Operation timed out after 30015 milliseconds with 0 bytes received
(Natural News) Local Calgarians are expressing deep concern about an upcoming event at a public recreation center in Calgary, Canada, where individuals both young and old will be swimming in the nude together at a “naked swim day” that many feel has overtones of encouraging pedophilia.
According to reports, the group “Calgary Nude Recreation” decided to rent out the Southland Leisure Centre for a nudist experience to be held on January 14, at which children under the age of 18 are being encouraged to attend.
The naked swim day, which will be staffed by government employees, is being dubbed as a “family oriented and kid friendly” event that’s “open to people of all ages, body types, all genders, sexual orientations, and anyone else in between.” Under the “Why” section of Calgary Nude Recreation’s Meetup page, the group explains its rationale for inviting children to a nudist event:
“Because being naked is awesome! The meetups are not a place to show off your body to others, compare or stare, but rather a place that you can enjoy being naked, in your rawest self expression in a safe and welcoming, non-judgmental environment. We as a society are inundated with so much false ideals about body image that we can easily become lost in self criticism, judgement and insecurities. This group is a place to break free from our societal constraints and tap into the liberation and freedom from embarrassment and shame and allow us to fully embrace and courageously love all of ourselves in the presence of others.”
Everyone who attends the naked swim day will be required to be naked, including women who are being told they have to be “topless at minimum.” Children will also have to be naked, as their portion of the event will apparently take place at the Naked Water Slides and Wave Pool.
Locals say nudist event that encourages children to attend is like ‘Christmas’ for pedophiles
When the local community got wind of what will soon transpire, many spoke to local media about their concerns. Some of them even started a Change.org petition asking that the event criteria be changed to allow for only people 18 years of age or older, as it simply wouldn’t be appropriate to have young children present in the nude alongside adults whom they don’t even know.
The Southland Leisure Centre, however, isn’t at all concerned. Jarret Hoebers, a recreational regional manager with the City of Calgary, told CBC News that this type of event creates “no issue,” and that people book out the center all the time for special events that represent all sorts of interests. He also says that the government’s workforce has “a huge variety and diversity,” so there shouldn’t be any problems.
But this hasn’t quelled the fears of many locals who insist that hosting a nudist event with really old people alongside really young people could be problematic if any pedophiles are present. Having naked children around a bunch of naked adults isn’t exactly a smart idea because there are many people out there with mental illness that could use it as an opportunity to prey on young victims.
In the Change.org petition, its crafters explain that holding such an event is like “Christmas” for pedophiles, as it basically welcomes them to try to indulge in their perversions in a public setting – unless, of course, pedophilia is just the latest form of leftist “gender expression.”
“Please take this into heavy consideration, [especially] if you have kids or grandkids,” the petition reads. “Take a look at them and ask yourself if it feels right for them to run around naked with naked older folks.”
Sources for this article include:
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaveHodges-TheCommonSenseShow/~3/6SZPp5YNKF8/
At least 100,000 children are prostituted annually in the U.S., adding to the $9.8 billion U.S. sex trafficking industry. Children all over the country are subject to physical and sexual abuse, and most of the time it happens a lot closer to home than we would expect. Ninety percent of child sexual abuse victims know the perpetrator, and an astonishing 68% are abused by family members.
What’s worse, some of the laws surrounding child sexual abuse and child marriage (or lack thereof) actually enable their practice. As a result, more than 200,000 children in the U.S. were married in the past 15 years alone. We often view child marriage as only being an issue in third-world countries, but in reality, it occurs right here in North America, too. Children as young as 10 have been married to far older adults, despite the legal requirement to wed being 18, or legal adulthood, nationwide.
This is because many states have “legal loopholes” that allow adults to marry children. Not all states are willing to provide statistics on this problem, and many have provided only some details rather than the full scope, so that 200,000 is likely far below the real number of American child brides and grooms.
Why Child Marriage Is a Huge Problem in the U.S.
In May of this year, the Republican governor of New Jersey declined an offer to sign a law that would have made New Jersey the first state to ban child marriage without exception. Many people probably assume that child marriage is illegal in the U.S., but the sad reality is that these loopholes allow children to get married at a very young age. In New Jersey alone, approximately 3,500 children were married between 1995 and 2012.
The governor claimed that signing the law would have “conflicted with religious customs.” Some of these loopholes include if the child has gotten pregnant or if the child receives parental consent. Can you imagine your parents arranging a marriage for you, prior to the age of 18? Yes, this is the reality for many people all over the world, but few realize this happens in America too. Alternatively, could you imagine getting pregnant at the young age of 13 and then being forced to wed? This is a terrifying reality for many victims of child marriage.
207,468 minors are known to have been married in the U.S. between 2000 and 2015, but 10 states provided absolutely no data or inaccurate statistics on child marriage, so this number does not reflect the true scope of the issue. Of this number, most of the children were girls who were married to much older men, and many were as young as 13. Eighty-seven percent of these minors were girls, and although the majority were aged 16 or 17, many were much younger.
Amongst the youngest to get married were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee, who married men between the ages of 24 and 31. Another young boy was married at the age of 11 to a 27-year-old woman in the same state.
It’s not just Tennessee; children as young as 12 were married in Alaska, Louisiana, and South Carolina, and 11 other states permit 13-year-old children to get married. Keep in mind that, in most of these cases, the minors were marrying older adults, not other minors. Only 14% of these minors were actually marrying other minors, but even still, is it really okay for a 17-year-old to marry a 13-year-old?
Although most of them married adults no older than 30, in some cases, children were permitted to marry adults decades older than them. There was one case in Alabama where a 14-year-old girl married a 74-year-old man, and another in Idaho in which a 17-year-old married a 65-year-old man.
Inspiration and all our best content, straight to your inbox.
Let’s remember that, although most states recognize that sexual consent can be granted by those aged 16 to 18, a person can still be charged with statutory rape for having sex with a minor. Despite this, many states are granting children with marriage licenses, including minors who are much younger than 16.
Senior Counsel for Policy and Strategy at Tahirih Justice Centre Jeanne Smoot explained that most of the children who get married as minors are those living in poverty. She stated: “Almost all the evidence indicates that girls in cities don’t get married young, that girls from middle class or wealthy families, don’t get married young. This is a rural phenomenon and it is a phenomenon of poverty.”
An astonishing 27 states don’t even have laws to set an “age floor,” meaning that no laws exist to establish the youngest age a minor can get married. Loopholes like this one are what allow minors to get married in the first place. The irony is that sexual abuse is “illegal,” yet the government is allowing minors to get married as young as 10 years old. What do these judges expect will occur in these marriages? This is not a way to protect these children, as child marriage can enable abuse and pedophilia.
It’s clear that child marriage isn’t just an issue in third-world countries. If we truly want to become leaders in this world and set the stage for other countries, we need to reflect that both in our laws and in our morals. Children deserve rights and protection, and this desperately needs to be reflected in our judiciary system.
Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.
With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.
Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/_W1Z-NTx2f8/
A recent French court case has sharpened the debate over the age of sexual consent and rape. This is the second recent case that highlights the normalize of pedophilia currently taking place across western society.
In the most recent case, a jury at Meaux, near Paris, said last week that the prosecution failed to prove any of the four criteria required for a rape conviction under French law – threat, violence, constraint or surprise.
The accused, a Cape Verde citizen now aged 30, who has not been named, admitted to meeting the 11-year-old girl in the street where she was playing, taking her to the park and engaging in sexual intercourse, which he claims was consensual.
According to a report in le Parisien newspaper:
Prosecuted for rape on minor under 15 years, the accused, a Cape Verdean today aged 30, was acquitted on Tuesday evening by jurors of the Assize Court of Seine-et-Marne. At the hearing, the Advocate General had required eight years of imprisonment, with a socio-judicial follow-up. On Friday, the public prosecutor’s office of the Paris Court of Appeal appealed this verdict. “Until 15 years old, a child must be preserved. You can not get him sex. His consent is not informed, “says Dominique Laurens, the prosecutor Meaux.
In the reasons for the judgment, the court explains that none of the elements of rape, namely, threat, violence, coercion or surprise, are established and there is doubt as to whether the accused had aware of coercing the one with whom he had sex. At no point in the verdict is there any mention of the age of the child.
“My client is traumatized,” says her lawyer Me Laure Habeneck. “In his defense, the accused referred to the African heat (sic). It is to be hoped that this justification will not be at the root of the jury’s deep conviction. It appears from this decision that a sexual relationship between a 22-year-old man and an 11-year-old girl is normalized in our society.“
The girl, who is of Congolese origin, was reportedly playing with her cousin when the man approached her and invited her for a walk in the park, according to le Parisien.
After going to the park, under the guise of going for a walk, the man – who was 22 at the time — proceeded to undress the girl and forced her to have sexual intercourse, says the 11-year-old victim. The girl claimed during the hearing that she asked the man to stop and told the stranger her age as he sexually assaulted her.
The man maintains the act was consensual, and that the girl told him she was almost 15 – the age of consent in France. To obtain a rape conviction, prosecutors needed to prove that the sex was non-consensual.
Despite the girl’s testimony about telling the man her age, the jury chose to believe the man who initially lied about engaging in a sexual encounter with the child.
“My client maintained at the hearing that the complainant lied to her about her age. He says they flirted,” said Samir Mbarki, attorney for the defense.
According to the girl’s counselor, who met her after the incident, she was of “girlish physique, [and] could not be confused with a teenager or a woman,” according to le Parisien.
The girl told no one of the alleged sexual assault, and the incident only coming to light after the girl’s family noticed she was pregnant months later.
Her mother told le Parisien: “The man has destroyed the life of my daughter.”
Prosecutors were seeking an eight-year jail term for the man, but after two days of hearings, an acquittal verdict was delivered. The decision has been appealed.
Apparently, the word of the defendant, who initially lied to investigators and said nothing happened between him and the young girl — only to later change his story about having sex with the 11-year-old girl — was enough to secure an acquittal.
In another recent case, a French court dropped rape charges against a 28-year-old man who allegedly raped an 11-year-old girl, as prosecutors claim the sex was “consensual” citing a lack of violence.
As we previously reported, authorities claim the child consented to the sexual acts and was not coerced into having intercourse, despite being 11-years-old, claiming that the child willingly followed the accused who had previously approached her twice for intimacy.
“There was no violence, no constraint, no threat, and no surprise,” the prosecution said.
That incident sparked mass outrage in France, as critics of the decision have noted that actual consent is not even possible at such a young age. The man is now charged with sexual assault of a minor under the age of 15 – with a maximum penalty of five years in prison – but not rape, which in France carries a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment and twenty years behind bars if the victim is a minor.
Both recent cases are similar in the fact that there was no “violence” was used to force the sex, although an argument could be made that taking off the clothes of an 11-year-old girl and penetrating her could constitute violence – especially given the fact that a child of that age has no ability to consent and little to resist.
In the wake of the case, human rights groups called for changes to French laws, saying a legal age under which sexual consent is never presumed should be introduced.
While it is currently illegal in France to have sex with anyone under 15, rape charges can only be brought if prosecutors can prove the act was non-consensual.
Despite its age of consent, France currently does not have any law which defines sex with someone below a fixed age as rape.
Currently, if there is no violence or coercion proved, people may only be charged with sexual abuse of a minor charge and not rape — which has a maximum sentence of five years in prison. The penalties for rape are much more severe.
In the wake of the recent decision, Justice Minister Nicole Belloubet said that the age of just 13 was now a “limit that is worth considering” by lawmakers, according to The Sun.
The man is set to be retired next year after the prosecution appealed his acquittal.
Please share this story in hopes of waking people up to the creeping normalization of pedophilia taking place across Western society!
10:25 a.m. ET
BISHOP WILLIAM BARBER, REPAIRERS OF THE BREACH: White evangelicalism is connected to white nationalism, is connected to white supremacy. It is the backbone of racism that has happened in this country. Now, you understand that white nationalism — white supremacy that promotes racism. Racism is twisted, and so this notion of white evangelical values is twisted anyway because so-called white evangelicals — I call them Republican religionists — extreme Republican religionists.
Well, a real spiritual battle would be addressing the fact that, in some counties in Alabama, 40 percent of the people are in poverty. There are 24 percent of children living in households that are in poverty. That’s policy pedophilia when you’re hurting children and not addressing that. It’s one of the lowest states in public education. You’ve got nearly 900,000 people got poverty — 20 percent no health insurance. Those are the things that Christians should be dealing with if they were dealing with orthodox evangelicalism. This is heretical — it’s hypocritical.
<<< Please support MRC’s NewsBusters team with a tax-deductible contribution today. >>>
10:44 a.m. ET
FRANK SCHAEFFER: American white evangelical Christianity that I grew up in is now part of a white supremacist movement that wants to hold onto power whether it’s by gerrymandering, voter suppression, racism. white supremacy, or even violence. They know, for instance, that the gun lobby is making a fortune selling guns to people who shouldn’t have them, and they will go along with this as long as it’s part of their party platform that keeps them in power with the dollars that flow in to candidates and the rest.
We are talking about a morally bankrupt religious movement. We are talking about a country that — thank God — I think faces a hopeful future because — as the speaker before on this show said — the California trend of ethnic diversity, less racism, tolerance, accepting homosexuality as a normal human behavior, these things are on the ascendant. But these last grim, bitter, clinging to power by white oligarchs — these racists, these child molesters, these buffoons, these liars. It is a pitiful thing. We are in the equivalent — and I’m not making a moral comparison — but it’s like the last days of Hitler’s bunker — bunch of white generals clustered around a table, looking at maps, grimly trying to hold on to a shrinking part of Berlin as the allies move in from all sides.
That’s our future. It’s going to be a good future here in America. It is going to be one of creative redemption, and it’s something that we can look forward to. But in the meantime, God Almighty, we are facing just the lowest, scummiest moment in American history I can remember as a 65-year-old man.
Their idea is that they are a remnant of persecuted true believers, and now you mix in a racial element after an eight-year black presidency that denies everything that their core racist beliefs hold on to. What Reverend Barber was talking about, this kind of slave-master theology. That has been denied in a documentary sense to them that has enraged them. And so I completely agree their view is not to build a healthy future. Look, the healthy future is sitting around that table with you.
There are black faces there, there are white faces there, there are Asian faces. You’ve got one token old white fart here who repents his own past right-wing stupidity. But, that said, I look at what’s around your table, and I say, “If two lines were forming,” I would be running in that direction. That’s the healthy, hopeful, redemptive future, and you’ve got it sitting at that table with you.
As people try to wrap their minds around the horrid nature of rampant sex abuse in Hollywood, the accusations continue to flow but we are still left with little answers. However, Oscar-nominated documentary filmmaker Amy Berg has named names and delves into the systemic grooming of child actors in an eye-opening exposé—which includes a shocking on-camera confession of molestation.
With the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse scandal blowing the doors off the open secret of Hollywood pedophilia, a documentary titled, “An Open Secret,” which premiered a few years ago to mass publicity but failed to gain digital distribution, has been officially posted online for the first time by the producer in the wake of recent events.
“It’s so funny to keep seeing headlines about how Harvey’s abuse was ‘an open secret’ in Hollywood, and that’s the name of our film,” producer Gabe Hoffman told The Hollywood Reporter.
Hoffman’s documentary delves into the systemic sexual abuse of children at the hands of Hollywood moguls and heavy-hitters. According to Hoffman, he put An Open Secret on Vimeo for free viewing “to commemorate serial predator Harvey Weinstein finally being exposed.”
While the documentary was initially posted online for free until October 22 by Hoffman, he has now decided that in light of all the other courageous survivors of sexual abuse coming forward since the Weinstein story broke, to extend the free online viewing through October 31.
The movie premiered to a limited theatrical release a few years ago, but the incendiary content of the documentary clearly limited his ability to secure strong distribution as Hollywood bigwigs pushed to marginalize the films reach.
“We haven’t got any offers from major distributors yet because Hollywood doesn’t want to expose its dirty laundry, so we’ve been sitting on this for a while. Now, we want to celebrate the brave women who have exposed Harvey,” Hoffman told the Hollywood Reporter.
“Harvey Weinstein, by the way, is not the only one who has used confidentiality settlements. That’s why more of Hollywood’s behavior hasn’t been exposed. This is the tip of the iceberg,” Hoffman said.
Since putting the film online for free, “An Open Secret” has become a viral internet sensation.
The meat of the hard-hitting documentary are the personal testimonies of five former child actors/models, as they recall in vivid detail the terror and horror of being victimized by trusted confidants—including managers, agents, and publicists. The victims voice the confusion they felt after unknowingly being “groomed” for years, by the men guiding their careers, in an effort to gain the trust of the children and their parents.
The familiar face of Corey Feldman appears in archival footage speaking out against the Hollywood pedophiles who molested him and the late Corey Haim, as detailed in his 2013 memoir.
As The Free Thought Project reported, Feldman has spent years attempting to blow the whistle on pedophilia and child abuse in Hollywood, much of which has fallen on deaf ears. Finally, the statements Feldman has made in the past are being viewed in a different light.
“The Number one problem in Hollywood was and always will be pedophilia,” Feldman said.
Please watch the eye-opening documentary “An Open Secret” posted below, as it completely blows the lid off of the systemic pedophilia that is rampant throughout Hollywood!
Source Article from http://thefreethoughtproject.com/documentary-exposes-hollywood-pedophilia/
Exposing subliminal sexualizing content aimed at young children from Hollywood, TV shows, Movies, and the pedophile fashion industry. Disney channel and Disney movies exposed. Young girls being turned into miniature sex kittens. Illuminati brainwashing and destruction of Morality.
‘Illuminati Hypersexualization of Children Exposed! Disney Pedophilia and Satanic Role models’
Sexting minors is illegal, but having sex with them is okay, an Indiana Supreme Court has ruled.
Indiana high school teacher Sameer Thakar faces three years in prison for sending nude photographs to a 16-year old girl after the Supreme Court ruled earlier this week to reverse a lower court’s decision to throw out the case.
Thakar began texting the teenager in 2014, when he was 38. After a short period in which the girl told him she was underage, he then sent her images of his erect penis, court documents reveal.
He was charged with one count of felony dissemination of matter harmful to minors, but argued in court that the charge doesn’t make sense.
In Indiana, it is legal for adults to have consensual sex with 16 year olds. It is illegal, however, for a person to knowingly send sexually explicit photographs to someone under 18, which is classed as disseminating material harmful to minors.
The court originally threw out the charges, explaining it was “patently illogical” that a man could have sex with a teenager, but not send them images. The case was appealed and ended up in Indiana’s Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court found the charges should be upheld, despite the “inconsistent” law. It found no conflict between the two rules, as both can be complied with at the same time.
“With respect to a 16-year-old, consensual sexual activity in person is permitted, the dissemination of a sexually explicit photograph (consensually or otherwise) is not,” Justice Mark Massa wrote.
Massa said the court interprets the text of the law, and that it’s up to state lawmakers to sort out the inconsistency.
- Prosecutors Unveil Full Details Of Anthony Weiner’s Pedophilia
- Vatican’s 3rd most powerful figure, Cardinal Pell, charged with multiple sex assaults
- Alex Jones apologizes for Pizzagate, others such as David Seaman disagree
- Obama’s DHS Made THOUSANDS of Attempts to Hack Indiana’s Electoral System
- Muslims In Canada Say 9-Year-Old’s Are Adults And It’s Okay To Marry Them
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheEuropeanUnionTimes/~3/CoZFd-qzZDw/
We should begin with the 2014 opinion piece published by the NYT that, shockingly, few are familiar with. That article is entitled, “Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime.” It begins, “THINK back to your first childhood crush. Maybe it was a classmate or a friend next door..” doing their best to associate this sickening practice with our first feelings of love, otherwise implying that it is natural, if not normal.
In what can only be seen as shameless pandering to those behind the scenes, the article goes on from there to make the assertion that pedophiles are neither responsible for the crimes they commit, nor do they have the ability to stop themselves, effectively relieving these damaged individuals of all culpability and accountability for their actions. The author goes as far as to label the crime a “disability,” with potential discrimination thereof. The writer makes the claim that the laws currently in place in the US are, “inconsistent and irrational,” and argues that these child molesters should be sent for treatment, as opposed to serving prison time for their heinous acts against the most defenseless of us all. This is despite the overwhelming numbers that show just how often these “victims of impulse,” as the writer is trying to frame them, are “victims” of recidivism; the tendency of a convicted criminal to re-offend.
According to Harvard Medical School, estimates of recidivism among sexual offenders vary because studies define this term in different ways. One such Harvard review found recidivism rates as high as 50% among pedophiles.
One long-term study of previously convicted pedophiles (with an average follow-up of 25 years) found that one-fourth of heterosexual pedophiles and one-half of homosexual or bisexual pedophiles went on to commit another sexual offense against children.
One may be thinking, this is exactly why these troubled individuals need treatment, as the author suggests. No one can argue that one with such sickening desires does not need treatment, as that seems to be a foregone conclusion. However, the issue in question is whether or not that treatment actually works, and most importantly, whether or not treatment can be, or should be, used in place of a correctional facility, as the author dangerously advocates. A 2004 study published in the International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, which included 109 convicted sex offenders who completed therapy and 37 who dropped out, showed that the “non-completers,” were in fact more likely to commit another sexual crime.
The point being, that treatment does work to a certain degree and is important, as many can attest to, but not in place of a correctional facility when considering violent sexual criminals – and for one very clear reason. Researchers of the study noted that sex offenders who completed the therapy were not any more likely to show empathy toward their past victims.
This, in the opinion of some, shows a willingness to complete the therapy so as to move past it, but not with the intention to get better. The lack of empathy is a very important note, as the researchers documented, as it shows a lack of remorse. How can one feel that treatment for such a horrendous crime is effective if the perpetrator never shows any remorse for the acts they committed? The running theme throughout the article is that those who engage in pedophilia, should not be treated as criminals, but as victims themselves, despite the fact that potentially half of them will victimize another child in the near future, and even those who complete the treatment were no more likely so show remorse for those they abused.
One could come to all kinds of conclusions about why this article was written, and what the intentions truly were, but at the end of the day, it could be chalked up to any number of agendas or personal experiences, on its own.
The next aspect to consider, was the abysmally bad coverage by the New York Times, of all the surrounding events and criminal acts in regard to the investigation that became known as “Pizzagate.” Now to be clear, you must do away with visions of Hillary Clinton in a pizza parlor basement with kids chained to the walls. As I do not doubt that these sinister individuals would do, or have done just that, in the case of this investigation, those bullet points are being used to discredit and distract from the larger truth behind the scenes, and were likely thrown out when researchers began to get a bit too close, as with the case of Laura Silsby.
On numerous occasions while “covering” the Pizzagate investigation, the New York Times editorial staff took it upon themselves to ignore their charge as journalists to hold those in power accountable, and instead chose to completely omit the evidence at hand, in order to pander to the very individuals under scrutiny for pedophilia. And the few articles the failing organization did choose to put out on the topic were shockingly devoid of any critical analysis of the information, while inserting their own feelings about the case, and “conspiracy theorists” as a whole. That is not journalism, its propaganda.
There is far too much information surrounding this case to rehash it all in a single article (for those interested, TLAV has done extensive research into the case, as have many others such as Titus Frost), yet it is not hard to see, even with a cursory glance, that there is truth to these claims backed up by some pretty damning evidence, as many are beginning to see.
Which brings us to a recent NYT piece entitled, “Why I Admire Anthony Weiner;” and yes, it was written after Weiner was arrested and sentenced to prison for acts of pedophilia. This one speaks for itself. And there is no hidden meaning, no metaphor to be had – as if that would make it any better, should the writer have some grand conclusion and explanation for why she is openly admiring a convicted pedophile. The writer is simply making the case for why she admires his conduct during his trial, for which he was being held accountable, and rightly so, for his illegal actions with a 15-year-old girl. In essence, the author is saying that Weiner chose to take the high road, in accepting that he was responsible for his crime instead of blaming the disease, as many often do. Yet this is a blatant attempt to minimize the negative press of both Weiner and the Democratic party. Despite him no longer holding a position, it still reflects very badly on the party, which is why they went to their knee-jerk political propaganda arm, The New York Times, to pump out a fluff piece.
In astonishingly oblivious fashion, the writer ignores the years of lies and manipulation that preceded Weiner’s display of what can only be seen as regret for being caught, as opposed to actual remorse. How can it be admirable to sexually abuse an underage girl, lie about it for years, allow Hillary Clinton to cover it up for you, wait until they have you dead to rights, still deny the charges, then sobbingly admit to them in court when confronted with the overwhelming evidence? That’s easy, it’s not.
What we are witnessing here is what amounts to the acceptance and normalization of child abuse by the New York Times, in order to cover for some much larger issue at play. God only knows what those are… (well, and the independent media)
The Last American Vagabond.
There is a distinctive agenda of pedophilia normalization currently underway in western elitist society. The latest case involves a court dropping rape charges against a 28-year-old man who allegedly raped an 11-year-old girl, as prosecutors claim the sex was “consensual” citing a lack of violence.
Authorities claim the child consented to the sexual acts and was not coerced into having intercourse, despite being 11-years-old, claiming that the child willingly followed the accused who had previously approached her twice for intimacy.
“There was no violence, no constraint, no threat, and no surprise,” the prosecution said.
The incident has sparked mass outrage in France, as critics of the decision have noted that actual consent is not even possible at such a young age. The man is now charged with sexual assault of a minor under the age of 15 – with a maximum penalty of five years in prison – but not rape, which in France carries a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment and twenty years behind bars if the victim is a minor.
The incident took place in April of this year when the 11-year-old victim was lured back to the apartment of the 28-year-old’s apartment for what she was under the impression would be a lesson in “kissing,” according to the girl’s mother.
The 28-year-old father of two, after luring the sixth grader back to his apartment, allegedly attempted to have sex with the girl in a stairwell only to be interrupted by a building guard. The two then reportedly entered an elevator where the man had the child perform oral sex on him. Following that, the man took the 11-year-old back to his parents’ apartment, where the pair engaged in intercourse.
Immediately upon leaving the apartment building, the girl called her mother, who went directly to authorities to file rape charges.
“She (the child) thought it was too late, that she didn’t have the right to protest, that it wouldn’t make any difference, so she went into autopilot, without emotion, and without reaction,” the mother told the Mediapart news site.
The victim’s attorney rightly claimed that a child can never meaningfully consent to sex, calling the pressure exerted on a girl the “worst act of domination.” The child’s attorney, Carine Diebolt, argued that the accused rapist had threatened to ruin Sarah’s reputation if she told anyone about their intimate encounter.
“We should not even have this debate when it comes to a child,” Diebolt, said. “There is a difference between curiosity and consent to a sexual act with a 28-year-old guy in a staircase.”
Incredibly, the alleged rapist’s attorney claimed, the “rape accusation does not hold, because there is an explicit consent of the girl.”
“The only question is whether my client knew the complainant’s age,” said lawyer Marc Goudarzian. “We must distinguish morality from the offense.”
“My client asked her age, she shrugged, he thought she was at least 15 years old,” Goudarzian noted, which is the legal age of consent in France.
In an attempt to besmirch the sixth grader’s reputation, and muddy the legal waters, the 28-year-old man claims the girl had been sending “naked” pictures of herself to strangers, which says led him to believe that the child had reached puberty and was much older than 11.
The girl’s legal team refutes this assertion, claiming that the child had shown the man her school notebook, thus him being fully aware of her young age.
Child rights groups have condemned the prosecutor’s decision to not charge the man with rape.
“It’s an emblematic trial of the shortcomings in the definition of rape, which is to be reviewed,” Celine Piques, a spokesperson for Osez le féminisme told BFMTV.com, denouncing what it termed a “scandalous judicial absurdity.”
“The question of consent or its absence should never arise for minor rape victims,” the Voice of the Child organization told the Washington Post.
“It’s truly terrifying to think that an 11-year-old girl is supposed to have the judgment of an adult,” Armelle Le Bigot Macaux, head of the Cofrade children’s rights group, told LCI television.
The trial, originally set for Tuesday, was rescheduled for February 13 due to procedural issues.
Revealing the complete lack of seriousness with which the molestation and rape of a child are treated, the 28-year-old man was not incarcerated – thus being free to continue to rape children – but is merely prohibited from contacting the girl.
Please share this story in hopes of waking people up to the creeping normalization of pedophilia taking place across the whole of western society!
Source Article from http://thefreethoughtproject.com/normalization-pedophilia-court-charges/