Man Found Not Guilty for Killing a Police Officer, Claiming He Acted in Self Defense

not guiltynot guilty

Greensburg, PA — In an extremely rare move, a jury has returned a verdict of not guilty in the trial of a man who killed a St. Clair Township police officer as he responded to a domestic violence call in November of 2015.

After six days of testimony and more than 20 hours of jury deliberations, Ray Shetler Jr. was found not guilty of murder Friday in the fatal shooting of St. Clair Township Police Officer Lloyd Reed, according to Trib Live.

Shelter was facing the death penalty for killing the officer before he was found not guilty of first and third-degree murder.

As Trib Live reports:

Shetler, 33, of New Florence, jumped up and hugged his defense attorney as the verdict was announced. His family members, seated just one row in front of Reed’s family, let out an audible gasp.

“You were in the courtroom, you saw him hugging me, thanking me for saving his life,” said defense attorney Marc Daffner.

The jury found Shetler guilty of two lesser charges in connection with stealing a truck as he attempted to flee the scene of the shooting in New Florence and swam across the Conemaugh River.

Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio ordered Shetler remain in jail until he is able to post $100,000 bail that continues keeps him in custody for the theft and receiving stolen property convictions.

The judge said Shetler could be sentenced up to seven years in prison.

While there have been a few cases of people being found not guilty of killing police officers, this case stands out for several reasons.

Not only did Shelter fire three rounds at police, but afterward he fled the scene, dumped his clothing and the rifle and evaded police for six hours.

Also, in other cases in which police were killed while raiding homes over marijuana or non-existent drugs, Reed was actually responding to a domestic violence call by Shelter’s girlfriend Kristen Luther, who said he was beating her.

According to Trib Live, “Shetler testified on his own behalf as did his girlfriend, Kristen Luther. Both claimed Reed fired first during the shootout. It was Luther’s call to 911, saying Shetler had assaulted her that led Reed, who was patrolling neighboring St. Clair Township, to respond to New Florence. Shetler maintained he didn’t know Reed was a police officer.”

Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck expressed he and the Reed family’s disappointment with the verdict but noted that is the system in place.

“We have a jury system in this country and will certainly abide by their verdict,” Peck said.

As The Free Thought Project first reported in 2014, Marvin Guy is facing the death penalty. Guy shot and killed Detective Charles Dinwiddie and injured several other Killeen police officers, as they were attempting to forcefully enter Guy’s home on May 9, 2014, at 5:30 am.

Police had been surveilling Guy’s home for some time after an informant claimed Guy was trafficking a large quantity of cocaine. At some point in the investigation, the decision was made to enter Guy’s home and attempt to find evidence which would corroborate the informant’s claim.

But after entering the residence, in a show of force which resulted in the loss of life of a veteran police officer, no drugs, not even a single marijuana joint was found—a case far different than Shelter’s.

The consequence for the police incursion resulted in one detective’s death, and yet another Black man being charged with homicide. Guy’s fate is yet to be determined, as he is awaiting trial for Dinwiddie’s murder which, arguably, would not have occurred had the police not attempted to enter his home unannounced.

Even if the police had identified themselves before attempting to enter Guy’s home, there have been enough crimes committed by criminals posing as police, to justify Guy’s decision to defend his life from intruders. With Guy already being a convicted felon, more questions will likely be raised as to whether or not the Castle doctrine can be extended to convicted felons. The weapon Guy used, a 9mm, had been reported stolen.

Likewise, his possession of the weapon was also another potential felony. But the question remains. Do all Americans have a right to defend themselves? Under current Texas law, convicted felons do not have a right to keep and bear arms for the protection of their persons or dwelling. According to many jailhouse interviews conducted by KDH News, Guy told reporters “he was simply defending himself when his bedroom window was broken out that morning.”

Complicating matters further for the prosecution in Guy’s case is the fact that a precedent has already been set in a similar case. As The Free Thought Project reported, charges against Henry Goedrich Magee were dropped following a TX grand jury’s refusal to indict Magee on capital murder charges for the shooting death of Burleson County Sgt. Adam Sowders, after the sergeant led a team of police officers into Magee’s residence using the same “no-knock” search warrant method.

Magee claimed he was protecting his home and his pregnant girlfriend, the exact same claim Guy made upon his arrest.

After the grand jury refused to indict Magee, the case against him was dropped, just a few short months after the shooting occurred, quite a contrast from Guy’s imprisonment. Guy has been sitting in jail for two and a half years awaiting his day in court, held under three million dollars bond.

The discrepancies in the way Magee was treated and how Guy’s case is being handled hasn’t gone unnoticed. A petition to drop all charges against Guy was created on the website. A portion of the petition reads;

It is always a tragic, unfortunate event when anyone loses their lives, especially in the line of duty. But how can we essentially say that one person was defending themselves and another was committing murder, under such similar circumstances…No drugs were found in Guy’s house. Besides, if beyond a reasonable doubt is needed to convict, how can we be certain that Guy knew that the person(s) entering his home, at 5:30 in the morning, were peace officers, something required for the capital murder charge? Guy deserves to be treated fairly and the same as another man who acted in self-defense or what any other reasonable American would do.

For Guy’s supporters, possibly, there’s new hope that he will soon be set free.

Source Article from

NSA Shooting: 3 in Custody, Officer Injured After SUV Stopped at Fort Meade Security Gate

NSA Shooting: 3 in Custody, Officer Injured After SUV Stopped at Fort Meade Security Gate

February 14th, 2018

Via: Baltimore Sun:

FBI officials said they are continuing to investigate an incident at Fort Meade early Wednesday that left three people injured when the driver of an SUV attempted to make an unauthorized entry into the National Security Agency’s compound.

Dave Fitz, a spokesman at the FBI’s Baltimore field office, said late Wednesday investigators are looking into the possibility that the driver made a wrong turn at the complex, but said it is not the only theory officials are examining.

Those injured included an NSA police officer, a civilian onlooker and the driver of the black SUV, said Gordon B. Johnson, special agent in charge for the FBI’s Baltimore office. He said the SUV had a total of three occupants.

At a news briefing at Fort Meade, Johnson described the encounter as “an isolated incident.”

“I cannot emphasize enough that we believe there is no indication that this has a nexus to terrorism,� Johnson said.

The FBI took the lead in the investigation, and at the news conference Johnson said only limited information was available to be shared.




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from

How To Spot A Lie In 5 Seconds, Former CIA Officer Teaches You How

Next Story

Intuition. This is the first thing that comes to mind when I think about how we can effectively spot lies. Some of us call it a gut feeling, while others call it straight up intuition.

Humans, like a lie detector test, have a field of energy that stems from the heart. It is a magnetic field that radiates several metres off of a person and it can be detected by other people’s hearts and minds. This magnetic field contains information, and the heart is incredibly intelligent.

The work The HeartMath Institute is doing has made that evidently clear through their scientific research of the heart, it’s magnetic field and the inherent intelligence that exists in each persons heart.

The way I have always described it is, spotting a lie is a feeling. And I know in some way we have all felt this before. We may not have attributed it to our hearts or our heart’s intelligence, perhaps at times it was physical cues that gave it away, but I’m certain that each of us have known a lie was being told to them simply based off a feeling.

This is your intuition. Like it or not, it exists and we all have it. Truthfully, we can develop that intuition to assist us a great deal in life.

CIA Officer Reveals How To Spot A Lie

Former CIA officer Susan Carnicero — believes that humans lie about 10 times per day on average. Susan has spent more than 20 years interrogating, interviewing and polygraphing suspects, over the span of her career, and thus has learned a great deal on how to spot a liar. What she will teach goes back to the mental and analytical side of spotting a liar, but nonetheless this can be an important tool. She tells all in the video below.

Before jumping into this however, note that spotting a liar isn’t an exact science. Just because you see a friend doing something you will learn about below, may not mean they’re lying.

When it comes down to it, there are a wide range of lies. Some lies are meant to spare someone’s feelings or avoid hurting them, while others are more of an aggressive lie to protect oneself or deceive another for personal benefit. So of course, there are times when it is much more important to be able to spot a lie than others.

When it comes to intuition, I tend to feel that the heart is so intelligent that if it is more of a playful lie to say surprise you for a party or something of that nature, you might be less aware of what is going on than when your intuition is really trying to get you to see something important. But this is truly my own experience, not a science.

Nonverbal Signs Of Deceit

Grooming gestures – This one is quite common. If a person is straightening a tie or piece of clothing, fixing hair, adjusting or fiddling with something else on their body like a watch or glasses, this can be a subconscious way people are trying to hide their anxiety about a question.

Verbal/nonverbal disconnect – Have you ever seen someone nod their head yes but say no when being asked a question? Then fumble over their words trying to correct it? This can be a sign of a deceptive behaviour as well.

Behavioural pause – Let’s say you asked a person something vague like what they might have been doing 5 years ago in September. The person may pause, think for a moment and try to figure it out as it’s not an easy thing to remember. However, if you had said, “did you murder someone 5 years ago in September?” And a pause occurred, that might indicate a sign of deceit as it should be a very easy question to answer.

Hand-to-face movements – If you notice a person raise their hand to their mouth, or face, lick their lips, pull on their ear or adjust their hair, this can be another sign of deceptive behaviour.

In the video below, Susan reveals more than just nonverbal signs, she also discusses further vocal cues that can tell a lot about what a persons intentions are.

Get Your FREE In Depth Numerology Reading

Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.

With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.

Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.


Source Article from

How They Do It–Ex-CIA officer says Trump’s ‘Deep State’ conspiracy is a ‘fascist concept’ aimed at undermining democracy

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,870 other followers

Source Article from

Man Convicted Of Theft In 1976 Cleared Of Charges After Googling Officer

By  Amanda Froelich Truth Theory

Technology has changed the world. And as such, it has changed many people’s lives. However, perhaps no one’s life has changed so drastically as a result of technology than Stephen Simmons.

In June of 1976, Simmons and two friends were arrested in south London by the British Transport Police. They were accused of stealing mailbags in south London. The Guardian reports that Simmons and his friends were allowed to see a duty solicitor who told them that if they said the police were liars, they would sit in jail for “a long time.”

Despite the warnings, all three men pleaded not guilty yet, they were convicted. As a result, Simmons served eight months in Suffolk. Reportedly, the incident has haunted him ever since. Only recently did he tell his grown-up daughters about the ordeal.

Four years ago, Simmons received “friendly advice” by barrister Daniel Barnett on the LBC radio’s legal advice program. He was told to Google the name of his arresting officer if he wished to overturn his conviction, so he did exactly that. Simmons did not expect anything to emerge, but was surprised to learn that Ridgewell himself was jailed for seven years for mailbag thefts totaling a whopping £300,000 in 1980. He died in prison in 1982.

“I was gobsmacked,” said Simmons. He then took his case to the criminal cases review commission whose “meticulous research” led to an appeal. Speaking for Simmons, Steven Powles said: “Mr Simmons has been waiting for 43 years for this day.”

Lord Burnett, the lord chief justice, acknowledged case worker Adam Bell’s “remarkable” efforts and expressed regret about the court’s prior decision. Lord Burnett said the evidence was “extremely telling … It is an exceptional case”.

It was also revealed in court that Ridgewell was responsible for a series of cases in which young black men were falsely accused of mugging patrons on the London Underground. Ridgewell’s behavior was so inflammatory, the book Black for a Cause was written and in it, Ridgewell’s long history of “fit-ups” exposed.

After having the charges cleared, Simmons told the press: “This is one of the happiest days of my life. It has hardly sunk in but I am not a criminal any more. I can hold my head up high.

“One of the hardest things for me was that my parents did not believe me because they were of the generation that believed that the police could not lie,” he added.

What are your thoughts? Please comment below and share this news!

Read more: 17 Solutions To Tackle Police Brutality In America

Image Credit: Stephen Simmons

Source Article from

Former top FBI officer warns: Israeli law enforcement lax, reforms needed

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,866 other followers

Source Article from

Female Officer Blows Whistle as Fellow Cop Pleads Guilty to Raping Her—Faces No Charges

female policefemale police

Nashville, TN – A female police officer who was strangled and raped is now calling out the district attorney’s office for letting the man who assaulted her off the hook because he was a fellow officer.

When the unnamed woman went to police to report the assault in June 2016, she was armed with evidence in the form of an audio recording in which the man who assaulted her admitted to his crime—but the district attorney determined that the recording was not enough.

Julian Pirtle was charged with aggravated assault for strangling the woman, but because he accepted a plea deal, the rape charges he was facing were dropped, according to a report from WSMV News.

The woman had previously dated Pirtle, and they worked together as school resource officers before the assault happened. Two days after the incident took place, the woman confronted Pirtle at work and recorded the encounter.

“I was so f—ing drunk,” Pirtle said in the recording.

“You were drunk?” the female officer asked. “And the look in your eyes?”

What did you see?” Pirtle responded.

“What did I see? It looked like you wanted to kill me. I have never felt that before,” the woman said. “Did you know for two days that I could not swallow? For you to know what you were doing.”

“I didn’t. I don’t think you understand that there are moments of intense rage,” Pirtle said, going on to say, “It’s like—why do you think they call me the Hulk?”

“I don’t know, but that doesn’t give you the right to put your hands on me,” the woman said.

“They don’t call me Bruce Banner for no reason. It’s not an excuse,” Pirtle replied.

When WSMV’s chief investigative reporter, Jeremy Finley, confronted Pirtle in October 2016, he said, “I’ve listened to the audio—the recording of you—and you refer to yourself as the Hulk. You want to explain that?”

Pirtle did not respond, and the report noted that during the Metro police internal investigation, “Pirtle said he was just talking dirty to the female officer in the parking lot, and that she was setting him up by recording the conversation.”

While Pirtle was fired from his job as a school resource officer, there are still questions remaining as to why the rape charge against him was dropped. Doug Thurman, the assistant district attorney who helped prosecute the case, told WSMV that while the audio recording helped prove that Pirtle strangled the woman, it did not provide any evidence that he also raped her.

“Obviously he makes comments about himself being angry, and that supports the aggravated assault, but in terms of the rape charge, we just did not have the evidence,” Thurman said.

Pirtle began receiving special treatment from Judge Rachel Bell in the case from day one when his bond was lowered from $75,000 to $5,000, and he was released on the same day he was arrested, according to jail records—even though he was facing aggravated assault charges.

Now, the woman is calling out the district attorney’s office in a statement in which she said the trial taught her that “political influence and our flawed justice system have voices that supersede the needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims.” 

Though the aggressor pled guilty to an Aggravated Assault which nearly took my life and openly acknowledged the severity of his actions, I’m baffled at having no consideration in a plea agreement that drops a prior conviction for order of protection violation, dismisses sexual assault, removes all safeguards and essentially renders me unprotected. Being a victim made me realize I was owed justice that I’ll never receive.” 

The female officer said her experience has helped her understand why incidents of domestic violence and sexual assault often go unreported, and she is now devoted to raising awareness and helping other victims

“I am moving forward with greater understanding of why so many domestic violence and sexual assaults go unreported, as victims are often dragged through lengthy litigation processes only to be unheard in the end,” she said.

WSMV News 4

Source Article from

Ex-CIA Clandestine Officer Confirms False Flag Missile Attack Upon Hawaii

The Hawaiian Islands “incoming missile” alert, which was officially downgraded to a “mistake”, was  supposedly made due to an inattentive worker that happened during a shift change. That explanation is total Bravo Sierra. As I previously reported on a broadcast on The Common Sense Show Youtube channel, the process to deliver a warning of this magnitude is a 5 step process, involving two humans, with keys, turning the mechanism to release the information at the same time. The key mounts are eight feet apart. An accident is impossible. Within hours of the event, and because I was able to quickly gather information to demonstrate that the Hawaiian event was no accident, and ex-CIA Robert David Steele was able to confirm the information.

In the following video, Lisa Haven also reported on this issue and she clearly states that her sources confirmed that the process to warn the public of an incoming threat is a 5 step process. Not only that, Lisa reduces the odds that this was some big coincidence because the same thing happened in Japan on the following day. When one does the work that Lisa and myself do on an ongoing basis, one comes to realize that coincidences are few and far between. Here is Lisa Haven’s report on this matter:


I also have confirmed this 5 step process with multiple people including one who will go on the record, and that person is former CIA clandestine officer, Robert David Steele. In addition, The Common Sense Show has learned that AFPAC’s warning system also broadcast the same warning at the same time and that this system is independent of the Hawaiian warning system. The government and the Governor of Hawaii are both lying to the people!


Multiple people, approximately 100 nautical miles from the Hawaiian Islands saw a flash of light following an explosion in the air.  The time frame fits the Hawaiian warning of an incoming missile. The witnesses included a boating expedition of about 10 people. Further, there are multiple accounts in the Islands of seeing the flash of light (ie explosion).



Yesterday, I interviewed Robert David Steele, who served for years in the clandestine service portion of the CIA. Among many subjects, we discussed the Hawaiian missile alert. He confirms the process of alerting the public to an imminent event and this warning is, as I have stated, a 5 step process and an accident of the type being described by the Hawaiian governor is not possible. The Governor is lying to the citizens of Hawaii.

In the interview, Steele is crystal clear in saying that this was a false flag attack designed to blame North  Korea and start World War III.


One should realize that the “attack” upon Hawaii and later Japan happened very shortly after is was announced that the two Korea’s would march under the same flag and form a joint hockey team. This development is being undertated in the mainstream media. This development is monumental in its implication because this represents two nations who are saying no to World War III.

It is not likely that the hockey coach and Olympic contingent from both nations called each other said let’s be friends. This development was generated at a much higher level. I have been told that the President’s’ of China and the US agreed to and encouraged this development.  And as I have previously covered on The Common Sense Show, this means that in actuality, none of the principals in the ongoing events related to NK’s nuclear missiles want World War III. Given what we know about the situation, it seems very likely that rogue elements of the globalists launched a missile at both Japan and Hawaii, both were taken down, and the attempted false flag events designed to start World War III were averted for the time being. I covered these possibilities in the following interview:

It is going to be a wild ride because the globalists don’t passively accept defeat. There will undoubtedly be  more provocations designed to start World War III as the globalists search for the right combination of events to have their (WW I) Archduke Francis Ferdinand moment.


For more stories like these, visit The Common Sense Show

Please donate to offset the costs of The Common Sense Show




 Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer.  Listeners to The Common Sense Show will receive 10% off their next order by mentioning “Hodges10” in the coupon code box.  Don’t wait until it is too late. Click Here for more information.


If the bad guy has night vision and you don't he wins. Don't be a victim, find out more by CLICKING HERE

If the bad guy has night vision and you don’t he wins. Don’t be a victim, find out more by  CLICKING HERE  


From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Take 5% off the cost of your order with coupon code DAVE5

From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at 



Source Article from

2015 Student Death Ruled Unjustified; Chicago Police Officer at Fault

CHICAGO — Chicago’s police oversight committee released a report sustaining allegations that an officer used excessive force in the 2015 fatal shooting of a NIU student.

The report, released by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability Dec. 22, determined Chicago Police Department officer Robert Rialmo was unjustified in his use of force that led to the deaths of Quintonio LeGrier, 19, and Bettie Jones, 55. LeGrier was on break from NIU at the time of the shooting.

Rialmo arrived at the 4700 block of West Erie Street in Chicago in response to a domestic disturbance call Dec. 26, 2015. Upon arrival, Jones pointed officers to the second floor where LeGrier was. LeGrier came to the door with an aluminum baseball bat. Rialmo then opened fire and shot the 19-year-old, accidentally striking Jones.

The police oversight committee report questioned Rialmo’s recountings of the incident. Rialmo said LeGrier swung the bat at him, however no other witnesses, including fellow officers, supported his claim. Rialmo also said he was on the porch steps of the building, but shell casings were found closer to the curb of the road.

The report found Rialmo’s statements to be inconsistent, and the actions were not within policy.

“In sum, a reasonable officer in Officer Rialmo’s position would not have believed he was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm at any time that Officer Rialmo fired his weapon,” according to the Civilian Office of Police Accountability report.

The report sustains allegations of unjustified use of force, firing into a home occupied by persons at risk of injury or death and working without proper taser certification.

Daniel McConkie, NIU College of Law professor, said similar incidents take time for groups like the Civilian Office of Police Accountability to review because they aim for accuracy while taking public interest into account.

“It’s not clear to me why it took so long,” McConkie said. “I can’t speculate. All I can say is it’s very important to get it right, but it’s within the public interest to get it out quickly. People lose confidence in public actions and investigations when they drag on for years for whatever the reason is.”

Andrea Kersten, Civilian Office of Police Accountability deputy chief administrator, made recommendations to fire Rialmo in a letter to Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson Dec. 22, according to a Jan. 4 Chicago Sun-Times article.

Johnson now has 90 days to decide to relay the recommendation to the Chicago Police Board.

McConkie believes the decision for Johnson will be a tough one as many factors come into play, including public trust and the allegations by Rialmo in a lawsuit against the city that the city provided poor training, according to a Dec. 29 Chicago Tribune article.

McConkie said the officer was, at the very least, improperly trained, which may play into the superintendent’s decision.

“Assuming [the Civilian Office of Police Accountability] is correct, it would probably be a good idea to fire the officer, if only to restore some public confidence in the system,” McConkie said. “I shouldn’t say if only, but one good reason is that it restores public confidence in the system. At a minimum, we have an officer that wasn’t adequately trained.”

The Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, the union that represents Rialmo, said they “strongly denounce the ruling” and have requested Chicago’s Inspector General Joe Ferguson to investigate the Civilian Office of Police Accountability because there is “compelling evidence that members of [the Civilian Office of Police Accountability] are leaking information on confidential investigations to reporters,” according to a Fraternal Order of Police Thursday press release.

McConkie said public perception of police action has changed a lot over the past several years and accountability is becoming more and more important.

“We live in a day and age where lots of people rarely accept police action unquestionably,” McConkie said. “The work of a body like [the Civilian Office of Police Accountability] is important in building trust.”


If you haven’t already, be sure to like our Filming Cops Page on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Please visit our sister site Smokers ONLY


(function(d) {
var params =
id: “3c7936d6-71e2-4cba-afb4-95ed4171941f”,
d: “ZmlsbWluZ2NvcHMuY29t”,
wid: “365543”,
cb: (new Date()).getTime()

var qs=[];
for(var key in params) qs.push(key+’=’+encodeURIComponent(params[key]));
var s = d.createElement(‘script’);s.type=’text/javascript’;s.async=true;
var p = ‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https’ : ‘http’;
s.src = p + “://” + qs.join(‘&’);

Filming Cops

Source Article from

WATCH: Metro Atlanta Police Officer Fired After Inappropriate Behavior During Traffic Stop

SOCIAL CIRCLE, GA – A metro Atlanta police officer is out of a job after he allegedly yelled profanities at a teen, then urged the teen to fight him during a traffic stop.

The incident happened in Social Circle on Wednesday, November 23rd. Officer James Sanders was fired this past Thursday after chief Tyrone Oliver received an anonymous tip.

Oliver says Sanders pulled the teens over after one of them yelled a vulgar term while he was working another traffic stop.

The video shows Sanders asking the 17 year old who yelled the term to get out of the car.

“Get out the jeep. What’d you have to say?” ‘Nothing,’ the teen said. “Tell me one more time and you’re going to jail son,” Sanders said.

Sanders then tells the kid to fight him.

“You wanna f**k the police?” “No sir I don’t,” the boy said. “Well I am right here brother,” Sanders said tapping the teen’s shoulder.

The encounter lasted about eight and a half minutes.

“If I go God damn jerking everybody out of that jeep and find marijuana, you think I’m going to take everybody to jail?” Sanders can be heard saying.

Oliver says Sanders had no legal reason to pull the car over. He also searched the vehicle without a warrant.

“It was completely uncalled for, unprovoked and it will not be tolerated here,” Oliver told CBS46 reporter Natalie Rubino.

Another officer who was called for back up handled the situation differently, talking calmly to the teens.

“What you did is not breaking law. It’s freedom of speech. Still just calling it out while we’re trying to do our job…” the officer said.

For Oliver the decision to fire Sanders was difficult but he says any type of disrespectful behavior towards the people they serve is unacceptable.

“We’re held to a higher standard and we have to conduct ourselves as such. We have to have tough skin and let things roll of our back,” Oliver said.

Sanders is an eight year veteran of the Social Circle Police Department. He’s been written up before including an 2014 incident where he threatened to blow up a local school over an argument about getting paid for off duty security. Oliver said regardless of whether or not Sanders was written up in the past, his decision to fire him would stay the same.


If you haven’t already, be sure to like our Filming Cops Page on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Please visit our sister site Smokers ONLY


(function(d) {
var params =
id: “3c7936d6-71e2-4cba-afb4-95ed4171941f”,
d: “ZmlsbWluZ2NvcHMuY29t”,
wid: “365543”,
cb: (new Date()).getTime()

var qs=[];
for(var key in params) qs.push(key+’=’+encodeURIComponent(params[key]));
var s = d.createElement(‘script’);s.type=’text/javascript’;s.async=true;
var p = ‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https’ : ‘http’;
s.src = p + “://” + qs.join(‘&’);

Filming Cops

Source Article from