SECRET Document Reveals Fmr CIA Director’s Plan to Make Reading WikiLeaks a Crime

zWashington, DC – A SECRET declassified report by then-CIA Director William Casey, titled, Unauthorized Disclosures to the Media proposed creating legislation that would make possession of classified information a criminal offense.

At the time that would make anyone reading a New York Times article with classified information, or WikiLeaks in the modern-era, criminally liable and able to be prosecuted by the state.

Although Casey was in favor of creating new legislation to specifically target media leaks, as well as those who come to possess those leaks (journalists or readers), he argued against utilization of the Espionage Act to prosecute leakers.

The former CIA Director reasoned that using the Espionage Act to target leakers was extreme, excessive and was akin to “driving tacks with a sledgehammer.”

While Casey acknowledged that the media was conflicted in their obligations, he conceded that it’s the job of the media to inform the public.

Ironically, despite his admission that the job of a journalist is to inform the public, he goes on to espouse a desire to see the media prosecuted for their role in publishing leaks and held in contempt if they failed to name their sources.

Ironically, as Muckrock points out, far from minimizing the potential harm of national security leaks, Casey emphasized the damage that they could do. However, none of the five examples provided by Casey in his report resulted in any actual harm. Two examples “could have” resulted in adversary adjusting their techniques, though the language implies that hadn’t happened.

A third and fourth example resulted in potential damage which forced the Agency to cut off contact with a human source lest that danger be amplified. While endangering human sources is never a good thing and disrupting HUMINT operations was unlikely to have been the intention, the report again indicates that no actual harm came to anyone. A fifth example placed someone in danger of being discovered, again a possibility which hadn’t come to pass, though it “could possibly have an adverse effect on U.S. relations” with an unknown group.



Ideally, as Muckrock notes, Casey felt that the new law should not require they demonstrate that a leak caused any actual damage to the United States. Instead, the question should be whether or not the information was passed to someone not authorized to receive it.



Although he expressed that the Espionage Act was the wrong way to go about doing so in the report, only a few months later the government successfully prosecuted Samuel Morison – setting a new precedent for decades to come.

Since then, the draconian Espionage Act has been used to target whistleblowers and leakers alike — with Obama using it to prosecute and imprison a record number of journalists’ sources — and even threaten media publishers.

The declassified report gives a clear insight into the mind of a high-level government official, in terms of how free of a press they really would really like to see in the United States.

While it was admirable that then-CIA Director Casey made clear that the Espionage Act was overkill for leakers, the idea, that that he wanted to create legislation for the government to have the ability to prosecute journalists for informing the American public about the extrajudicial actions of their own government – and which could likely also be used to criminalize the public – seems extremely antithetical to the First Amendment and the entire notion of a free press.

For those that don’t remember, CNN also said the same thing—that reading WikiLeaks is illegaland this was just last year.

Source Article from

7 Things You Should Always Keep Secret

There are a few things in your life that are worth keeping as secrets. When you have a wide network of friends and family, revealing everything about you may complicate your life. You are wrong to assume that every person is a well-wisher. Sometimes, they tend to use the information to weaken you. Hence, these seven things should be kept as a secret in your mind.

1. Your Future Plans

Your ambitious future plan is something you like to share with friends. You expect them to encourage you. But, it may not happen that way. Some of them may discourage you, undermining your potential to achieve it. They make you feel that you are not capable of doing it. At the end of the day, your confidence will be shaken. If you share your business plans or startup ideas, they may even steal them. Keep in mind that there are people in your community who are good at finding faults to demotivate others.

2. Secrets Of Your Friends

Anything said in confidence should be buried deep in your mind. It might be about your friend’s messed-up relationship or a new job offer. Never speak about it. This will betray the trust your friend invested in you. And this is enough to spoil the friendship. Also, don’t gossip. If you have heard unpleasant things about others, which you are not sure of, keep them to yourself. Do not go around spreading the news.

3. Your Family Issues

Fights at home? On the verge of divorce? These issues are never worth disclosing. As you expose family problems, you look weak in front of others. Moreover, these issues become more complex when you discuss them. It might seem harmless when you talk about your partner’s annoying habits. But, in the process, you degrade him or her and if your partner comes to know about it, he/she will definitely feel hurt.

4. Your Love Life

Of course, you feel good when you tell your friends or colleagues about the beautiful date you had with your partner. Yes, it’s quite tempting to boast of the moments with your partner. But, it is not a good habit to share every little detail about your love life. By doing so, the intimacy and privacy just the two of you enjoy will be washed away.

5. Your Charity Work

As a philanthropist, you change lives and you leave a positive impact on so many lives. But if you publicize the charity work, then its value is lost. It may look like your generous deeds are for popularity. Stop praising yourself for your actions. 

6. Money Matters

This is a universal fact. Your income and finance should not be a point of discussion. Genuine relationships do not hinge on economic uniformity. As you start discussing income among friends, it may kick-start a competition to decide who earns more. Your hitherto friendship may get smeared with animosity and jealousy. To avoid this painful emotional experience, you should learn to keep this as a secret.

7. Your Lifestyle Secrets

Have you ever thought who sabotaged your new diet or who derailed your healthy eating habits? Well, it might be your friends. Your new diet or healthy lifestyle will last longer if it’s a secret. Trying to be vocal about it, will attract others who are not genuinely interested in your well-being. They may wreck your attempts to embrace a lifestyle that is beneficial for your health. In the same way, your faith and belief should not come up in your conversations. These are very delicate topics, which may pave the way for unnecessary arguments.

Source Article from

Secret CIA docs reveal what US intel worried most about Soviet Navy capabilities


The Central Intelligence Agency has released some 2,000 pages of formerly classified materials on the Soviet Navy during the Cold War. Military observer Andrei Kotz takes a look at some of the most fascinating conclusions Western intelligence analysts reached about the Soviet Navy’s presumed strengths and weaknesses.

The trove of documents, encompassing 82 reports spanning three decades, from the 1960s to the 1980s, includes everything from translations of materials from ‘Military Thought’, a Soviet military journal, to high-level US national intelligence estimates of Soviet naval power, to agency reports focused on subs, carriers, cruise missiles, and more.

The documents confirm that the US military leadership saw the Soviet Navy as a serious threat to US naval hegemony, and that they allocated generous funding to intelligence studies on the subject. The materials touched on practically all aspects of Soviet naval military thought, from the characteristics of its ship-based anti-aircraft missile systems, to the tactical configuration of submarine strike groups.

RIA Novosti military observer Andrei Kotz decided to take a look at some of the most interesting conclusions reached by the CIA analysts.

Soviet Aircraft Carriers: Inklings of an Ocean-going Navy

In the early 1970s, the Soviet Union began fielding its first ships capable of operating fixed-wing combat aircraft. These were the Project 1143 Kiev-class designs, the upgraded Project 1143.5 version of which would go on to become the Kuznetsov-class.

The lead ship of the Kiev-class, the Kiev, was launched in December 1972, and commissioned in December 1975. These massive 45,000 ton aircraft-carrying cruisers were fitted with Yak-38 vertical takeoff/landing (VTOL) fighters, and what was then the latest in anti-submarine warfare, air defense, cruise missiles, close-in weapons, and 3D air search radar capabilities.

US analysts concluded that Project 1143 class ships, while not a threat to the US aircraft carrier advantage, did pose a direct danger to NATO hegemony in the Atlantic.

A November 1973 report titled ‘Soviet Naval Shipbuilding Programs: Impact on Major Surface Forces’ concluded that the USSR had about a dozen major surface vessels under construction, including two carriers, four frigates, at least seven destroyers, and probably a few ocean escorts.


The CIA noted that along with modernization, those construction programs were expected to “provide significant qualitative improvements in the major surface forces over the next few years. The V/STOL aircraft carriers will give the Soviet Navy an entirely new capability for the employment of sea-based air power.” This includes new capabilities for aircraft reconnaissance and air-based ship defense, giving the Soviet Navy new confidence in operating far from its home shores.

Soviet Submarines: Danger to US Carrier Groups

By the early 1970s, the Soviet Union had successfully renewed its submarine fleet. In a 40-page document entitled ‘The Soviet Attack Submarine Force: Evolution and Operations’, the CIA outlined the capabilities of the USSR’s submarine fleet, its tactics and operations. Authors put special focus on the outcome of a possible confrontation between Soviet submarines and US carrier groups.

“The Soviets view the submarine as their primary naval weapon system,” the report reads. “The Soviet Navy now has some 335 submarines, the largest submarine fleet in the world. About 55 of these have a strategic strike mission. The remainder – some 280 attack submarines – is the principal force for strategic defense against Polaris ballistic missile submarines, for countering [enemy] aircraft carriers, and for interdicting sea lines of communication. The attack submarine force is also an important contributor to ocean surveillance.”


CIA analysts anxiously explained that Soviet attack submarines’ numbers, armament and speed gave them the opportunity to “stalk and attack the US carrier force at sea. There are currently about 54 first line cruise missile submarines (all but 16 are nuclear powered) and the number is increasing by two to three per year. The number of US attack carriers, about 14, presents the Soviets with the opportunity for concentrating the operations of several submarines on each US carrier.”

Finally, according to the report, the newest Soviet cruise missile-armed submarines presented US carriers with a particular “complex defensive problem,” with the 250 nautical mile range of the Soviet SS-N-3 nuclear-capable cruise missile (Soviet designation P-5 Pyatyorka) giving the Soviets “some 200,000 square nautical miles from which to launch.” US analysts were particularly concerned by Soviet tactical capabilities to conduct coordinated surprise raids on US carriers, using a combination of multiple submarines and aircraft. This was of particular concern to the US in the Mediterranean, but less so in the Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans. The CIA concluded that the Soviet Navy would be most likely to attack those carrier group targets closest to the Soviet Union in the event of war.

Soviet Cruise Missile Capabilities

The document dump made clear that US intelligence was extremely concerned by the potential of Soviet cruise missiles. Reports on the subject include ‘The Soviet Naval Cruise Missile Force: Development and Operational Employment’, a 1971 primer on what this class of weapon gave the Soviet Navy.

Among the “at least seven classes” of Soviet cruise missiles estimated to be deployed were over-the-horizon long range weapons which the CIA said allowed for “greater tactical flexibility” for ships and patrol craft equipped with these weapons. The “new AS-6 missile,” Soviet designation KSR-5 Raduga, launched from Soviet Tu-16 strategic bombers, was of particular concern to analysts. “The AS-6 has a top speed of Mach 3, which is about twice as fast as carrier naval air-to-surface missiles, and has a maximum range of 300 nautical miles, which is more than double that of its best predecessor,” the report noted.


A separate 1972 study, called ‘Soviet Capabilities to Counter US Aircraft Carriers’, concluded that “the Soviets considered the antiship cruise missile a revolutionary weapon making the aircraft carrier obsolete.” It added that in addition to their 286 attack subs, the Soviets had over 600 bomber and reconnaissance aircraft, 275 of them armed with air-to-surface missiles, and significant surface ship forces and coastal launchers, equipped with about 915 and 420 launchers, respectively.

Soviet Naval Aviation: No Pushover

One particularly interesting assessment from 1979, called ‘Naval Aviation in Soviet Antiship Attack Planning’, is curious for the fact that nearly 40 years later, much of it remains classified. The readable section of the report concludes that notwithstanding US superiority in carriers and naval-based aviation, the US military assessed the threat posed by Soviet naval pilots as very serious.

That report pays special focus to the Tu-22M Backfire supersonic strategic and maritime strike bomber, which began deployment in the 1970s. The study noted that the bomber’s range and speed would make Western naval sea control and power-projection forces vulnerable in conventional and theater nuclear war scenarios in the Mediterranean, the Pacific, the Atlantic, and elsewhere. It concluded that the success or failure of Soviet naval aviation operations would depend on the degree of coordination, surveillance of their intended targets, and survivability amid encounters with Western air defenses, whose effectiveness would also depend on their coordination.

Sergei Gorshkov: The Admiral Who Transformed the Soviet Navy

In its supplementary booklet dedicated to the declassified archive of documents, the CIA devoted a special chapter to Admiral Sergei Gorshkov, and the major role he played in transforming the Soviet Navy. The naval commander, who became head of the Navy in 1956, served as commander in chief until 1985, during which time he would transform it beyond recognition.

Summarizing his achievements, the CIA wrote that “the story of Admiral Gorshkov is very nearly the story of the Soviet Navy for the thirty years he served as Commander-in-Chief. His lengthy tenure…was a tribute both to his professional naval expertise and, perhaps more important in Moscow, his bureaucratic skill navigating through the hazards of the changing attitudes of the national and party leadership. In retrospect it seems clear Admiral Gorshkov never lost sight of his goal of creating a world class navy operating proudly on all the world’s oceans.”


Indeed, under Gorshkov, for the first time in its history, the USSR achieved the capability to operate far from its shores, with some 170 warships operating in the world’s oceans. Secondly, the admiral presided over the creation of the submarine-based leg of the Soviet nuclear triad, featuring some 62 modern ICBM carriers, including the fearsome Akula (Typhoon-class) sub. Finally, Gorshkov shifted the focus of the Navy from submarines and coastal defense to the creation of a truly ‘balanced fleet’, “i.e., a fleet for open ocean operations and a broad array of contingencies,” including the creation of the USSR’s first carriers.

Source Article from

Feds Give Top-Secret Clearances to Murderers, Rapists

Feds Give Top-Secret Clearances to Murderers, Rapists

September 6th, 2017

Via: McClatchy:

Under a crushing backlog in the issuing or renewing of security clearances, federal authorities have given interim clearances to people they later discovered were murderers and pedophiles, a senior government official said Wednesday.

“This is very, very dangerous,� said Daniel E. Payne, head of the Defense Security Service, a federal office that oversees the granting of temporary clearances.

Payne said roughly 100,000 people hold interim clearances while working for companies with Defense Department contracts or at 13,000 cleared facilities and plants around the country and as they await a full comprehensive background investigation.

“I’ve got murderers who have access to classified information. I have rapists. I have pedophiles. I have people involved in child porn,� Payne said. “This is the risk we are taking.�




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from

Photo: The Wave reveals a secret sky

This phenomenally photogenic formation shows its playful side.

Arizona and Utah’s crazy surreal sandstone rock formations – like The Wave in Coyote Buttes, shown here – are a photographer’s dream for their undulating lines, striated color, and otherworldly beauty. And honestly, there have been a lot of photos taken of these spots … which is what makes it so refreshing to see one with a twist, like this shot from Rollie Rodriguez, in which a snippet of sly sky is caught playing in the reflection. It kind of turns the whole thing upside-down, adding even more magic to an already enchanted place.

Would you like to see your nature photo featured as the TreeHugger photo of the day? Join TreeHugger’s Reader Photo Pool on flickr and add your pictures to the group.

Source Article from

Bilderberg on Steroids – Meet The Secret CIA-Funded Group Behind The ‘War on Terror’


Bilderberg has gained a reputation as the world’s most secretive group of billionaires and political leaders who conspire to impact global events—but reports indicate that they don’t hold a candle to another group that includes a host of war criminals responsible for the “War on Terror.”

The group is named Le Cercle. In a report dated Sept. 13, 1982, the German publication Der Spiegel describes it as a “legal cartel” made up of “loyal Bundesnachrichtendienst agents, foreign intelligence agents, reactionary politicians and ultra-right journalists” who played a crucial role in the 1980 election.

The existence of the group was revealed by Bavarian constitutional protector Hans Langemann. According to the report, he described the group as:

“In the case of CERCLE, which is clearly defamatory,” as far as my earlier knowledge of the BND “and my present knowledge are concerned, a “loose” “concentration “about two times a year and at various” places of conservative- anti-Communist politician,” “publicists, bankers, and VIPs of other professions,” “which originated in the former French Prime Minister Antoine PINAY, and the circle to which guests are invited continues to this day.”

Former U.S. Defense Secretary and President of the World Bank Paul Wolfowitz, former Iraqi Coalition Provisional Authority Leader Paul Bremer, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and former Chairman of the Defense Department’s Defense Policy Board Richard Perle—some of the most notable neoconservative architects of the Iraq War—are all reportedly members.

Other reported American members of Le Cercle include former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former Directors of Central Intelligence Bill Casey and William Colby, and former President Richard Nixon after he left the White House.

In a report from The Independent dated June 28, 1997, the “exclusive think-tank said to be funded by the CIA” is mentioned because its chairman at the time, former Member of Parliament Jonathan Aitken, was reportedly going to be removed over a libel trial that ultimately sent him to prison for perjury.

Accusations that Le Cercle receives funding from the CIA have been made by Robin Ramsay, editor of Lobster Magazine; and by John E Lewis, author of “The Mammoth Book of Cover-Ups.”

As the report noted, “the group’s existence is only occasionally disclosed” following its creation in the 1950s:

“Cercle was intended to cement Franco-German relations, as a buffer to Soviet aggression during the Cold War. Down the years, however, it has become much more, advocating right-wing causes round the world and growing into a confidential talking shop for about 70 politicians, businessmen, polemicists and personnel from the diplomatic and security services. Members are invited to attend its meetings; they cannot ask to be admitted, and as a condition of attending they agree to keep all sessions secret. It meets twice a year, once in Washington DC in the autumn and once in the early part of the year in an ‘overseas’ venue.”

The Independent described senior member Brian Crozier as an “author and well-known Cold-Warrior with close ties to MI6 and the CIA” who wrote a “planning paper” for Le Cercle in 1979. In addition to securing changes of government in Germany and the United Kingdom (where Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister in 1979), the agenda included objectives such as:

  • “Undercover financial transactions for political aims”
  • “International campaigns aiming to discredit hostile personalities or events”
  • “Creation of a (private) intelligence service specializing in a selective point of view”
  • “Establishment of offices under suitable cover each run by a coordinator from the central office. Current plans cover London, Washington, Paris, Munich and Madrid”

In a report on the history of Le Cercle, British news source True Publica noted that the 1982 Langemann Papers were “the first significant leak to expose the activities of Le Cercle, confirming that the group was actively involved in influencing Western European elections.

“Its purpose is to subvert the democratic principles and processes of individual countries and are by nature ideologically ‘hawkish’ – distributing propaganda, stoking fear of communist plots from Russia, vote rigging and hacking the accounts of politicians and prominent global figures. Promoting the ‘war on terror’ has been a major factor in their activities of recent years and in so doing broker weapons deals and setting up false flag operations the world over to suit its own agenda.”

While the majority of the information surrounding Le Cercle is covert and secretive—especially regarding its activity in recent years—one of the most important things to remember about the think tank is that its presence is well-documented, its members include influential U.S. politicians, there have been accusations of funding by the CIA, and yet mainstream media in the United States has ignored its existence and influence for decades.

Source Article from

Secret Appeal Hearing for Oklahoma City Police Officer Sentenced to 263 in Prison for Raping 12 Women

Download your free copy now.

Source Article from