kicked out from the Internet for "Discrimination and Hate"

Home » Activism, Breaking News, Corruption, Injustice, North America, Suppression, Videos » kicked out from the Internet for “Discrimination and Hate”


Gab, an ad-free social network centered around free speech & personal liberty has been under fire from the corporatized mainstream media lately, after the startup announced a lawsuit against Google.

Gab received an email from their domain registrar late Sunday night about a “domain violation” regarding the violation of Australian federal and state anti-discrimination laws. It is unclear what Gab has specifically violated if anything at all due to the lack of specificity from Asia Registry’s legal team.

Asia Registry has decided to give Gab 5 days to find a new domain registrar or they will cancel Gab’s domain name registration.

Gab’s CEO, Andrew Torba stated from his Gab account that the website was not going anywhere except possibly losing the websites .ai domain. Follow Claps News on Gab.

Can you believe that all of this is happening under Donald Trump who is ALLEGEDLY our man? The right-wing president? These things didn’t even happen under Obama and probably not even under Hillary Clinton and please get your head our of your butt for a second and stop excusing Trump.

This is not  excusable, what is his role there in the White House? Why isn’t he doing anything? He doesn’t seem to care his base, his right-wingers get stamped on everywhere, left and right. This guy behaves like the Antichrist, he deceived us all into supporting him because he pretended to be on our side and now look, he is breaking all of his campaign promises and does nothing for us! Check this song out, its exactly what’s happening now with Trump:



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

After Cops Stole His Cash for Selling Unlawful Hot Dogs, The Internet Gave Him $57,000

hot dogshot dogs

Berkeley, CA — Berkeley police are in the spotlight this week after one of their officers not only cited a man for selling hot dogs to willing customers without a permit but then opened up his wallet and robbed him of his cash as well.

The entire robbery was captured on video and subsequently went viral. But that was only the beginning. Showing how much society respects hard working entrepreneurs while decrying the police state that robs them, a Go Fund Me for the hot dog vendor has raised over $57,000.

The Go Fund Me campaign was started by the person who was brave enough to question authority and film the road side robbery. According to the campaign:

The funds raised will be utilized to cover legal and personal loses. In addition, funds in excess are to cover other vendors who have been robbed of their hard earned living through citations and removal of their carts. It is my goal to locate Juan in Berkeley. Any and all help to support and locate him is welcome.

On Monday, the video became so viral that UC Berkeley Vice Chancellor Scott Biddy had to issue a statement, in which he justified the theft of the hot dog vendor’s money.

“While I cannot comment on the specifics of this particular case, our practice is to issue warnings before giving a citation,” Biddy said. “In a case such as this, it is typical to collect any suspected illegal funds and enter them into evidence.”

According to NBC 5, UCPD officials said that three other people were warned about vending without a permit, but the vendor in the video was the only person who was given a ticket.

Perhaps it was because he had the thickest wallet.

Whether or not the money in the man’s wallet was from selling unlicensed hot dogs remains to be answered. However, that was apparently of no importance to UC police officer Sean Aranas who found it necessary to confiscate it all.

Yes, selling food without first paying the government for permission—known as a permit—is against the law. However, this does not in any way justify this incident.

“That’s not right man, that’s not right,” Martin Flores, the man who took the video, said as he used his phone to record Aranas issuing the hot dog vendor, Beto, a ticket.

“That’s how it works,” the male officer responded. “Take it to a judge, and the judge can decide whether or not it’s right.”

The officer then took the money out of the vendor’s wallet, and when he began to protest in Spanish, the officer told him to “Back up.”

“You’re going to take his hard-earned money?” Flores asked. The officer replied, “Yep.”

“He doesn’t have a permit,” the officer replied as he dug through Beto’s wallet to steal his cash. “Yep. This is law and order in action.”

In an interview with NBC Bay Area’s sister station Telemundo, the street vendor said he holds down a regular job in construction. He was selling hot dogs to earn a little extra money, he said.

“People saw I wasn’t doing anything wrong,” he said of the response to the video. “I wasn’t stealing or drinking. I was just working to sustain my family.”

As TFTP has reported, in the Land of the Free, if you do not pay the State before you attempt to sell a product or service to a willing customer, you can and will be extorted, kidnapped and caged, with extreme prejudice.

Sadly, Americans are being conditioned to think that in the land of the free, people are somehow morally wrong if they try to make a dollar without first being extorted by the state.

The bottom line is — in modern day police state, USA — exchanging goods and services is a crime unless the State gets their cut. We are told that this is for our safety and that we could all die if a brown man sells unlicensed hot dogs on the road side. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Morality does not equal reality — and the video above is more than enough evidence to prove this.

Source Article from

Dr. Duke Exposes the Zio-Tyrant Efforts to Silence Us on YouTube & the Internet – Helps Us in the Battle of the Ages!


Today Dr. Duke addressed the unprecedented attack from the Jewish power structure on pro-white voices on the internet, including himself, the Daily Stormer, and Stormfront. For instance, Google has changed its algorythims to make it difficult to do search for David Duke videos. Youtube has disable the “share” function on David Duke videos. Of course, the reason for this unprecedented attack is that we pose an unprecedented threat to the Jewish power structure.

Meanwhile, pornographers, pedophiles, and even terrorist organizations like ISIS have unfettered access to the internet. Why? Because they all serve the interests of the organized Zionist elite.

Please keep us on the air and on-line. Send your contribution to:

P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LA 70470

Thank you.

This is an entertaining and informative show that you will want to spread widely.

Click here and look for the show dated 8-28-17.

Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern

This is a must watch video of David Duke discussing President Trump’s latest press conference.


Here is Mark Collett’s latest video:


Source Article from

The White Nationalists Must Move from the Internet to the Soapbox

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Antifa are using masks as a method to conceal their identities while committing acts of terrorism. Technologies exist which permit police to see through clothing, including masks. The authorities should review privacy issues and equip police at rallies with cameras that see through clothing to be used in the event crimes occur in order to collect evidence. Another possible option is to screen those wearing masks in a fashion similar to airport security in order to scan for weapons and identify those who are deliberately concealing their facial features, perhaps narrowing exits and screening those wearing masks after a crime has occurred. The fact that they are not doing this indicates that government agents may be participating in Antifa.

White Nationalists are being discriminated against on the internet. In addition to filing lawsuits claiming that the internet is a “public accommodation” for purposes of Federal Law, and that antitrust laws are being broken to discriminate against Whites, with Terms of Service agreements serving as sham devices to empower this illegal discrimination; White Nationalists should seize this opportunity to move their message from the internet to the soapbox and garner as much media attention as possible. They should devise ways to protect themselves from terrorists. One approach I have been advocating for years is the use of flashmobs with camera crews, Flashmob / Smartmob Tactics, December 14, 2012:

I suggest we use flashmob / smartmob tactics to generate awareness of the Jewish war on mankind. The following video demonstrates such methods used for silly entertainment, but we could instead do something considerably more substantial:

If Ron Paul follows through on his plans to undertake a college speaking tour in 2013, this will provide us with an ideal opportunity to reach college students eager to understand why their future is evaporating. We should produce an informational brochure and dvd exposing the Libertarians as the new Communists and offering an alternative party which will provide our young with an honest future of prosperity and opportunity.

We could turn what appears to be a random crowd into an organized demonstration opposing the Libertarians and Jews and offering the Power Party as a far better alternative. We will have to comply with all laws, of course. We should have hidden camera crews to capture our demonstration for distribution, and to protect our interests.

In the 1950’s through 1970’s, the Jews funded and conducted a faux controlled opposition to the Communists using Jewish “neo-Nazis” to make a mockery of the exposure of Jewish subversion. Libertarianism is far more dangerous to Americans than was Communism, and we need to provide a genuine opposition to it, and the Jews generally, or they will destroy us.

There are other creative ways to protect speakers. Hologram projectors could enable White Nationalists to generate a virtual protest and make the Antifa appear to be low tech brutes. Armored vehicles might be available for rent or even just a van that can be used to bring people in and out and then project from the roof. Large television screens sealed in bullet proof glass could be brought in and placed on stage with a remote feed creating a surreal feeling the media would love, that highlights the suppression of Whites’ rights to peaceably assemble and speak. The speaker could highlight the fact that his or her rights are being denied by violent terrorists. The protesters will appear ridiculous protesting a giant TV screen. Of course, it will be necessary to catch them off guard.

It is time to become creative and smart, not more thuggish. The soapbox is waiting for someone to ascend and capture the media attention which is not yet being exploited to its full potential.

Under circumstances where it would be legal to do so, drones could be used to conduct a virtual protest. They could also be used to track Antifa criminals who have committed crimes.

Source Article from

Syd from the Internet maps out fall solo tour

On Aug. 23, The Internet frontwoman Syd announced on Twitter that she’ll be touring North America later this fall. The singer-songwriter-producer will be playing shows at venues in Atlanta, New York, Washington D.C., Boston, Baltimore, Detroit, Minneapolis, Houston, Dallas, Seattle, San Diego, Las Vegas and San Francisco’s iconic Regency Ballroom. Tickets for the Always Never Home tour are on sale now.

Syd will also be performing at this year’s Camp Flog Gnaw Carnival. As such, she’ll be sharing a bill be sharing with pop musical luminaries like songstress Lana Del Rey, rapper Kid Cudi, R&B superstar Solange and Australian EDM producer Alison Wonderland. She’ll also reunite with her erstwhile Odd Future members Tyler, The Creator, Domo Genesis and Earl Sweatshirt.

Although only 25-years-old, the recording artist born Sydney Bennett has already had an incredibly interesting and varied career. Syd got her start in music in the late 2000s as rap collective Odd Future’s resident producer and audio engineer. In 2011, she branched out to form a trip-hop and alternative soul band called The Internet. In February of this year, Syd again switched things up by releasing Fin, a solo record that explores quiet storm and neo soul soundscapes.

Syd’s upcoming tour dates.

Oct. 7 – Atlanta, GA – Project Pabst 
Oct. 9 – New York, NY – Irving Plaza
Oct. 10 – Washington, D.C. – Fillmore
Oct. 11 – Boston, MA – Royale (Click here to get tickets)
Oct. 13 – Baltimore, MD – Soundstage
Oct. 28 – Los Angeles, CA – Camp Flog Gnaw Carnival (Click here to get tickets)
Oct. 29 – Los Angeles, CA – Camp Flog Gnaw Carnival
Nov. 6 – Detroit, MI – St. Andrew’s Hall
Nov. 7 – Minneapolis, MN – Cabooze
Nov. 9 – Toronto, Ontario – The Phoenix Theater
Nov. 13 – Houston, TX – House of Blues
Nov. 14 – Dallas, TX – South Side Music Hall
Nov. 15 – Austin, TX – Emos
Nov. 24 – Vancouver, BC – Vogue
Nov. 26 – Seattle, WA – Neptune
Nov. 28 – Santa Cruz, CA – The Catalyst
Nov. 29 – San Francisco, CA – The Regency Ballroom (Click here to get tickets)
Dec. 1 – Las Vegas, NV – Vinyl at Hard Rock Hotel (Click here to get tickets)
Dec. 2 – San Diego, CA – North Park Observatory
Dec. 6 – Santa Ana, CA – The Observatory
Dec. 7 – Los Angeles, CA – The Novo (Click here to get tickets)

Source Article from

Neo-Nazi Site Heads to Dark Web, Old Internet Forums After Being Dumped by Google, GoDaddy

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,752 other followers

Source Article from

TOS Agreements Are a Sham Device to Discriminate: The Case to Be Made that the Internet Is a "Public Accommodation"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

A Federal suit alleging discrimination is long overdue as companies selectively enforce Terms of Service agreements as a sham device to discriminate against the rights of Americans to express their views. It is a demonstrable fact that jewry has openly advocated that TOS agreements be implemented and used for the purpose of discrimination against critics of jewry and Israel, and has organized to use this sham device to muzzle persons speaking up for their White racial interests.

I quote the relevant law is these articles:

Selective Enforcement of Internet TOS Agreements to Silence Political Speech and the Firing and Blacklisting of Celebrities for Expressing Political Speech Are Violations of Federal Law, December 21, 2013

We Need to Vigorously Defend Our Rights, April 26, 2017

Source Article from

Google insiders warn "outright censorship" of the internet is Google’s top priority… and everyone has been intimidated into silence

Image: Google insiders warn “outright censorship” of the internet is Google’s top priority… and everyone has been intimidated into silenceImage: Google insiders warn “outright censorship” of the internet is Google’s top priority… and everyone has been intimidated into silence

(Natural News)
If the right to bear arms is the most important right outlined in the United States Constitution, then the freedom of speech is a close second. The Founding Fathers understood better than anyone that those who are in positions of power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree, and that tyranny will come to America unless those with authority are restrained. One way we restrain these authoritarian figures (namely the politicians in Washington DC) is by practicing our First Amendment rights to speak about, praise or criticize the direction in which the country is going. The freedom of speech allows us to hold politicians accountable, elect leaders that will govern in our best interests, and expel those who don’t. Without the ability to speak freely and openly, none of this is possible.

Currently, and sadly, the freedom of speech is under attack in America. The mainstream media, Hollywood and leftists on college campuses across the country have been the main culprits of the assault on free speech, however recently it has also been undermined on the Internet. More and more frequently, stories are emerging of conservative voices being suppressed or even silenced by various social media websites, search engines, and even Google.

Recently, a Google employee who goes by the alias “Hal” spoke to Breitbart News about the political bias that allegedly runs rampant throughout the company. Hal’s interview with Breitbart is the first in a series entitled “Rebels of Google,” which will be published in full within the next few days.

In the interview, Hal, who understandably chose to use a fake name out of fear of losing his job, spoke about the ongoing effort within Google to suppress certain content that the company doesn’t want the public to have easy access to.

“Many people now fear that Google, Facebook and other companies are moving to control and censor their content. Are these fears justified?” asked Breitbart reported Allum Bokhari. “That is absolutely what Google is trying to do,” Hal replied. “The pro-censorship voices are very loud, and they have the management’s ear. The anti-censorship people are afraid of retaliation, and people are afraid to openly support them because everyone in their management chain is constantly signaling their allegiance to far-left ideology. Our leadership (Sundar in particular) is weak, so he capitulates to the meanest bullies on the block.”

The news is particularly damning to conservatives, who in recent years have been working to establish a stronghold on the Internet considering the fact that all other outlets, from the mainstream media to Hollywood, are run by leftists. A prominent example of this is Mark Levin’s LevinTV, which is an Internet-based conservative program launched last year that puts out new episodes every weeknight. If Google is actively working to censor ideas and information that do not align with the progressive ideology, conservative voices on the Internet could be in serious trouble. Related: Google and Facebook algorithms create a whole new kind of censorship, warns News Corp CEO.)

Another area of the Internet where widespread censorship is occurring is on the Google-owned video sharing website, YouTube. Just days ago, YouTube revealed on their official blog that they would be taking action to censor what they consider to be “hate speech” and “violent extremism.” YouTube also plans on launching a “trusted flagger” program, which will help the video sharing website identify videos that contain hate speech and extremism. Unsurprisingly, one of the organizations tasked with identifying which videos are to be censored is the left wing No Hate Speech Movement, as well as the Anti-Defamation League.

With liberal censorship running rampant in the mainstream media, in Hollywood, on college campuses and across the Internet, our country needs pro-First Amendment voices now more than ever. Once the freedom of speech is gone, it is only a matter of time before an all-powerful authoritarian state is established and individual liberty in America ceases to exist.

Sources include:



Source Article from

Chinese teen dies less than 48 hours after entering internet addiction camp

The suspicious death of the young man occurred earlier this month, at an illegal internet addiction rehabilitation school in Anhui province, in the country’s east, reports local paper Anhui Business News.

Concerned for her son Li Ao’s wellbeing, the teen’s mother, identified only by her surname Liu, sent him to the Positive Energy Education center in the city of Fuyang.

To treat what his mother described as a serious internet addiction, the center reportedly used a combination of “psychological counselling and physical training.”

Before she enrolled her son, Liu was assured by a staff member that the center’s methods were “gentle” and did not involve the use of corporal punishment. Liu signed her son up at a cost of 22,800 yuan ($3,420) for a period of 180 days.

Liu enrolled Li Ao on August 3 but, less than two days later, was informed that he had been rushed to hospital where he died, allegedly from injuries sustained at the camp.

The cause of death has yet to be determined, though the director of the center and a number of staff members have been held by police.

The distraught mother told the paper that her son’s body was “completely covered with scars, from top to toe.”

“When I sent my son to the center he was still fine, how could he have died within 48 hours?” she asked.

A postmortem examination on the boy identified 20 external wounds on his body as well as signs of internal bleeding.

Use of these centers, many of which are illegal, has become a hot topic in China. Some reportedly use barbaric tactics, such as corporal punishment and electroshock therapy (EST), to treat internet addiction.

Earlier this year, Chinese lawmakers banned the use of EST in treatment.

Last September, the centers were once again placed under the spotlight after it was reported that a young girl, sent to one such facility by her mother where she was allegedly abused, returned home and murdered her.

The 16 year old reportedly tied her mother to a chair, held her captive and starved her to death.

Source Article from

City court partially upholds order for Navalny to delete internet film targeting Medvedev

The Friday ruling came after the city court looked into an appeal filed by Navalny’s defense lawyers soon after they lost the defamation suit in May, which was filed by Usmanov – one of Russia’s richest tycoons and co-owner of English soccer club Arsenal.

The case dealt with an internet video in which Navalny and his allies described the alleged graft schemes used by PM Medvedev.

In particular, they alleged that in 2010 Usmanov donated a large and expensive home together with a plot of land to a charity foundation, and by doing this bribed top state officials who could potentially use the real estate located on the plot.

In return, Usmanov supposedly hoped for favors in business schemes involving government contracts, Navalny speculated. The activist also repeatedly called Usmanov a criminal and alleged that the businessman was evading taxes.

After the video was posted on the internet, officials and businessmen mentioned in it rejected the allegations as politically charged propaganda.

Usmanov was the only one to take actual action – he recorded and posted on the internet a video reply to Navalny in which he addressed several points mentioned in Navalny’s video, and claimed that they were lies and slander. He also told reporters that tax bodies and security services of several nations knew everything about him and his businesses and, therefore, all Navalny’s accusations of alleged tax evasion were lies.

He then asked the court to order Navalny to remove the damaging material from the web.

In late May, the Lyublino district court in Moscow sided with Usmanov and ordered that the video and several blog posts promoting it should be deleted from the internet by its authors. The court also ordered that Navalny publicly refute the statements that were damaging to Usmanov’s reputation.

Navalny’s defense lawyers used the trial as an opportunity to attract more attention to the video, and repeatedly asked for it to be demonstrated in court. They also insisted that it was “based on facts” and appealed the verdict that ordered its deletion.

On Friday, the appeal was rejected. “The court has ruled to leave the decision of the Lyublino district court concerning Alisher Usmanov’s defamation lawsuit against Aleksey Navalny without changes and the appeal filed by Navalny without satisfaction,” reads the text of the ruling read by the judge.

However, RBC news agency reported that while Moscow City Court did not change the text of the earlier verdict, in comments it indicated that Navalny could delete only parts of the film that contained mentions of Usmanov.

Also, Navalny’s attorneys noted in comments with Interfax that they intended to appeal the ruling in the Moscow City Court presidium and then in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Until decisions are made in these instances, neither Navalny nor his Foundation for Countering Corruption had no intention to delete anything, they added.

Source Article from