Siberian communists hold rally in support of North Korea

The people and leaders of North Korea are making every effort to secure their country against the United States’ aggression. Novosibirsk Communists say a resolute ‘no’ to the imperialist policies of the US and its threats against the North Korean people,” the press service of the Novosibirsk Regional Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) wrote, in the press release announcing the rally.

The Communists also wrote about the “long-lasting friendly ties” between the Novosibirsk Region and North Korea. “Novosibirsk Region was the birthplace and home of Hero of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Yakov Novichenko, who shielded Kim Il Sung with his own body during an assassination attempt. North Korean leaders Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il visited Novosibirsk during their visits to the USSR and to the Russian Federation.”

Deputy Head of the Novosibirsk regional committee of the KPRF Renat Suleymanov said in comments to the RBC news agency that he and his comrades wanted to debunk the myth about the aggressiveness of North Korea spread by mass media.

I have a very positive personal attitude to this country. I have been there several times and I know the real situation there. There are a lot of myths being circulated about North Korea; they claim that it is a miserable and resentful nation,” he said. 

This rally is not in support of the media portrayal of an aggressive Korea, it is in support of the country and the people against the aggressive policies of the United States.” 

Speaking at the rally, Suleymanov also warned the public that if the United States succeeded in their plans to destroy North Korea, their military bases would be placed just 70 kilometers away from Russian borders.

The latest North Korean nuclear and missile tests have prompted an emergency session of the UN security Council and provoked the United States to enter the “war of words” in which President Donald Trump promised to “totally destroy” North Korea if forced to defend the US or its allies.

This statement was immediately subjected to harsh criticism not only by North Korean diplomats and officials but also by US allies, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The North Korean leader replied with a promise to make Trump “pay dearly” for his words and adding that “his remarks…have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.”

Earlier this month, Russian President Vladimir Putin told reporters that sanctions and war threats could not dissuade North Korean leaders from carrying on their missile and nuclear programs, because the examples of Iraq and Libya have convinced them that nuclear deterrence is the only credible way to ensure their security.

Ramping up military hysteria in such conditions is senseless; it’s a dead end,” he added. “It could lead to a global, planetary catastrophe and a huge loss of human life. There is no other way to solve the North Korean nuclear issue, save that of peaceful dialogue,” Putin said.

Source Article from

North Korea May Blow Up Hydrogen Bomb in Pacific

SPUTNIK–North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho has suggested that the nation’s leader might be mulling a hydrogen bomb test in the Pacific after their row with the United States escalated this week.

“It could be the most powerful detonation of an H-bomb in the Pacific,” Ri told reporters as quoted by the South Korean state news agency Yonhap.

The North’s top diplomat added he had no idea what Kim Jong Un’s exact plans were, after he warned the United States of a “high level” countermeasure, in response to the US president’s recent threats.

President Donald Trumpon Wednesday called Kim a “rocket man” on a “suicide mission,” in his first major speech at UN, and said Pyongyang faced a total destruction if it attacked the United States or its allies.

The North Korean leader in response to Donald Trump’s speech accused US President of exhibiting a “mentally deranged behavior” and threatened him with a “highest level of hard-line countermeasure in history”.

Source Article from

North Korea Warns It’s About To Detonate H-Bomb Over The Pacific

Kim Jong-un has made another threat directed at President Donald Trump claiming he will detonate a deadly H-Bomb over the Pacific.

The threat from North Korea was in response to Trumps earlier warning that America would “totally destroy” North Korea if the regime attacked the U.S or its allies.

The North Korean leader also threatened to “tame” Donald Trump with fire and promised the “highest-level” action against the U.S.“It could be the most powerful detonation of an H-bomb in the Pacific,” he said, adding that he has “no idea about what actions could be taken as it will be ordered by leader Kim Jong Un.”

The Daily Caller reports: Earlier this month, North Korea conducted its sixth and most powerful nuclear test to date, detonating a suspected staged thermonuclear weapon, specifically a hydrogen bomb.

The country has twice successfully tested an intercontinental ballistic missile that can reach the U.S., and it North Korean state media has presented images of the warhead. Pyongyang has yet to put everything together and demonstrate its full capabilities though.

It is unclear if, when, or how North Korea might choose to conduct its next nuclear test, but it could choose to carry out such a test with its ICBM or new intermediate-range ballistic missile, which it has already fired over Japan twice, although doing so would be risky.

Testing a hydrogen bomb in the Pacific would represent a new kind of North Korean provocation, one unlike anything the world has seen before. Kim is determined to prove that he will not be deterred by Trump. North Korea recently claimed that it is close to achieving its nuclear goals, despite international pressure to rein in the aggressive little country.

Source Article from

We will be putting more sanctions on North Korea – Trump

“We will be putting more sanctions on North Korea,” Trump told reporters on Thursday, as he was heading into a meeting with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani.

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster told CNN Thursday morning that Trump will make a sanctions-related announcement about North Korea later today.

Source Article from

US Might Not Even be Able to Shoot Down North Korean Rockets


Despite President Donald Trump telling the UN General Assembly that the US would “totally destroy” North Korea if it is attacked, the US arsenal may not be able to stop a nuclear strike if one is carried out, according to some analysts.

Some experts in the military and missile defense fields believe that even if the US had information that North Korea posed a real threat to America, or one of its allies, they may not be able to shoot down a missile headed for a target.

North Korea’s intermediate range missile launch over Japan’s Hokkaido Island on September 15 reached a maximum altitude of 480 miles (770 km), according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. But Joseph Cirincione, who is the founder of the Ploughshares Fund, a global security foundation, says the US and Japan do not even have the capability to intercept a missile launched at that altitude.

Cirincione elaborated by saying that no ballistic missile defense system in existence can even reach the height which the North Korean missile test achieved, according to Defense One.

Bruce Bennett, an analyst from the nonprofit public policy group RAND Corporation, shares some of Cirincione’s skepticism.

“We could potentially miss or hit, we don’t know for sure,” he said, according to the Express.

Another expert has called into question the value of a Washington Post report last month stating that North Korea may be able to fit a miniaturized warhead on an intercontinental missile.

Tom Plant, Director of the Proliferation and Nuclear Policy Program at London’s Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said that the country may still not possess the technology to support the critical reentry phase of a successful long-range missile strike.

Plant says the warhead mentioned in the report may only be designed to initially take off from inside the ICBM, but does not account for reentry into the atmosphere after it is launched. The missile’s reentry vehicle must endure scathing heat and cold temperatures when coming back into the atmosphere en route for its target.

Plant believes that “North Korea has successfully produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead but question remains if its missile technology could survive a launch into space, and subsequent re-entry to hit an intended target,” Plant told Newsweek.

“In relation to that particular U.S. intelligence assessment, the language is always worth paying very close attention to. The assessment states that North Korea has produced nuclear weapons for ballistic missile delivery, to include delivery by ICBM,” he said, according to Newsweek.

“That’s subtly different from saying that those weapons fit in a survivable reentry vehicle.”

Following the September 15 test, US Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday that the US has not seen a reason to shoot down any North Korean missiles as of yet.

Mattis explained the recent threats by North Korea and how the US will deal with the alleged threats to them and their allies.

“The bottom line is: The missiles, were they to be a threat – whether it be to U.S. territory, Guam, [or] obviously Japan’s territory — that would elicit a different response from us,” he said, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Mattis elaborated and said the US would take “immediate actions” to intercept and shoot down any missile headed for Japan, South Korea or Guam.

Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga also explained Japan’s response to the provocative missile launch by Kim Jong-un’s government on September 15.

“We didn’t intercept it because no damage to Japanese territory was expected,” he said, according to the Japan Times.

President Trump, meanwhile, has gone further in his statements on addressing a hypothetical North Korean missile attack. Following in his predecessor’s footsteps, the president said he “will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea,” if forced to defend the US and its allies, during his first speech to the UN General Assembly on Tuesday.

During the speech, he also referred to Kim Jong-un’s regime in North Korea as “depraved,” and called the leader “rocket man.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reacted to Trump’s speech by saying threats will not help solve the North Korean missile problem.

“If we just condemn and threaten, then we are likely to antagonize the countries that we want to influence. That’s why we prefer to work with all interested parties, to give them incentives to enter a dialogue,” Lavrov said.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Trump warns U.S. may have to 'totally destroy' North Korea

NEW YORK — President Trump bluntly warned in a speech to the United Nations on Tuesday that the United States may be forced to “totally destroy North Korea” if that country proceeds with its nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile programs.

Condemning the “depraved” North Korean regime as a major threat to global security, Trump mocked its leader, Kim Jong Un, saying: “‘Rocket Man’ is on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime.”

“The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea,” the president told world leaders in his first address to the annual U.N. General Assembly.

That unusually martial language from the U.N. rostrum drew a rebuke from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who said that the president used the United Nations “as a stage to threaten war” and said his “bombastic threat” did nothing to help defuse the crisis.

Trump’s stark message came in a roughly 40-minute speech in which he also sharply criticized China, mildly rebuked Russia, condemned Venezuela’s government, and suggested he might scrap the Iran nuclear deal. Overall, the tone was a nod back to his 2016 campaign’s unapologetically nationalist approach to world affairs.

“I will always put America first, just like you, as the leaders of your countries, will always and should always put your countries first,” the president said. “In America, we do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to watch.”

Some of Trump’s toughest language targeted China, North Korea’s primary patron and trading partner.

Slideshow: World leaders’ faces react to Trump’s U.N. speech >>>

“It is an outrage that some nations would not only trade with such a regime, but would arm, supply and financially support a country that imperils the world with nuclear conflict,” he said, without explicitly naming Beijing. “No nation on earth has an interest in seeing this band of criminals arm itself with nuclear weapons and missiles.”

Chinese President Xi Jinping skipped the General Assembly, as he frequently does. Other absent leaders included Russian President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Trump also pressed for global action to rein in Tehran and hinted that he could either tear up the Iran nuclear deal, which he pronounced “one of the worst and most one-sided” accords Washington has ever signed, or declare that the Islamic Republic is not in compliance with the agreement.

“We cannot abide by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual construction of a nuclear program,” he said. “Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it, believe me.”

Russia rated only a couple of passing mentions in the speech: Trump lumped its invasion of Ukraine among “threats to sovereignty” that deserve condemnation, but praised Moscow for joining recent unanimous 15-0 U.N. Security Council votes to tighten sanctions on North Korea.

But Trump, who in mid-August had floated a “possible military option” to respond to Venezuela’s slide into chaos, railed at length against that country’s leader, Nicolas Maduro.

“The Venezuelan people are starving, and their country is collapsing. Their democratic institutions are being destroyed. This situation is completely unacceptable, and we cannot stand by and watch,” the president said. “We are prepared to take further action if the government of Venezuela persists on its path to impose authoritarian rule on the Venezuelan people.”

Trump further vowed to “stop radical Islamic terrorism,” a phrase he had left out of recent speeches, and declared, “It is time to expose and hold responsible those countries who support and finance terror groups.” He did not name names.

Again and again, the president returned to the theme of national sovereignty, describing international trade deals and immigration as threats to America’s identity.

“The United States will forever be a great friend to the world, and especially to its allies,” he promised. “But we can no longer be taken advantage of or enter into a one-sided deal where the United States gets nothing in return.”

And he blamed “mammoth multinational trade deals, unaccountable international tribunals and powerful global bureaucracies” for lost jobs and shuttered factories in the United States.

Returning to a core theme of his campaign, Trump said: “Our great middle class, once the bedrock of American prosperity, was forgotten and left behind. But they are forgotten no more, and they will never be forgotten again.”

Trump’s presidency has been shaped by a range of clashes with foreign allies. The president has suggested that he would not honor NATO’s mutual-defense provision unless partner nations stepped up defense spending. He scrapped U.S. participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, upsetting leaders in Japan, South Korea and a number of other countries worried about being in the shadow of a rising China. He called for ending the U.S. trade deal with South Korea, shocking Seoul at a time when both countries need to cooperate on North Korea. He withdrew from the Paris Agreement to fight climate change, a step French President Emmanuel Macron has urged him to reconsider. And Trump has repeatedly said Mexico will pay for the border wall he promised during his campaign, something America’s southern neighbor flatly rejects.

Trump made no mention of the Middle East peace process or international efforts to combat climate change in his remarks.

Read more from Yahoo News:


Source Article from

Trump Threatens to "Totally Destroy" North Korea


In his first address to United Nations, US President Donald Trump has threatened North Korea with total destruction if it attacks the US or its allies. He also blasted Iran, Venezuela, Cuba and Syria.

If forced to defend itself and its allies, the US “will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea,” Trump said in his remarks at the 72nd session of the UN General Assembly on Tuesday. He also called North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un a “Rocket Man” on a suicide mission.

Trump thanked China and Russia for joining the US at the UN Security Council to impose new sanctions on the DPRK. In the past two month, the UNSC passed two rounds of sanctions against North Korea for its repeated testing of ballistic missiles.

Last week, Moscow told Washington that while Russia and China are implementing the sanctions part of the UNSC resolution, the US must deliver on its obligation to pursue diplomacy to defuse the crisis.

Meanwhile, North Korea warned Monday that the more sanctions imposed on it, the more quickly it will complete its nuclear force, official state news agency KCNA reports.


Trump declared the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran an “embarrassment to the US,” adding, “frankly, I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it.”

His administration has threatened to quit the deal if the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) did not require and obtain access to all Iranian military sites.

The UN’s nuclear watchdog last week certified that Iran complied with the agreement, which was negotiated by world powers – including the US – two years ago, in order to make sure Iran does not build nuclear weapons.

Venezuela & socialism

Trump also railed against Venezuela and its leadership, saying the US will help the Venezuelan people “regain their country and restore their democracy.”

“We call for the full restoration of democracy and political freedoms in Venezuela,” Trump said, adding that the US has imposed sanctions against the government of President Nicolas Maduro and is prepared to do more.

He then went on to blast socialism in places like Venezuela and Cuba, saying that their problems stem from the fact that “socialism has been faithfully implemented.”

Earlier in the speech, however, Trump spoke about the importance of sovereignty as a guiding principle in international relations.

“We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone,” Trump said. “We are guided by outcomes, not ideology.”

The American president stated he will always put America first, just like other leaders in the room “will always and should always put your countries first,” he said, drawing brief applause from the audience.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

The Worst Case Scenario Is Unfolding in Communist North Korea

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

This article states that many experts believe that Russia and China have been supplying North Korea with specialized rocket fuel, as I have been saying for quite some time:

A Potent Fuel Flows to North Korea. It May Be Too Late to Halt It.

The article further discusses the fact that our crypto-communist leaders did nothing to protect us from this danger, as they laid in bed with Red Russia and Red China, and concerned themselves with attacking Iran, instead of protecting America from the communist alliance of Russia, China and North Korea. Why would Red Russia and Red China supply their communist client North Korea with rocket fuel, but not hydrogen bombs? Since they are supplying the rocket fuel, it is almost certain they are also supplying the H-bombs. Those bombs are probably going to go off soon. That seems to me to be the plan, to lure the USA, Japan and South Korea into launching an attack, and then detonating several hydrogen bombs in a local doomsday campaign, much like the Samson Option.

I suspect Russia has supplied North Korea with several hydrogen bombs. They will detonate these as close as they can to Japan and South Korea. They will also likely clad them with Cobalt to make them as dirty and deadly as possible. I hope it does not happen, but the situation is bad and getting worse. Most people have their heads buried in the sand on this issue.

One of the reasons why I believe Russia is supplying North Korea with H-bombs and missile technology and supplies, is the fact that the North Koreans are advancing too quickly and without necessary testing to be doing it on their own. They must be getting help.

Another interesting and telling fact is that the North Koreans are attacking Japan. Japan is a traditional enemy of China and Russia, and the jews hate Japan because the Japanese are highly intelligent and are racially aware and racially homogenous.

This is the worst case scenario, and North Korea is probably worst case:

Source Article from

US to Blame for North Korea’s Nuclear and Ballistic Missile Programs

US to Blame for North Korea’s Nuclear and Ballistic Missile Programs

by Stephen Lendman ( – Home – Stephen Lendman)

Longstanding US hostility toward the DPRK poses a serious threat to its security – its leadership acting rationally to defend itself against feared US aggression. 

Failure to develop the strongest possible deterrent would be irresponsible. The menace America poses forced North Korea to prepare for the worst. 

The lesson of defenseless nations victimized by US aggression is not lost on its government and military officials.

The root of the problem on the Korean peninsula lies in Washington, not Pyongyang. 

“The nature of the North Korea nuclear problem is a security issue. The core of it is the conflict between the US and North Korea,” China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying explained, adding:

“The cause of escalating tensions is not China, and the key to the problem is also not China. Parties…directly involved should do their duty and, any attempts to push away the problem is irresponsible.”

Beijing already made great sacrifices by agreeing to harsh sanctions on Pyongyang, Hua stressed. Her comments indicate China’s unlikelihood to permit further Security Council sanctions on the country.

Knowing they’re counterproductive, making things worse, not better, why didn’t China and Russia put a stop to them by vetoing the latest US draft Security Council resolution and earlier ones, heightening, not easing tensions, forcing the DPRK to continue developing its nuclear and ballistic missile deterrents, its only option given the major threat it faces.  

According to Korean affairs expert Cai Jian, “North Korea will not stop developing nuclear weapons because of the sanctions, as the regime now sees greater importance in increasing its bargaining power before any negotiations take place.”

“The firing of a second missile over Japan basically shows that North Korea could hit Guam, which it has threatened to do. So I still think it is not an option for the US to start a war when it seems North Korea’s nuclear weapons are more developed than expected. Both sides will have to sit down somehow.”

Stepping back from the brink on the Korean peninsula and avoiding possible war is only possible through diplomacy, an option Washington rejects, wanting endless political and economic war on Pyongyang to continue, threatening hostilities, risking possible conflict by accident or design.

After decades of an uneasy armistice, successive US administrations from Truman to Trump, refusing to formally end the 1950s war with a peace treaty, their unwillingness to respect North Korea’s sovereign independence, and today’s menacing US posture toward the country makes resolving things no simple task no matter what happens going forward.

Time and again, Washington showed it’s untrustworthy, lacking good faith, breaching deals made, North Korea and other countries leery of negotiating with a duplicitous partner. 

The deplorable way America treats Iran shows what other independent countries are up against.

Aggressive wars Washington is waging against nonbelligerent states reveal the real threat North Korea faces, the same one Tehran faced for years.

Russia’s lower house State Duma Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Leonid Slutsky called Pyongyang’s latest missile test, three days after newly imposed sanctions, “a clear challenge for the global community.”

The launch “proves the uselessness of sanctions and pressure,” what Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping stress while opposing the DPRK’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs because they heighten regional tensions and risk possible war.

“There is a need to search for a diplomatic solution to the North Korea issue rather than hold military drills near North Korea’s borders, threatening to conduct preventive strikes and reciprocal missile launches,” Slutsky stressed.

The obvious need is unacceptable to Washington. “(T)alking is not the answer,” Trump roared.

“Political prostitute” Nikki Haley called the Sino/Russian double-freeze proposal “insulting.” Dealing with a belligerent nation like America to resolve major issues diplomatically is near-impossible.

Its favored strategy is endless wars of aggression. It could smash North Korea harder than earlier if it wishes. The major difference between now and then is the DPRK can hit back hard – against US regional forces, South Korea and Japan.

War on the peninsula would threaten millions of people. If waged with nuclear weapons, millions could perish.

China and Russia could be forced to intervene because of the threat to their security.

The worst case scenario is unlikely but risky enough to go all-out to prevent. Large-scale conflicts begin incrementally, the way WW I and II developed. 

America wasn’t involved in the first world war until more than two-and-a-half years after it began (April 1917) – over two years after Hitler attacked Poland in September 1939.

Tens of millions of people perished in both conflicts. How many regional lives would be lost if Washington dares attack North Korea, especially if nuclear war erupts?

VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

Source Article from

Here’s what war with North Korea would actually look like: 20,000 dead in the first 24 hours

Image: Here’s what war with North Korea would actually look like: 20,000 dead in the first 24 hours

(Natural News)
To borrow a phrase that was used hundreds – if not thousands – of times by leftists in the months following the election of Barack Obama, President Trump was “dealt a bad hand.” This is not an excuse for inaction or strategic mistakes, however, sort of like how the liberals used it to cover up Obama’s foolishness. Rather, the fact that Donald Trump was dealt a bad hand with regards to foreign policy is simply reality. Due largely to the fecklessness and the submissiveness of the prior administration on the global stage, America now faces several dangerous threats, not the least of which is North Korea.

For months now, President Trump and Kim Jong-Un have been engaged in a war of words, so to speak, with both leaders casting threats at one another without actually pulling the trigger. However, in addition to these threats, Kim Jong-Un has been repeatedly testing intercontinental ballistic missiles, almost as if he is trying to provoke the United States into making the first move. Many Americans and conservative commentators, such as nationally syndicated radio host “The Great One” Mark Levin, rightfully believe that the time has come for us to consider taking action against North Korea before they have a chance to strike.

“He needs to be taken out,” Levin said of Kim Jong-Un on his radio program back in April. “This inbred is hell-bent on developing long-range ICBMs – which he doesn’t need.” Levin went on to explain that he’s “not a neocon,” and that he just wants to protect America.

Indeed, the time to strike North Korea may have arrived. Waiting around while one of our greatest enemies continues to threaten us and produce powerful long-range weapons is not a strategy; it is surrender. But before the United States officially pulls the trigger, it is helpful to know what exactly we would be getting ourselves into.

Rob Givens, who was the deputy assistant chief of staff for operations of U.S. Forces Korea as well as special assistant to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently published an article on to help shed some light on the matter. According to Givens, war with North Korea will look something like this: “Thousands of aircraft will wage an epic battle across the entire Korean Peninsula. The two American Air Force fighter wings – 100-plus fighter aircrafts permanently stationed there – accompanied by our South Korean partners would fight the opening minutes, striking against the North’s aged, but plentiful air forces while also bombing Kim Jong-Un’s missiles and artillery.”

Givens ultimately concludes, “North Korea’s casualties would be appalling. The estimates are that we would inflict 20,000 casualties on the North each day of combat.” Sadly, this sort of violence and mayhem is expected when two nations go to war with each other. While 20,000 North Korean casualties per day is certainly unfortunate, it would be unwise for President Trump and his military advisors to let it dissuade them from taking action. There is simply too much on the line. (Related: Read about why preppers should expect a war between the U.S. and North Korea, and what they should do to prepare.)

What would happen if one day, North Korea’s threats turned into action? What if they finally developed an effective ICBM that could carry a nuclear warhead over a long distance, and then used that ICBM to reduce one of America’s cities to rubble? And then what if instead of U.S. forces taking the battle to the other side of the world, the North Koreans infiltrated our country and began taking over? The amount of innocent American lives that would be taken would be innumerable, and as commander-in-chief, that is something that President Trump should do everything in his power to prevent. Because when it comes to war with North Korea, it really is a simple reality – it’s either them or us.

Sources Include:



Source Article from