Man Found With Arsenal of Automatic Weapons Had Recently Lost Custody of His Kids

A man caught carrying numerous weapons including two submachine guns and 900 rounds of ammunition had lost custody of his children and written hostile letters to local judges, authorities said Wednesday.

Washington County Sheriff Ed Graybeal said Scott Edmisten won’t talk, so officials are still trying to determine why he had the weapons, as well as a mask and black fatigues, when he was pulled over for speeding before dawn Monday.

Graybeal said guns and ammunition are common in Tennessee, but that it was “odd” for all the guns and clips to be loaded, and for Edmisten to have 900 more rounds and survival gear. In addition, he said, when people have survival gear with them, they are usually going hunting, but that didn’t seem to be the case. Graybeal said he has asked state and federal agencies to assist in the case since the automatic weapons aren’t registered and lack serial numbers.

“Whatever he had planned for that morning, that little traffic stop that one of my guys made made all the difference in the world to someone, I believe,” Graybeal said. “It’s just one of those situations where nothing seemed right and we wanted to make sure that everyone was OK, especially since he’d been sending letters to the courts.”

Edmisten, 43, has been jailed without bond on charges of possessing prohibited weapons, speeding, and felony evading arrest. An attorney listed in court records as representing Edmisten didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment. A bond hearing was set for Oct. 11.

In addition to the guns in the car, authorities found another four rifles in Edmisten’s home Tuesday while executing a search warrant. Graybeal said one had been altered to make it fully automatic. Investigators also found about $6,000 worth of ammunition that hadn’t been opened.

Graybeal said he didn’t know why Edmisten lost custody of his children, but Edmisten made it clear he did not like the Department of Children’s Services or law enforcement.

Michael Knight, a spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, has confirmed that the agency is investigating and said authorities “don’t see a connection” to recent mass shootings.

Edmisten’s arrest came a day after Stephen Paddock opened fire on a music festival from a high-rise hotel suite in Las Vegas, leaving 59 people dead and more than 500 injured. When police stormed his room, they discovered that Paddock had killed himself.

Source Article from https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-found-arsenal-automatic-weapons-214729598.html

Why Mammagraphy Was Recently Condemned By The Swiss Medical Board: You Might Want To Think Twice Before Getting One

In 2013, the Swiss Medical Board, an independent health technology assessment initiative, was requested to prepare a review of mammography screening. The team of medical professionals included a medical ethicist, a clinical epidemiologist, a pharmacologist, an oncologic surgeon, a nurse scientist, a lawyer, and a health economist. Two of those members, Nikola Biller-Andorno, M.D. Ph. D. and Peter Juni, M.D, opened up about the project in the New England Journal of Medicine. 

They said: “As we embarked on the project, we were aware of the controversies that have surrounded mammography screening for the past 10-15 years. When we received the available evidence and contemplated its implications in detail, however, we became increasingly concerned.”

In 2016, it is estimated that approximately 246,660 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in women in the United States as well as 61,000 new cases of non-invasive breast cancer. Mammograms continue to be touted as the most effective screening tool we have today to find breast cancer.

However, these two doctors were shocked to discover that there is minimal evidence that actually indicates that the benefits of mammography screening outweigh the harms.

“The relative risk reduction of approximately 20 percent in breast-cancer mortality associated with mammography that is currently described by most expert panels came at the price of a considerable diagnostic cascade, with repeat mammography, subsequent biopsies, and over-diagnosis of breast cancers — cancers that would never have become clinically apparent.”

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study, which was conducted over the course of 25 years, concluded that 106 of 484 screen-detected cancers were over-diagnosed.

The doctors explained: “This means that 106 of the 44,925 healthy women in the screening group were diagnosed with and treated for breast cancer unnecessarily, which resulted in needless surgical interventions, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or some combination of these therapies.”

The fact that the benefits of this form of cancer screening are so overestimated seems worrisome for the medical community and patients at large. How, in this day and age, do we not have more awareness, more answers, and better technology?

Another review of 10 trials involving more than 600,000 women discovered no evidence that mammography screening was effective on overall mortality. This caused concern over the benefits of the medical practice. A survey of U.S. women’s views on the mammography screenings discovered that 71.5 percent of women think that it lessened risk of death from breast cancer by half, while 72.1 percent believed that 80 deaths could be avoided per each 1,000 women screened. Their perceptions were gravely over-calculated. In fact, when looking at the real numbers, mammography results in a risk reduction of 20 percent and only 1 death can be prevented per 1,000 women screened.

The Swiss Medical Board report became public in February 2014, provoking the board to advise that the quality of mammography screening ought to be evaluated and that women should be educated about both the benefits and the harms of the medical practice.

The report created controversy within the Swiss medical community, even though it supports a growing perspective around the world that mammography for breast cancer screening in asymptomatic populations is outdated and harmful at best.

When reviewing the data in regards to every breast cancer death prevented in U.S. women over a 10-year period of yearly screening starting at the age of 50, you will find that:

    • 490-670 women usually have a false positive mammogram with repeat examination
    • 70-100 women usually have an unnecessary biopsy
    • 3-14 women were the victim of over-diagnosed breast cancer that would never reach clinical relevance

Furthermore, up to 50 percent of women have breast tissue that is dense. This makes it very hard to read mammograms correctly, as dense breast tissue and cancer both show up white on an X-ray.

Due to the lack of evidence in support of mammography and the clear potential risks involved with them, the board chose to recommend cancelling mammography-screening programs altogether. Although their recommendations are not legally binding, the report caused an uproar amongst Swiss cancer experts and organizations. The doctors on board reported:

“One of the main arguments used against it was that it contradicted the global consensus of leading experts in the field… Another argument was that the report unsettled women, but we wonder how to avoid unsettling women, given the available evidence.”

It’s clearly no mystery why the board become increasingly concerned about their researcher. The “evidence” simply does not back up the global consensus of other experiences in the field suggesting that mammograms were safe and capable of saving lives.

When it comes down to it, we are dealing with outdated clinical trials, the benefits do not clearly outweigh the harms, and women’s perceptions of mammography benefits do not match reality.

More Information On Breast Screenings

I believe that if you did have a tumor, the last thing you would want to do is crush that tumor between two plates, because that would spread it. – Dr. Sarah Mybill, General Practitioner (taken from the documentary trailer below)

I think if a woman from the age of 50 has a mammogram every year, or every two years, she’s going to get breast cancer as a direct result from that – Dr. Patrick Kingsley, Clinical Ecologist (take from the documentary trailer below)

In 2011, 220,097 women and 2,078 men in the United States were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 40,931 women and 443 men in the United States died from breast cancer. It has become the most common type of cancer among women.

Below is a trailer to a documentary entitled, “The Promise.”  The film interviews various researchers, scientists, doctors (and more), all of whom are hoping to shed light on a practice which is turning out to be not only useless, but harmful to those taking part. There is more information below the video, but I highly recommend you watch the documentary.

There is a wealth of scientific data concluding that mammograms are not, as the CDC claims, the most effective way to detect breast cancer. In fact, having a mammogram is likely the last thing you want to do if you have breast cancer.

A study published in The European Journal of Public Healthtitled “Trends in breast cancer stage distribution before, during and after introduction of a screening programme in Norway” found that breast screenings actually increase the incidence of localized stage cancers without reducing the incidence of advanced cancers. (source)

The study, which used a huge population sample of 1.8 million Norwegian women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1987 – 2010, found that:

“The annual incidence of localized breast cancer among women aged 50–69 years rose from 63.9 per 100 000 before the introduction of screening to 141.2 afterwards, corresponding to a ratio of 2.21 (95% confidence interval: 2.10; 2.32).The incidence of more advanced cancers increased from 86.9 to 117.3 per 100 000 afterwards, corresponding to a 1.35 (1.29; 1.42)-fold increase. Advanced cancers also increased among younger women not eligible for screening, whereas their incidence of localized cancers remained nearly constant.”

This study outlines how Norway’s breast screening program has actually increased the chance of being diagnosed with early stage breast cancer by more than 200%, as well contributing to an increased chance of receiving advanced stage breast cancer diagnosis by 35%. This is the opposite of what mammograms are supposed to do; if they were useful then the incidence of cancers would be lower and not higher.

The study concluded that:

Incidence of localized breast cancer increased significantly among women aged 50–69 years old after introduction of screening, while the incidence of more advanced cancers was not reduced in the same period when compared to the younger unscreened age group.(source)

It’s important to note that, “although the study did measure the impact of Norway’s breast screening programme, a comparison of trends between participants and non-participants in the age group eligible for screening warrants further investigation. Also the causal link between stage distribution and mortality needs to be investigated in the context of screening.”

A paper published in 2011 in the British Medical Journal  set out to prove that breast screening by mammography is associated with a steeper fall in mortality cancer compared to other countries who were not offering this service. They did not expect to find the complete opposite; they found a drop in breast cancer mortality among women who were not screened. They concluded that the recent downward trend in breast cancer mortality had nothing to do with screening and everything to do with improvements in treatment and service provision. (source)

The new data published in the BMJ now suggests that none of the gratifying falls in breast cancer can be attributed to screening and that the very existence of a NHSBSP (national breast screening programme) should be questioned. Unless there is public pressure for an independent inquiry to challenge the status quo, it will be business as usual for the screening programme. Furthermore, the Department of Health has painted itself into a corner and it is no longer a question of scientific debate – the subject has become too politicized by those who like to avoid U-turns at all costs. –  Michael Baum, Professor Emeritus of Surgery and visiting Professor of Medical Humanities at University College London, is a leading British surgical oncologist who specializes in breast cancer treatment (source)

This would be an asymptomatic woman walking along the high street, having a mammogram, and then two weeks later she’s told she has to have a mastectomy. This is so cruel that it should make you weep. (quote taken from the documentary trailer above)

As Sayer Ji, founder of Greenmedinfo.com points out, a National Cancer Institute commissioned expert panel concluded that “early stage cancers” are not cancer, they are benign or indolent growths. This means that millions of women were wrongly diagnosed with breast cancer over the past few decades and have been subjected to harmful treatment, when they would have been better off leaving it untreated or diagnosed; frighteningly, it is not uncommon for a breast cancer misdiagnosis to occur.

Another study that was recently published in the British Medical Journal concluded that regular mammogram screenings do not reduce breast cancer death rates. And they found no evidence to suggest that mammograms are more effective than personal breast exams at detecting cancer in the designated age group. The study involved 90, 000 Canadian women and compared breast cancer incidence and mortality up to 25 years in women aged 40-59.(source)

The study was conducted over a period of 25 years.

Many Studies Showing The Same Thing

The sheer number of studies that have been published on breast mammography examinations and their failure to produce a benefit in screened populations is overwhelming. What’s even more disturbing is the fact that these types of examinations have also been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer, and to have negative implications for both physical and mental health.

U-turns do not embarrass clinical scientists, unlike politicians: if the evidence changes then our minds must change. As the national programme began to run its course, two disturbing observations made me begin to question my original support. First, about 10 years after the initiation of the service, updated analyses of the original data set by independent groups in Europe and the US found that the initial estimate of benefit in the reduction of breast cancer mortality was grossly exaggerated. –  Michael Baum, Professor Emeritus of Surgery and visiting Professor of Medical Humanities at University College London, is a leading British surgical oncologist who specializes in breast cancer treatment (source)

Other sources used not listed in the article.

collective-evolution

(1) eurpub.oxfordjournals.org

(2) www.bmj.com

www.greenmedinfo.com

Source Article from https://worldtruth.tv/why-mammagraphy-was-recently-condemned-by-the-swiss-medical-board-you-might-want-to-think-twice-before-getting-one/

Third Snowy Pyramid Recently Discovered In Antarctica Could Rewrite History

Though not everyone is willing to admit it, our planet is full of relics and monuments that prove Earth was once populated by extremely advanced civilizations. Point in case: the third ice-covered pyramid discovered in Antarctica!

Ever since the service was released, Google Earth been a boon not just for conspiracy theorists but also for anyone looking to uncover clues about what lies hidden beyond sight. If you need a good vantage point, you need good eyes and altitude. Satellites have both.

The latest in a group of three snow-covered pyramids was recently discovered through Google Earth satellite imagery and in a few days, the finding has taken the alternative history communities by storm. Two of the pyramids can be found approximately 10 miles inland while the third rests near the coastline.

The implications of this discovery are complex and if accepted, it could turn the scientific world on its head. No history book ever mentioned an Antarctic civilization with the skills and technology necessary to erect enormous pyramids. There is one apparent reason behind this situation and by the looks of it, it would suggest tech-savvy civilizations existed on Earth a long time before our own emerged.

Antarctica is now a frozen wasteland but it wasn’t always like this. It got to its current position through plate tectonics, inching closer to the geographic South Pole year after year. Millions of years ago, Antarctica’s climate was much warmer because its position was closer to the equator. This is established fact backed up by several accepted discoveries, not some wild speculation.

Some years ago, the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) uncovered evidence that the antarctic climate was much different in the distant past.

”Go back 100 million years ago,” BAS’s Dr. Vanessa Bowman said “and Antarctica was covered in lush rainforests similar to those that exist in New Zealand today.”

Another expedition –led by NASA and involving 11 other scientific organizations– discovered out-of-place microbial life forms in the depths of Antarctica’s Lake Vida, trapped under a sheet of ice 65 feet thick. The microbial colonies had been prospering in isolation for millions of years and scientists believe they are the descendants of microorganisms that lived in a much warmer climate. Who knows what other enigmas lay buried in ice, hopelessly waiting to be revealed.

Even with today’s technology, building structures as massive as the pyramids of Antarctica would be nearly impossible. There are simply too many problems relating to manpower and the logistics required for such a project. If building these mysterious monuments were to be a viable venture, it must have taken place in the past, when Antarctica was a favorable place for human life.

And this opens up a king-sized can of worms. The continent was habitable only in the very distant past, but mainstream science says the wheel wasn’t invented until some 6,000 years ago. At the same time, anatomically-modern humans are said to have mastered fire only 125,000 years ago. So where do these controversial pyramids fit in? Are they evidence of an ancient advanced civilization or do we need to stretch our imagination even further and regard them as proof of time travel? The mind boggles when we remain attached to our outdated beliefs.

Proponents of alternative history and fans of the ancient aliens hypothesis have no problem in accepting the parallel reality generated by such discoveries. It’s not hard to see and accept that we aren’t the first and though it may seem this way, we probably won’t be the last.

Thousands of years after they were built, we are still fascinated by the Egyptian pyramids. The monuments left behind by their society have stood the test of time and in more than one way, they’ve granted their builders immortality. Keeping that in mind, what could be said about pyramids that are millions of years old? Does that put our own lives into perspective and make us see the bigger picture?

Or do we recoil in egotistic dismissal?

via:alien-ufo-sightings.com

Source Article from https://worldtruth.tv/third-snowy-pyramid-recently-discovered-in-antarctica-could-rewrite-history/

I Recently Had A Conversation With God Here Are 15 Things I Was Told

BLuke Miller Truth Theory

I recently had a deep spiritual experience which you can read about here in which I felt many of life’s big questions were answered. There was no thought involved, it was as if the answers flowed through me and were given to me, not thought up by me. I don’t claim to hold any ultimate truth and your intuition is your biggest gift for filtering out information that does not resonate with you- but this is my experience of a conversation with God (the first point defines God):


” +

” +

“;
}
document.getElementById(“sda_1241”).style.display = “block”;
document.getElementById(“sda_1241”).innerHTML = sda_html;
}
function _load_1241() {
var xhrq_1241 = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhrq_1241.open(“GET”, “/ez_aba_load/?aba_id=1241&aba_wid=87C9CA76-2B78-4334-A9C9-B2F171EB1D68&aba_did=dHJ1dGh0aGVvcnkuZXpvaWMuY29t”, true);
xhrq_1241.onload = function (e) {
if (xhrq_1241.readyState === 4) {
if (xhrq_1241.status === 200) {
eval(xhrq_1241.responseText);
}
}
};
xhrq_1241.send(null);
}

if (typeof ez_cra_check === ‘undefined’) {

if (typeof loadbvjhghf === ‘undefined’) {
var xhr_1241 = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr_1241.open(“GET”, “/ezoic/prebid-ad-728×90.js”, true);
xhr_1241.onload = function (e) {
if(xhr_1241.responseText == “”){
var loadbvjhghf = true;
_load_1241();
} else {
eval(xhr_1241.responseText);
}
};
xhr_1241.onerror = function (e) {
var loadbvjhghf = true;
_load_1241();
};
xhr_1241.send(null);
}
else {
_load_1241();
}
}

  1. God is the same thing as science, consciousness and any of the religious or non religious things we have used to describe our creator. Prophet such as Buddha, Mohammed and Jesus experienced the same thing in different ways, then shared what they saw. Ultimately they saw creation, in its purest form and relayed that information. All holy books are merely a human translation of a godly experience, but they still hold the human element.
  2. We process this experience through our brains, but that is exactly what our brains are- processors of consciousness. This is why other people and animals experience things differently- they are running a different operating system. Think of the consciousness as the internet and our brains as the system that processes that internet- you can have a wire, wireless, fast, slow and a million other ways and speeds it is processed at- but we are all tapping into the same thing, and uniquely interpreting it in our way. Our systems can always be upgraded, you just need to know how.
  3. The next was our physical reality is dual and everything has its opposite- this is what the alchemists were communicating and trying to work out. How do you transcend duality? By understanding both sides of it. This was not 100% new to me however I also realised that there is a trinity to duality- the middle ground in which you can walk to become balanced. The holy trinity is actually duality with its central piece. The central ground of mind, body and soul is mind- as the body is the physical reality, the soul is spiritual reality and mind is where they meet- the brain (body) processing the consciousness (soul) to create a mix of the 2 (mind). The central ground for man and woman is child. The central ground for masculine and feminine energy is balanced. The central ground for hot and cold is warm. You go into both sides to fully realise the middle ground. This is why it is not always obvious, because you have to enter the world and commit to the understanding of a substance, there are many more layers to this, but this is the gist of it.
  4. I realised that the ultimate duality and perhaps the most important to determine the quality of your existence is that of fear and love- most live in a combination of the 2, but it is important which ones you predominantly feed as this determines the type of life you manifest.
  5. Both fear and love are tools for manifestation. That which you love grows, that what you fear grows.
  6. Love in its purest form is the sum total of all emotions experienced, then transcended to embody love for humanity.
  7. You transcend fear through love- if there is a part of yourself you hate (fear based) you transcend it by learning to love it, no matter how dark it is.
  8. We are the sum total of our parents- their trauma, their joy and everything in between manifested into a new person and then developed by our experiences. Meaning we carry all they carry then we pick up our own ways of being through our experiences. This is why it is important to heal trauma, as you pass on trauma through our DNA. It is very important to be at peace with your parents and children, even if the relationship cannot work for any reason. This works in the complete ancestral line- meaning we hold within us that which is healed and unhealed through all generations of our bloodline, this is why we have the ability to change so much by simply changing ourselves- we are laying the groundwork for future generations.
  9. We deal with issues through nonviolent confrontation, when I say non violent I am not just talking about physical violence, but emotional and verbal violence. Misdirected aggression is the root of all conflict. The best way to deal with an issue is immediately, with non violent confrontation. If you think of our troubles as a vine, when they first arise they are a tiny little baby vine with no grounding or deep roots- to deal with this you simply pull the root and it comes out of the ground- however, like all roots- the longer you leave them the deeper and more entangled they become. Before you know it the root has offshoots that all have a new consciousness of their own and the tiny root becomes unmanageable. All problems (no matter how big) once started as a tiny root that could simply be pulled, this is the best place to deal with the problem at hand. Non violent confrontation.
  10. There are many languages, not just verbal language- the reason this is important is verbal language can be used to deceive, whereas energetic language cannot. Donald Trump can say he is going to “make America great again” and people fall for the bullshit. If you understand the language of energy you can see that he is lying and has an alternative agenda. We actually all know this language, it is just a matter of recovering it.
  11. There is a very simple languages (no more than 10 words) that can describe all that needs to be described. This is not including artificial constructs created by human beings, for example in this language their would be no word for car- but their would be for transport, however this same word would have multiple other meanings also- this is why it would coincide with energetic language, so as not to cause confusion, but could also be interpreted differently depending on those listening, meaning a group conversation could be interpreted in multiple ways depending on who is listening.
  12. We are one thing, meaning the whole of the universe started as a single cell, that replicated and mutated in many forms. But at our roots we are still that single cell. The clouds, the moon, the plastic bags in the ocean- it is all just a manifestation of us- that single cell that started it all.
  13. God (as a metaphor) created life to try and realise itself- to fully express itself in all its form- god is a creator, not a controller- this is why we have free will and choice. But the very fact that we are all the same and quantumly entangled means we are guided if we choose this guidance.
  14. Life is infinite and goes infinitely outwards and inwards.
  15. Everything is perfect in all moments and we find peace with this by the realisation that- perfection is not what it is perceived to be- meaning everything is imperfectly perfect- but still perfect all the same.

There are plenty more questions and answers in this beautiful life, and in the infinite forms of existence that will precede. I look forward to it all! Please share this article with your tribe! Much love, Luke!

IMAGE CREDIT:rszarvas / 123RF Stock Photo

THIS ARTICLE IS OFFERED UNDER CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE. IT’S OKAY TO REPUBLISH IT ANYWHERE AS LONG AS ATTRIBUTION BIO IS INCLUDED AND ALL LINKS REMAIN INTACT.Creative Commons LicenseCreative Commons License

” +

” +
“”;
}
document.getElementById(“sda_1242”).style.display = “block”;
document.getElementById(“sda_1242”).innerHTML = sda_html;
}
function _load_1242() {
var xhrq_1242 = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhrq_1242.open(“GET”, “/ez_aba_load/?aba_id=1242&aba_wid=82EA05C7-AE81-4886-BDF9-DE385286EE65&aba_did=dHJ1dGh0aGVvcnkuZXpvaWMuY29t”, true);
xhrq_1242.onload = function (e) {
if (xhrq_1242.readyState === 4) {
if (xhrq_1242.status === 200) {
eval(xhrq_1242.responseText);
}
}
};
xhrq_1242.send(null);
}

if (typeof ez_cra_check === ‘undefined’) {

if (typeof loadbvjhghf === ‘undefined’) {
var xhr_1242 = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr_1242.open(“GET”, “/ezoic/prebid-ad-728×90.js”, true);
xhr_1242.onload = function (e) {
if(xhr_1242.responseText == “”){
var loadbvjhghf = true;
_load_1242();
} else {
eval(xhr_1242.responseText);
}
};
xhr_1242.onerror = function (e) {
var loadbvjhghf = true;
_load_1242();
};
xhr_1242.send(null);
}
else {
_load_1242();
}
}

I am Luke Miller the author of this article, and creator of Potential For Change. I like to blend psychology and spirituality to help you create more happiness in your life.Grab a copy of my free 33 Page Illustrated eBook- Psychology Meets Spirituality- Secrets To A Supercharged Life You Control Here

 

” +
“”;
}
document.getElementById(“sda_1249”).style.display = “block”;
document.getElementById(“sda_1249”).innerHTML = sda_html;
}
function _load_1249() {
var xhrq_1249 = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhrq_1249.open(“GET”, “/ez_aba_load/?aba_id=1249&aba_wid=97C9D60D-B8C5-4C41-BB7C-68B5B1944C86&aba_did=dHJ1dGh0aGVvcnkuZXpvaWMuY29t”, true);
xhrq_1249.onload = function (e) {
if (xhrq_1249.readyState === 4) {
if (xhrq_1249.status === 200) {
eval(xhrq_1249.responseText);
}
}
};
xhrq_1249.send(null);
}

if (typeof ez_cra_check === ‘undefined’) {

if (typeof loadbvjhghf === ‘undefined’) {
var xhr_1249 = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr_1249.open(“GET”, “/ezoic/prebid-ad-728×90.js”, true);
xhr_1249.onload = function (e) {
if(xhr_1249.responseText == “”){
var loadbvjhghf = true;
_load_1249();
} else {
eval(xhr_1249.responseText);
}
};
xhr_1249.onerror = function (e) {
var loadbvjhghf = true;
_load_1249();
};
xhr_1249.send(null);
}
else {
_load_1249();
}
}





<!–
(function(){
var spoutjs=document.createElement(‘script’),firstjs=document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0];
spoutjs.async=1;
spoutjs.src=’//cdn.spoutable.com/1196d4f0-a74b-4be4-9775-8daed9cd46d6/spoutable.js’;
firstjs.parentNode.insertBefore(spoutjs,firstjs)
})();
–>


Quantcast

Source Article from https://truththeory.com/2017/06/30/recently-conversation-god-15-things-told/