arts of Kung Fu, Qi Gong and Yoga. After seven years of living in Costa Rica, he now lives in the Blue Ridge Mountains, where he practices Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and enjoys spending time with family. He has written hundreds of articles, reaching and inspiring millions of people around the world.

This article (Experiment Demonstrates the Deadly Power of Social Compliancewas originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to DylanCharles and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Get free copy of our 33 Page Illustrated eBook- Psychology Meets Spirituality- Secrets To A Supercharged Life You Control!

Source Article from https://truththeory.com/2018/03/12/experiment-demonstrates-deadly-power-social-compliance/

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Surveils Social Media for Vaccine Beliefs, Study Finds

Photo Credit: HTSABO

This article is posted with permission from our friends at Greenmedinfo.comFor more news from them, you can sign up for their newsletter here. It was written by Celeste McGovern

Social scientists and data analysts: Why not just ask parents who don’t vaccinate what they believe? Or read the vaccine damage claims?

Would it make you feel safer to know that your government is monitoring social media for your views on vaccines?  Studying us all like lab rats to isolate the anti-vaccine animals, to determine the nature of the beast, his habitat, his resources, his beliefs? That it is culling all this data to be used one day in large government programs to identify the perpetrators of unsafe opinion with ease and to silence them?

No? Well, it is underway.

study published this month reveals that social scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health have monitored hundreds of thousands of personal tweets to document “trends of anti-vaccination beliefs” on Twitter and to “geolocate” the users of the social media platform and pigeonhole them in demographic categories.

They sifted through 549,972 tweets from January 2009 to August 2015 using Social Studio’s Radian6 application to identify 272,546 tweets that they classified as containing references to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and “anti-vaccination beliefs” within the same tweet.

“The volume of online anti-vaccine beliefs is alarming and may indicate shifts in public opinion, which can translate to lower vaccine coverage,” says the paper led by Theodore S. Tomeny, a psychologist at the University of Alabama.

Tomeny and the other researchers that included a professor of data analytics in mass communication from the University of Boulder-Colorado and someone at the Brave New World sounding Division for Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities calculated “tweet volume” at state level and used CensusReporter’s API and Google Maps Places to “geo-tag” people and then to determine demographic figures to describe them.

What they found is what everybody already knows: Anti-vaxxers have children, they tend to make a lot of money and they are smart.  The tweets were concentrated in neighborhoods occupied by a high number of women who had a baby in the past 12 months, households with annual incomes of $200,000 or more and men between ages 40 to 44 with some college education.

They even race profiled anti-vaxxers. “Asian-only race variable was significantly associated with anti-vaccine tweet volume,” they reported.

Anti-vaccine autism tweets coincided with news reports on vaccines were higher than average in five states: California, Massachusetts, New York,   Connecticut and Pennsylvania and spiked in August and September (just when school officials start harassing parents to comply with mandates).

The data analyst set up an interactive website to illustrate anti-vaccine tweets moving around a map of America like a map of election returns. http://chrisjvargo.com/animatedautism/

They call it “Social listening.” “Social listening allows for an examination of vaccination-related beliefs and can serve as an early indicator of shifts in public opinion,” the study says.

“Monitoring social media for anti-vaccine beliefs is beneficial for surveillance and intervention efforts to curtail anti-vaccine beliefs.”

So just what sort of “interventions” are they thinking of?

They say public health professionals should implement “real-time interventions” that, “aided by computer-assisted content analysis software and machine learning algorithms, are designed to instantly detect anti-vaccine tweets and reply with counter messages using the twitter handle (i.e., @username) and/or hashtag of the original tweet.”

They actually claim it’s worked before. Except the study they cite concludes that pro-vaccine public health messages based on actual information usually backfire and make people less likely to vaccinate.  And using images of sick children tends to make people fear vaccines more than the diseases they are supposed to prevent.

Their surveillance could allow public health professionals to “target geographic areas where these beliefs are most prevalent” and to tailor their approach to demographics, the researchers said.

But don’t be fooled. These guys are not about winning people over with counter-tweets and they already know they lose in the information battle.

Their real idea is to jackboot people into compliance with views of “social desirability.” Uptake rates for the combined seven-vaccine series have fallen to 80% and below in the five states they cited (71.9% in New York, 72.8% in Pennsylvania, 75.0% in California, 78.5% in Massachusetts, and 80.6% in Connecticut). They don’t want the public to know that educated and wealthy mothers and fathers are vaccinating less and less. They want them to be forced to inject their children.

They note that the “ease of granting exemptions is also associated with a 5% annual increase in non-medical exemptions” and they suggest that ease of obtaining exemptions for vaccines should be “examined.” Code language for “enforced.”

Make no mistake, these are the sort of people that are the reason that Michigan mother Rebecca Bredow is doing jail time right now for refusing to vaccinate her nine-year-old son. And you can bet while she is in there that her child will receive up to eight different injections to “catch him up” on the mandated vaccine schedule. Eight injections are child abuse itself, but the state overriding parental rights and medical freedom is becoming a norm that pro-vaxxers are accepting without thinking it will apply to them one day too. Perhaps when they go to renew their driver’s license they will need a Gardasil and a flu shot, or when they want to claim a government tax benefit, they will have to get a cancer vaccine or one to prevent opioid addiction, zika, ebola or whatever the pharmaceutical companies want to be mandated. They should hope they don’t have a reaction.

Prof. Tomeny and his colleagues could have saved taxpayers a bundle of money if they just asked anti-vaccination parents what they believe. If they want to understand anti-vaccine sentiment, they could watch the hundreds of Vaxxed interviews with grieving mothers. Or read the thousands of vaccine claims that the health departments keep adding to their ever-growing “Stuff To Pretend Doesn’t Exist” pile. Or just read the VAERS database of vaccine adverse reactions.

The fact is that public health officials and data analysts should already know what anti-vaccine parents know. Or they don’t want to know. The anti-vaccine “movement” is comprised mostly of parents who used to be pro-vaccine. They listened to inane public health marketing messages and they did what they were told. And then they saw their children get injured.  They are the parents of children who are brain damaged.  Their children have narcolepsy and Type 1 diabetes from flu vaccines. Their children have bowel syndromes and intussusception from rotavirus vaccine. They have skin rashes and hay fever and eczema and food allergies and all kinds of autoimmune diseases. And some have children who are deadfrom Sudden Infant Death after a pertussis shot or from a Gardasil vaccine.

All of these conditions are the result of damaged immune systems and they are soaring. Public health officials, pediatricians, and social scientists say they haven’t got a clue why. But the parents of damaged children know why and they cite endless sources of medical research to back up what they know about how toxic vaccine ingredients trigger autoimmunity, dangerous immune activation, and other damage. The only study to date that looks at vaccinated versus unvaccinated children reveals alarmingly high odds risk ratios for chronic diseases such as autism and allergies among the vaccinated group.

Public health’s answer to this current level of chronic illness in children is to send in social scientists to “counter-tweet” real information with copy and paste pap from pharmaceutical companies. And to silence those who are trying to warn others. The problem is not going to go away, however.  They may jail more parents but the Twitter storm is the least of their worries and it will just get louder as the numbers of vaccine hesitators and anti-vaccine resistors keeps growing with the numbers of vaccine-injuries. If public health had any concern for the health of these children, they would not be counting tweets.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/JB6QYoyI2u0/

5 Harsh Truths About Social Media Signalling It’s Time To Let Go

Next Story

Forget “lions and tigers and bears, oh my!” The more accurate statement of the top fears for 2018 seems to be “ads and reach and algorithms, oh my!” While none of these terms are new to our digital lexicon, they’ve certainly forced themselves to the forefront of every digital marketers mind due in large part to the recent “well-intentioned” changes announced by Mark Zuckerberg.

To those that are strictly end users, these changes sure do sound quite nice, as we all remember the days where our newsfeeds were filled with “John Smith is at the gym” and “Suzie Jones needs a coffee”, rather than “SIGN UP FOR MY FREE WEBINAR”.

But as much as “the Zuck” is making it seem as though we are soon going to be traveling down memory lane with only our friends and families, that couldn’t be farther from the truth. We’ll still be seeing just as much “gimmicky” content as we have been, except now we’ll only be seeing it from those who can afford to put it in front of us.

As a social media manager for several companies and brands (including my own), let me set the record straight that this article isn’t intended to be an outlet for me to whine and complain about the current state of social media. It’s to help you all make sense of some of what is happening, since it seems to be affecting even my Aunt who uses Facebook for nothing more than cooking videos and to play Candy Crush Saga.

Here are 5 harsh truths to help you make sense of what’s happening to social media in 2018:

1. It’s Past Its Prime

While statistics pertaining to the average amount of time we spend on social media daily may suggest it’s only getting started, we all know that has more to do with its addictive stronghold on us, rather than the quality of what it offers.

Think about it, when is the last time you heard someone tell you that they genuinely love scrolling through their newsfeed? It’s not to say that no valuable or worthwhile content exists on social media, but it’s undeniably overrun by both that which is completely insignificant and that which is paid for.

For companies and brands, social media is past its prime, because: A) gone are the days where followings were easy to grow and come by and, B) you can no longer interact with even those who previously showed interest in you without paying top dollar.

For end users, social media is past its prime, because: A) you keep seeing the same things from the same people over and over again and, B) you can’t trust much of what you see for many of the reasons I’m going to elaborate on below.

2. It’s Antisocial

How could any SOCIAL media platform be antisocial? Easy, by being what they currently are. We may be connected to way more people than our younger selves (depending on how old you are) would have ever thought possible, but how much do we actually know about them?

Social media gives us all the illusion of socialization, while gradually making us more and more uncomfortable with actual interaction. Case in point: think of how much even a simple phone call from all but a select few numbers makes you uncomfortable. Compare that (again depending on how old you are) to how welcome phone calls were in your household growing up.

We live in a world where hundreds, if not thousands, of us gather daily on buses and subway trains to not exchange more than a courteous nod with one or two others. Just as social media usage numbers are on the rise, so are those pertaining to depression and loneliness, do you think there is any correlation?

3. It Brings Out the Worst In Us

We’re all familiar with the term “cyber-bully” by now, and while the internet as a whole may be responsible for its creation, its on social media that cyber-bullying has firmly planted its feet.

Just as alcohol provides many of us a level of “liquid courage” to speak out, social media provides us with just enough security to openly vocalize our displeasure towards pretty well anything. Hateful and rude comments have become the norm, while words of support and encouragement seem few and far between, except when naturally called upon by hardship or tragedy.

Even if you consider yourself one of the “nice ones” online, you’re likely still affected by it through the conscious or subconscious filtering you apply to everything you say, like, or share to mitigate your chances at being the recipient of it.

4. Everyone Wants Your Money

Whether it’s fuelled by well-intentioned necessity or sheer greed, everyone is ultimately looking for your money online. We should all know by now that the free webinar is just the starting point to a sales funnel, and that the “click-bait” title is to get you to their site overrun by ad units. And that’s okay.

The best defence in the face of this reality is not to avoid them altogether, but to really think critically before you act upon one. As someone who has built an online course myself, and is currently working on another one, I know it seems counterproductive for me to be saying this, but even I know my work won’t have value for everyone that comes across it.

There is a lot of value to be found in certain things online, but what those certain things differs for each of us.

5. It’s Making You Impatient

The article is a slowly dying medium; in fact, it’s almost a miracle that you are actually reading this sentence. Blame it on vine, blame it on news feeds, blame it on Snapchat, whatever happens to be the main culprit in your life, we’ve all become substantially more impatient and demanding online.

Spoiler alert: your newsfeed is currently littered with square videos with catchy titles (some of which are admittedly mine) and numbered “list-icle” articles (like this one) for a reason… it’s pretty much the only things that catch your attention 1 in every 50 tries! (not an actual stat)

Long gone are the days where we could be slowly lured into a point of interest, and here to stay are the days where our attention needs to be caught in 3 seconds or less. So, if you’re tired of seeing the same “crap” online, realize that it’s only there because we’ve collectively brought it to that point.

To see and read more brutally honest personal development content like this, be sure to subscribe to my YouTube Channel and to like me on Facebook.

Get Your FREE In Depth Numerology Reading

Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.

With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.

Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.


Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/5KV9trn8UCM/

Social media giant YouTube moves to PROTECT Alt-Left domestic terrorist group Antifa by censoring investigative journalist’s post

Image: Social media giant YouTube moves to PROTECT Alt-Left domestic terrorist group Antifa by censoring investigative journalist’s post

(Natural News)
In case you haven’t heard, the social media giants are continuing their war on free speech by censoring yet another independent media voice who was attempting to report a violent death threat against conservatives made by domestic terrorists associated with Antifa.

Mike Cernovich posted on his Twitter account a video explaining in full detail how YouTube Nazis “flagged” one of his reports documenting Antifa thugs making their death threats.

“As you know, our Community Guidelines describe which content we allow — and don’t allow on YouTube,” says a message that Cernovich was sent by YouTube content censors. “Your video, ‘Far-Left group ANTIFA chants death threats’ was flagged for review.

“Upon review, we’ve determined that it violates our guidelines,” the message said, adding that the speech Nazis at YouTube then proceeded to remove the video.

Cernovich then begins playing the video that was removed and it clearly shows what the title indicates: Antifa thugs making death threats against conservatives and supporters of President Donald J. Trump.

The video showed protestors chanting, “The revolution has come, it’s time to pick up a gun,” among other things including, “You want a red pill, how ‘bout a lead pill?” — a reference to the movie series “The Matrix.”

“So apparently now if you just report on what Antifa was doing — which was all I did, I just uploaded a video from their actual protest — if you report on what Antifa does, then that’s what [YouTube] is gonna do to you,” Cernovich explained.

“They want to murder people,” he continued. “This is not me characterizing what they’re saying.”

Cernovich added that the world of “fairness” and “human decency” no longer exists for the Alt-Left.

The content censorship isn’t confined to Cernovich. In a column Thursday, Natural News founder and editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, reported that YouTube speech Nazis contacted him as well regarding a video dating from 2012.

“Today, I’ve learned that YouTube is now going back in time and issuing strikes against videos questioning the Sandy Hook narrative from 2012,” he wrote.

“Mere hours after I publicly called for the regulation of Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, YouTube issued a strike against my account for a 2012 interview with a controversial book author named Jim Fetzer. That interview, which has now been banned by YouTube, focused on why Amazon.com banned Fetzer’s book,” he continued.

Adams noted the hypocrisy of the bans. (Related: Continuing its tirade of political censorship, Facebook just BANNED the author of a new book that criticizes Obama.)

“Keep in mind that Amazon.com sells books that claim the Earth is flat. They also sell books that promote Adolf Hitler’s genocidal philosophy. But when someone questions the official story on Sandy Hook, they get blacklisted,” he wrote.

And I can tell you for certain that Facebook censors are limiting dissemination of stories from The National Sentinel, an independent online news site where I serve as editor-in-chief. At the beginning of February, our stories were averaging 1,500 people “reached” but by month’s end, that average fell to just over 500 — despite the fact that our “Likes” grew by about 8,000 during the month to just over 27,000 now.

How’s it possible to increase your reach via “Likes” while your “People Reached” numbers drop by two-thirds (which means our site traffic from Facebook fell by two-thirds, which means our revenue from Facebook traffic fell dramatically as well).

It’s only possible if there is a concerted effort to censor conservative, independent, and alternative media content. [Fortunately, we’ve figured out a way to deliver our content to our readers uncensored — here’s how you can help.]

Under the guise of ‘combatting fake news, these Alt-Left social media giants have declared an economic war on independent media voices — not simply to starve them out but also to prevent as many Americans as possible from being exposed to anything but Marxist indoctrination.

Stay current with the most important news of the day from the most reliable sources at Censored.news, which is updated throughout the day.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources include:





Source Article from http://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-02-social-media-giant-youtube-moves-to-protect-alt-left-domestic-terrorist-group-antifa-by-censoring.html

This one disturbing photo perfectly captures the "social justice" future of America if Leftists win

Image: This one disturbing photo perfectly captures the “social justice” future of America if Leftists win

(Natural News)
You need to see this photo and share it everywhere.

This one disturbing photo captures the “social justice” future of America if we allow Leftists to gain power and roll out their totalitarian demands for social justice conformity. This photo shows a transgender wrestler named Mack Beggs — who is taking testosterone drugs — winning the  Texas girls’ wrestling championship for the second year in a row. (h/t to Front Page Mag)

As you view this picture, keep in mind how this is cheered by the LGBT lunatics and left-wing nut jobs who literally endorse “beat downs” of women by hormone-enhanced transgenders, all in the name of “social justice.”

Also note that several girls forfeited the wrestling competition for fear of being permanently injured by Mack Beggs, who is obviously taking on the musculature and strength of a male wrestler.

Liberalism is rooted in insanity, cruelty and ultimately the systematic abuse of women

Liberalism is rooted in delusional thinking and unbounded insanity. The idea that hormone-doped-up “men” should be defeating high school girls on the wrestling mat while “winning” state championships could only make sense to a demented, mentally ill liberal. Yet this is precisely what the “Left Cult” believes.

Look at the photo above and ask yourself: Is this “equality” for a progressive society? Is this “social justice?” How many more women will be beaten on the mat — or in the gyms — in the name of transgenderism and LGBT conformity?

Will there even be any women remaining in sports after the LGBT crybullies get done taking over every institution across society? As PJ Media points out, “transgenderism continues to make a mockery of women’s sports.” That story describes a mediocre male volleyball player in Brazil who decided he wanted to be a “she.” Now, on the women’s volleyball teams, “she” is suddenly a superstar:

As PJ Media explains:

Joffre rightfully claims that “the acceptance of trans athletes into women’s sports signals the death knell of women’s sports… All we have now are human sports.” Of course, as he notes, the current phenomenon of trans athletes is only going one way. “No born women are becoming men and then excelling in men’s sports. But the opposite is happening. So we’re just going to end up with volleyball, and no natural women playing. We’re just going to end up with basketball, sprinting, whatever, and no natural women competing.”

Women cannot physically compete against men… Beyond just stealing opportunities from women, these men who are claiming to be women will be erasing real women from the record books. Eventually, at some point in the future, women are going to bemoan the fact that very few (if any) women are enshrined in the record books of sports. The people to blame for the suppression of female athletes are those who refer to themselves as feminists.

“Social justice” will ERASE the records of all real women from the sports record books

Now you know where this is all really headed. Welcome to the future of America if Leftists win elections and gain power. This is the crybully future that’s being deployed right now, where “wife beating” is applauded by the Left; where women have no bathroom privacy against male perverts pretending to be females; and where the Olympics is turned into an “obedience fest” of horrible athletes who are largely chosen because of their LGBT conformity rather than anything resembling competitive skills.

Thanks to LGBT insanity, a bunch of low-level male athletes can demand to be recognized as women, then they can clean up on the court — or on the mat — while stealing all the gold and rewriting all the record books, proclaiming to be “champion women” even while scratching their own biological balls in defiance of logic and reason. Thanks to feminism and LGBT insanity, there will soon be no place left for biological women to compete, meaning all women’s sports will be dominated by biological men in the name of “feminism.” (Yeah, I know, it’s complete lunacy, but that’s feminism: A movement that used to fight for women’s rights but now fights for biological men to beat up women in the name of “inclusiveness.”)

Did you notice how bad the U.S. athletes sucked at the Winter Olympics this year, even though they all said the right things about hating Trump and being sufficiently gay? That’s not a coincidence. The days of “merit-based” athletes are long gone in America, increasingly replaced by a priority for “social justice” and other forms of left-wing bulls##t parading around as “equality.” Sadly, America’s Olympics teams are going to be increasingly dominated by athletically-impaired “social justice warriors” who can’t compete with the merit-based athletes from other countries, where sports performance is the determining factor of who actually makes the team.

It truly won’t be long before America’s “women’s” teams will be full of hairy biological men wearing nut sack cups and sporting 26-inch biceps, while America’s “men’s” teams will be full of feminized, gayed-up sissies sporting designer skater blouses painted in harmonized unicorn rainbows.

It seems unethical to even partake in the watching of such a twisted spectacle. Mark down the Olympics as one more thing the Left has completely ruined for our world, on top of the NFL, Hollywood, Halloween and even “burrito day” at the student cafe. Now, the lunatic Left even says white girls aren’t allowed to practice yoga because that’s “cultural appropriation.” Following the Left’s lunatic logic, why can’t those white girls simply declare, “I’m Indian for the next hour” and do their yoga anyway?

Ultimately, liberalism is about making sure the LGBT mafia stomps on our heads forever, attempting to beat us all to the point of insanity where we no longer recognize biological reality. Once the delusional Left can convince everyone else to share in their dangerous delusions, they’ve WON. Be sure you don’t ever let that happen.

Share the following meme everywhere (and yes, the word “stamping” is correct, we checked it):

Read LeftCult.com for a daily dose of the sheer insanity of the deranged, lunatic Left and its LGBT mafia agenda.



Source Article from http://www.naturalnews.com/2018-02-27-this-one-disturbing-photo-perfectly-captures-the-social-justice-future-of-america-if-leftists-win.html