New Report Proposes The Government Should Pay Every Brit Under 55 £10,000


BLuke Miller Truth Theory

New report suggests the government should give everyone under 55 £10,000 regardless of employment status or current wealth.

The findings have come from The Royal Society for the encouragement of the Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA)  saying it could be the transition needed for everyone to eventually receive a state funded basic wage.

The idea proposes two seperate payments of £5,000 to be paid over a two year period. This would also result in other benefits and tax reliefs being removed.

RSA believe the incentive will support the way work and jobs will be changing during the 2020’s “as automation replaces many jobs, climate change hits and more people face balancing employment with social care”.

The money would be taken from a British sovereign wealth fund, and applicants would only have to explain how they plan to use the money.

Director of the RSA’s Action and Research Centre Anthony Painter has said: “The simple fact is that too many households are highly vulnerable to a shock in a decade of disruption, with storm clouds on the horizon if automation, Brexit and an ageing population are mismanaged.

Without a real change in our thinking, neither tweaks to the welfare state nor getting people into work alone, when the link between hard work and fair pay has broken, will help working people meet the challenges ahead.”

It is thought that the fund would help people who have not had time to pursue their passion: “A low-skilled worker might reduce their working hours to attain skills enabling career progression.” and “The fund could provide the impetus to turn an entrepreneurial idea into a reality. It could be the support that enables a carer to be there for a loved one.”

The BBC reports: The fund would be built from public debt, levies on untaxed corporate assets and investments in long term infrastructure projects, and be similar to Norway’s $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund.

As the dividends would replace payments such as Child Benefit, Tax Credits and Jobseeker’s Allowance, the savings for the government could also be ploughed into the fund.

A similar idea is currently being trialed in Finland were 2000 random unemployed people are all being given around £500 per month.

The idea also has roots in Alaska were since 1982 all residents are entitled to a yearly cash dividend taken from the Alaska Permanent Fund.

Scotland has 4 local authorities currently looking into the idea. And one hopeful US Democrat presidential nominee, David Yang is currently promoting his idea of a $1,000 a month “Freedom Dividend”.

A potential argument against would be- do we want a government being in control of so much of our finances which could be revoked at any time they decide? Although the main argument against it are that it would make people lazy and unmotivated. The arguments for it is the opposite, it will give people the opportunity to pursue their passions, without the fear they will not be able to survive.

Overall it sounds like an interesting incentive, let us know what you think, and please share this article.

Image Copyright: mkos83 / 123RF Stock Photo

I am Luke Miller the author of this article, and creator of Potential For Change. I like to blend psychology and spirituality to help you create more happiness in your life.Grab a copy of my free 33 Page Illustrated eBook- Psychology Meets Spirituality- Secrets To A Supercharged Life You Control Here

Source Article from https://truththeory.com/2018/02/16/new-report-proposes-government-pay-every-brit-55-10000/

Valentines Day: A Great Day To Show Love & Affection or Another Marketing Ploy We Should Boycott?



Next Story

It’s that time again – hearts, flowers, candy, cupid and enough lovey dovey stuff in your face to make you sick – yep, it’s Valentine’s Day. This is a holiday that can definitely bring up a lot of emotion for people, generally depending on their romantic relationship or, lack thereof. For many it is filled with high expectations – mainly from what we see in the media. Like, if there was one day out of the year for your partner to muster up all of the romance they can possibly produce, this is definitely the day to do it. And if they can’t? Well, then perhaps they failed at living up to the intense expectations that this holiday often portrays.

What if you are single? I won’t lie, in years past it has been slightly depressing because for the month leading up to this holiday and the day of, love and romance in your face everywhere you turn can remind you that you don’t have that special someone to cuddle up to and act like a total weirdo with… I feel that I never felt more alone than on the day when all of the coupled friends are busy celebrating their love for each other.

Where Did This Holiday Even Come From?

Like many Hallmark holidays, the story of how Valentine’s Day came to be is a strange one. According to NPR.com,

“From Feb. 13 to 15, the Romans celebrated the feast of Lupercalia. The men sacrificed a goat and a dog, then whipped women with the hides of the animals they had just slain.

The Roman romantics “were drunk. They were naked,” says Noel Lenski, a historian at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Young women would actually line up for the men to hit them, Lenski says. They believed this would make them fertile. The brutal fete included a matchmaking lottery, in which young men drew the names of women from a jar. The couple would then be, um, coupled up for the duration of the festival — or longer, if the match was right.

The ancient Romans may also be responsible for the name of our modern day of love. Emperor Claudius II executed two men — both named Valentine — on Feb. 14 of different years in the 3rd century A.D. Their martyrdom was honored by the Catholic Church with the celebration of St. Valentine’s Day. Later, Pope Gelasius I muddled things in the 5th century by combining St. Valentine’s Day with Lupercalia to expel the pagan rituals. But the festival was more of a theatrical interpretation of what it had once been. Lenski adds, “It was a little more of a drunken revel, but the Christians put clothes back on it. That didn’t stop it from being a day of fertility and love.

Around the same time, the Normans celebrated Galatin’s Day. Galatin meant “lover of women.” That was likely confused with St. Valentine’s Day at some point, in part because they sound alike.”

I told you, it was strange. But, how did this holiday become one that is celebrated almost religiously in so many Western cultures around the world? The works of Shakespeare and Chaucer romanticized Valentine’s Day, and it started to gain popularity in Britain and the rest of Europe, eventually making its way to the New World. With the industrial revolution in the 19th century came factory made cards. In 1913, Hallmark Cards of Kansas City began mass producing these cards and promoting this holiday and ever since, February 14th has never seen so much action.

Valentine’s Day, Today

Today, Valentine’s Day is a corporate money making machine, research provided by IBIS World says that sales on this day reached $17.6 billion last year, and sales for this year are expected to total $18.6 billion – cray.

So, Why Buy Into What We Know Is Just A Money Making Marketing Ploy?

As I’ve shared before, and you might remember from my previous articles my friends often say, “Alanna Ruins Everything” because I’m often full of facts that can take the fun out of things, but I strongly believe knowledge is power and I will not be silenced! When we have awareness of why we do the things we do and why things are a certain way we become empowered to then make our own decisions as to whether or not we want to participate in certain aspects of society. Believe it or not, we do have a choice, but without the awareness, we wouldn’t know any better. So! You like Valentine’s day? Think it’s fun? Like any excuse to show your love, dress up, go on a date or do something special with your significant other? Go for it! If you recognize that it is just a money making scheme, then you can choose to do with it as you wish.

I guess I will state the obvious here and say that we don’t need a special day of the year to show our love, and that things like presents really aren’t needed to show our love. This is a materialistic idea of love and unconditional love means loving no matter what, without expectation and regardless of how much romance your partner could muster up. Of course, these things are nice from time to time and in no way am I suggesting that we don’t show our love in this way, but it is important to observe why we do the things we do. Are we doing it out of obligation or because we genuinely want to?

Related CE Article: 5 Phrases More Important Than I love You

Single? Be Your Own Valentine

A couple of years ago I wrote an article, “Single This Valentine’s Day? Be Your Own Damn Valentine.” It was about the importance of loving ourselves first and foremost and how important it is to give yourself your love care and attention. I feel this is just as important today. This year, I am in a relationship after 3 years of being single, and guess what? We are going out for dinner, just for the fun of it. We are traveling and with each other daily so we basically just thought, meh, why not?

No matter what you decide to do – or not do – this Valentine’s Day, just remember to choose love, everyday.

Much Love


Get Your FREE In Depth Numerology Reading

Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.

With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.

Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.

×

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/bD-tabHGsdA/

Israeli right wing leaders–Israel should just ignore Trump on issue of settlement annexation

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,879 other followers

Source Article from https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/02/13/israeli-right-wing-leaders-israel-should-just-ignore-trump-on-issue-of-settlement-annexation/

This should end well: Delaware students can now choose their own race

Are they really going there? Yes, they apparently are. Too late for Rachel Dolezal, alas. Dolezal identifies as ‘transracial’ a belief that would have been affirmed if she were a Delaware student today

Rachel Dolezal

    

The state of Delaware is poised to adopt what is known as “Regulation 225.” Approved both by the Delaware State Education Association and Gov. John Carney, Regulation 225 would safeguard children’s “protected characteristics,” such as gender, age, race, sexual orientation and gender identity. Section 7.4(1) of 225’s Prohibition of Discrimination Code states, “All students enrolled in a Delaware public school may self-identify gender or race, which is maintained in the school.”

Gender isn’t news. But race? Are they really going there? Yes, they apparently are.

Too late for Rachel Dolezal, alas. Remember her? The Spokane, Wash., native became a media sensation in 2015 when she was outed as a white woman passing as black. Dolezal looked the part, with her dark skin and Afro-style hair. Come to think, in Delaware I guess nobody can say she was “passing” anymore. Dolezal identifies as “transracial” – that is, she believes she “is” black, and that belief would have been affirmed if she were a Delaware student today.

Dolezal claimed her identity was a direct analogy to that of a transgender person. She even compared herself to Caitlyn Jenner, who had transitioned around the same time as her story broke. As she said in an interview, “Gender is understood – we’ve progressed, we’ve evolved to understanding that gender is not binary. It’s not even biological. But what strikes me as so odd is that race isn’t biological either.”

On the face of it, that’s perfectly logical. If gender isn’t biologically linked, and it’s all about how you feel, then why not race? Trouble is of course, gender is linked to biology. Yes, gender dysphoria is a rare but real phenomenon. But the notion that gender is fluid, widespread and harmless is a theory promulgated by transactivists posing as scholars, and the theory has been bought as settled science by progressive pedagogues. Also bought by Dolezal, a woman sadly afflicted with an idiopathic dysphoria.

Viciously derided for “cultural appropriation” and “white privilege,” Dolezal calmly stuck to her guns. I felt a sneaking admiration for her, because her reasoning hoisted transgender theorists with their own petard. Of course black people were offended by her assertions, rightly so. But so are many lesbians and gay men offended by transactivists. They don’t feel the least bit gender fluid and they resist co-optation of their biology-based identities.

I have a chicken-and-egg theory about the whole trans phenomenon we are witnessing. It only took off in a big way when the chemical means became available to artificially mimic the opposite sex in self-presentation. In other words, the notion that one was born in the wrong body only became a social contagion when the look of the assumed identity could be approximated via medication. Certainly there were true gender dysphorics before the age of hormonal therapy, but they were stuck in their birth bodies. That’s not the case today. Chicken, egg.

Big Pharma must be pretty pleased with this upward trend, since kids who present as trans and are encouraged to transition will spend a lifetime on hormones. That’s nice for pharmaceutical companies specializing in hormones. At the moment, there isn’t a hormone for skin darkening. But what if there was? If I were an amoral Big Pharma executive, I would be asking myself what it would take to create a race “chicken,” a hormone-like easy-popping substance that turned your skin dark and kept it dark as long as you kept popping it. And one that, unlike cross-hormones, didn’t render you sterile.

Source Article from https://www.sott.net/article/377321-This-should-end-well-Delaware-students-can-now-choose-their-own-race

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki says Facebook should ‘get back to baby pictures’

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki

    

YouTube may be derided as full of cat videos, but as Facebook pushes aggressively into YouTube’s video turf, Susan Wojcicki says it should stick to baby pics.

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki won’t divulge her biggest fear about competing with Facebook, but she will give them some free advice.

“They should get back to baby pictures,” Wojcicki said Monday at the Code Media conference in Huntington Beach, California. (By the way, Facebook’s already aiming in that direction.)

Video has been an obsession for Facebook, as it tries to swipe the most advertising dollars migrating off television before YouTube can get them. Facebook has been aggressively advancing the number of clips and live streams that bubble up to the top of your News Feed and has rolled out a central hub for TV-like programming called Watch.

“You always have to take competition seriously. You don’t win by looking backwards; you win by looking at your customers and looking forward,” she said.

Facebook didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.

Also, Wojcicki said YouTube planned on Tuesday to roll out its Red subscription tier much wider internationally to about 100 countries, from the five where it operates now.

She also explained the rational behind allowing stars like Logan Paul — a digital star under fire for posting offensive videos to YouTube including one showing a suicide victim — to stay on the service. YouTube has a three-strikes rule, she said. That means creators can have their accounts terminated for three infractions against YouTube’s official policies. Paul hasn’t hit three strikes, Wojcicki said, noting it’s important for the company to enforce its rules consistently.

YouTube, the biggest video resource on the internet, has spent much of the last year battling against backlashes like the one against Paul. Ads running offensive clips spurred an advertiser boycott early last year, and when YouTube responded by more aggressively pulling ads off questionable content, it faced an outcry from creators who say they unfairly lost their money-making power. Whether it’s nightmarish clips slipping into its app for kids, and or channels that border on child exploitation, YouTube has been grappling with its ability to responsibly manage its vast scale.

Wojcicki said Monday that drawing a line about what’s appropriate to exist on YouTube is sensitive because “on one side is censorship and the other is too much freedom of speech.”

“This year we’ve been really focused on growing up,” she said.

Source Article from https://www.sott.net/article/377319-YouTube-CEO-Susan-Wojcicki-says-Facebook-should-get-back-to-baby-pictures

Sportswriter: NBC Should Censor Tony Dungy for Citing QB’s Christian Faith As Success Factor

There is a little doubt that a segment of the sports press and the public would prefer that athletes with conservative and Christian beliefs keep their views to themselves (but secular and leftist views are fine). This became evident after the Super Bowl, when one sportswriter and the Twitter mob strongly criticized NBC’s Tony Dungy, a Super Bowl-winning coach himself, for citing Philadelphia Eagle quarterback Nick Foles’ self-professed Christian faith as contributing to his success.

These people wanted — no, really expected — Dungy to not relay what Foles, the team’s backup quarterback until became its starter after Carson Wentz’s season-ending injury on December 10, told him about his mindset ahead of the big game.

But that’s part of Dungy’s job, so he did:

TonyDungySuperBowlFoles3on020618

Oh my. Foles cited the Lord, and Dungy told everyone. Pass the smelling salts.

After harsh initial criticism, Dungy responded early Tuesday:

TonyDungySuperBowlFoles1on020618

Note that Dungy (and Foles) are both mature enough not to claim that the Eagles’ victory was God’s will, or that Foles won because he might be a stronger Christian that New England Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady, as one unhinged Twitter critic charged. Dungy simply believed Foles’ “Christian faith would allow him to play with confidence.”

Dungy was on the Foles bandwagon weeks ago. While many sportswriters thought that Wentz’s injury had sealed the Eagles’ doom, Dungy predicted: “Nick Foles will play well. The NFC Championship Game will be in Philly.”

Dungy posted a further response later Tuesday morning:

TonyDungySuperBowlFoles2on020618

Those statements were too much for Kyle Koster, a Senior Writer at The Big Lead, to handle.

Late Tuesday morning, Koster wrote that Dungy “should be checked,” i.e., muzzled (h/t Daily Caller):

… it would be naive to think Dungy trumpeting the benefits of faith is something being done from a distance while only wearing an analyst’s hat.

…. His long history of evangelizing must be weighed.

In other words, if you evangelize on your own time, anything you say as a sports analyst will receive greater scrutiny, because, well, we’ve got to make sure that “evangelizing” doesn’t occur on the air.

Dungy, a very public and proud Christian, pushed a narrative favorable to Christianity that may or may not be true

Dungy expressing his beliefs on his personal time and platform is one thing. … But when his beliefs seep into his analyst role — either unintentionally or otherwise — they should be checked, both by NBC and the public.

No, Mr. Koster. All Dungy did is tell the public what Foles told him and compliment his play. Koster clearly believes that a sports journalist shouldn’t be allowed to do that if icky Christianity is involved, and that NBC and “the public” should stop someone who tries. This is the same mindset possessed by broadcasters who routinely censor athletes thanking God for their success after games.

Koster’s hostility also came through in a separate Wednesday tweet: “Nick Foles was a Christian when he wasn’t very good at football, too.”

How pathetic.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Source Article from https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2018/02/08/sportswriter-wants-nbc-censor-tony-dungy-reporting-eagles-qb-cited

How They Do It– ‘Why Poland’s New Holocaust law should terrify everyone’

Many Communist Polish Jews and other Communist Poles joined the Russians in their savage attacks on German women and young girls, raping and mutilating them to death in ways typical of the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia following the 1917 Jewish terrorist takeover of Russia following which the Jews savagely murdered 66 million Christians there.

We never ever hear of the Bengali holocaust of up to 4.5 million caused by Churchill, the Ukrainian holocaust of 10 million self-admittedly caused by Stalin, the Russian holocaust of scores of millions of Christians caused by Trotsky and Lenin et al, we only hear the fake and impossible Jewish holocaust of 6 million that is publicised whenever the Jewish-controlled MSM reports on any war crimes, and it is thoroughly sickening.

The fact that the falsely-alleged Jewish holocaust of 6 million is featured literally daily on national TV, not only by ‘documentaries’, but also in war films falsely acknowledging the fake holocaust of Jews. but no other holocaust ones that really took place, means that WWII is still on, and that whatever they wanted to accomplish by WWI is still being worked on, bizarre almost beyond belief, yet the reality is that this fake war propaganda is still being hammered into us daily nonetheless. It is obviously part of the JWO NWO program to take over the entire world by first numbing everyone with an induced sense of guilt for something that never occurred, so that we will always say sorry and never dare to criticize them for all the horrors the Jews themselves continue to inflict, like in Palestine in the Gaza Strip.

Personally, I see that the real reason they keep relentlessly stuffing us with this falsehood about their ‘holocaust’ of 6 million Jews is precisely because that makes it uttterly unthinkable for anyone then to be able to say that the Jews themselves have caused several major holocausts, the 50 million dead gentiles in WWI that they caused, the 60 million dead gentiles in WWII that they caused, the 66 million Christian gentiles dead in the misnomered Russian ‘Revolution’ that they caused, the holocaust of 100 million Chinese in Mao-Tse-Tung’s largely Jewish- infuenced Communist regime that they caused, and so on, but as always, we hear in response to any claims we may make of these things, accompanied by very pained and anguished expressions on the faces of anyone we may raise these issues with, “but you can never say that it did not happen, I have seen the photographs”, and “you can never day it was right, it is never right to kill, as if it still really happened, you can never get through to these people.

They act as if it is still the case that only the Jews have died, as if the 6 million (falsely-alleged deaths) of Jews in WWII are somehow of vastly greater importance in comparison to several hundred million actually dead gentiles, and those gentiles intended to be killed under the Noahide Laws, which number 6 billion. which itself, I know sounds a highly unlikely and even impossible figure, so impossible as to warrant being completey ignored, yet the Jewish rabbis themselves are quite literally making verbal statements today stating that to kill all so-called ‘idolatrous’ gentiles is quite literally what they intend, and they do number around 6 billion when you add up the total devotees in the various religions that will be affected, yet STILL, it is wrong to blalme the Jews they say, and they insist that the holocaust of Jews really happened and that it was the worst tragedy ever, so they are obviously under a suicidal state of hypnosis, quite unable to rouse themselves from their deep inner paralysis whilst their own peoples are literally destroyed by one means or another by the Jews all around them.

But the ‘holocaust’ of 6 million Jews never ever occurred, they have tried to assert this falsehood over and over again, the 4 billion Jews burned alive in their own Torah scrolls by the Romans, the 6 million near death or dying in Russia, and in another instance in Poland, well before Germany. The Jews use these lies as a weapon, to disable the possibility of any dissent against their ongoing programs that are destroying our societies in many western countries today, using their purposely- created and conditioned ‘refugee’ bioweapons.

Most negroe men that I see with white women today, and there are a lot, seem almost always to be going out with pretty blonde caucasian women, some obviously impossibly with money that must have been earned fom dealing crack and so on, as if to make a statement ‘I can do this now, I have the right, this is my trophy bitch, and I am taking the best of your blonde-haired, blue-eyed devil women to have sex with, right in your face, and you can’t have her, and all I had to do to get her was to drug her with crack’, and they are thinking of not only taking the white man’s women, they are thinking ahead, they don’t want a white woman with black hair, they want their children to get ahead in a white man’s world, so they aim, very craftily, to produce kids with sandy-coloured hair, not black hair.

“Even the best of non-Jews should all be killed,” says the Jewish Talmud. And that is not taken out of context, becuase when put together with the statement in the Zohar, that ‘the Lord in his wrath will kill all gentiles in the world’, that statement means that ALL gentiles are to be killed, after many of our numbers have first been enslaved by one means or another and made to manufacture the weapons to accomplish that with of course, and the DARPA humanoid robots intended to be perfected in 20 years time will be perfect servants for the Jews to use once we ourselves have all been removed from this world, likely also by those same robots, if any of are still left alive after the other Jewish programs that are intended for our destruction, like the nuclear weapons, all of them invented without any exception by Jews, and those DARPA humanoid robots will be able to self-replicate at an exponential rate, making us utterly and completely redundant and unneccessary in this world, as the Jewish scriptures state that gentiles were only created to serve the Jews, so when they no longer have any need for us, we will without the slightest doubt, all be physically annihilated, to leave the Jews to enjoy ‘their’ world, in their intended Pax Judaica.

Source Article from https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/02/07/how-they-do-it-why-polands-new-holocaust-law-should-terrify-everyone/

9 Reasons Why You Should Only Cook With Cast Iron Pans

Iron cookware has been with us for thousands of years….since the dawn of the Iron Age. It fell out of favour in the second half of the 20th century with the successful marketing of synthetic coatings for convenience. Cooking in cast iron is known to greatly increase the dietary source of iron. This is especially true when cooking foods high in acid, such as tomato based sauces.

The body needs iron because it is used in the blood. It is what carries oxygen from the lungs via the bloodstream to the rest of the body. It has been estimated that only 65 – 70% of Americans get enough iron.

9 Benefits of Cast Iron Cooking

Cheap

Cast iron remains some of the most inexpensive cookware on the market. A brand new 10 inch cast iron skillet is a mere $25 . On the other end of the spectrum, a quality heavy-bottomed stainless steel pan that same size will run you over $100.

Long lasting

Cast iron lasts a really long time, often passed down from one generation to the next. Old and worn pieces can be refurbished with a little scrubbing, making this a great eco-friendly option.

Avoid Toxic Fumes

Replacing a non-stick skillet with a cast iron one allows you to avoid the toxic fumes that accompany most non-stick cookware. Cast iron can also replace aluminum cookware, which may also pose health hazards.

Even Cooking Temperature

Cast iron pans are noticeably hefty and their weight is part of their magic, allowing them to hold heat longer than most other pans. This works well, whether you’re searing a steak at a high temp, or simmering a stew on low. If you don’t have the most reliable stove, a cast iron pan can help prevent you from accidentally burning dinner.

It is nonstick

Surprisingly, a preheated cast iron skillet rivals the qualities of non-stick cookware, as long as it is properly seasoned and cared for. You can quickly move up this short learning curve by talking with employees at your local cookware store or by reading a book or Internet article about cast iron care.

You can use less oil

A well-seasoned pan is virtually non-stick, which means you can use less oil in your recipes, cutting down on the fat where desired.

Healthy

Emits small amounts of iron into your food, adding needed nutrients that boost energy and help strengthen the immune system. Totally chemical free.

Easy to clean

One of the most popular benefits of cast iron pans is that they are easy to clean. They don’t require soap and food lifts up off of the pan easily.

It’s emergency-ready

You can use cast iron over any heating source, so even in a natural disaster, you’ve got a way to cook your food even over a fire.

Sources:

blackdoctor.org

huffingtonpost.ca

naturalnewsblogs

Source Article from https://worldtruth.tv/9-reasons-why-you-should-only-cook-with-cast-iron-pans/

Anonymous: This Shocking Footage Should Worry You

Anonymous is the most famous ‘hacktivist’ group in the world. The informal nature of the group makes its mechanics difficult to define. Subsequently, without a formal organizational hierarchy, it’s difficult to explain Anonymous to the general public and the media. In this article, I’ll explain the history of the group, and offer some clarity on what’s misunderstood about them.

‘Hacktivist’ is a portmanteau of ‘hacker’ and ‘activist’. When people have technical skills, have access to the Internet, and understand how network infrastructure and servers work, it can be tempting to put that knowledge into having some effect on the world. The ‘activist’ part of ‘hacktivist’ means that they don’t do their hacking and cracking without a cause.

The various people behind Anonymous worldwide are united in a belief that corporations and organizations they consider to be corrupt should be attacked. If you’re an administrator for a network that has little reason to be a target for social activists, your network and servers are unlikely to become a target for Anonymous.

If for some reason you believe your network might become a target, I recommend testing it for handling DDoS attacks, as that’s the most common method Anonymous uses to bring down web servers.

Not all of Anonymous’ activities involve attacking networks or websites. Anonymous has also been active in initiating public protests. But the web and IRC channels are the lifeblood of the group. If it weren’t for the Internet, Anonymous would’ve never existed.

Source Article from https://worldtruth.tv/anonymous-this-shocking-footage-should-worry-you/