Kellyanne: 'As a mother, as a Catholic' nobody likes family separation policy

Trump Adviser Kellyanne Conway tells Chuck Todd Democrats are holding up the funding for family detention center funding, during an exclusive interview with Meet the Press

Watch TV shows, movies and more on Yahoo View.

About NBC Meet the Press

Interviews with news makers from around the world every Sunday morning. See More

Check out more stuff on Yahoo View

Source Article from https://www.yahoo.com/news/kellyanne-apos-mother-catholic-apos-064333656.html

Mark Collett on Tommy Robinson and Google’s redefinition of family

Patrick Slattery and Mark Collett talk North Korea, Tommy Robinson, Google’s redefinition of family (hint: it’s really gay), and gains being made due to our enemies’ overreach.

Download

Check out Dr. Slattery’s website, NationalBugle.com

Source Article from https://davidduke.com/mark-collett-on-tommy-robinson-and-googles-redefinition-of-family/

For The First Time Ever, Lawsuit Targets Billionaire OxyContin Family For Causing Opioid Epidemic

Members of the Sackler family, who’ve made billions pushing their deadly OxyContin drug on the masses are arguably responsible for more deaths than any Mexican drug cartel. Instead of being hunted down at their plush mansions by DEA agents, they are rubbing elbows with members of Congress. Now, however, for the first time, the family is being targeted by a landmark lawsuit for the damages they knowingly caused with their products.

On Tuesday, the state of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit against the multi-billionaire Sackler family over the role their drug OxyContin has played in sparking one of the worst addiction and overdose epidemics in history. The lawsuit accuses the company, Purdue Pharma, and its heirs of spinning a “web of illegal deceit” which fueled the deadly crisis in which America currently finds itself.

What sets this lawsuit apart from the numerous other lawsuits targeting opioid manufacturers — including several against Purdue — is that it has taken the landmark step of personally naming the company’s executives.

According to Maura Healy, Massachusetts state attorney general, the suit names 16 current and former executives and board members, including the chief executive, Craig Landau, and eight members across three generations of the Sackler family that wholly owns Purdue.

“Purdue Pharma and its executives built a multi-billion-dollar business based on deception and addiction. We’re suing,” Healey tweeted Tuesday.

As the Guardian reports, the lawsuit alleges Purdue deceived patients and doctors about the risks of opioids, pushed prescribers to keep patients on the drugs longer and aggressively targeted vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and veterans.

“Their strategy was simple: the more drugs they sold, the more money they made, and the more people died,” Healey said on Tuesday.

On Tuesday, Purdue issued a statement in response to the lawsuit in which they denied all allegations.

“We share the attorney general’s concern about the opioid crisis. We are disappointed, however, that in the midst of good faith negotiations with many states, the Commonwealth has decided to pursue a costly and protracted litigation process,” the company said in a statement. “We will continue to work collaboratively with the states toward bringing meaningful solutions.”

According to reports, in just the last decade, in the state of Massachusetts alone, the company sold 70 million doses of prescription opioids, bringing in more than half a billion in revenue.

“It was Purdue’s executives who led and directed this illegal business model, leading to addiction and deception to enrich a few while leaving a path of devastation and destruction in its wake,” Healey said.

According to Healey, more than 670 Massachusetts residents have died solely from the result of ingesting the Sackler family’s drugs.

Purdue, along with several other companies who knowingly pushed opioids on people who did not need them, is facing more than 300 lawsuits from city and county authorities across the country. However, this is the first one which goes after the individuals who became exceedingly wealthy from the sale of this drug.

According to the Guardian, the Sacklers being sued are: Theresa and Beverly, the widows of the brothers Mortimer and Raymond Sackler who built the company into the narcotics giant it is today; Ilene, Kathe and Mortimer David Alfons Sackler, three of Mortimer’s children; Jonathan and Richard Sackler, Raymond’s two sons; and David Sackler, Raymond’s grandson. These family members and a number of their siblings and children are collectively worth an estimated $13bn, according to Forbes, with the vast bulk of the fortune generated from sales of OxyContin. Feuding family members have mostly declined to talk about the opioids crisis and avoid discussing their links to it.

As previously reported, Purdue Pharma, under the guidance of brothers Arthur, Raymond, and Mortimer Sackler, began a propaganda campaign to push their new drug, as described in The American Journal of Public Health, “The Promotion and Marketing of OxyContin: Commercial Triumph, Public Health Tragedy.”

One of the primary missions of Purdue Pharma was to identify the doctors across America prescribing the most pain medication and strategically marketed the drug directly to them as a safe alternative to other pain medications.

According to the LA Times:

“The Times’ investigation, published in July, disclosed that for more than a decade, an internal security team at Purdue monitored doctors and pharmacies it suspected of colluding with dealers and addicts. In the case of the L.A. ring, criminals set up a phony clinic near MacArthur Park in 2008 and worked with corrupt physicians and pharmacies to obtain pills over 18 months.

A Purdue sales manager dispatched to investigate the high volume of prescriptions at the clinic found a rundown building thronged with rough men and urged supervisors to alert the Drug Enforcement Administration, saying she was “very certain this is an organized drug ring.”

Despite her pleas and additional evidence suggesting that pills were pouring into the hands of criminals, company officials did not go to authorities until years later when the drug ring was out of business and its leaders under indictment. By then, 1.1 million pills had spilled into the illicit pipeline.

These disturbing revelations came after a prior investigation that found Purdue maintained a secret Purdue database of 1,800 suspect doctors, but only about 10 percent of them were reported to law enforcement.

As doctors began to readily hand out this new drug, these high dose pills became a scourge across main street America. Drug users increasingly turned to OxyContin for the powerful high and euphoric effects, comparable to heroin, but which can reportedly last for over eight hours.

Instead of investigating the company for their overt and dangerous tactics, the government and establishment welcomed them into their ranks. Even after dozens of lawsuits exposing this corruption, in an entirely irresponsible and hypocritical move, the FDA approved a measure to give OxyContin to children.

The fact that some people are freely allowed to market potentially deadly drugs, while others are thrown in a cage for the same activity, seems to highlight that not all people are equal in the eyes of the state or the law. Hopefully, this landmark lawsuit will expose this insidious paradigm.

via:

thefreethoughtproject

Source Article from https://worldtruth.tv/for-the-first-time-ever-lawsuit-targets-billionaire-oxycontin-family-for-causing-opioid-epidemic/

For the First Tim Ever, Lawsuit Targets Billionaire OxyContin Family for Causing Opioid Epidemic

oxycontinoxycontin

Members of the Sackler family, who’ve made billions pushing their deadly OxyContin drug on the masses are arguably responsible for more deaths than any Mexican drug cartel. Instead of being hunted down at their plush mansions by DEA agents, they are rubbing elbows with members of Congress. Now, however, for the first time, the family is being targeted by a landmark lawsuit for the damages they knowingly caused with their products.

On Tuesday, the state of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit against the multi-billionaire Sackler family over the role their drug OxyContin has played in sparking one of the worst addiction and overdose epidemics in history. The lawsuit accuses the company, Purdue Pharma, and its heirs of spinning a “web of illegal deceit” which fueled the deadly crisis in which America currently finds itself.

What sets this lawsuit apart from the numerous other lawsuits targeting opioid manufacturers — including several against Purdue — is that it has taken the landmark step of personally naming the company’s executives.

According to Maura Healy, Massachusetts state attorney general, the suit names 16 current and former executives and board members, including the chief executive, Craig Landau, and eight members across three generations of the Sackler family that wholly owns Purdue.

“Purdue Pharma and its executives built a multi-billion-dollar business based on deception and addiction. We’re suing,” Healey tweeted Tuesday.

As the Guardian reports, the lawsuit alleges Purdue deceived patients and doctors about the risks of opioids, pushed prescribers to keep patients on the drugs longer and aggressively targeted vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and veterans.

“Their strategy was simple: the more drugs they sold, the more money they made, and the more people died,” Healey said on Tuesday.

On Tuesday, Purdue issued a statement in response to the lawsuit in which they denied all allegations.

“We share the attorney general’s concern about the opioid crisis. We are disappointed, however, that in the midst of good faith negotiations with many states, the Commonwealth has decided to pursue a costly and protracted litigation process,” the company said in a statement. “We will continue to work collaboratively with the states toward bringing meaningful solutions.”

According to reports, in just the last decade, in the state of Massachusetts alone, the company sold 70 million doses of prescription opioids, bringing in more than half a billion in revenue.

“It was Purdue’s executives who led and directed this illegal business model, leading to addiction and deception to enrich a few while leaving a path of devastation and destruction in its wake,” Healey said.

According to Healey, more than 670 Massachusetts residents have died solely from the result of ingesting the Sackler family’s drugs.

Purdue, along with several other companies who knowingly pushed opioids on people who did not need them, is facing more than 300 lawsuits from city and county authorities across the country. However, this is the first one which goes after the individuals who became exceedingly wealthy from the sale of this drug.

According to the Guardian, the Sacklers being sued are: Theresa and Beverly, the widows of the brothers Mortimer and Raymond Sackler who built the company into the narcotics giant it is today; Ilene, Kathe and Mortimer David Alfons Sackler, three of Mortimer’s children; Jonathan and Richard Sackler, Raymond’s two sons; and David Sackler, Raymond’s grandson. These family members and a number of their siblings and children are collectively worth an estimated $13bn, according to Forbes, with the vast bulk of the fortune generated from sales of OxyContin. Feuding family members have mostly declined to talk about the opioids crisis and avoid discussing their links to it.

As TFTP previously reported, Purdue Pharma, under the guidance of brothers Arthur, Raymond, and Mortimer Sackler, began a propaganda campaign to push their new drug, as described in The American Journal of Public Health, “The Promotion and Marketing of OxyContin: Commercial Triumph, Public Health Tragedy.”

One of the primary missions of Purdue Pharma was to identify the doctors across America prescribing the most pain medication and strategically marketed the drug directly to them as a safe alternative to other pain medications.

According to the LA Times:

“The Times’ investigation, published in July, disclosed that for more than a decade, an internal security team at Purdue monitored doctors and pharmacies it suspected of colluding with dealers and addicts. In the case of the L.A. ring, criminals set up a phony clinic near MacArthur Park in 2008 and worked with corrupt physicians and pharmacies to obtain pills over 18 months.

A Purdue sales manager dispatched to investigate the high volume of prescriptions at the clinic found a rundown building thronged with rough men and urged supervisors to alert the Drug Enforcement Administration, saying she was “very certain this is an organized drug ring.”

Despite her pleas and additional evidence suggesting that pills were pouring into the hands of criminals, company officials did not go to authorities until years later when the drug ring was out of business and its leaders under indictment. By then, 1.1 million pills had spilled into the illicit pipeline.

These disturbing revelations came after a prior investigation that found Purdue maintained a secret Purdue database of 1,800 suspect doctors, but only about 10 percent of them were reported to law enforcement.

As doctors began to readily hand out this new drug, these high dose pills became a scourge across main street America. Drug users increasingly turned to OxyContin for the powerful high and euphoric effects, comparable to heroin, but which can reportedly last for over eight hours.

Instead of investigating the company for their overt and dangerous tactics, the government and establishment welcomed them into their ranks. Even after dozens of lawsuits exposing this corruption, in an entirely irresponsible and hypocritical move, the FDA approved a measure to give OxyContin to children.

The fact that some people are freely allowed to market potentially deadly drugs, while others are thrown in a cage for the same activity, seems to highlight that not all people are equal in the eyes of the state or the law. Hopefully, this landmark lawsuit will expose this insidious paradigm.

DASH cryptocurrency and The Free Thought Project have formed a partnership that will continue to spread the ideas of peace and freedom while simultaneously teaching people how to operate outside of the establishment systems of control like using cryptocurrency instead of dollars. Winning this battle is as simple as choosing to abstain from the violent corrupt old system and participating in the new and peaceful system that hands the power back to the people. DASH is this system.

DASH digital cash takes the control the banking elite has over money and gives it back to the people. It is the ultimate weapon in the battle against the money changers and information controllers.

If you’d like to start your own DASH wallet and be a part of this change and battle for peace and freedom, you can start right here. DASH is already accepted by vendors all across the world so you can begin using it immediately.

Source Article from https://thefreethoughtproject.com/for-the-first-tim-ever-lawsuit-targets-billionaire-oxycontin-family-for-causing-opioid-epidemic/

Family embraces plant-based, zero-waste lifestyle with tiny house (Video)

Is it possible to move into a tiny house as a family with a newborn baby? Some may say that such a small space can’t accommodate a growing child, yet we’re seeing numerous examples of families with one, two even three children and even a dog or two happily living in smaller spaces.

For Australian couple Mark and Joanna, tiny house living was one way to lessen their environmental impact and to live closer to their values. They’ve been taking big steps toward a zero-waste lifestyle, have switched over to a plant-based diet, and have built their own tiny home as an intentional way to welcome their new baby girl into the world. Watch the tour of their home via Living Big In A Tiny House‘s Bryce Langston:

Living Big in a Tiny House© Living Big in a Tiny House

The couple’s home is located on Mark’s parents’ property near Yarra, in the southern part of Australia, which has a warm climate perfect for enjoying the outdoors and growing food. This aspect is seen in the gardens around the couple’s tiny house — which are tended by both the couple and Mark’s mother, a passionate gardener.

Living Big in a Tiny House© Living Big in a Tiny House

The home has a self-built deck that extends the usable space around the home, which is made with recycled tomato stakes, which have been cut and grouped together as tiles, which facilitate their transportation when the couple moves in the future. It’s been used not only for eating outside, but also for recently homebirthing the couple’s baby, via a birthing tub.

Living Big in a Tiny House© Living Big in a Tiny House

The interior is done with a warm, minimalist aesthetic: walls painted white but offset with warm textures of wood and items neatly stacked or organized. There is a day-bed at one end of the house where the family can sit and watch movies. The stairs are integrated with storage for the refrigerator and washing machine; the last two steps can be moved and used as seating for guests when they visit.

Living Big in a Tiny House© Living Big in a Tiny House

Living Big in a Tiny HouseLiving Big in a Tiny House/Video screen capture

Living Big in a Tiny HouseLiving Big in a Tiny House/Video screen capture

Mark is a chef specializing in plant-based foods. The family has been eating a primarily plant-based diet for the last two years or so, and have started a pop-up restaurant called The Circle Dining as well, which brings delicious plant-based tasting experiences to the area. The couple is also aiming toward a zero-waste lifestyle, reducing their use of single-use plastics.

Living Big in a Tiny House© Living Big in a Tiny House

Living Big in a Tiny HouseLiving Big in a Tiny House/Video screen capture

The house includes a small room at the back that serves as the nursery for the couple’s newborn.

Living Big in a Tiny HouseLiving Big in a Tiny House/Video screen capture

The bathroom has been done as a wet room, meaning that it’s been waterproofed well, and there is no separation between shower and the rest of the room, leaving more space to move around.

Living Big in a Tiny HouseLiving Big in a Tiny House/Video screen capture

Over the kitchen, bathroom and nursery is the sleeping loft, which has windows on both side for improved cross-ventilation, and an extended floor to permit more movement around when upstairs.

Living Big in a Tiny House© Living Big in a Tiny House

In total, the couple spent around USD $38,000 in building the house themselves, which was completed in three months, with a bit of help from family, especially Mark’s father, who had construction experience. With their tiny house, they plan to save more money to buy land of their own. To learn more, visit Living Big in a Tiny House.

Source Article from https://www.treehugger.com/tiny-houses/family-living-plant-based-zero-waste-life-tiny-house.html

Google Redefines Family in Video Promoting LGBTQ Activists

A pot of gold isn’t the only thing at the end of the rainbow. Google is there, as well.

The No. 1 search company has found its own way to be part of Pride Month this year by partnering with three LGBTQ activist organizations. Google is working to encourage donations to the groups GLAAD, PFLAG, and the It Gets Better Project. As part of the collaborations with these groups, the company released a video advertising its own definitions of family.

Presented as a message of inclusion and love, the promotion functions more like a frontal attack on the traditional family. As Google admits in the description, it wants to encourage people to “challenge traditional views of family.”

In the video, and in every aspect of Google’s Pride page, traditional values are assaulted head on. The video depicts Olivia, who of course has two moms, a young boy who has two dads, and Sabelle (spelt phonetically), who was rejected by her family for contracting HIV. Her true family, the video says, are the two women who accepted her “every day” since she got the disease.

Google claims to be partnering with these organizations to help LGBTQ people who are “striving for full equality.” The specific issues of equality for Google are same sex marriage, the right to change legal gender, same sex adoption rights, and anti-LGBTQ discrimination.

The company is supposedly all about toleration, claiming that they aim “to build a more inclusive family narrative that both reflects and celebrates the life experiences of the community.”

Keeping in mind the people it is partnering with, one wonders whether they are really honest about being loving and inclusive. The It Gets Better Project can trace its origins to Dan Savage, a man who is verbally abusive to conservatives, and who specializes in ridiculing Catholics. Sarah Kate Ellis, the president and CEO of GLAAD, the media police for all things gay, thinks 13% of 2017 movies featuring gay characters just isn’t enough. That’s not really a logical argument, as liberals estimate the LGBTQ population at 4%.

These people and the organizations they represent display an attitude marked more by conquest of the traditional family and less by toleration of others. “Show us your family, however you define it,” are the words depicted on the screen at the end of the promotional video. Perhaps they should have added for clarity’s sake, “unless you are heterosexual and have a father and mother.”

Interesting fact to consider: recent studies indicate that children of same sex couples statistically are more likely to become depressed and suicidal. If these families are “defined by love,” as google puts it, why do the studies suggests they are less able to raise happy children?

Source Article from https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/isaac-cross/2018/06/12/google-redefines-family-video-promoting-lgbtq-activists

South Africa Land Occupier Mob Tries to Murder White Family with Molotov Cocktail



 


A mob of blacks in South Africa—part of the growing “land occupation” movement—last week tried to murder a white family living in a house they wanted by attacking the residence with Molotov cocktails, local media have reported.

The attack, which took place on May 25, 2018, but which has only been reported now by the GroundUp alternative media service, occurred after the land’s owner had won a temporary court injunction preventing the blacks from further occupying the land in question.

According to the GroundUp report, a white woman by the name of Carrie Esterhuizen and her two small children were in the hostel at the Cremona Cheese Factory in Tshepisong, west of Johannesburg, when “angry land occupiers set the building alight on the afternoon of Friday, May 25.”

Her husband, Fredrick Esterhuizen, told GroundUp he had been working for the factory as a security manager for about a month before the incident.

Carrie and the children, aged four and 11 months old, were at home when the blacks, residents of Ebumnandini squatter camp in Tshepisong, broke the fence and set the building alight.

“My wife phoned me and all I could hear was frantic screaming so I rushed down to the house,” said Fredrick.

“I managed to grab my wife and kids just before one of the petrol bombs exploded in the lounge.”

Carrie said she could smell the petrol bomb as she was calling her husband for help.

“I tried not to think about [the petrol bomb] and focused on getting my kids out of the house,” she said.

Fredrick said he had taken his family to the factory office.

“Looking out the office window I could see my house burning down. We didn’t have time to take anything with us so we lost everything,” he said.

The blacks had previously tried to occupy the land next to the factory but the Johannesburg Metro Police Department demolished their shacks on the same day.

The owner of the land, Antonio Cremona, filed for an eviction order in April, and the South Gauteng High Court issued an “interim eviction order” valid until September 2018.

Cremona’s personal assistant Carol Cooke said the fire had destroyed the Esterhuizens’ identification documents, and the children’s school uniforms and books. She said the blacks also entered the building and stole items.

The report added that the blacks claimed they needed the “land because they can no longer afford to pay rent as they are unemployed. They say the land had been vacant for 23 years and is a safety concern because there is no fence and the grass is long.”

But Cooke said the property used to be fenced but the fencing “kept getting ripped down and stolen.”

She said the land had not been developed because it had been tied up in a deceased estate until 2015.

The attack is just the latest of a growing number of incidents in which whites are being targeted by blacks in South Africa in what is clearly a racially-based genocide attempt—which, of course, is ignored by the anti-white establishment in the West, which would otherwise make it into a major incident if the racial roles were reversed.

Source











RELATED ARTICLES


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheEuropeanUnionTimes/~3/XqjUvzSFwdI/

Family Of Black Florida Man Killed By Sheriff's Deputy Awarded A Measly 4 Cents

A federal jury determined that the family of a black man killed in his home in Florida by a sheriff’s deputy after being called for a noise complaint would receive only 1 percent of the $4 awarded in damages. 

The St. Lucie County Sheriff’s Office was found partly liable in the 2014 shooting of Gregory Hill Jr., the jury determined last week. Ken Mascara, the sheriff, was found to be only 1 percent liable, given that Hill was under the influence of alcohol. Deputy Christopher Newman, who shot Hill, was found not liable. 

The jury decided Thursday to award a grand total of $4 in damages: $1 to his mother to cover funeral expenses and $1 to each of his three children. 

Newman and another deputy were sent to investigate a complaint about noise coming from Hill’s garage. Hill opened the garage door, then started to close it. Newman shot Hill three times, claiming Hill was holding a gun ― which is still in dispute. An unloaded gun was later found in Hill’s back pocket. His family filed a wrongful death lawsuit in 2016. 

Gregory Hill Jr. with fiancée Monique Davis and two of his daughters. A sheriff’s deputy killed him in his garage in 2014, and his family has been awarded 1 percent of $4 in damages. (GoFundMe)Gregory Hill Jr. with fiancée Monique Davis and two of his daughters. A sheriff’s deputy killed him in his garage in 2014, and his family has been awarded 1 percent of $4 in damages. (GoFundMe)

“That a black child’s pain is only worth a dollar is exactly the problem with the plight of the African-American right now,” John Phillips, the Hill family’s attorney, told CNN. “This says black lives don’t matter.”

“Deputy Newman was placed in a very difficult situation, and like so many fellow law enforcement officers must do every day, he made the best decision he could for the safety of his partner, himself, and the public, given the circumstances he faced,” Mascara said in a statement. “We appreciate the jury’s time and understanding and wish everyone involved in this case the best as they move forward.”

  • This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

Source Article from https://www.yahoo.com/news/family-black-florida-man-killed-153757730.html