10-13-17 — Kathy Inman – Theo Chino — (VIDEO LOADED)

Guests
Theo Chino
, Theo Chino

Topics
Challenge NY BitLicense Regulation
, Morpheus Arrest

Hour 3 – Theo Chino provides an update about challenging New York’s bitcoin regulation and provides an update on his case; Update on Morpheus


-30-




Hour 3


Theo Chino


Chino v. Dept. of Financial Services, Index # 101880-15 challenging New York’s bitcoin regulation…


Article 78  Against NYDFS – A Lawsuit Against the Executive Branch Overreach


https://www.article78againstnydfs.com/


================================


Other Webpages:


@theochino (Twitter)


BIO: Royal Pain in the Ass for a Better World.


French:  


Spanish: 


Bitcoin:  


Geek: 


===============================


Theo’s Lawsuit: 


Article 78  Against NYDFS – A Lawsuit Against the Executive Branch Overreach




[ Case Information ]   [ Case Documents ]   [ In the News ]

Historical Development ]   [ Videos ]

Follow @A78gnstNYDFS ]   [ Instagram ]


$ 120,000


7 %Funded


$ 9,012.43Raised


Donate:



  Generosity by Indiegogo  Meetup by WePay
Bitcoin: 32TkdtErKNZKcccNcFynRRCG6WAoY1ofj9




Hearing in front of Justice Saint George. (10/10/2017)


Transcript of the hearing (PDF – 6 008 KB)



Free Morpheus Titania!


People Keep Getting Charged With a Crime for Selling Bitcoin



Bitcoin Foundation launches Fundraiser.


BitLicense can still be stopped if we use this opportunity



Hearing Date: Thursday, January 11th, 2018 @ 2:15 pm
Meetup Information


Justice Carmen St. George

Part 34, Room 308

80 Centre street, New York, NY 10013



Llew Claasen, Executive Director of the Bitcoin Foundation.


The foul smell of state cryptocurrency legislation



Off the Hook () explain the lawsuit on WBAI 99.5 FM.


Full show on 2600’s website: www.2600.com/offthehook/2017/0317.html (Air Date: March 29th 2017)


What is the case about ? Read this great overview of the case.
CEI Blog: New York’s “BitLicense” on Trial.



Pierre Ciric explain Article 78 to Bitcoin Engineers in NYC. (8 minutes)


Pierre Ciric, an expert in Article 78, explained why the department of financial services acted arbitrarily and inappropriately by using Bitcoin companies as “Guinea Pigs” when it promulgated its virtual currency regulation.


=================================


IN THE NEWS…



Still Alive: NY Judge Delays Decision in Fight Against BitLicense


Oct 11, 2017 at 12:30 UTC by Michael del Castillo


https://www.coindesk.com/still-alive-ny-judge-delays-decision-fight-bitlicense/


“Is he paying you in bitcoins?”


The question directed by a court security guard to the legal counsel of New York resident Theo Chino yesterday, highlights a central issue long facing regulators considering the technology – is bitcoin a currency or commodity?


As the industry has found out, time and time again, that just depends.


But that answer isn’t quite good enough in New York, where early rules were put in place for startups on the basis that money transmission laws applied. While most businesses have resigned themselves to the rules, getting practices in shape or else shipping out, Chino hasn’t given up the fight.


Two years after initially filing court documents, Chino’s lawyer argued in court yesterday that the so-called BitLicense regulations brought an early end to his client’s career as a bitcoin entrepreneur, as many others have claimed.


On one side, Chino’s legal counsel argued that the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) overstepped its mandate when it issued the BitLicense. On the other, the defendant’s lawyer argued that Chino had no grounds for his complaint.


But rather than dismissing the underdog claim, Judge Carmen Victoria St. George issued what may be one of the more surprising statements in bitcoin’s short legal history.


She concluded:


“Court reserves decision.”


Instead of formally weighing in on the case, Judge St. George set a future court date for the participants to reconvene on January 11, 2018.


But while that could seem like an irritating bureaucratic measure, Chino was all smiles at the day’s conclusion. Not only does this mean his case gets to live another day, but the judge seemed, at times, swayed by his lawyer’s arguments.


The plaintiff


For Chino and his legal counsel, the indecision can be seen as a small victory, one that will move their case ahead in court, and hopefully, provide relief for smaller businesses they argue have been hurt by the law.


Stepping back, the thrust of Chino’s argument is and has been that as a “small business” owner, he did not have the resources to go through the notoriously expensive application process for the BitLicense. Not only does the application cost $5,000, but it has also resulted in applicants spending millions on legal fees.


So, back in 2015, Chino filed a complaint against NYDFS and ceased work on his business.


“From the moment the license was promulgated,” Chino’s counsel Pierre Ciric argued in court, “he knew the cost of compliance was prohibitive.”


And there’s evidence to back up the claim. To date, just a handful of BitLicenses have been granted, and many more companies remain stuck in application status.


Still, it was perhaps Chino’s critiques based on bitcoin’s legal classification that had the most impact. When asked by the judge if bitcoin was, in fact, a financial instrument, Ciric responded, “No, absolutely not.”


Instead, he argued the cryptocurrency was a commodity, more closely aligned with the definition put forth in 2015 by the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission.


And Judge St. George seemed open to the argument.


The defense


On the other side, however, Jonathan Conley, who represented NYDFS, spent much of his time sidestepping this larger intellectual question.


Rather than addressing bitcoin’s open-ended legal definition, Conley argued instead that Chino had no right to proceed with his claim due to the fact that he botched his BitLicense application, among other claims.


According to Conley, Chino filed his forms with multiple fields stating “not applicable” and “I will not disclose,” before stopping the process altogether. Because of this Conley argued damages were only “speculative.”


In this way, the remarks cut to the core of what could be another issue in the case – whether Chino is a suitable candidate to back his claims. But for now, that determination will be delayed.


Come January, it remains to be seen just how the judge will rule – and if more surprises are in store for what is perhaps the industry’s most unlikely legal case.





=================================


Man at center of bitcoin-bodega lawsuit wants Paul Krugman to testify


NEW YORK DAILY NEWS


Wednesday, October 11, 2017, 4:00 AM



http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/man-bitcoin-bodega-lawsuit-paul-krugman-testify-article-1.3554489



An entrepreneur who sued the state for foiling his efforts to get seven city bodegas to accept bitcoin wants Pulitzer Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman to testify in his case.


An attorney for Theo Chino says the noted New York Times columnist and CUNY Graduate Center professor should testify before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carmen St. George regarding the “economic nature” of the global digital currency.


“I’ll take any expert! Krugman is good enough for me,” Chino’s attorney Pierre Ciric told the Daily News.


Both Chino and attorneys for the state Department of Financial Services have cited Krugman as an authority amid a legal dispute over whether bitcoin is a “financial product or service.” A judge would have to approve a subpoena for the famed economist.


Bitcoin explained and why hackers use it


Chino argues bitcoin’s value fluctuates too wildly to be considered a viable financial product. State Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Conley said that argument “defied common sense” and that bitcoin is money subject to state regulation.


Chino sued in 2015, arguing that the state license required to engage in a “virtual currency business” was too burdensome. He had hoped to get the bodegas to accept bitcoin for any purchases.


Conley added that the effort to put Krugman on the stand was an example of a “classic fishing expedition.”


Efforts to reach Krugman through the Times were unsuccessful.






Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/227169-2017-10-13-10-13-17-kathy-inman-theo-chino-video-loaded.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-12-17 — Warren Redlich – Dr. Phranq NMD = Trump Report — (MP3’s & VIDEOS LOADED)

Guests
Warren Redlich

Topics
FairDUI.Org
, DUI Checkpoints

Hour 1 – Warren Redlich (Trial Attorney; Expert on DUI Checkpoints; Author: Fair DUI: Stay Safe and Sane in a World Gone MADD) on FairDUI.Org and your Fourth Amendment Rights


Hour 2&3 – Dr. Phranq Tamburri In Studio for The Trump Report 



CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800



-30-



Feature Article  •  Global Edition
Freedom’s Phoenix
Declare Your Independence APP now on Google Play 
Donna Hancock

   Listen to any recent show of “Declare Your Independence” at the click of a button!

 

 


 


September 12th, 2017


Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock


on LRN.FM / Monday – Friday


9 a.m. – Noon (EST)


Studio Line: 602-264-2800 


 







Hour 1



2017-10-12 Hour 1 Warren Redlich from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Warren Redlich


Webpage: http://fairdui.org/


Warren Redlich has been a trial attorney for over 20 years with over 50 jury verdicts under his belt. Warren is the leading national expert on DUI checkpoints, and has handled hundreds of drunk driving cases, including misdemeanor and felony jury trials, as well as civil rights lawsuits in federal court in both New York and Florida. Warren is the author of Fair DUI: Stay Safe and Sane in a World Gone MADD.

 


Link to Fair DUI book: http://amzn.to/2z04w7F




My biggest video from a DUI checkpoint is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFYrY3vl9iY



 


One of my instructional videos for checkpoints is:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlUjwv2F3wQ&t=1s



Flyer


We’ve created a flyer you can show to police during checkpoints and traffic stops. The idea is that you do not roll down your window but rather press the flyer up against the window so police can read it. You show them your license and other papers through the window.



Warning: This is not for everyone or every situation. 

Please read more on our “Is it for you” page.



Fair-DUI-FL-Flyer-1


Fair-DUI-FL-Flyer-2


This page was getting ugly as we added more states. We’ve revised the site to include DUI directory by state.


At this writing we’ve lost count with 25 or more states, but check the above state directory to see if more have been added.


So far we have:


Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut


Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana


Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan DUI
Missouri DWI


Nevada
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina


Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee


Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia


The flyer also goes along with our DUI book.


You can see the flyer in action through various videos we’ve posted.

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/227098-2017-10-12-10-12-17-warren-redlich-dr-phranq-nmd-trump-report.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-12-17 — Warren Redlich – Dr. Phranq NMD = Trump Report — (MP3’s & VIDEOS LOADED)

Guests
Warren Redlich

Topics
FairDUI.Org
, DUI Checkpoints

Hour 1 – Warren Redlich (Trial Attorney; Expert on DUI Checkpoints; Author: Fair DUI: Stay Safe and Sane in a World Gone MADD) on FairDUI.Org and your Fourth Amendment Rights


Hour 2&3 – Dr. Phranq Tamburri In Studio for The Trump Report 



CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800



-30-



Feature Article  •  Global Edition
Freedom’s Phoenix
Declare Your Independence APP now on Google Play 
Donna Hancock

   Listen to any recent show of “Declare Your Independence” at the click of a button!

 

 


 


September 12th, 2017


Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock


on LRN.FM / Monday – Friday


9 a.m. – Noon (EST)


Studio Line: 602-264-2800 


 







Hour 1



2017-10-12 Hour 1 Warren Redlich from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Warren Redlich


Webpage: http://fairdui.org/


Warren Redlich has been a trial attorney for over 20 years with over 50 jury verdicts under his belt. Warren is the leading national expert on DUI checkpoints, and has handled hundreds of drunk driving cases, including misdemeanor and felony jury trials, as well as civil rights lawsuits in federal court in both New York and Florida. Warren is the author of Fair DUI: Stay Safe and Sane in a World Gone MADD.

 


Link to Fair DUI book: http://amzn.to/2z04w7F




My biggest video from a DUI checkpoint is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFYrY3vl9iY



 


One of my instructional videos for checkpoints is:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlUjwv2F3wQ&t=1s



Flyer


We’ve created a flyer you can show to police during checkpoints and traffic stops. The idea is that you do not roll down your window but rather press the flyer up against the window so police can read it. You show them your license and other papers through the window.



Warning: This is not for everyone or every situation. 

Please read more on our “Is it for you” page.



Fair-DUI-FL-Flyer-1


Fair-DUI-FL-Flyer-2


This page was getting ugly as we added more states. We’ve revised the site to include DUI directory by state.


At this writing we’ve lost count with 25 or more states, but check the above state directory to see if more have been added.


So far we have:


Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut


Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana


Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan DUI
Missouri DWI


Nevada
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina


Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee


Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia


The flyer also goes along with our DUI book.


You can see the flyer in action through various videos we’ve posted.

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/227098-2017-10-12-10-12-17-warren-redlich-dr-phranq-nmd-trump-report.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-11-17 — Stephen Lendman – Vin Suprinowicz — (VIDEO & MP3s LOADED)

Guests
Vin Suprynowicz

Topics
Las Vegas Massacre
, Fake News
, Libertarian author/writer

Hour 2 – Vin Suprinowicz (Libertarian Author) on why you should wait 3 weeks for the truth to start to come out after a tradegy/massacre/’false flag event”; Discusses upcoming article ‘Blood on their Hands?’


-30-



Hour 2



2017-10-11 Hour 2.1 Vin Suprynowicz from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.




Hour 2.2 Vin Suprynowicz from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.



Vin Suprynowicz 
Libertarian Author comes on the show to discuss the narrative that is fake news and why waiting 3 weeks after a tragedy will provide you with more truth than all the initial spin…


 


Deep in the Nevada desert, in a hidden mansion full of old books and vintage clothes, guarded by five anthropomorphic cats and a family of Attack Roadrunners, Vin Suprynowicz went cold turkey from a 40-year newspaper career. They said he’d never write anything over a thousand words, again. But with the help and encouragement of the Brunette and a few close friends, he came back. With “The Testament of James” — about the modern-day search for a lost book revealing the long-suppressed secret of Jesus and the manna — he proved them wrong.


Now comes the second adventure of Matthew Hunter and Chantal Stevens. “The Miskatonic Manuscript” asks the question that victims of the Drug War have been waiting a hundred years to hear: “What if they fought a War on Drugs . . . and someone fought back?


 


The bibliomysteries of Matthew Hunter and Chantal Stevens are based in the used bookstore “Books on Benefit,” in H.P. Lovecraft’s Providence, Rhode Island. Vin edited and published the weekly Providence Eagle from 1980-1985.


He began his writing career with the alternative weekly Hartford Advocate (writing part-time and driving the delivery truck at night), eventually giving up honest work entirely to become an award-winning reporter for the daily Willimantic Chronicle, news editor of the daily Norwich Bulletin, and managing editor of the daily Northern Virginia Sun.


Vin worked on the Las Vegas Review Journal Opinion section, winning numerous industry awards, through the great Las Vegas boom. He rode it a bit further into the ground than Tom Mitchell, finally exiting in 2013. For the past six years, he has sold vintage and collectible books online at https://www.abebooks.com/cats-curiosities-pahrump-nv-u.s.a/51238921/sf (newest arrivals atwww.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sortby=0&vci=51238921 ) as “Cat’s Curiosities.”


In an earlier life, Vin published two collections of his daily Libertarian newspaper columns, “Send in the Waco Killers” and “The Ballad of Carl Drega,” and the freedom novel “The Black Arrow.” He continues to write his monthly column on the politics of gun control for Firearms News (previously Shotgun News.)


The latest lengthy interview with Vin about his writing was posted by Claire Wolfe at her blog at Backwoods Home magazine on Sunday Jan. 4 and Monday, Jan. 5, 2015. Unfortunately, it appears the publishers have now deleted all such material.


To subscribe to Vin’s articles, you must have an RSS reader. You can subscribe to his articles with this link, and/or the comments with this link.


 


Webpage: VinSuprynowicz.Com


=======================


A version of this column will appear in the Nov. 10 edition of ‘Firearms News


 


‘Blood on their hands’?



The bodies from the Oct. 1 mass shooting at the Route 91 Harvest country music festival in Las Vegas weren’t even cold before the usual gang of jackals started braying for more “gun control.”


Mind you, simpler, more effective remedies were quickly suggested.


It appears millionaire mass murderer Stephen Paddock (more about whose motivations will doubtless come to light) spent days setting up his shooting gallery — complete with closed-circuit TV cameras — in a pricey 32nd-floor hotel suite. Steve Wynn, owner of the competing Mirage Resorts hotels, says no guest at any of HIS properties would have been allowed to hide behind a “Do Not Disturb” sign for days — someone from security would have been knocking after 12 hours, checking the room to make sure everything was OK.


But of course, recommending such mundane procedural changes doesn’t get you the satisfaction of cynically shrieking that your political opponents have “blood on their hands.” 


On “Face the Nation” Oct. 8, champion gun-grabbing Sen. Dianne Feinstein admitted no gun law, current or proposed, would have stopped shooter Paddock from killing 58 and wounding 500.


“Could there have been any law passed that would’ve stopped him?” asked John Dickerson.


Though she couldn’t resist incorrectly adding “Possession of machine guns is not legal under the Second Amendment” (Does that mean the BATF is going to refund all those decades worth of $200 “Class Three” tax payments, Senator?) Feinstein’s direct answer was “No. He passed background checks registering for handguns and other weapons on multiple occasions. I’m not sure there is any set of laws that could have prevented it.”


But that didn’t stop DiFi from proceeding within days to call for a new ban on “bump stocks,” trigger cranks, etc. Nor did it stop dyed-blonde “techno-pop” chanteuse Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, who prefers to go by “Lady Gaga,” from declaring “blood is on the hands of” Congress and President Trump if they don’t immediately sign into law more gun control legislation — any kind will do, presumably.


Even has-been warbler Nancy Sinatra stomped out in her white vinyl boots to join the fray, declaring on Twitter Oct. 3 that President Donald Trump was “complicit” in the mass killing, and that “murderous” members of the National Rifle Association should face a “firing squad” for their support of firearm rights.


(A “firing squad” using what, Nancy – spitballs?)


The legislators who had “blood on their hands,” Ms. Gaga, were those who disarmed the Soviet, German and Chinese citizenry BEFORE Hitler, Stalin and Mao came to power, thus allowing those mass murderers to round up and massacre not mere dozens, but tens of millions of unarmed opponents and minority scapegoats.


And of course Hillary Clinton couldn’t keep her mouth shut (be polite, now), declaring “The crowd (in Las Vegas) fled at the sound of gunshots. Imagine the deaths if the shooter had a silencer. . . . “


Politifact correctly rules that statement “false.” Those on the scene say they did NOT start to run at the sound of distant shots, which they initially thought were “firecrackers going off.”


A rifle “produces two sounds,” Politifact notes. “One is the crack of the bullet, which can be heard on most video recordings of the shooting and is produced by the bullet traveling faster than the speed of sound. This is unaffected by suppressors. Suppressors instead work on the muzzle blast. . . .


“A typical gunshot is around 150-160 decibels, a level that can cause hearing damage,” Politifact continues. Suppressors can reduce that sound by around 20-30 decibels . . . just below the threshold for instant hearing damage. Experts compared the suppressed sound levels to a jackhammer and a jumbo jet on the tarmac 100 yards away. That’s still fairly loud.”


Not only that, rapid fire can quickly “blow out” a suppressor’s internal baffles, heating up both a suppressor and the muzzle to which it’s attached till it’ll burn your skin, as many a novice shooter has learned. There’s a reason many military machine guns are issued with asbestos mitts so red-hot barrels can be changed when they “fail.”



GET OFF THE DEFENSIVE, GUYS



Why on earth we should expect any useful input about firearm and suppressor technologies from has-been canaries and failed First Ladies who presumably wouldn’t know how to rack a slide to save their lives, but who nearly all live in gated communities protected by, um . . . armed guards . . . is not clear to me. 


But OK, if they want to talk gun control: Let’s go.


“The first new law we want . . .” they begin.


“No, wait, hold on there” all those congresscritters (including plenty of Democrats) who ran for office insisting “I support the Second Amendment” should say at that point.


“You have an idea for a new ‘gun control’ bill? Great. But how many hundreds of separate laws can a police officer enforce? If we’re looking to make sure they can focus on ‘gun control’ laws that actually prevent or at least reduce the number of deaths from these lunatic attacks, we need to start by evaluating how much good our CURRENT gun control laws did on October the First.


“Just to reassure the electorate your goal isn’t merely to layer on so many bureaucratic enactments that you eventually ban our gun rights de facto, by making it impossibly inconvenient and expensive to exercise those God-given rights, let’s start by repealing ALL THOSE EARLIER GUN CONTROL LAWS THAT DIDN’T DO ANY GOOD on October First, OK? Then we’ll be happy to debate the likely effectiveness of your new proposal concerning, what, ‘bump stocks’?”


Start with the granddaddy of them all, the 1934 National Firearms Act, which was disguised as a tax measure to pass constitutional muster, but which was really designed – and is enforced – to make it expensive, cumbersome, nearly impossible for the average American to (legally) purchase and own and shoot a full-automatic machine gun or machine pistol.


(If the BATF was really trying to ease the deficit by collecting as much revenue as possible from this $200 “firearms tax,” Americans would be allowed to pay their $200 in cash – no ID required — and drive away with a machine gun off the shelf at 24-hour drive-through ATF windows all over the country. Instead, the BATF has come up with an insanely onerous and time-consuming process involving fingerprinting, getting their permission if you want to transport your legally-acquired firearm to a machine-gun shoot, all kinds of hoops and obstacles to acquire and enjoy a machine gun or machine pistol – or suppressor or short-barreled rifle or rifle grenade – and then topped it off with the clincher: they’ve banned “for civilian use” the manufacture or re-importation of real automatic weapons like the heavy, clunky, 1918-vintage Browning Automatic Rifle, creating an artificial shortage which has driven the price of weapons of interest only to collectors — not the kind of piece anyone today would be likely to choose to stick up a liquor store – above $40,000.)


(At least they got rid of the absurd “police-chief-signoff” requirement, effective July, 2016.)


All kinds of Americans who have never shot anyone with a machine gun (never tried to, never intended to) have been deprived of their gun rights – even gone to prison – for technical violations of the absurd and complicated paperwork and inspection and “reporting” requirements of the 1934 NFA. But at least all this rigmarole cut way down on casualties in Las Vegas on October the First, right?


Well . . . no. We’ll have to rate the effectiveness of that 1934 law at “zero.” The shooter was able to sidestep ALL those requirements and fire his legally acquired semi-automatic weapons at rates of fire mimicking those of fully automatic machine guns through the simple expedient of using a rifle with a couple of springs in its stock – a technology no one had thought of in 1934, when rifles were much heavier.



WHICH OF THEIR LAWS DID ANY GOOD?



So of course the gun-grabbing blood-lickers now insist that Congress ban “bump-stocks” — which means what they’ll really be banning is a couple of springs. Make no mistake, based on the way the BATF has enforced other such laws, gun owners in the future would likely be jailed not just for owning rifle stocks with a couple of springs in them, but also for possessing a couple of spare springs which COULD have been installed in their rifle stock to turn it INTO a “bump stock.”


Springs! Congress is talking about banning a couple of SPRINGS!


Furthermore, since I presume even the Democrats aren’t ready to call for house-to-house searches, all such laws get enforced selectively. You think when they “ban” something it goes away? How did that work out with marijuana?


But we’ve gotten off the track. The question was how much good the 1934 National Firearms Act – which was LARGELY INTENDED TO STOP BAD GUYS FROM USING RAPID-FIRE FIREARMS as in the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre — did in saving a single life at that outdoor country music concert in Las Vegas on October First. And the answer is “zero.” So if we’re going to review our gun control laws, we should start by repealing the onerous, cumbersome, worthless, vastly expensive, unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934. Right? Why not?


(Yes, “unconstitutional.” In U.S. vs. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 – 1939 — the high court merely remanded the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing – never held — TO DETERMINE WHETHER possession or use of a “shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches” had any reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-practiced citizen militia — a question which of course must be answered in the affirmative about actual machine guns.)


How about “waiting periods”? Did they do any good in slowing down the Las Vegas shooter? Of course not. So before we enact any new laws, we should repeal these useless “cooling-off periods.” Right? Why not?


How about “background checks”? Do any good in Las Vegas? Of course not. As is nearly always the case in such crime sprees (and as Sen. Feinstein confirms), this strange, millionaire shooter had no criminal record and passed his “background checks” with flying colors.


But the gun control gang insisted “background checks” would do LOTS of good in reducing crime and violence — though by the same logic, since I can burn down a house and kill a whole family with a couple gallons of gasoline, I should have to pass a “background check” each time I buy gasoline, right?


So the nation now spends millions and millions of dollars on the time-consuming, frustrating task of checking the “background” of everyone who buys a firearm from a federally licensed dealer – each TIME he or she buys a firearm (sort of like having to get a new driver’s license every time you go to drive your car) — and it . . . does no good. So before we enact any new laws, we should surely repeal these cumbersome “background checks” — right? Why not?


The answer to all these questions, of course, is that gun grabbers don’t care whether any of their thousands of existing “gun control” laws do any good. They just want to pass more laws so they can preen before their gun-dumb urban constituents, meantime shrieking that anyone who stands up for our Constitutional rights has “blood on his hands.”


Their real goal is, indeed, to make it so onerous, so expensive, so inconvenient to buy and own and practice with a firearm that there will be no more guns in America – except in the hands of the government police, and the armed guards that guard the gated communities where most of these leftist celebrities and media elites hide out, of course.


What do terrorists do when they find it inconvenient to use a gun? As the radical Islamic extremists have shown us in Europe, they steal a truck and run it into a crowd and kill dozens of people that way. Or as they’ve shown us right here at home, they hijack airplanes and fly them into tall buildings. So: Do lawmakers who have failed to outlaw trucks and commercial aircraft have “blood on their hands,” Ms. Germanotta?


Vin Suprynowicz was for 20 years a columnist and editorial writer at the daily Las Vegas Review-Journal. He blogs occasionally at www.vinsuprynowicz.com .

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/227024-2017-10-11-10-11-17-stephen-lendman-vin-suprinowicz-video-mp3s-loaded.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-10-17 — Doug Hodges – Nicolas Guillermo — (VIDEO & MP3s LOADED)

Guests
Nicolas Guillermo
, Nicolas Guillermo

Topics
RIPAC

Hour 3 – Nicolas Guillermo on Representatives Initiatives PAC (RIPAC) 


-30-



Hour 3



2017-10-10 Hour 3 Nicolas Guillermo from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Nicolas Guillermo


Webpage: https://ripac.us/



Shifu Nicolas Guillermo, a practitioner of Chinese Martial Arts, Entrepreneur, and Activist, is putting together an unprecedented opportunity for people of the States, to claim sovereignty under their 10th amendment and stop corruption in government. Just as advanced martial arts focus on technique and strategy, so does the activism project he is working to deliver. With door to door canvassing for citizens ballot proposal, Shi Fu Guillermo has created a Political Action Committee for the people to file and circulate ballot proposals organized by our own members. Currently, RIPAC is organizing people for five active PACs in the State of Arizona, Citizen Grand Jury, Free Market Solutions, Organic Now, Hemp Freedom and Save Oak Flat. Information is being compiled at https://ripac.us


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GjVK2KbM-xYYGDKZpqXpvRzemSXNK17osXhhOUscVVU/edit?usp=sharing



About Us


RIPAC = Representative Initiatives PAC


RIPAC is a cooperatively run think-tank and political action committee for grassroots ballot propositions.


Join Our Social/Political Evolution


“We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just authority from the consent of the governed.” – Declaration of Independence



Save the Republic with Direct Democracy


Rather than give our power away to political parties, imagine what we can do when we unite on issue-specific policy!



“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.” – George Washington


Participate in Educational Collaboration


“Educate and inform the whole mass of people… they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” – Thomas Jefferson


IMAGINE


Vote for anti-corruption candidates to replace the current politicians of every office. 


Recall every non-satisfactory candidate from office.


Veto every non-satisfactory law made by your state legislature.


Nullify, every unconstitutional federal law.


Create new statutory law, as needed, to safeguard liberties and freedom from government power.


Create new constitutional amendments, as needed, to safeguard liberties and freedom from government power.


File suit against corrupt politicians, corporate leaders and judges. 


Call for constitutional conventions, on issue specific agenda, with partnering states to supersede corrupt supreme court decisions. 


RIPAC is the first citizens cooperative SUPERPAC project.


We are to become an extremely dynamic, organized, educational resource serving and empowering the public to end government corruption.


The Technological Breakthrough


The RIPAC system is one of the future. Dynamic collaboration for direct democracy processes online will serve as a model for our civilization that can span the vastness of time onward into the future.


We are working to crowdfund a revolutionary software. Open-source and eventually block-chained and decentralized direct democracy software will empower local communities, states, nations and the world at large. Some predict it will even serve as the model for future societies in space and on other worlds.


“The form of government on Mars would be a direct democracy, not representative. So it would be people voting directly on issues. And I think that’s probably better because the potential of corruption is substantially diminished in a direct versus a representative democracy.” – Elon Musk


RIPAC is a clearing house for citizen’s ballot propositions



Initiative Process


Referendum


Nomination


Recall


Citizen Grand Jury


Constitutional Convention


What is a Ballot Proposition?


A ballot proposition is a method where votes are cast and counted tangibly in accordance with a specific issue and a winning vote creates new changes in government.


E.g. Initiative, Referendum, Recall, Nomination, Citizen Grand Jury and Limited Constitutional Convention.


The first amendment in the Bill of Rights includes,” to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” and was designed to benefit the public while serving as a check and balance in government. Without this first amendment right we are at the mercy of our elected and unelected officials; politicians and bureaucrats. The power to supersede our government through ballot propositions for authentic self-reliance is our right and we must use it to avoid inescapable bondage and tyranny should we witness unchecked unconstitutional government policy continue on its current path.


Initiative, referenda and other direct democracy tools, will further empower the people to strengthen and fix problems of our representative government.


“I believe in the Initiative and Referendum, which should be used not to destroy representative government, but to correct it whenever it becomes unrepresentative”. – President Teddy Roosevelt


Ballot Propositions Are The Solution.


All of the world’s great civilizations followed the same path.


1. Bondage to Liberty.

2. Liberty to Abundance

3. Abundance to Complacency

4. Complacency to Apathy

5. Apathy back to Bondage


The RIPAC platform will end the cycle.


Apathy becomes Action


Enough people who care to take direct action with us can be united. We are working towards the final revolution, the e-governance solution for world peace. We can achieve peace through direct initiative specifically focused on empowering people to vote for solutions at the ballot.


We are not going back because too many people are aware who care enough to take direct action with us. We are working towards the final revolut

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/226959-2017-10-10-10-10-17-doug-hodges-nicolas-guillermo-video-mp3s-loaded.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-06-17 — Etienne de la Boetie2 – Colin Pape – Sterlin Lujan — (VIDEO & MP3s LOADED)

Guests
Etienne de la Boetie2

Topics
Book: Understanding Our Slavery

Hour 1 – Etienne de la Boetie2 (nom de guerre of a voluntaryist/anarchist author) on his book Understanding Your Slavery


Hour 2 – Colin Pape (Founder of Presearch.org) on the decentralized search engine


Hour 3 – Sterlin Lujan (Communications Ambassador for Bitcoin.com; Writer) on cryptocurrencies and their purpose, who are the crypto-anarchists, decentralized bitcoin, problems with SegWit, what it’s like to work at Bitcoin.Com, crypto investing and the future of blockchain, etc…



CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800



-30-



Feature Article  •  Global Edition
Freedom’s Phoenix
Declare Your Independence APP now on Google Play 
Donna Hancock

   Listen to any recent show of “Declare Your Independence” at the click of a button!

 

 


 


October 6th, 2017


Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock


on LRN.FM / Monday – Friday


9 a.m. – Noon (EST)


Studio Line: 602-264-2800 


 






Hour 1



2017-10-06 Hour 1 Etienne de la Boetie2 from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Etienne de la Boetie2


Etienne de la Boetie2 is the nom de guerre of a voluntaryist/anarchist author, father, technology entrepreneur, cyclist, runner, hot yogi, racquetballer, scuba-diver, multi-disciplinarian truther, armchair economist, cryptocurrency enthusiast, and neo-abolitionist who is experimenting with large-scale cult deprogramming. Mr. Boetie2 distills 20+ years of research into short, easily-digestible treatises on individual subjects and optimizes them for the 70% of society who are visual learners.


Webpage: https://www.understandingyourslavery.com/


About the Book: Understanding Your Slavery exposes the hidden control system and pseudo-religion of Statism used by organized crime interests centered around banking and central banking to manage the population. Using historical photographs, memes, and infographics the book is designed to accelerate and deepen the understanding of the 70% of the population who are visual learners. The book catalogs 20+ techniques used by the Nazis, Soviet Union, East Germany and the United States to take free, sentient children and indoctrinate them into a worldview that produces obedient “tax-payers” and classic “shave-headed cult members” willing to kill foreigners on command or enforce on their fellow tax slaves. The PDF version with links to additional research and evidence is available for free at www.UnderstandingYourSlavery.com


=================================


Etienne de la Boetie2 speaking in Arlington, VA at Adam Kokesh event Friday, October 6th


by  | Oct 6, 2017 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments



Etienne de la Boetie2, the author of Understanding Our Slavery, is speaking at an Adam Kokesh event in Arlington, VA on Friday night, October 6th.  Anti-war activist and author Adam Kokesh is seeking the Libertarian Party’s Presidential nomination for 2020 on a platform of a peaceful and orderly dissolution of the US Federal government.  He is currently on a 68 city tour of the US and is speaking at Texas Jack’s Barbeque in Arlington, VA.  The event runs from 6:00 – 9:00 PM EST and will feature remarks by Mr. Boetie2.


Texas Jack’s Barbecue  


2761 Washington Blvd


Arlington, VA 22201


703-875-0477


Facebook Event Page



 


 

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/226778-2017-10-06-10-06-17-etienne-de-la-boetie2-colin-pape-sterlin.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-04-17 — James Corbett – Top Tech News – Philip Giraldi — (VIDEO & MP3s LOADED + Bonus)

Guests
Philip Giraldi
, Philip Giraldi

Topics
America’s Jews Are Driving U.S. Wars

Hour 3 – Philip Giraldi (Former military intelligence and CIA Operations Officer) on truth-telling about American Jews


-30-



Hour 3



2017-10-04 Hour 3 Philip Giraldi from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Philip Giraldi


Webpages:


http://www.unz.com/ 


https://www.facebook.com/philip.giraldi


Former military intelligence and CIA Operations Officer with experience in Europe and the Middle East. PhD in modern history from the University of London. Currently writes for magazines and websites on foreign policy and national security and holds the position of Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest.


=================================


TOPIC: 


How I Got Fired


Exposing Jewish power in America has real consequences


http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/how-i-got-fired/


aipac2


Two weeks ago, I wrote for Unz.com an article entitled “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars.” It sought to make several points concerning the consequences of Jewish political power vis-à-vis some aspects of U.S. foreign policy. It noted that some individual American Jews and organizations with close ties to Israel, whom I named and identified, are greatly disproportionately represented in the government, media, foundations, think tanks and lobbying that is part and parcel of the deliberations that lead to formulation of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Inevitably, those policies are skewed to represent Israeli interests and do serious damage to genuine American equities in the region. This tilt should not necessarily surprise anyone who has been paying attention and was noted by Nathan Glazer, among others, as long ago as 1976.


The end result of Israel centric policymaking in Washington is to produce negotiators like Dennis Ross, who consistently supported Israeli positions in peace talks, so much so that he was referred to as “Israel’s lawyer.” It also can result in wars, which is of particular concern given the current level of hostility being generated by these same individuals and organizations relating to Iran. This group of Israel advocates is as responsible as any other body in the United States for the deaths of thousands of Americans and literally millions of mostly Muslim foreigners in unnecessary wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. It has also turned the U.S. into an active accomplice in the brutal suppression of the Palestinians. That they have never expressed any remorse or regret and the fact that the deaths and suffering don’t seem to matter to them are clear indictments of the sheer inhumanity of the positions they embrace.


The claims that America’s Middle Eastern wars have been fought for Israel are not an anti-Semitic delusion. Some observers, including former high government official Philip Zelikow, believe that Iraq was attacked by the U.S. in 2003 to protect Israel. On April 3rd, just as the war was starting, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz headlined “The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.” It then went on to describe how “In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in [Washington]: the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another.”


And the deference to a Jewish proprietary interest in Middle Eastern policy produces U.S. Ambassadors to Israel who are more comfortable explaining Israeli positions than in supporting American interests. David Friedman, the current Ambassador, spoke last week defending illegal Israeli settlements, which are contrary to official U.S. policy, arguing that they represented only 2% of the West Bank. He did not mention that the land controlled by Israel, to include a security zone, actually represents 60% of the total area.


My suggestion for countering the overrepresentation of a special interest in policy formulation was to avoid putting Jewish government officials in that position by, insofar as possible, not giving them assignments relating to policy in the Middle East. As I noted in my article, that was, in fact, the norm regarding Ambassadors and senior foreign service assignments to Israel prior to 1995, when Bill Clinton broke precedent by appointing Australian citizen Martin Indyk to the position. I think, on balance, it is eminently sensible to avoid putting people in jobs where they will likely have conflicts of interest.


Another solution that I suggested for American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and find themselves in a position that considers policy for that country and its neighbors would be to recuse themselves from the deliberations, just as a judge who finds himself personally involved in a judicial proceeding might withdraw. It would seem to me that, depending on the official’s actual relationship with Israel, it would be a clear conflict of interest to do otherwise.


The argument that such an individual could protect American interests while also having a high level of concern for a foreign nation with contrary interests is at best questionable. As George Washington observed in his farewell address,


“…a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification…”


My article proved to be quite popular, particularly after former CIA officer Valerie Plame tweeted her approval of it and was viciously and repeatedly attacked, resulting in a string of abject apologies on her part. As a reasonably well-known public figure, Plame attracted a torrent of negative press, in which I, as the author of the piece being tweeted, was also identified and excoriated. In every corner of the mainstream media I was called “a well-known anti-Semite,” “a long time anti-Israel fanatic,” and, ironically, “a somewhat obscure character.”


The widespread criticism actually proved to be excellent in terms of generating real interest in my article. Many people apparently wanted to read it even though some of the attacks against me and Plame deliberately did not provide a link to it to discourage such activity. As of this writing, it has been opened and viewed 130,000 times and commented on 1,250 times. Most of the comments were favorable. Some of my older pieces, including The Dancing Israelis and Why I Still Dislike Israel have also found a new and significant readership as a result of the furor.


One of the implications of my original article was that Jewish advocacy groups in the United States are disproportionately powerful, capable of using easy access to the media and to compliant politicians to shape policies that are driven by tribal considerations and not necessarily by the interests of most of the American people. Professors John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt of Harvard, in their groundbreaking book “The Israel Lobby”, observed how the billions of dollars given to Israel annually “cannot be fully explained on either strategic or moral grounds… {and] is due largely to the activities of the Israel lobby—a loose coalition of individuals and organizations who openly work to push U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction.”


Those same powerful interests are systematically protected from criticism or reprisal by constantly renewed claims of historic and seemingly perpetual victimhood. But within the Jewish community and media, that same Jewish power is frequently exalted. It manifests itself in boasting about the many Jews who have obtained high office or who have achieved notoriety in the professions and in business. In a recent speech, Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz put it this way, “People say Jews are too powerful, too strong, too rich, we control the media, we’ve too much this, too much that and we often apologetically deny our strength and our power. Don’t do that! We have earned the right to influence public debate, we have earned the right to be heard, we have contributed disproportionately to success of this country.” He has also discussed punishing critics of Israel, “Anyone that does [that] has to be treated with economic consequences. We have to hit them in the pocketbook. Don’t ever, ever be embarrassed about using Jewish power. Jewish power, whether it be intellectual, academic, economic, political– in the interest of justice is the right thing to do.”


My article, in fact, began with an explanation of that one aspect of Jewish power, its ability to promote Israeli interests freely and even openly while simultaneously silencing critics. I described how any individual or “any organization that aspires to be heard on foreign policy knows that to touch the live wire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a quick trip to obscurity. Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from the offending party ever again.”


With that in mind, I should have expected that there would be a move made to “silence” me. It came three days after my article appeared. The Editor of The American Conservative (TAC) magazine and website, where I have been a regular and highly rated contributor for nearly 15 years, called me and abruptly announced that even though my article had appeared on another site, it had been deemed unacceptable and TAC would have to sever its relationship with me. I called him a coward and he replied that he was not.


I do not know exactly who on the TAC board decided to go after me. Several board members who are good friends apparently were not even informed about what was going on when firing me was under consideration. I do not know whether someone coming from outside the board applied pressure in any way, but there is certainly a long history of friends of Israel being able to remove individuals who have offended against the established narrative, recently exemplified by the hounding of now-ex-Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel who had the temerity to state that “the Jewish lobby intimidates lots of people” in Washington. As Gilad Atzmon has observed one of the most notable features of Jewish power is the ability to stifle any discussion of Jewish power by gentiles.


But the defenestration by TAC, which I will survive, also contains a certain irony. The magazine was co-founded in 2002 by Pat Buchanan and the article by him that effectively launched the publication in the following year was something called “Whose War?” Buchanan’s initial paragraphs tell the tale:


“The War Party may have gotten its war. But it has also gotten something it did not bargain for. Its membership lists and associations have been exposed and its motives challenged. In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: ‘Can you assure American viewers … that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?’ Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party is not amused. Finding themselves in an unanticipated firefight, our neoconservative friends are doing what comes naturally, seeking student deferments from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group. People who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly in the schoolyard of politics. Not so. Former Wall Street Journal editor Max Boot kicked off the campaign. When these ‘Buchananites toss around neoconservative—and cite names like Wolfowitz and Cohen—it sometimes sounds as if what they really mean is ‘Jewish conservative.’ Yet Boot readily concedes that a passionate attachment to Israel is a ‘key tenet of neoconservatism.’ He also claims that the National Security Strategy of President Bush ‘sounds as if it could have come straight out from the pages of Commentary magazine, the neocon bible.’ (For the uninitiated, Commentary, the bible in which Boot seeks divine guidance, is the monthly of the American Jewish Committee.)”


Pat is right on the money. He was pretty much describing the same group that I have written about and raising the same concern, i.e. that the process had led to an unnecessary war and will lead to more unless it is stopped by exposing and marginalizing those behind it. Pat was, like me, called an anti-Semite and even worse for his candor. And guess what? The group that started the war that has since been deemed the greatest foreign policy disaster in American history is still around and they are singing the same old song.


And TAC has not always been so sensitive to certain apparently unacceptable viewpoints, even in my case. I write frequently about Israel because I believe it and its supporters to be a malign influence on the United States and a threat to national security. In June 2008, I wrote a piece called “The Spy Who Loves Us” about Israeli espionage against the U.S. It was featured on the cover of the magazine and it included a comment about the tribal instincts of some American Jews: “In 1996, ten years after the agreement that concluded the [Jonathan] Pollard [Israeli spying] affair, the Pentagon’s Defense Investigative Service warned defense contractors that Israel had ‘espionage intentions and capabilities’ here and was aggressively trying to steal military and intelligence secrets. It also cited a security threat posed by individuals who have ‘strong ethnic ties’ to Israel, stating that ‘Placing Israeli nationals in key industries is a technique utilized with great success.'”


Three days later, another shoe dropped. I was supposed to speak at a panel discussion critical of Saudi Arabia on October 2nd. The organizer, the Frontiers of Freedom foundation, emailed me to say my services would no longer be required because “the conference will not be a success if we get sidetracked into debating, discussing, or defending the substance of your writings on Israel.”


Last Saturday morning, Facebook blocked access to my article for a time because it “contained a banned word.” I can safely assume that such blockages will continue and that invitations to speak at anti-war or foreign policy events will be in short supply from now on as fearful organizers avoid any possible confrontation with Israel’s many friends.


Would I do something different if I were to write my article again today? Yes. I would have made clearer that I was not writing about all or most American Jews, many of whom are active in the peace movement and, like my good friend Jeff Blankfort and Glenn Greenwald, even figure among the leading critics of Israel. My target was the individuals and Jewish “establishment” groups I specifically named, that I consider to be the activists for war. And I refer to them as “Jews” rather than neoconservatives or Zionists as some of them don’t identify by those political labels while to blame developments on Zios or neocons is a bit of an evasion in any event. Writing “neoconservatives” suggests some kind of fringe or marginal group, but we are actually talking about nearly all major Jewish organizations and many community leaders.


Many, possibly even most, Jewish organizations in the United States openly state that they represent the interests of the state of Israel. The crowd stoking fears of Iran is largely Jewish and is, without exception, responsive to the frequently expressed desires of the self-defined Jewish state to have the United States initiate hostilities. This often means supporting the false claim that Tehran poses a serious threat against the U.S. as a pretext for armed conflict. Shouldn’t that “Jewish” reality be on the table for consideration when one is discussing the issue of war versus peace in America?


 


When all is said and done the punishment that has been meted out to me and Valerie Plame proves my point. The friends of Israel rule by coercion, intimidation and through fear. If we suffer through a catastrophic war with Iran fought to placate Benjamin Netanyahu many people might begin to ask “Why?” But identifying the real cause would involve criticism of what some American Jews have been doing, which is not only fraught with consequences, but is something that also will possibly become illegal thanks to Congressional attempts to criminalize such activity. We Americans will stand by mutely as we begin to wonder what has happened to our country. And some who are more perceptive will even begin to ask why a tiny client state has been allowed to manipulate and bring ruin on the world’s only super power. Unfortunately, at that point, it will be too late to do anything about it.



======================================



Hour 4 – Ernest Hancock Special Edition: Ernest goes over the top tech news =   Past, present, and future of space travel and exploration, materials, manufacturing, batteries, energy, communications, health, food, water, shelter, transportation, automation, education, and much more. And…showcases his presentation he gave at the Nexus Earth Conference last month


-30-



Hour 4



2017-10-04 Hour 4 Ernest Hancock Top Tech News – Nexus Earth Presentation from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Ernest Hancock Special Edition


Top tech news =  Past, present, and future of space travel and exploration, materials, manufacturing, batteries, energy, communications, health, food, water, shelter, transportation, automation, education, and much more. And…showcases his presentation he gave at the Nexus Earth Conference last month


 


 

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/226626-2017-10-03-10-04-17-james-corbett-top-tech-news-philip-giraldi.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

10-03-17 — Dennis Kucinich – Tim Picciott – Dr. Judy Mikovits (MP3s & Video LOADED)

Guests
Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD
, Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD

Topics
Vaccines

Hour 3 –  Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD (molecular biologist) on CDC corruption/vaccine education; 


-30-




2017-10-03 Hour 3 Dr Judy Mikovits from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.



Hour 3


Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD


To contact Judy: marcinc0224@gmail.com


Webpage: http://www.marcinc.org/


Judy testified on a lawsuit for Racketeering and conspiracy against the CA legislators who passed the SB277 mandating toxins be inoculated in their children under the guise of vaccination and she will re-cap her testimony…


Lawsuit: 


First-Amended-RICO-Complaint–img20160817_09071194.pdf


 


Other references and webpages:


http://www.plaguethebook.com/


http://vaxtruth.org/


http://www.truthrx.org/


Judy’s previous interviews on the Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock Radio Show:


 https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Guest-Page.htm?No=01359


Judy A. Mikovits, PhD has spent her life training to be a research scientist to honor her grandfather who died of cancer when she was a teenager. Dr. Mikovits earned her BA from University of Virginia and PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from George Washington University. In her 35-year quest to understand and treat chronic diseases, she has studied immunology, natural products chemistry, epigenetics, virology and drug development. In just over twenty years she rose from an entry-level lab technician to become director of the lab of Antiviral Drug Mechanisms at the National Cancer Institute before leaving to direct the Cancer Biology program at EpiGenX Pharmaceuticals in Santa Barbara, California where she had met and married David Nolde in 2000. There in 2006, she became attracted to the plight of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Autism. In only five years she developed the first neuroimmune institute from a concept to a reality and is primarily responsible for demonstrating the relationship between immune based inflammation and these diseases. She has published over 50 scientific papers.


Dr. Judy A. Mikovits recently founded MAR Consulting Inc. with her collaborator Dr. Frank Ruscetti. 


 


She can be contacted at:


MAR Consulting Inc.


300 Carlsbad Village Drive


Suite 108A  Box 132 


Carlsbad, CA  92008or


 


MAR Consulting Inc. website:


http://www.marcinc.org/



Mission statement


MAR Consulting Inc., led by Drs. Frank Ruscetti and Judy A. Mikovits, seeks to understand complex and innovative biological issues to yield unbiased integrated, cutting-edge information for  patients and physicians impacted by some of the most challenging chronic diseases. Utilizing their combined 75 years experience in tumor biology, immunobiology of retroviral-associated inflammatory diseases, cancer, stem cell biology, hematopoiesis, and drug development, MAR focuses on research projects, consulting (to patients doctors, academia, and industry) and lecturing without the restrictive authority of vested interest groups, following Thomas Jefferson’s dictum: “Here we are not afraid to follow the truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate error so long as freedom is left free to combat it.”


Webpage: http://www.plaguethebook.com/


http://nebula.wsimg.com/f21f2e6991e9f6cca59d99a18a6743f0?AccessKeyId=9A4B018BAAEAE6B8C001&disposition=0&alloworigin=1About Plague


On July 22, 2009, a special meeting was held with twenty-four leading scientists at the National Institutes of Health to discuss early findings that a newly discovered retrovirus was linked to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), prostate cancer, lymphoma, and eventually neurodevelopmental disorders in children.


When Dr. Judy Mikovits finished her presentation the room was silent for a moment, then one of the scientists said, “Oh my God!” The resulting investigation would be like no other in science.


For Dr. Mikovits, a twenty-year veteran of the National Cancer Institute, this was the midpoint of a five-year journey that would start with the founding of the Whittemore-Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease at the University of Nevada, Reno, and end with her as a witness for ?the federal government against her former employer, Harvey Whittemore, for Illegal campaign contributions to U. S. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid.


On this journey Dr. Mikovits would face the scientific prejudices against CFS, wander into the minefield that is autism, and through it all struggle to maintain her faith in God and the profession to which she had dedicated her life. This is a story for anybody interested in the peril and promise of science at the very highest levels in our country.


Plague The Book: Teaser Trailer:



To order your copy of Plague: One Scientist’s intrepid Search For the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Autism, and Other Diseases    Click on any of the links –  Amazon.com    Barnes & Noble.com   IndieBound


==============================


TOPICS DISCUSSED…


I Nominate – ELLIOT NESS to Be the NEW US Secretary of Health and Human Services…


Judy Mikovits Can Wait Until The Cleanup Is Completed...


Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen


Our friend Jon Rappoport, the other day, re-issued an article he wrote in 2012 called “Reminder: murder at the FDA.”  In it Jon pointed out that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a “relentless criminal mafia representing its client Big Pharma.”


Just below are Jon’s exact words:


“In a stunning interview with Truthout’s Martha Rosenberg, former FDA drug reviewer, Ronald Kavanagh, exposes the FDA as a relentless criminal mafia protecting its client, Big Pharma, with a host of mob strategies.


Kavanagh: “…widespread racketeering, including witness tampering and witness retaliation.”


“I was threatened with prison.”


“One [FDA] manager threatened my children…I was afraid that I could be killed for talking to Congress and criminal investigators.”


Kavanagh reviewed new drug applications made to the FDA by pharmaceutical companies. He was one of the holdouts at the Agency who insisted that the drugs had to be safe and effective before being released to the public.


But honest appraisal wasn’t part of the FDA culture, and Kavanagh swam against the tide, until he realized his life and the life of his children was on the line.


What was his secret task at the FDA? “Drug reviewers were clearly told not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve drugs.” In other words, rubber stamp them. Say the drugs were safe and effective when they were not.


Kavanagh’s revelations are astonishing. He recalls a meeting where a drug-company representative flat-out stated that his company had paid the FDA for a new-drug approval. Paid for it. As in bribe.


The Kavanaugh story is not unusual – it is COMMON at every federal agency involved in US health care regulation…



We’ve spent a lot of time here at the BolenReport detailing the corruption at the CDC, another agency under the authority of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).


So, I think, we need to do a clean-up first.  To do that we don’t need a health care expert – we need a team of hard-driving, gun toting, wire-tapping, door-breaking, highly intelligent, God-Fearing, Judeo/Christian value oriented, John-Wayne-Walking, No-Nonsense-Texas-Ranger types that can focus on cleaning up the corruption FIRST.


I suggest that the Trump Administration look for an “Elliot Ness” type of person to head up the DHHS until it is cleaned out.


CLICK HERE for the rest of the article




FLU SHOT Kills DHHS Head Tom Price…..


It Only Took One Day…


Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen


Yes, there was a flap over Tom Price’s luxury travel arrangements in private aircraft.  But that was NOTHING compared to the results of an EXAMINATION of WHERE he recently went in those luxury aircraft and WHOM he met with.


That’s where things got interesting…


Let’s start with what happened…


On Thursday, September 28th, 2017, Tom Price, in a moment of supreme idiocy, came out in favor of the annual flu shot.  The globalist oriented, Anti-American Washington Post said:


“This flu season could be a bad one, and Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price got his flu shot Thursday and urged Americans to follow his example and get vaccinated.


But after getting jabbed, Price, who is under fire for his flights on government-funded private jets, left before a scheduled question-and-answer session. He rolled down his sleeve and hurried out of the room at the National Press Club even before putting his suit jacket back on.


More, the Post said:


“In his remarks at the annual flu awareness event, Price noted that vaccination coverage has plateaued and that fewer than half of the U.S. population was vaccinated last season. Even though overall flu vaccination coverage ticked up slightly last season, the hospitalization rate nearly doubled from the previous season and was higher across all age groups than in seven of the eight previous seasons.


Just a 5 percentage point uptake in vaccination coverage could have prevented nearly half a million cases of flu last season, Price said. “We’ve got a lot of room for improvement,” he stressed.”



In July 2015, bioCSL and the influenza vaccines of Novartis joined forces to create Seqirus, the largest maker of flu vaccines in the world – Price’s hired private jet – a French made Falconer 2000, took him to Seqirus in August for private meetings.


Price’s travel schedule explains his difference with the Trump administration over the safety and effectiveness of the US Vaccine program.


In August Price used the jet to get him to Raleigh, North Carolina, so he could tour the Seqirus flu vaccine plant and address its employees.  A synopsis of THAT meeting is NOT available.


But, make no mistake, Price’s travel arrangements were NOTHING compared to his promotion of the flu vaccine to Americans.  EVERYONE knows the annual flu vaccine is worthless junk laced with 25 micrograms of mercury.


It is NO SECRET how dangerous the flu vaccine actually is and what it did to pregnant US mothers.


In short, the Anti-Vaccine Movement NAILED Tom Price, after he Promoted the FLU SHOT…



It only took 24 hours.  It was EASY.


Why was it EASY?  Because the Trump Team has been made VERY AWARE, all along, of the truth of the vaccine story.  Vaccines are total crap.  Like the rest of SANE America, Donald knows the truth about not just the flu vaccine, but ALL vaccines.


Just below is what the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD TRUMP has to say about the flu shot…


CLICK HERE for the rest of the article

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/226574-2017-10-03-10-03-17-dennis-kucinich-tim-picciott-dr-judy-mikovits.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

09-29-17 — Guest Host Dr. Phranq Tamburri =Trump Report — (MP3 LOADED)

Guests
Phranq Tamburri

Topics
Trump
, Precious Metals

Hour 1-3 – Guest Host Dr. Phranq Tamburri, In Studio for the Declare Your Indepenence with Ernest Hancock Show, gives this week’s Trump Report


CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800



-30-



Feature Article  •  Global Edition
Freedom’s Phoenix
Declare Your Independence APP now on Google Play 
Donna Hancock

   Listen to any recent show of “Declare Your Independence” at the click of a button!

 

 


 


September 29th, 2017


Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock


on LRN.FM / Monday – Friday


9 a.m. – Noon (EST)


Studio Line: 602-264-2800 


 






 


Hour 1




 


Dr. Phranq Tamburri – In Studio – Guest Host of the Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock Show today…


Webpages: http://www.longevitymedical.com/



=============================



 


Phranq’s previous interviews on the Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock Radio Show:


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Guest-Page.htm?No=00672


PHRANQ BIO – Dr. Phranq Tamburri is a naturopathic physician specializing in men’s health with a sub-specialty in prostate cancer. In tandem to these fields, Dr. Tamburri treats male hormone deficiency, low energy, and sexual performance. Although naturopathic medicine is a specialty in itself, Dr. Tamburri has garnered recognition as an expert in the field of prostate cancer assessment, diagnosis, and treatment; each of the preceding from a balanced natural and allopathic perspective. His training in this area has been varied and wide in scope. As Chief Resident from his Alma Mater, he trained under Mayo trained urologist Bernard Gburek, M.D. at Scottsdale North Hospital while at the same time apprenticed under CMO and Physician of the Year Thomas Kruzel, N.D. who specialized in natural urology. Dr. Tamburri later was director of the Men’s Health Clinic at his local teaching clinic. Currently he is long term professor of Clinical Urology at the Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine and also sits as a member of the AZNMA and is the only naturopathic physician on the AZ State Funded SW Prostate Cancer Awareness Council. Dr. Tamburri has been published in this area along with multiple lectures to fellow physicians at yearly professional conventions. Recently he has been asked to serve as expert witness for the State of Arizona Board of Medical Examiners with regard to the management of natural prostate cancer assessment and treatment.


Dr. Tamburri, on his limited down time, loves to study Early American and World History in both didactics and in travels. He has taught inline skating for many years, hikes often with fellow doctors, and recently began pursuit as a poi practitioner!


Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment


Dr. Tamburri’s NP Packet


Urological Questionnaire


Prostate Packet


Dr. Phranq Tamburri November 2008 NDNR article


Dr. Phranq Tamburri September 2007 NDNR article


========================================

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/226385-2017-09-29-09-29-17-guest-host-dr-phranq-tamburri-trump-report.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS

09-19-17 — Robert Anthony Peters (MP3 & Video LOADED)

Guests
Robert Anthony Peters

Topics
Actor, Director, Writer, Producer
, Libertarian Activism
, Nexus Earth Conference

Hour 1 – Robert Anthony Peters (Actor; Producer; Director) speaking at Nexus Earth Conference on the Libertarian perspective of the world; and on the Young Hollywood Panel: How to Change the Industry Within 


Hour 2 – Freedom’s Phoenix Headline News


Hour 3 – Rerun – NO VIDEO 



CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800



-30-



Feature Article  •  Global Edition
Freedom’s Phoenix
Declare Your Independence APP now on Google Play 
Donna Hancock

   Listen to any recent show of “Declare Your Independence” at the click of a button!

 

 


 


September 19th, 2017


Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock


on LRN.FM / Monday – Friday


9 a.m. – Noon (EST)


Studio Line: 602-264-2800 


 





2017-09-19 Hour 1 Robert Anthony Peters from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.


Hour 1


Robert Anthony Peters


ROBERT ANTHONY PETERS completed his BS at the University of Arizona in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, was a Charles G. Koch Summer Fellow in DC, and trained at the Lee Strasberg Theatre Institute in NYC. A member of SAG-AFTRA, he has been acting, producing, and directing professionally in theater, film, voiceover, and more for over a decade. He has been an active libertarian for even longer. Currently he lectures internationally on the relationship between art and liberty, speaking at several Students For Liberty events, the State Policy Network annual conference, the Bastiat Society, APEE, FreedomFest, Arizona FreedomFest, Coins in the Kingdom, the Hero’s Journey Conference, Libertopia, PORCfest, FEE seminars, Institute for Liberal Studies Summer Seminar series, and the Free Minds Film Festival. He is president of Laissez Faire Media and the Culture of Liberty Institute and a producer with Ozymandias Media – purveyor of top quality web content for freedom oriented think tanks and businesses. He records audiobooks, is a policy advisor for the Heartland Institute, is on the inaugural FEE Alumni Board, leads discussions for Liberty Fund, and is a contributor to The Freeman. He also manages his family’s retail shipping store in Tucson, AZ. Look for his film directing debut with “Tank Man.” His website is robertanthonypeters.com


 


Robert Anthony Peters Demo Reel:



Robert will be speaking at Nexus Earth Conference on the following topics:


*The Libertarian perspective of the World


*He will be on the Young Hollywood Panel: How to Change the Industry Within


==============================


TOPICS DISCUSSED…


Tank Man – Robert Anthony Peters is Writer/Director


http://www.tankmanfilm.com/


Image may contain: outdoor


One man stood up to the brutality of the government and inspired millions around the world to do the same. Join us and help tell his story.

Source Article from https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/225701-2017-09-19-09-19-17-robert-anthony-peters-mp3-video-loaded.htm?EdNo=001&From=RSS