5 Fast Facts You Need To Know About The Tennessee Waffle House Shooting

shootingshooting

UPDATE: The Metropolitan Nashville Police Department confirmed that Reinking was arrested around 2 p.m. Eastern on Monday after he was found in a wooded area near Old Hickory Blvd. and Hobson Pk. Officers searched the area after they received a tip that a laptop bag containing “a handwritten ID card bearing the name Travis Reinking” was found on the side of the road nearby.

Antioch, TN – Reports of an early morning shooting at a Waffle House turned into a statewide manhunt as police searched for the suspect who killed four people and injured two others.

Here are five fast facts you need to know about the shooting:

1) The shooter was on the run for more than 24 hours before he was caught

The suspected gunman has been identified as Travis Reinking, 29, from Morton, Illinois. His record consists of a number of encounters with police, which included an interview with the FBI last year.

Reinking was reportedly mostly naked when he entered a Waffle House in the Nashville suburb of Antioch around 3:30 a.m. on Sunday, and he fled the scene wearing only a green jacket. The Metropolitan Nashville Police Department confirmed on Monday morning that its officers are working with a SWAT team to search for Reinking and “there have been no credible sightings” since he was last seen behind his apartment complex Sunday morning.

2) The shooter claimed he was suicidal because Taylor Swift was stalking him, and his family began calling police in 2016

Reinking has a history of mental health issues, and law enforcement was well aware of his past delusions. He became obsessed with the idea that Taylor Swift was stalking him in 2014, and according to reports, he told his family that he believed she had hacked his phone and his Netflix account.

His family was so concerned that they called police five times starting in May 2016 to report that Reinking was suicidal because he believed he was being stalked by Swift. Reinking told police that he went to Nashville because it was where Swift started her music career and he tried to confront her in person “in an attempt to get her to stop harassing him.”

3) The shooter was interviewed by the FBI and had his guns seized after he was arrested at the White House in 2017

Reinking was arrested by Secret Service agents when he was caught entering a restricted area of the White House during a trip to Washington D.C. in July 2017. While officials claimed there was no evidence at the time to show that he posed a danger to himself or others, and the misdemeanor charge of “unlawful entry” was dismissed after he completed community service, the incident led to an investigation by the FBI.

After conducting an interview with Reinking, the FBI ordered police to confiscate his guns and his firearms licenses were revoked. The local sheriff acknowledged that Reinking clearly suffers from mental health issues, and police let his father take possession of the guns as long as he promised to “keep the weapons secure and out of the possession of Travis.” It appears that Reinking once again gained access to an AR-15, which is the weapon he reportedly used in the shooting at the Waffle House.

4) A Tennessee congressman used the shooting to call for gun control less than 5 hours after it happened 

Within hours of the shooting, before the families of the victims had time to process the loss of their loved ones, politicians were already using the incident to call for gun control. Rep. Jim Cooper, a Democratic congressman from Tennessee, took to Twitter to insist that “now is the time to discuss change.”

While Reinking’s record shows that he was clearly on police radar, he has a history of mental health issues, he was interviewed by the FBI, and his legal access to guns was already revoked, Cooper claimed that “widespread civilian access to military-grade assault weapons” needs to be stopped.

5) The shooter was stopped by a heroic man who grabbed his gun 

While the name Travis Reinking has made headlines as police search for the naked, mentally ill man, there is another name that should be remembered: James Shaw Jr. He is the man who confronted the shooter and ended the bloodshed, and his bravery saved countless lives.

Shaw Jr. rushed Reinking, grabbed the barrel of his AR-15 and pulled it out of the shooter’s hands. Shaw then threw the gun over the Waffle House Counter and pushed Reinking out of the door. He told the Tennessean that the minor wounds he sustained from a bullet that grazed his arm were worth it because he feared he would never be able to see his 4-year-old daughter again.

“I distinctively remember thinking that he is going to have to work for this kill. I had a chance to stop him and thankfully I stopped him,” Shaw Jr. said. “I grabbed the gun and kept it down. He had one hand on it. I pulled it away and threw it over the bar.”

DASH cryptocurrency and The Free Thought Project have formed a partnership that will continue to spread the ideas of peace and freedom while simultaneously teaching people how to operate outside of the establishment systems of control like using cryptocurrency instead of dollars. Winning this battle is as simple as choosing to abstain from the violent corrupt old system and participating in the new and peaceful system that hands the power back to the people. DASH is this system.

DASH digital cash takes the control the banking elite has over money and gives it back to the people. It is the ultimate weapon in the battle against the money changers and information controllers.

If you’d like to start your own DASH wallet and be a part of this change and battle for peace and freedom, you can start right here. DASH is already accepted by vendors all across the world so you can begin using it immediately.

Source Article from https://thefreethoughtproject.com/5-fast-facts-you-need-to-know-about-the-tennessee-waffle-house-shooting/

Suspect in Ocala, Florida school shooting: ‘I want to be put away’

As students around the country rallied against gun violence on Friday, one student was injured in a shooting at a Florida high school. The suspect spoke to local NBC reporter Matt Lupoli.

Watch TV shows, movies and more on Yahoo View.

About NBC Nightly News

Watch “NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt,” providing reports and analysis of the day’s most newsworthy national and international events. See More

Check out more stuff on Yahoo View

Source Article from https://www.yahoo.com/news/suspect-ocala-florida-school-shooting-162346592.html

Shooting at Florida high school injures 1 student

Panic and fear gripped another Florida school Friday when a gunman opened fire, wounding one student before being taken into custody on a day planned for a national classroom walkout to protest gun violence, authorities said.

It happened Friday morning at Forest High School, which was put on lockdown, the Marion County Sheriff’s Office reported. The wounded student, a 17-year-old boy, was taken to a local hospital for treatment of a non-life threatening injury to his ankle.

Some students and teachers piled desks and filing cabinets against classroom doors as a makeshift barricade.

Police initially said the 19-year-old suspect is also a student at the school, but later said he was a former student not currently enrolled. No charges were immediately announced. The sheriff’s office said no other schools in the county were under any threat.

The Ocala shooting comes just over two months after a gunman killed 17 people and wounded 17 others at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Nikolas Cruz, 19, faces the death penalty if convicted in that Valentine’s Days shooting.

The shooting also coincided with a nationwide student walkout to protest gun violence on the anniversary of the 1999 massacre at Colorado’s Columbine High School. The Ocala school had planned its version of a walkout, students said. (AP)

See more news-related photo galleries and follow us on Yahoo News Photo Twitter and Tumblr.

Source Article from https://www.yahoo.com/news/shooting-florida-high-school-injures-slideshow-wp-185113989.html

Alex Jones, backtracking in the face of crippling lawsuit now says Sandy Hook shooting did happen

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,917 other followers

Source Article from https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/alex-jones-backtracking-in-the-face-of-crippling-lawsuit-now-says-sandy-hook-shooting-did-happen/

Israeli Killer Soldiers Cheer Shooting Palestinian for Target Practice

Israeli Killer Soldiers Cheer Shooting Palestinian for Target Practice



by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)



The self-styled “world’s most moral army” is comprised of brainwashed youths, trained from childhood to hate Arabs – abusing and killing them OK, they’re taught.



Rogue state Israel has been governed by ruthless Ziofascist thugs from inception to today. 



It shows in how deplorably Palestinians are treated, their fundamental rights and welfare ignored.



On Monday, a video broadcast on Israeli television showed an IDF sniper shooting an unarmed, defenseless Gazan, the images shared on social media.



The incident happened weeks earlier. Military officials confirmed its authenticity.



A soldier in the video is heard asking: “Do you have a bullet in the barrel? Is it on him?”



Another soldier is heard saying “I can’t see because of the wire. There’s a little boy there.” The sniper opens fire, hitting a Palestinian. 



In legitimate tribunals, it’s called assault with a deadly weapon – if someone killed, it’s first degree murder.



Cries of enthusiasm followed shooting, one soldier saying “Wow, what a video! Yes! Son of a bitch.”



“What a video…Run and get him out of there. Of course I filmed it. Wow! Someone was hit in the head. What a legendary video. He flew in the air. Get out, you sons of bitches.”



Joint (Arab) List MK Jamal Zahalka denounced the cold-blooded shooting, saying it shows how “Israeli snipers killed unarmed Palestinian protesters in cold blood who were participating in a non-violent protest.”



They perform what they’re taught to do, Palestinian lives and welfare of no consequence.



Israeli officials defend cold-blooded shootings. Islamophobe minister Naftali Bennett said “(a)nyone who was ever on the battlefield knows that to sit in Tel Aviv or (television) studios and judge IDF soldiers according to their comments, when they are busy defending our borders, is not something serious.”



Extremist minister Gilad Erdan added “(w)as it so boring in this country over the last day that this video needs to receive such exposure?” 



“To take a situation from the battlefield, when soldiers are under stress and explosive devices are being thrown at them and attempts are being made to infiltrate, and to take their human response and judge them from the armchairs in Tel Aviv? No country in the world does such a thing.”



Palestinians shot in cold blood threatened no one. These type incidents are common in Israel by soldiers and other security forces – in America as well by killer cops nationwide.



Extremists running Israel call shooting Palestinians OK. Following mass shootings of Palestinians with live fire on two successive Fridays, Netanyahu and defense minister Lieberman praised the actions of soldiers.



Israel flagrantly violates international law with impunity. As an occupying power, it’s obligated to protect the lives, rights, welfare and health of Palestinians – a core responsibility it spurned for the past half century.



In response to B’Tselem urging Israeli soldiers to disobey orders to shoot Gazan demonstrators, Lieberman called for a criminal probe on the organization, saying:



“I take a serious view of this attempt to sow fear and division among IDF fighters and commanders at a time when the IDF is protecting Israel’s southern border from Hamas sabotage and provocations.”



B’Tselem responded calling an investigation of its righteous remarks “unwarranted and baseless,” repeating its “appeal to Israeli soldiers to refuse to abide by patently unlawful orders to use lethal force against unarmed protesters in Gaza.”



VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.



My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”



http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html


Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/238142-2018-04-11-israeli-killer-soldiers-cheer-shooting-palestinian-for-target-practice.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

MSNBC Covers Black Police Shooting Victim 10-1 Over White Victim; CNN 2.5-1

As the dominant news media inform viewers of controversial police shooting cases in which there is debate about whether the officers acted lawfully, there has been a blatant double standard in spending substantially more time on victims who are black, even though blacks only make up a little more than one out of four suspects who are killed by police, with whites outnumbering blacks in the count by 2:1.

An examination of recent CNN, MSNBC, and FNC coverage of the aftermath of black shooting victim Stephon Clark in Sacramento, contrasted with the aftermath of white victim Justine Damond in Minneapolis from July 2017, finds that MSNBC has spent almost 10 times as much time on the Clark case while CNN has spent about 2.5 as much time.

FNC was closer to being balanced as it devoted about 22 percent more time to the aftermath of the Damond case, versus that of the Clark case.

Similarly, going back to the Philando Castile shooting from July 2016, when it was announced in November 2016 that charges would be pursued against the officer involved, CNN and MSNBC both updated viewers, with CNN providing more than 27 minutes worth of updates, while MSNBC gave it about 2 minutes 25 seconds.

But, when it was announced in March 2018 that charges would be pursued against the officer in the Damond case, CNN only provided a total of 56 seconds as the story was buried in two news briefs during the Early Start show, one of which aired on March 21 and the other on March 22, airing around 4:20 a.m. ET on both days. This means CNN actually devoted 29 times as much time to the charges in the Castile case in contrast with the Damond case — even though both cases raised serious questions about the behavior of the officer involved, and even happened in the same geographic area.

MSNBC did not update viewers on the Damond story at all. FNC did not run updates after charges were filed in either the Castile story from November 2016, or the Damond case in March 2018, as it awaited the final outcome of the Castile story before revisiting it.

An examination of MSNBC shows in recent weeks that run between 5:00 a.m. and midnight ET finds that the Clark story received just over 235 minutes, while the Damond case received almost 24 minutes in later part of July.

And on CNN, the shows that air between 4:00 a.m. and midnight ET gave stories about Clark, including the protests in Sacramento, just over 272 minutes in recent weeks, whereas the Damond story was given about 109 minutes in late July.

And, in the time period between 4:00 a.m. and midnight ET, FNC spent almost 70 minutes on Clark, and just over 85 minutes on Damond.

The dominant media’s disproportionate fixation on police shooting victims who are black creates the illusion that nearly all victims are black, and implicitly suggests widespread racism by police officers, even though statistics show that white suspects shot and killed by cops outnumber black suspects by about a 2-1 margin. According to the Washington Post, around 27 percent of police shooting victims are black, and, if one looks at FBI crime statistics from the past several years, including those compiled by the Obama administration Justice Department, the numbers are not wildly inconsistent with patterns of crime.

Such selective coverage has helped lead to public figures like CNN’s April Ryan and veteran singer Harry Belafonte wrongly claiming that police shooting victims are mostly black.

Any police shooting should be taken seriously by those who are responsible for making sure officers are acting appropriately, and cases where there is serious room for debate about whether deadly force was necessary, or whether unnecessary mistakes were made, are worthy of some level media attention. But it is also important not to make Americans of any race unreasonably fearful of police officers, or to incite demonization of law enforcement.

Source Article from https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/brad-wilmouth/2018/04/09/msnbc-covers-black-police-shooting-victim-10-1-over-white-victim

5 Compelling Reasons Why The Youtube Shooting Has Disappeared From Headlines

Rachel Blevins–Breaking news alerts announcing reports of a shooting at YouTube’s headquarters quickly faded from the spotlight and out of the news cycle—and there are a number of imperative reasons why the rampage initiated by a woman who injured three people and then killed herself, has not been used to push the mainstream’s media obsession with gun control.

Here are 5 compelling reasons why the YouTube shooting has disappeared from headlines:

1. As a woman, a peaceful vegan, and a PETA advocate, the suspected shooter is the opposite of the typical “mass shooter” profile promoted by the mainstream media.

When the suspected shooter was identified as Nasim Najafi Aghdam—a 39-year-old woman attempting to carry out a mass shooting when the overwhelming majority of mass shooting suspects are typically men in their early 20s, it may have seemed as though she would actually receive more media attention than most.

However, Aghdam does not appear to have been a white supremacist, a crazy conspiracy theorist, or a religious cult member. Instead, she was a vegan YouTube content creator with a long list of bizarre videos and a passion for animal rights. Despite being Iranian-American, which would excite neocons who are hungry for war with Iran, it does not appear that Aghdam had a political motive or was affiliated with any terrorist groups.

2. The shooter reportedly used a handgun, which also deviates from the mainstream narrative that all mass shooters use high-powered rifles.

Aghdam’s weapon of choice was a 9mm Smith & Wesson handgun, which she purchased legally in January. While Bloomberg attempted to blame Smith & Wesson by noting that the company’s AR-15 was the gun used in the Parkland shooting, the fact is that the weapon Aghdam used does not fit the narrative of dangerous firearms pushed by the mainstream media.

To attempt to ban a 9mm handgun would be almost impossible, but to attempt to ban a firearm that has been demonized and referred to as an “assault rifle” used in a number of mass shootings, is something the media has been working towards for years. While it is estimated that more than 8 million Americans own AR-15’s, it has not stopped the mainstream media from openly calling for a ban on “assault rifles” and attempting to explain Why the AR-15 keeps appearing at America’s deadliest mass shootings.”

3. The shooting happened in California—a state that has already enacted some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation.

When a mass shooting occurs, one of the first things the mainstream media and gun control advocates tend to do—after blaming the weapon—is to look at the location where the shooting took place and how that state’s gun laws can be tightened to prevent another attack.

In this case, the shooting happened in San Bruno, California, which already has some of the strictest gun laws in the United States. As a “May Issue” state, California issues concealed handgun permits to individuals at the discretion of the local sheriff, and restrictions can be based on where that permit can be used in the state itself. California also requires all guns to be registered, and it does not honor permits from any other states.

4. The police were warned about the shooting by the suspect’s father in advance, and they did nothing—something the media tends to cover up.

One day before Nasim Aghdam entered YouTube’s headquarters and opened fire on innocent employees, her father contacted police to report that she was missing, and warned that she may be planning an attack on YouTube. Ismail Aghdam said “she was angry” because YouTube “stopped everything” in terms of monetizing her videos, and he warned police that his daughter may be trying to attack YouTube because she “hated” the company.

While police reportedly found Nasim Aghdam sleeping in a car at 2 a.m. on the morning of the shooting, it is not clear why greater surveillance measures were not taken at YouTube’s headquarters, or how long the attack lasted before Aghdam took her own life and police arrived at the scene.

5. The shooter blamed YouTube for censoring and demonetizing her videos—a problem alternative content creators experience on a daily basis that mainstream media tries to pretend doesn’t exist.

As her father noted, Nasim Aghdam was overwhelmingly angry with YouTube for demonetizing her videos and she believed that the platform was intentionally censoring her work. On her website, Aghdam wrote, “There is no free speech in the real world and you will be suppressed for telling the truth that is not supported by the system. Videos of targeted users are filtered and merely relegated so that people can hardly see their videos.”

While most content creators who have had their channels demonetized by the giant platform would never dream of going to its headquarters and attacking innocent employees, the fact is that YouTube does have a serious ongoing problem.

As The Free Thought Project has reported, while YouTube has ignored ISIS recruiting videos, it has chosen to label videos that show the United States committing war crimes, conducting airstrikes that kill innocent civilians and aiding the enemies it claims to be fighting as “extremist content” that is banned from the site.

The platform has also started openly targeting smaller channels by demonetizing them and removing the incentive for the creators to continue to attempt to grow their channels.

While there is no way to defend Nasim Aghdam’s actions, there are a number of glaring reasons why the shooting she carried out has been blacklisted by the mainstream media, as it does not fit the typical narrative and can hardly be used to rally against one race or religion, or to call for increased gun control.

Source Article from http://govtslaves.info/2018/04/5-compelling-reasons-why-the-youtube-shooting-has-disappeared-from-headlines/

BREAKING: Active shooting at YouTube headquarters “Gun-free zone” fails yet again, mysteriously…

Mike Adams–An armed gunwoman has opened fire inside the YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California, multiple news sources are reporting. NOTE: This post may be updated as new facts unfold. Check back often…

According to CNBC, the shooter was female, and she is now dead. Multiple casualties have been reported, and local hospitals are reporting receiving those casualties. It is not yet known how many are injured or dead, but hospitals are reportedly expecting “four to five patients,” Stanford Health Care told CNBC.

This comes on the exact same day, by the way, that I unleashed a tweetstorm against YouTube for censoring my entire content channel without justification or explanation. It now appears that tweetstorm will go nowhere, since many of the people who could potentially respond to such requests were apparently busy ducking behind cover and barricading themselves in their cubicles. The reason I even mention this is because no doubt some left-wing media lunatic (previously known as “journalists”) will try to link the shooting with my tweetstorm activism effort, since the only thing they know how to publish is fake news that maliciously attacks responsible citizens who own firearms.

There are four possible explanations for the motivation of the shooter, see below:

Four possible motivations for the shooting

As explained in my emergency broadcast podcast, above, there are four possible motivations for this shooting:

Possibility #1) ISIS terrorism – The dishonest left-wing media fails to report this, but ISIS has openly called for attacks on social media technology providers such as Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

Possibility #2) False flag operation to blame gun owners – To help push the “gun ban” narrative that’s now being desperately regurgitated by the anti-freedom left-wing media, a false flag operation could easily be plotted and carried out that would link the shooter to conservative organizations like the NRA or InfoWars. Note that the FBI routinely plots terrorism attacks all across the United States and even helps would-be terrorists nearlycarry them out.

Possibility #3) Disgruntled YouTube employee / personal reasons – As I’ve stated on the record many times, YouTube employees are evil people engaged in an evil empire of censorship and oppression. It would not surprise me at all if some of those evil people started turning on each other in fits of uncontrolled violence. This is what happens when you surround yourself with evil people who despise freedom, truth and the right to self-defense. It also makes me wonder how many lives might have been saved if YouTube employees were allowed to carry concealed firearms in their own defense. But no, they “hate” guns, and so some of them die in a hail of bullets, utterly defenseless but apparently committed to their own self-destructive false beliefs. It would have only taken one competent employee with a concealed carry firearm to stop the shooter, but apparently guns are not allowed in the hands of law-abiding workers at Google / YouTube. Only criminals get to carry them there, it seems.

Possibility #4) Disgruntled video content owner who got banned by YouTube – It’s well known that YouTube recently banned firearms videos, instantly terminating thousands of firearms video channels. This is on top of the widespread demonetization attack YouTube has been waging on conservative channels since the Trump victory in 2016. With YouTube destroying the livelihoods of so many people and censoring their First Amendment speech rights, is it possible that one of those individuals who was harmed by YouTube may have snapped and “gone postal” against YouTube employees?

It’s just speculation at this point, of course, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility. It makes me wonder what else might unfold as YouTube continues to wage war against half the American people who have valuable, conservative views to share online. It also brings up the question: How will YouTube react if this was a revenge shooting? Will they ban all women, given that the woman was a shooter? Will they ban all white people if the shooter was white? Will YouTube become a left-wing libtard echo chamber of self-reinforced stupidity and irrational social justice regurgitation? Probably. It’s almost there already.

Here are some photos from the scene:

Source Article from http://govtslaves.info/2018/04/breaking-active-shooting-at-youtube-headquarters-gun-free-zone-fails-yet-again-mysteriously/

YouTube employees suddenly find themselves on the front lines of a shooting war that they started via censorship and oppression of speech


Image: YouTube employees suddenly find themselves on the front lines of a shooting war that they started via censorship and oppression of speech

(Natural News)
A shooting at the YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California, turned out to be the work of an angry Youtuber who was censored and demonetized by YouTube, after which she sought to murder YouTube employees in an act of revenge. See the full details about Nasim Aghdam / Nasima Sabz at this link.

Nasim Aghdam was no typical “shooter.” She was a left-wing Farsi-speaking vegan into auras, fitness and the vegan food pyramid. On her website, she railed against YouTube for censoring her channel and reducing her earnings — something YouTube has deliberately done to tens of thousands of content channels, including my own now-terminated channel, “TheHealthRanger” (which was terminated without warning or justification).

As this event first began to unfold, I immediately wondered, “Is this a revenge shooting from someone whose content channel was banned by YouTube?” At first, the media reported this was some deranged girlfriend targeting her boyfriend who worked at YouTube, but as more facts have emerged, that doesn’t seem to be the case at all. This was, we now know, the first known case of a censored Youtuber escalating the war on free speech into a kinetic response (i.e. an attempted mass shooting).

YouTube is an evil corporation that’s censoring many voices of reason, truth and liberty… and now YouTube employees find themselves on the front lines of a shooting war

YouTube, you see, is on a tyrannical censorship crusade to silence all independent voices. Even Nasim Aghdam, as crazy as she may be in other ways, saw that she was being systematically censored by YouTube to silence her views (which, granted, may have been a little twisted, but if she had simply been allowed to vent on a public video channel, she would have had no reason to seek revenge against YouTube in the first place). As she posted on her own website:

As more and more people are coming to realize, this systematic censorship of freedom of expression by YouTube is an act of war against the freedom to speak, as it violates the first and most important divine right set out in the Bill of Rights: Freedom of Speech. As with all such acts of war, it will eventually spawn repercussions from those whose lives are being adversely affected (or even ruined) by YouTube’s assault on free speech. This is precisely what we witnessed today with the YouTube shooting. It’s not excuse for the shooting, of course, but rather an attempt to try to understand the mental state and twisted justifications of the shooter herself. The important thing to realize is that she’s probably not alone in her convictions.

Although I never endorse the use of violence to resolve such conflicts, it is worth noting that in an age when YouTube is engaged in massive information warfare and censorship to defraud the United States, steal the election and overthrow our Constitutional Republic, sooner or later someone is likely to escalate that war into a kinetic phase. (Visit YouTubeCensorship.com for more coverage of evil YouTube and its war against freedom and human rights…)

Now that exact event has unfolded before our eyes. And I fear it won’t be the last we see…

YouTube employees suddenly realize they are in the line of fire as the lives they destroy seek revenge against them

YouTube employees might be wise to ponder the unfortunate repercussions they now face from certain unstable individuals in response to YouTube’s intense evil, oppression and censorship of content creators who are merely trying to have an honest platform to be heard in a peaceful, non-violent way.

In a world of online tech monopolies that are now systematically attempting to strip away the First Amendment and Second Amendment rights of American citizens who merely followed the democratic process of electing President Trump, it’s probably only a matter of time before it all breaks down into actual civil war, as I’ve publicly warned numerous times. (Yet another case of “I told ya so,” but it seems the forces in charge actually want a civil war to occur for their own twisted reasons.)

As I stated in a previous podcast, recorded weeks ago, “YouTube cannot suppress human freedom.” They can try, for a while, but there will always be efforts to correct their attempt at oppression of free expression. The people who work at YouTube are probably just now realizing that their overlord employers (Google / Alphabet / YouTube) actually thrust them into a very serious war without telling them so. You don’t just get away with obliterating the First Amendment rights of people without, sooner or later, dealing with some blow back in various forms, from all sorts of people across a spectrum of responses (some reasonable, some violent, some even deadly).

When YouTube began ruining the lives of video content creators with punitive “deplatforming” algorithms and selective banning of independent voices, they apparently failed to foresee that some of those people might feel assaulted or violated by such actions. And in a few extreme cases like the one we’ve all witnessed today, some individuals might decide to declare physical war on YouTube employees who they see as being responsible for their lives being ruined.

Perhaps YouTube employees should rethink what they’ve really signed up for when they decided to work for a deeply evil corporation in exchange for a crappy paycheck while pissing off people who, in some cases, might be one insult away from totally losing it. As I’ve said before in multiple podcasts, if you work for YouTube, you are steeped in evil and promoting an evil organization. Evil begets evil, so we should not be surprised at what’s unfolding. If you ruin other people’s lives for a living, you are sooner or later likely to face a day of reckoning. (Yes, the tech giants are the new “Big Tobacco” in the sense that they’re steeped in evil and they destroy innocent lives.)

Some people may SNAP when you silence their voices and take away their opportunity for peaceful expression

My next unfortunate prediction, but not an endorsement of such actions, obviously, is as follows: At some point if the tech monopolies continue to press for the silencing of all independent voices who question the status quo, there will likely be an escalating response from those whose lives are being ruined by Google / YouTube.

Not everybody, obviously, has the resources to do what I did when YouTube censored me: Launch a competing video network called REAL.video. That’s how I deal with censorship: I just launch an alternative and invite the world to use it. (Over 16,000 people have requested video channels so far, with hundreds more joining each day…) But other people, not having access to such opportunities, might be less adaptive, or more angry… and they might snap and do something violent. Although I hope such attacks never happen, it seems inevitable that more will occur, especially as YouTube continues to pursue a deeply evil policy of silencing and demonetizing independent voices.

We never want to see violence taking place in response to tech overlords abusing their power, but when I see stories of cab drivers committing suicide en masse in New York City because of the rise of Uber, I’m wise enough to know that monopolistic technology companies really do ruin the lives of many people. Some of those people might kill themselves, and others might arrive at a point of such deranged anger that they seek to take a whole bunch of other people with them.

A wake-up call for YouTube, Google, Facebook and Twitter: All your employees are insanely vulnerable to physical attack, as we’ve now seen demonstrated

So far, YouTube has been operating in a delusional fairyland where all YouTube employees magically think they can wage a censorship war against people they don’t like, without any real-world repercussions whatsoever. But people whose lives are ruined by the tech giants can, as we’ve now seen, decide to take their grievance to the real (physical) world and put tech company employees in the direct line of fire, as we saw today. After all, YouTube employees are made of flesh and blood just like everyone else.

I’m afraid we’re now starting to see some real-world repercussions, and I fear it’s only going to escalate as Google amps up its own war against the freedom to think. These shots fired at the YouTube headquarters may actually be the opening salvo of the coming civil war that engulfs the campus buildings and employees of Google, YouTube, Facebook and even Twitter. Have no doubts that all these tech giants are urgently beefing up security of their campus buildings, knowing that their employees are insanely vulnerable to “revenge” attacks from an ever-increasing number of people whose lives have been destroyed by Google, YouTube, Facebook or Twitter.

Seriously, what did they think would happen? I seem to recall Milo Yiannopoulos predicting that “the Facebook headquarters will be firebombed” or something similar, in the coming civil war. (He wasn’t advocating such actions, but merely predicting they would occur.) Once again, Milo was eerily accurate in that prediction, because the shooting has already begun at YouTube headquarters.

Stay informed. Read YouTubeCensorship.com for more coverage of evil YouTube, and read Censorship.news for headlines from across the evil tech industry.

 

<!–

–>

Source Article from http://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-03-youtube-employees-front-lines-shooting-war-censorship-speech.html