In hot mic comments, Netanyahu says Europe will ‘shrivel and disappear’ if it doesn’t change course vis a vis Israel

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,747 other followers

Source Article from

Re: Netanyahu to Macron: Islam Seeks to Destroy Israel and Europe

During his visit to France on Sunday to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the expulsion of French Jews in Paris, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continued his incitement against Islam, while recalling the scarecrow of “Islamophobia” and describing Islam again as “terrorism.”

French President Emmanuel Macron and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held an official meeting at the Élysée Palace. It was an opportunity to test each other’s positions on the conflict between Israel, the Palestinians and Iran.

In his statement, Netanyahu stressed that Jerusalem is the united and eternal capital of the State of Israel, and attacked “Islamic terrorism,” calling for unity and fighting it together. “Political Islam seeks to destroy both Israel and European countries,” Netanyahu said. “We have heard  extremist voices that not only call for the destruction of the Jewish state, but the Jews themselves and everyone who objects to and opposes their way,” he added.

Addressing the French president, Netanyahu said: “You spoke two days ago in the city of Nice about the Crusades and you are sincere in what you said. The radical Islam that Iran and ISIS (Daesh) represent seeks to destroy us and destroy Europe. Israel is their first goal. They do not hate the West because of Israel, but they hate Israel because of the West. They are trying to destroy us and you, and since France is a great power they will not ignore it.”

Read: Israeli disguised as French minister defrauds French security firms

Regarding Palestine, Netanyahu told the French president that the source of the conflict is the Palestinian refusal to recognize a national state for the Jewish people and to allow it to live in peace.

Netanyahu thanked also the French President for hosting him in this tragic anniversary and stressed the deep and old friendship between the French and Israeli states. In a lengthy speech, French President Emmanuel Macron pointed to the responsibility of the French state for the displacement campaign against Jews during the Second World War.

He called then for a minute of silence for the victims of the holocaust campaign and stressed that the recognition of the crime is the way to reconciliation. Macron said that we must not give up everything that promotes humanity, such as receiving refugees and fighting global warming.

He stressed also that he would never concede to “anti-Zionism” because it represents the new form of anti-Semitism. At the end of the ceremony, Macron and Netanyahu went to the presidential palace in Paris to talk about Syria and Iran as well as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

Source Article from

How Treatment of Palestinians Causes Terrorism in Europe and America


The Jewish-only ethnostate has sent soldiers in to seize solar panels which were donated to a Palestinian village called Jubbet al-Dhib inside the occupied West Bank—even though the land belongs to the Palestinians and the village is very close to a number Jewish settlements, illegal under both Israeli and international law which are all connected to Israel’s national power grid.

Although Israel has claimed that the confiscation of the solar panels was carried out because they were “illegally erected,” the reality is that the move forms a part of a concerted effort to drive all the Palestinians out of the West Bank so that it can be annexed to the Jewish state.

According to reports, the Dutch government has now “lodged a formal complaint with the Israeli government”—but, of course, nothing else will happen because the Jewish lobby in the Netherlands will cause too much trouble for the Dutch government.

The hybrid diesel and solar power electricity system was installed last year in the village, which is home to 150 Palestinians whose livelihood is directly threatened by the illegal Jewish settlements.

The Palestinians pointed out that although the solar panels were erected without asking the Jews for permission, the reality is that the land is by all international law, Palestinian, and in any event that building permissions for new Palestinian homes and infrastructure are almost impossible to obtain.

The village mayor told Palestinian outlet Ma’an News that the panels were destroyed, although Comet-ME, the aid organisation which installed the panels, said that between 60 and 90 were taken away intact and other equipment at the site destroyed and left behind by Israeli forces.

The Dutch Foreign Ministry has asked for the equipment to be returned to Jubbet al-Dhib and is considering what “next steps can be taken”, according to a report in Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz.

Cogat, the Israeli military agency responsible for coordinating Israeli policy in Palestinian areas, said that several work-stop orders were issued before the day of the raid. Villagers maintain that they did not know the site had been targeted until Israel Defence Force (IDF) soldiers showed up.

Cogat said in a statement that the village had “other electricity sources” other than the “illegal electricity room”. Haaretz said that before the solar panel system was installed, the 150 residents relied on a couple of “old and noisy” diesel generators for three hours of power a day.

More than 300 structures in the occupied West Bank demolished by the Israeli authorities in 2016 were at least in part funded by the EU or international NGOs, an Israeli military official said earlier this year.

Last year also saw the highest number of Israeli demolitions of Palestinian structures since rights groups began records.

Although many in the West are either unaware of this ongoing brutal treatment of the Palestinians by the Jews—or do not care—the reality is that this sort of behavior has a direct impact upon the west.

This is because the Muslim world understands very well the relationship between the Jewish lobbies’ control of western governments and those nations unqualified support for Israel –and therefore correctly blame European nations for Israel’s actions in the Middle East.

This in turn provides ideological fuel to the Jihad fire which is currently raging in Europe—and is the primary reason for the ongoing terrorist attacks in Europe and America.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Photographer captures haunting abandoned places of worship in Europe

This incredibly haunting body of work was created by a committed photographer traveling across Europe to capture the continent’s abandoned places of worship. James Kerwin’s journey took him from small chapels in Wales to stunning monasteries in Italy, as well as relics in Spain, Belgium and France.

The photographer, from Norwich, England, said he is fascinated by the craftsmanship and hard work that went into building such important places of worship, and through his images he likes to show their depth and grandeur.

Although he revealed the countries where his beautiful images were taken, the 35-year-old Kerwin did not name the exact spots that he traveled to in order to shoot such wonders, adding an element of mystery to his work. (Caters News)

See more news-related photo galleries and follow us on Yahoo News Photo Twitter and Tumblr.

Source Article from

102,387 Migrants Land in Europe in first 6 months, says IOM


At least 102,387 nonwhite invaders pretending to be refugees have landed in Europe in the first six months of this year as of June 29, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has reported.

Of this number, 101,210 have invaded Europe by sea, and 1,177 by land routes, the latest IOM update has reported.

This compares to the grand total of 387,739 nonwhite scroungers who invaded Europe in all of 2016 via all routes in 2016—indicating that there has been a massive increase in invasion numbers across the Mediterranean Sea to Italy.

According to the latest figures, for the week 20 to 26 June, some 1,953 nonwhites invaded Italy. This figure skyrocketed the following week (27 June to 3 July) to 12,225—a 526 percent increase.

The invasion of Europe via Greece appears to be slowing down—mainly thanks to the actions of the Hungarian government in closing off the “Balkans route.”

For the two week period from June 20 to July 3, “only” some 928 nonwhite scroungers landed in Greece, while 0 (zero) landed in Bulgaria.

In the period from 27 June to 3 July, 7 invaders were registered in Hungary, a 22 percent decrease from the previous period (9 registered arrivals, from 20 to 26 June).

The main nationalities of the invaders (in descendant order) for the two week period are as follows:

To Italy: Nigeria, Bangladesh, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Gambia.

To Greece: Syria, Iraq, Republic of Congo, Algeria, Afghanistan.

Even though the invasion force is therefore clearly majority made up of nonwhites seeking to parasite off the European taxpayer-provided welfare system—and not in any sense fleeing “wars,” the controlled media still insists on calling them “migrants” or “refugees.”

This deliberate misnaming of the invaders is part of the controlled media’s plan to trick Europeans into thinking that what is happening is either “completely normal” or is purely the result of “war.”

The liberal left and the controlled media argues that “migration” is a “normal” human phenomenon—but the mass migration being seen today is anything but “normal”—because it is exclusively a one-way development, from nonwhite countries to white countries.

There are not millions of Africans trying to “migrate” to India, nor millions of Africans trying to migrate to China.

Instead, there are millions of Africans trying to “migrate” to Europe or America.

The overtly racial aspect to this one-way movement of nonwhite races to white countries reveals that this is not a “normal” human phenomenon, but simply the mass invasion of white countries by nonwhites.

The question which no one seems to ask is quite simple and effective! Even though we don’t agree with ONE single migrant being here in Europe, let alone millions… let’s say we supposedly agree, the question is: WHEN will it be enough of them? WHEN will the EU finally say OK 50 million are enough, 500 million are enough, 5 billion?? WHEN? What is the number? No one has a freaking clue and these invaders keep pouring in! When will it be enough? When we squeeze the entire planet in Europe and America and leave their continents 100% empty? Is that it?



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Are The Globalists Backing Down?: Bill Gates Calls To Stem Refugee Migration Into Europe

[7/6/17  DANIEL LANG]  By all accounts, Bill Gates has all of the standard credentials for a card carrying globalist. He’s incredibly wealthy, promotes globalism and denigrates nationalism, he has suggested that socialism can fight climate change, and has repeatedly called for a reduction of the global population. He’s an “insider” through and through, so when he makes a public statement, you know that you’re receiving an insight into what the globalist elites are thinking about.

Which makes his latest statement all the more surprising, because Bill Gates is now questioning globalist orthodoxy. He’s suggesting that European countries should be tightening their borders now.

In an interview with the German Welt am Sonntag newspaper, Gates said massive population growth in Africa will result in “enormous [migratory] pressure” on Europe unless countries increase overseas development aid payments.

Praising Germany having achieved its commitment to devote 0.7 per cent of GDP to foreign aid as “phenomenal”, the 61-year-old called on “other European nations to follow its example”.

But Gates also spoke of a dilemma caused by ‘the German attitude to refugees’, referring to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to open Europe’s borders to illegal migrants arriving from the third world.

“On the one hand you want to demonstrate generosity and take in refugees, but the more generous you are, the more word gets around about this  — which in turn motivates more people to leave Africa,” Gates told the Sunday newspaper.

“Germany cannot possibly take in the huge, massive number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe.”

Because of this, Gates stressed that “Europe must make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes”.

We have to ask ourselves, does this represent a major shift in the way globalists view immigration? And if so, why would this shift occur?

If I were to guess, it has nothing to do with the fact that mass migration is ruining Europe and Western civilization. The globalists have always advocated for the disintegration of Western values and borders. It has to do with the indirect results of mass immigration.

The refugee crisis is what has spurred the most resistance to globalism in recent years. It has ignited countless nationalistic political parties in Europe. It has contributed to Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and the slow motion fracturing of the EU.

RELATED: Improve Your Cognitive Health In As Little As 21 Days

What Bill Gates is saying, is a sign that the globalist may have realized that they’ve made a fatal mistake. By promoting open borders, they’ve sown the seeds for their own destruction. Their decision to allow millions of refugees into Europe has solidified populist conservative movements across the West that threaten to dethrone them. Now they’re trying to close this can of worms.

Unfortunately for them and us, it may to be too late.

Source Article from

350,000 Immigrants Land in Europe in Six Months


At least 350,000 nonwhite invaders pretending to be refugees have made applications for “asylum” in Europe during the first six months of 2017—and that number does not even include all of the 100,000 who have landed in Italy, Spain and Greece during the same period.

According to the latest figures from the European Union’s “European Asylum Support Office” (EASO), during the month of May 2017, EU countries recorded 59,128 “applications for international protection.”

In April, a total of 49,916 such applications were made, and in March, 66,908 applications were made.

In February, 59,036 applications for asylum were made, and in January of this year, 61,697 applications were made.

The total for these five months was 296,685—but the EASO figures for June 2017 were not available at time of writing. They are likely to be in excessed of the number for May, which would put the total number for the first six months at over 350,000.

Only 14 percent of all these applicants claimed to be “Syrians”—and even that number is doubtful, given the huge numbers of fake Syrian passports and identification documents in circulation.

Three percent of all applicants claimed to be unaccompanied minors (UAMs) when lodging an application. The largest share of claimed UAM applicants were, as in the previous months, Afghan citizens (17 percent), closely followed by Gambian citizens (8 percent).

In May, the top four citizenships of origin of applicants was composed of Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and Nigeria. In May the groups of Iraqi and Nigerian applicants were almost as numerous as group of applicants from Afghanistan, each consisting of approximately six percent.

The list of the 10 most frequent citizenships of origin was completed by Pakistan (5 percent), Albania (4 percent), Bangladesh (4 percent), Eritrea (4 percent), Guinea and Iran (3 percent each).

According to the United Nations’ International Organization for Migration (IOM), as of June 29, 2017, there had been 96,945 “arrivals” in Europe since January 1, 2017. Of this number, 95,768 had invaded Europe by sea, and 1,177 by land.

The difference between the EASO and IOM figures is because the “asylum” application reporting process always lags behind the physical invasion by several months—which means that not all of the IOM’s figures have as of yet been included in the EASO totals.

According to the IOM, the main nationalities of arrivals (in descendant order, for the month of May 2017), are to Italy: are Nigeria, Bangladesh, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Gambia; to Greece: Syria, Iraq, Republic of Congo, Algeria, Afghanistan; and to Bulgaria: Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran.

The IOM also reported that a total of 22,841 invaders had been “relocated” from Greece and Italy and “moved” to other EU countries as of June 28, 2017.

Some 15,487 invaders had been moved by the EU from Greece, and 7,354 from Italy.

Recipient states, ranked by the number of invaders “relocated,” were as follows:

Germany: 6,400; France: 3,641; Netherlands: 2,055; Finland: 1,739; Norway: 1,481; Portugal: 1,391; Switzerland: 1,058; Spain: 886; Belgium: 745; Sweden: 656; Romania: 634; Ireland: 459; Luxembourg: 327; Lithuania: 324; Latvia: 317; Slovenia: 199; Malta: 137; Estonia: 136; Cyprus: 104; Croatia: 64; Bulgaria: 50; Slovakia: 16; Czech Republic: 12; and Liechtenstein: 10.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Europe’s Elites Seem Determined to Commit Suicide by Diversity


White people have a right to their own living space or territory, to possession of their own racial homeland, to exist within secure borders, to have and hold their own country, separate from and exclusive of other races, as a condition required for both their continued life and independence. Therefore, if we are to have an instinctive informed rejection of the new suicidal / genocidal morality then we must continue to promote and nurture dedicated activists across the West who aren’t afraid to tell, and enforce, that kind of truth.

Europe in 2017 is racked with uncertainty—the eurozone crises, the endless challenges of the European Union, national elections that resemble endless rounds of bullet-dodging. Yet even these events are insignificant compared with the deep tectonic shifts beneath the Continent’s politics, shifts that Europeans—and their allies—ignore at our peril.

Throughout the migration crisis of recent years I traveled across the Continent, from the reception islands into which migrants arrive to the suburbs in which they end up and the chancelleries which encouraged them to come. For decades Europe had encouraged guest workers, and then their families, to come. As Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel once admitted, nobody expected them to stay.

Yet stay they did, with their numbers swelling even when there were no jobs. Waking up to the results of their policy, European societies rebranded themselves “multicultural” societies, only to begin wondering what that meant. Could a multicultural society make any demands of its newcomers? Or would that be “racist”?

From the 2000s legal and illegal immigration picked up. Boats regularly set out from Turkey and North Africa to enter Europe illegally. Syrians fleeing civil war pushed into the Continent, soon joined by people from across sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa, the Middle East and Far East.

Today the great migration is off the front pages. Yet it goes on. On an average weekend nearly 10,000 people arrive on Italian reception islands alone. Where do they go? What do they expect? And what do we expect of them?

To find the answer to these and other questions it is necessary to ask deeper questions. Why did Europe decide it could take in the poor and dispossessed of the world? Why did we decide that anybody in the world fleeing war, or just seeking a better life, could come to Europe and call it home?

The reasons lie partly in our history, not least in the overwhelming German guilt, which has spread across the Continent and affected even our cultural cousins in America and Australia. Egged on by those who wish us ill, we have fallen for the idea that we are uniquely guilty, uniquely to be punished, and uniquely in need of having our societies changed as a result.

There is also, for Europe, the sense of what I call tiredness—the feeling that the story might have run out: that we have tried religion, all imaginable forms of politics, and that each has, one after another, led us to disaster. When we taint every idea we touch, perhaps a change is as good as a rest.

It is often argued that our societies are old, with a graying population, and so we need immigrants. When these theories are challenged—by asking, for instance, why the next generation of Germany’s workforce might not come from unemployed Greece rather than Eritrea—we are told that we need low-skilled workers who do not speak our languages because it makes Europe more culturally interesting. It is as though some great hole lies at the heart of the culture of Dante, Bach and Wren.

When people point out the downsides of this approach—not least that more immigration from Muslim countries produces many problems, including terrorism—we get the final explanation. It doesn’t matter, we are told: Because of globalization this is inevitable and we can’t stop it anyway.

All these instincts, when put together, are the stuff of suicide. They spell out the self-annihilation of a culture as well as a continent. Conversations with European policy makers and politicians have made this abundantly clear to me. They tell me with fury that it “must” work. I suggest that with population change of this kind, at this speed, it may not work at all.

Yet still it is possible that the publics will not go along with the instincts of their leaders. Earlier this year, a poll of European attitudes was published in which citizens of 10 countries were asked a tough question: whether they agreed that there should be no more Muslim migration into their countries. Majorities in eight out of the 10 countries, including France and Germany, said they wanted no more Muslim immigrants.

Over recent decades Europe has made a hasty effort to redefine itself. As the world came in, we became wedded to “diversity.” As terrorism grew and more migrants arrived, public opinion in Europe began to harden. Today “more diversity” remains the cry of the elites, who insist that if the public doesn’t like it yet, it is because they haven’t had enough of it.

The migration policies of the political and other elites of Europe suggest that they are suicidal. The interesting thing to watch in the years ahead will be whether the publics join them in that pact. I wouldn’t bet on it.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Has Europe Surrendered to Radical Islam?

Home » Culture, Europe, Multiculturalism » Has Europe Surrendered to Radical Islam?


London, June 5, 2017: A minute of silence is held at Potters Field Park, next to the City Hall, to pay tribute to the victims of the London Bridge jihadist attack three days before.

Those who came have brought flowers, candles and signs bearing the usual words: “unity”, “peace” and “love”. Faces are sad but no trace of anger is visible. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, a Muslim, gives a speech emphasizing against all evidence that the killers’ ideas have nothing to do with Islam.

A few hours after the attack, Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May also refuses to incriminate Islam, but dares to speak of “Islamic extremism”. She was immediately accused of “dividing” the country.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Source Article from–wQfq8/