FACEBOOK Is 100% Anti Gun…

If just a handful of our 600,000 monthly readers donated one dollar, I could easily crush my modest yearly fundraising goal of $10,000 by January 31 2018. If you value the information on this site and have the means, please consider making a donation below. Your support will help us expand, keep ads off the site and buy out any remaining advertising contracts we have with vendors. No contribution is too small and will undoubtedly go towards the many expenses this site incurs. If would like to learn more about our mission, please visit our manifesto here.

Thank you so much for your support,
Thomas Dishaw Editor @ Gov’t Slaves

Source Article from http://govtslaves.info/2017/11/facebook-100-anti-gun/

Chicago Cop Faces Discipline For Insensitive and Threatening Posts on Facebook

Chicago’s police oversight agency has cited a veteran officer for more than 60 rule violations, blasting him for repeatedly posting insensitive racial and religious comments on Facebook and promoting violence against police protesters, Muslims and others.

In addition to the Facebook posts, Officer Brian J. Hansen allegedly parked his Chevrolet Equinox outside the Central District police station at 1718 S. State St. with a bumper sticker on the back windshield showing a truck running over fleeing protesters beside the words: “All lives splatter. Nobody cares about your protest.”

In a 95-page report obtained by the Chicago Tribune through an open-records request, the Civilian Office of Police Accountability used unusually strong language to condemn Hansen’s actions, leaving little doubt that it favored his firing even though it publicly declined to give its position.

In its conclusion to its findings, COPA made clear that it had no faith in Hansen carrying out “fair and impartial” law enforcement to everyone in Chicago, regardless of their ethnic and sociological backgrounds.

“There can be no doubt, based on PO Hansen’s Facebook activity and vehicle decals, that PO Hansen cannot live out this mission,” the investigators wrote.

Neither Hansen nor the lawyer representing him in the COPA proceedings returned telephone calls. But COPA said in interviews with investigators, Hansen tried to laugh off his postings as an indication of his sense of humor and insisted his off-duty comments were protected by the First Amendment.

In a footnote in its report, however, COPA said courts have routinely held that officers can be fired for bigoted speech without violating the First Amendment.

Hansen, a 25-year department veteran, has been stripped of his police powers and assigned to paid desk duty since August, according to the COPA report. Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson has up to three months to decide if he will recommend Hansen’s firing to the Chicago Police Board, which would then decide his fate.

Pages: 1 2

If you haven’t already, be sure to like our Filming Cops Page on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Please visit our sister site Smokers ONLY


(function(d) {
var params =
id: “3c7936d6-71e2-4cba-afb4-95ed4171941f”,
d: “ZmlsbWluZ2NvcHMuY29t”,
wid: “365543”,
cb: (new Date()).getTime()

var qs=[];
for(var key in params) qs.push(key+’=’+encodeURIComponent(params[key]));
var s = d.createElement(‘script’);s.type=’text/javascript’;s.async=true;
var p = ‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https’ : ‘http’;
s.src = p + “://api.content-ad.net/Scripts/widget2.aspx?” + qs.join(‘&’);

Filming Cops

Source Article from http://filmingcops.com/chicago-cop-faces-discipline-insensitive-threatening-posts-facebook/

Billionaire investor George Soros dumps Apple & Facebook

According to the filings, the fund sold 1,700 shares of Apple and 1.55 million of Snap stock. It also reduced its stake in Twitter by 5,700 shares while still holding 18,400 shares of the social media site. The investor got rid of 367,262 shares in Facebook; he has now 109,451 of the network’s shares.

At the same time, the Soros hedge fund boosted its stake in Microsoft by 99,000 shares and in Amazon by 2,500 shares.

Snap stock tumbled on the news that another key shareholder has bailed from the struggling messaging app. The company is down over 48 percent since it went public in March. Apple, whose shares hit a record high last week, plunged almost three percent on Wednesday.

READ MORE: Investors eager to snap up Snap shares after successful IPO

Soros’ position contradicts that of another billionaire investor Warren Buffet who’s holding company Berkshire Hathaway almost quadrupled its stake in Apple earlier this year. According to an SEC filing, in the third quarter, the company also topped up on Apple, boosting its stake in the iPhone maker by 3.9 million to 134.1 million shares.

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/business/409930-soros-dumps-apple-snap/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

NYT calls for Facebook to censor all pro-life websites by labeling them "fake news”

Image: NYT calls for Facebook to censor all pro-life websites by labeling them “fake news”

(Natural News)
The American communist Left has begun an all-out push in the Age of President Donald J. Trump to completely destroy our history, culture and traditions, likely because they sense that our 45th president just may be the one capable of defeating them once and for all with his “MAGA” message.

They are, of course, being aided by the legacy media and the Leftist-run technology companies we have been allowed to become far too pervasive and powerful. Case in point: A New York Times columnist just recently called on Facebook to censor all pro-life websites by labeling their information “anti-abortion fake news.”

By cherry-picking select stories and sites, and relying on discredited “fact-checking” organizations like Media Matters — a far-Left outfit founded by uber-Leftist and Clinton sycophant David Brock — columnist Rossalyn Warren then paints with a broad journalistic brush to complain that Facebook isn’t doing enough to address “the vast amount of misinformation and unevidenced stories about reproductive rights, science and health.”

“Evidence-based, credible articles about abortion from reputable news outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post didn’t make it to the top of the list of “most shared” articles on Facebook last year, according to BuzzSumo. But articles from the site LifeNews.com did,” she complains, while at the same time failing to inform her readers that two of the biggest purveyors of fake news over the last election cycle were her beloved Times and Post. (Related: The corporate-controlled media has been weaponized against America… “disinfo dictatorship” seeks to replace all FACTS with FICTIONS.)

As seen by Warren, who has also been published by reliably Left-wing sites like The Guardian and Buzzfeed, the problem is that Facebook isn’t using the right criteria to judge what is and isn’t “fake” regarding information posted on pro-Life sites like LifeNews.com.

Currently, Facebook concentrates on sites that mimic existing sites or are financially motivated to produce misleading stories. However, so-called “anti-abortion” sites are neither because they publish their own content and are motivated by ideology, not profit, Warren observed.

And she also claimed that Facebook really only started to pay attention to fake news and crack down on it after facing “intense scrutiny” from public and mainstream media pressure after the 2016 election. Now, she says, the social media giant is concentrating on “the worst of the worst, on the clear hoaxes by spammers for their own gain.”

“That’s why those of us who are concerned by the misinformation around reproductive rights need to make ourselves heard,” she said, adding that much more pressure must be brought to bear against Facebook to censor ‘anti-abortion information.’

The very language that Warren uses — terms like “anti-abortion” instead of “pro-life” and “reproductive rights” instead of the term “abortion” — are in and of themselves liberally biased and prove that she is actually the one who is motivated by ideology.

By throwing in a few of the most heinous examples of fake abortion-related news and then tossing in a few specific websites, she creates the illusion that all pro-life sites are filled with bytes and bytes of fake news and that none of them are reputable, scientifically-sourced or credible.

The fact is, most of those sites are reputable, credible and well-sourced; it’s just that Warren doesn’t like those sources personally because they also push a political point of view that’s generally conservative, and she obviously isn’t.

This is what communists do: They insist they are the ones ‘fighting the good fight’ on ‘behalf of truth and justice,’ when in reality their ‘battle’ masks their agenda of authoritarianism. Warren, like others on the communist Left in America, doesn’t want a legitimate debate over ideas. They seek to impose their anti-traditional ideology on the entire country by force or by censorship.

And that’s about as un-American as it gets.

Sources include:






Source Article from http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-11-14-nyt-calls-for-facebook-to-censor-all-pro-life-websites-by-labeling-them-fake-news.html

NY Times Op-Ed Writer Wants Facebook to Censor Pro-Life Content As ‘Fake News’

In a Friday New York Times op-ed, Rossalyn Warren, described as “a journalist who regularly covers women’s rights and internet culture,” wants Facebook to expand its definition of “fake news” to include “the vast amount of misinformation and unevidenced stories about reproductive rights, science and health.”

That is, Warren wants to marginalize and even silence legitimate pro-life messages, sites, facts, and viewpoints.

Ms. Warren somehow missed the news that the establishment press has earned sole ownership of the “fake news” tag thanks to its disgraceful conduct and dishonest reporting during the entire election season and the first year of Donald Trump’s presidency. That has included its early strategic coordination with the Clinton campaign, its obvious cooperation with the attempt to rig the Democratic Party primary to defeat Bernie Sanders, its October 2016 release of the Access Hollywood tapes, its thoroughly cooked polling throughout the election season, and its blatantly hostile treatment of the President, his appointees, and others on his team during the past year.

But that doesn’t mean that the leftist gatekeepers at Facebook won’t consider acquiescing to her demands. What Warren wants to do is to marginalize legitimate pro-life content she has unilaterally decided is “fake news” (bolds are mine throughout this post):

Facebook Is Ignoring Anti-Abortion Fake News

… Last week … (Facebook’s) general counsel appeared before Congress alongside his counterparts from Twitter and Google to testify on the company’s role in distributing misinformation ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Facebook says it’s taking “fake news” seriously. It has a label for “disputed” stories, brought in independent fact-checking partners and allows users to report false articles.

It’s not clear whether these attempts to tackle misinformation will work; critics have called them ineffective and slow. But there’s another problem, too. So far, Facebook and the public have focused almost solely on politics and Russian interference in the United States election. What they haven’t addressed is the vast amount of misinformation and unevidenced stories about reproductive rights, science and health.

Evidence-based, credible articles about abortion from reputable news outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post didn’t make it to the top of the list of “most shared” articles on Facebook last year, according to BuzzSumo. But articles from the site LifeNews.com did.

Good heavens, we can’t have upstarts like LifeNews beating out the venerable Times and Post!

Continuing (link is in original):

LifeNews, which has just under one million followers on Facebook, is one of several large anti-abortion sites that can command hundreds of thousands of views on a single post. These sites produce vast amounts of misinformation; the Facebook page for the organization Live Action, for instance, has two million Facebook followers and posts videos claiming there’s a correlation between abortion and breast cancer. And their stories often generate more engagement than the content produced by mainstream news organizations … People on Facebook engage with anti-abortion content more than abortion-rights content, … (so) as a result of the company’s algorithms, means more people see it.

Note that Warren, despite being an award-winning reporter, never bothered to provide a single bit of evidence that pro-life content created by LifeNews.com is in any way untrue, deceptive, or otherwise “fake.”

As one would expect, LifeNews Founder and Editor Steven Ertelt noted that complete failure (link is in original):

… nowhere in her article does she provide any proof or evidence of that false (“fake news”) claim. If LifeNews is as fake as Warren claims surely she could produce even one example of a piece of fake news but she is totally unable to meet even that low threshold.

Warren claims there is a “vast amount of misinformation and unevidenced stories about reproductive rights, science and health.” Yet again she is unable to cite even one example.

And she complains that so-called “Evidence-based, credible articles” from news outlets that are longtime abortion advocates did not make the top of the most shared articles on Facebook. Perhaps that’s because most Americans realize that the New York Times And The Washington Post have an extensive liberal bias and are firmly embedded in the pro-abortion camp.

She complains that articles from LifeNews.com were some of the most shared articles on Facebook, whines about LifeNews having almost 1 million Facebook followers and her article alludes to this website supposedly being one of the fake news websites that Facebook ought to take into account.

Yet Warren’s post is entirely fake news — where she puts forward her opinion and substitutes it for fact. Simply claiming that a website is fake news doesn’t make it fake news, especially when Warren is completely unable to offer even one shred of evidence to support her theory.

Warren’s attack on Live Action’s assertion of a likely link between abortion and breast cancer is also disingenuous.

The video to which she linked is a three-minute video trailer for a full documentary which explains in scientific terms why any pregnancy terminated early — whether it be because of abortion (which is the primary emphasis), or premature birth before 32 weeks — increases the likelihood of breast cancer. The trailer notes that since “nobody disagrees” that premature delivery before 32 weeks increases breast cancer risk, “to entirely deny the connection” between terminating a pregnancy before 32 weeks and increased breast cancer risk “is ludicrous,” and that the continued denial may be causing women not to get the post-abortion testing they need to detect breast cancer at an early stage.

Live Action’s video is not fake news.

<<< Please support MRC’s NewsBusters team with a tax-deductible contribution today. >>>

Therefore, an award-winning reporter violated journalistic standards by utterly failing to present even a single shred of evidence to support her claim that the two pro-life sites sites she mentioned produce “fake news.” Stripping matters down to their essence, Ms. Warren is outraged that pro-life facts are winning in the arena of ideas, and wants to put a stop to that positive development through censorship.

Sadly, as noted earlier, given the people who run and manage Facebook, it’s not inconceivable that she might get her way.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Source Article from https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2017/11/13/ny-times-op-ed-writer-wants-facebook-censor-pro-life-content-fake

[VIDEO] Facebook’s Founding President Admits That Social Network “Exploits A Vulnerability In Human Psychology”

By Fattima Mahdi Truth Theory

Early investor and Facebook’s founding president Sean Parker has admitted that the network was built to “consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible.”

At an Axios event, Parker shed light on Facebook’s early ethos. He explains how Facebook is designed to “give you a dopamine hit every once in awhile because someone liked or commented on your post.” He went on to say “that is going to get you to contribute more content and that’s going to get you more likes and comments.” He concluded that the network was a “social validation feedback loop.”  

“The inventors, creators — it’s me, it’s Mark [Zuckerberg], it’s Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it’s all of these people — understood this consciously. And we did it anyway,” Parker said.

Parker is a stream founder and chair of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. He has accused the social media platform of exploiting human “vulnerability” using psychology and appears to be concerned with the effect this is having on us. He warned about the unknown societal consequences of widespread social media use, saying that he had become “something of a conscientious objector” against social platforms. “The unintended consequences of a network when it grows to a billion or 2 billion people and … it literally changes your relationship with society, with each other,” the billionaire said onstage at the National Constitution Center during an event that also focused on his work supporting cutting-edge cancer research. “It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. “God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains,” Sean Parker said.

Read more: Did Social Media Create A Mass Spiritual Awakening?

Image Credit: Flickr / Axios

I am Luke Miller, content manager at Truth Theory and creator of Potential For Change. I like to blend psychology and spirituality to help you create more happiness in your life.Grab a copy of my free 33 Page Illustrated eBook- Psychology Meets Spirituality- Secrets To A Supercharged Life You Control Here

Source Article from https://truththeory.com/2017/11/13/video-facebooks-founding-president-admits-social-network-exploits-vulnerability-human-psychology/

Facebook Police Continue Attacks on Influential Conservative News Sites


After last year’s Presidential election, then President Barack Obama met face to face with Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook. Although the minutes of their meeting are not publicly available, far-left publications shared that Obama warned Zuckerberg about ‘fake news’ –

Former president Barack Obama personally warned Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in a post-2016 election meeting to check the spread of fake news on the site, but he was told there was no easy fix, according to a Washington Post report on Sunday.

Soon after in January the Washington Free Beacon published a lengthy document relaeased by far left operative David Brock from far left radical website Media Matters. This liberal site is funded by controversial anti-American agitator George Soros.

At a January donor retreat it became clear that liberals weren’t for free speech, they were for liberal approved speech only. The 49 page memo from the retreat outlined how the George Soros-funded groups Media Matters, American Bridge, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and Shareblue planned to undermine President Trump’s agenda and help Democrats win control of Congress and the White House by 2020.

The leaked document claimed Media Matters was working with Facebook and Twitter to crack down on pro-Trump articles on social media.

Via The Daily Wire:

The memo decried the “fake news” that spread on social media as a reason why Hillary Clinton lost the election, and then went on to state something alarming: Media Matters obtained “access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites” so they can “systemically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data.”

“The earlier we can identify a fake news story, the more effectively we can quash it,” the memo states. “With this new technology at our fingertips, researchers monitoring news in real time will be able to identify the origins of a lie with mathematical precision, creating an early warning system for fake news and disinformation.”

The memo went on to state that Media Matters had a discussion with Facebook on how to crack down on fake news, including Media Matters providing the social media giant with “a detailed map of the constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news.” The memo also bragged that Media Matters provided Google with “the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake new sites” that would be prevented from using Google’s advertising network.

It was soon clear that what Obama and the far left meant by ‘fake news’ was any conservative information that they did not like.

After Obama’s meeting with Facebook, the Columbia Journalism Review published an article in March that was entitled “Study: Breitbart-led Right-wing Media Ecosystem Altered Broader Media Agenda“.

The article stated that only Breitbart, The Hill and FOX News were more influential to conservative audiences in the months leading up to last year’s election than was the Gateway Pundit.

The conservative right was dominated with trusted online ‘new media’ outlets and liberal media critics that shared the real news that mainstream media would not share.
The left was dominated by biased liberal ‘legacy media’ outlets that have carried water for Democrats for ages.

President Trump tweeted in September that Facebook was never pro-Trump during the election and since –

Facebook was always anti-Trump. The Networks were always anti-Trump hence, Fake News, @NYTimes and @WaPo were anti-Trump. Collusion?

This did not sit well with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg who rejected President Trump and per Facebook replied in part –

…After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea. Calling that crazy was dismissive and I regret it. This is too important an issue to be dismissive. But the data we have has always shown that our broader impact — from giving people a voice to enabling candidates to communicate directly to helping millions of people vote — played a far bigger role in this election.

We will continue to work to build a community for all people. We will do our part to defend against nation states attempting to spread misinformation and subvert elections. We’ll keep working to ensure the integrity of free and fair elections around the world, and to ensure our community is a platform for all ideas and force for good in democracy.

Based on Facebook’s actions, Zuckerberg was not honest especially since the election and one of the entities Facebook wants to stop the most is conservative leaning Gateway Pundit.

Before the election it was reported that Zuckerberg and the COO of Facebook, Sheryl Sandberg were huge Hillary supporters in the 2016 elections. WikiLeaks released Hillary’s Campaign Manager’s emails which included emails from Zuckerberg asking creepy Podesta for a meeting.

Podesta emails also showed Zuckerberg was working directly with Hillary with Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg declaring: “I Still Want HRC to Win Badly. I Am Still Here to Help”.
Here is our recent analysis of Facebook traffic.

In every single Facebook category our numbers are down. In page visits our numbers were sky rocketing before the election. Then in three distinct periods our numbers were cut off. This didn’t have anything to do with the quality of our posts as we have proof that our generic numbers are up and increasing.

The fact is Facebook is doing something to prevent our stories from being shared.

Our Facebook weekly total reach numbers are also way down.

In all statistical categories provided to us by Facebook our current numbers are below linear projections of where we should be even with their robust efforts to shut us down.

Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are not being honest. They do not want conservative messages to be promoted or shared. President Trump again is right – Facebook always was (and is) anti-Trump!



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheEuropeanUnionTimes/~3/b6FAHMfM7hI/

Ex-Facebook Chief Sean Parker Warns Site Was Built To Exploit People’s Weaknesses

Next Story

Facebook. It’s something that over 1.8 Billion people are using on a daily basis — can you believe that? For many of us, it’s the first thing we do when we wake up, and the last thing we do before we go to bed at night. Is this a healthy relationship? There is no doubt that Facebook has connected all of us on a level that may have previously been unimaginable. Without Facebook, a lot of important information would not have been seen. It presented a platform to share so much information and so many ideas.

How Did This Happen?

But, was this all by mistake? Was Facebook solely created to connect College kids, and simply exploded from there? Was it an accident? Were  there sinister intentions behind its creation or did all those, if any, creep in after its success?  Was it designed to essentially suck as much of our time away from us as possible? Well, according to former Facebook president, Sean Parker, that’s exactly what it was designed for and continues to do.

Either Parker is a disgruntled ex employee trying to seek revenge on the corporate giant, or he is worried enough about the implications of Facebook as we know it now, and potentially where is headed. I’ll leave it to you to decide after reading some of what he recently announced during an interview with Axios.

Parker joked that the following comments would probably get him blocked from Facebook by Mark Zuckerberg.

“When Facebook was getting going, I had these people who would come up to me and they would say, ‘I’m not on social media.’ And I would say, ‘OK. You know, you will be.’ And then they would say, ‘No, no, no. I value my real-life interactions. I value the moment. I value presence. I value intimacy.’ And I would say, … ‘We’ll get you eventually.’”

I can relate to this statement as I’ve seen many people that always said they would never use Facebook come over to the dark side, or even people like my Mother who barely know how to use a computer, add me as a ‘friend.’

“I don’t know if I really understood the consequences of what I was saying, because [of] the unintended consequences of a network when it grows to a billion or 2 billion people and … it literally changes your relationship with society, with each other … It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains.”

Could anyone have understood the implications of what something this massive could have brought to our society is a whole? He’s right, Facebook has taken over aspects of our lives in many ways.

“The thought process that went into building these applications, Facebook being the first of them, … was all about: ‘How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?’”

How much time do you spend on Facebook?

“And that means that we need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in a while, because someone liked or commented on a photo or a post or whatever. And that’s going to get you to contribute more content, and that’s going to get you … more likes and comments.”

Are you addicted to “the scroll?” Constantly scrolling, waiting for something that makes you laugh or you find interesting, just to give a like or a comment and then get right back to scrolling? Facebook is extremely addictive, and it’s not your fault, it was designed to be this way. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem.

“It’s a social-validation feedback loop … exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology.”

This is so true. I can relate to this on many levels, after posting something, if I don’t get a like or a comment, I start to regret my post and wonder if it was worth it or not.  After than, I then began to feel validated by a ‘like’ or a comment. Many of us, not all , post to get likes. It’s that simple.

“The inventors, creators — it’s me, it’s Mark [Zuckerberg], it’s Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it’s all of these people — understood this consciously. And we did it anyway.”

I know what a lot of you are probably thinking: but, I saw this post on Facebook and that’s how I ended up coming to read it. Which is a valid thought. It’s no surprise that Facebook has literally taken over so much of the internet, and even the use of the built in apps on our phones at times. Facebook came in quick and literally just took over everything standing in its way. In some ways it’s actually impressive, but in others it’s extremely scary.

Sean Parker Isn’t The Only Social Media Big Cheese With A Warning

Former Google employee, Tristan Harris explained how these tech companies master the minds of their users. Product designers “play your psychological vulnerabilities (consciously and unconsciously) against you in the race to grab your attention,” he wrote.

Like magicians, social media apps “give people the illusion of free choice while architecting the menu so that they win, no matter what you choose.”

So, What Do We Do?

It’s not that you need to save all of your photos, copy and paste all of your links and  contact your closest friends to make a massive list of emails, although, that’s one way to go about it. Just be aware, especially if you catch yourself with any amount of time to spare, 30 seconds, 10 minutes, or a couple of hours, it’s so easy to instantly grab your phone and begin “the scroll.”

Be aware of the addiction, and then break it. If you need to take a break from all social media from time to time so that you remember what life was like before we were constantly glued to our small screens, our medium screens and our larger screens, then do it. Sometimes it’s easy to forget that we are in control of our lives, it’s time to take back the power!

If you are wondering how you will be able to read our articles whilst taking a break from social media, don’t worry, we’ll still be here, and you can easily find us by coming right to our website or using Google. Much Love

Get Your FREE In Depth Numerology Reading

Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.

With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.

Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.


Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/krfOTi-KkKs/