Erdogan calls Europe "Failed Democracy" for allegedly Mistreating Turkish immigrants


The Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is complaining how evil racist and Islamophobes are the Europeans for allegedly mistreating and discriminating against his Turks but are the Europeans really that evil when governments like the German one for example is throwing their own citizens behind bars for criticizing the ongoing Muslim invasion of Europe? How evil are the Europeans when they are trying to appease the migrants that much? As much throwing their own citizens in jails for migrants with no rights and no citizenship in given nations?

After dozens of Jihadi terror attacks, Europe still allows them to pour in without any check in place yet they are evil and “failed democracies” according to Erdogan.

If Europe is so failed and evil and your Turkish people feel so unwelcome, why the hell do you continue to want to live in Europe?? Why do you want to be there? Why do you want to live in such a bad place which doesn’t want you there?? WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY???

These logics crack our heads when we think about it. The times of great thinkers and philosophy is over, now is the time of moronic cry-babies who throw fits over their feelings. Where is the great Aristotle? Where is our thinking gone to?

Uggghhhh oggg oggg, uga booga, you hate me, you iz ivel, you not want me live in your house, but I still want to live in your house even if you not want me, oggg oggg, uga booga!!!!!!!!!!!!!! These are the times we live in…

Listen Erdogan, Europe owes you nothing, if anything TURKEY owes Europe a lot, especially those Balkanic nations you subjugated for hundreds of years and forced them to pay tributes. Here’s what Europe should do, Europe should round up everybody and deport them all to wherever the hell they came from. Europe doesn’t need to listen to your whiny complains.

Is Europe really that evil when its filled with Kebab and Shaorma shops everywhere? Or with cheap Turkish clothes stores? Your BEKO electronics has invaded all European markets for example. Turkish jeans everywhere, Turkish gold jewelry, Turkish fruits and vegetables, especially tomatoes. Turkish products everywhere. For Europe, Turkey is like the second China. Made in Turkey everywhere!!!!!! Yet you call Europe evil?

You are in luck Europe is so tolerant and stupid these days because others wouldn’t have tolerated thins kind of nonsense for anything. Others would have cut all ties with Turkey and oppressed it with sanctions, a very long time ago. You insolent whelp! Someday Europe will change, and you will regret all these filthy words you throw at Europe now for they will not be forgotten nor forgiven. You will be sanctioned 10 times worse than how North Korea is sanctioned now, until you go bankrupt and apologize on your knees.

Sputnik reported:

Upon his arrival to the Bosnian capital Sarajevo on Sunday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan delivered a passionate speech, condemning Europe’s treatment of Turks.

Addressing 15,000 supporters at the Olympic stadium in Sarajevo, President Erdogan touched upon the issue of discrimination of Turks in Europe. He went on to say that expatriates serving in European governments had sought to undermine Turkey, and encouraged his supporters to become educated and work their way into power in those governments.

“The European countries that claim to be the cradles of democracy have failed, European Turks must show their strength to the whole world. You need to be in those parliaments instead of the ones who betray our country. Are you ready to demonstrate to the whole world the strength of European Turks? Are you ready to give the terrorist organizations and their local and foreign henchmen an Ottoman slap?” Erdogan said.

Erdogan arrived to Sarajevo to canvass support from Turks living in Europe for his ruling AK Party ahead of next month’s election in Turkey.

He also lambasted European nations that had not let him hold rallies on their soil, and said that the Turkish state news agency, TRT, would expand its coverage in Europe to counteract the alleged propaganda against Muslims. Erdogan also promised that expatriates who had obtained citizenship in other countries would still have their right to vote in Turkey.

Many of his supporters were bussed in from Germany, Austria and the Netherlands to Sarajevo so that they could meet the president, and some of them told The Times that they saw Erdogan as “a world leader” despite the fact that he’s been “shut out from everywhere in Europe.”

Outside the stadium where Erdogan gave his speech, street vendors sold flags and T-shirts and scarves with Erdogan’s image on them and shouted “World leader scarves!”

Hours before Erdogan left for Sarajevo, the Turkish intelligence services received information about an assassination plot against the president. Reacting to the reports that quickly spread on media, Erdogan told a press conference in Bosnia and Herzegovina, “Such threats and operations cannot deter us. We have taken our path and will continue on it. Is it right, on my part, when thousands of people have come here to meet and communicate with the president, that they would not be able to do this? No, this will not work.”


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Adapt 2030 Ice Age Report: Several feet of snow in Europe in late May



From spring to winter again across the peaks and valleys of France, Italy, Switzerland, Austria. Snow depths are measuring in at 2 feet with seven day snow totals at 3.5 feet. It seems late spring snows are becoming a thing of now and the future now. I thought our children would never know what snow was. Arctic temperatures are back to the 1969-2002 base line and new images of glaciers advancing in Norway.


Source Article from

‘Goodbye Europe!’ Der Spiegel depicts Trump as middle finger flipping off EU amid Iran deal tensions

Reaction from EU officials is still pouring in since Trump announced his decision earlier this week, so it didn’t take long before the cover was retweeted by French Ambassador to the US Gerard Araud.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas also had a few words to say to Der Spiegel on Friday about Washington pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal, saying the US has shown “very little willingness to take the arguments of its allies seriously.” He went on to say that the decision has “already taken hold of transatlantic ties.”

READ MORE: Open rebellion? Europe signals patience drying up as US re-imposes harmful Iran sanctions

Der Spiegel’s tone on the cover was matched inside the magazine, with an editorial titled “Time for Europe to Join the Resistance.” The article says that US President Donald Trump is “only proficient in destruction,” referencing his pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal and Paris climate agreement.

The self-explanatory cover came just one day after German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Europe can no longer count on the US, and must take matters into its own hands. That sentiment was echoed by French President Emmanuel Macron, who agreed that “something should be done.” 

Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal despite America’s three biggest allies – the UK, Germany, and France – putting forth their best efforts to convince him to stick with the landmark agreement signed in 2015. However, the US president walked away from what he deems the “worst deal ever negotiated” on Tuesday.

Much like Merkel and Macron, the decision has also left EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker to say that the US must be replaced as a leader on the international stage because it has “lost vigor.” 

As for Merkel, it seems that her statement wasn’t entirely fueled by Trump’s Iran decision. She made a similar statement following a G7 summit last year, when attendees of the meeting were unable to convince the US president to stay with the Paris Climate Agreement. “The times in which we could completely depend on others are on the way out. I’ve experienced that in the last few days,” she said at the time. 

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Source Article from

Europe: Plastic Trash Piling Up, China No Longer Wants It

Europe: Plastic Trash Piling Up, China No Longer Wants It

May 11th, 2018

Via: Reuters:

Europe has sent just over half the plastic waste it used to ship to China to other parts of Asia since Beijing’s environmental crackdown closed the world’s biggest recycling market in January. The knotty problem is what to do with the rest.

In an overcrowded continent where landfills are much more restricted than elsewhere, burning is the obvious option to help generate electricity or heat from hundreds of thousands of tonnes of surplus waste.

But more radical ideas, such as putting oil derived plastic back underground to “mine� back when recycling becomes more sophisticated, are being aired as Europe tries to work out what to do.




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from

Nissan Leaf 2.0 is selling like crazy in Europe

When Nissan first started hinting that the new Leaf would have significantly less range than the Bolt or the Tesla Model 3, it prompted me to ask a question:

Do we need shorter range electric cars? Not only would medium-range cars be more affordable, but they also require fewer resources to manufacture while still meeting something like 90-95% of most drivers’ daily needs.

What I didn’t really get into, however, is that the answer to that question will depend very much on where you live. In the United States, for example, where towns and cities are generally speaking further apart, where transit options are more limited, and where there’s a stronger cultural affinity to the motor car and the road trip—the idea of a shorter range electric car might have limited appeal. (Indeed, some of the commenters let me know that in no uncertain terms.)

In my native Europe, however, (yes, I am a firm and unapologetic Remainian) people tend to drive shorter distances, live in denser urban communities, and also have more viable transit options for intercity travel.

This difference may be having an impact on two separate stories in the news recently. On the one hand, over at Cleantechnica, we hear that Leaf 2.0 is selling like hot cakes in Europe—shifting 6,053 units in March alone, setting a European record for sales of an all-electric car. (The plug-in hybrid Mitsubishi Outlander did once sell 6,485 units thanks to an incentive change-related spike in sales.)

Meanwhile, Electrek reports that Leaf sales ticked up only slightly in the United States following the launch of version 2.0. Specifically, the company sold 1,171 units in April, up only 10% on the year before.

Of course, early sales are a little dangerous to read too much into. After all, dealer familiarity and model availability, not to mention consumer awareness, may all mean that there’s simply a lag between launch and lift off. But it wouldn’t shock me if medium-range electric cars like the Leaf 2.0 do better in markets like Europe and Japan where cars are thought of less as an all encompassing mobility tool, and more as one option among many.

What do we think—sign of things to come, or simply statistical noise leading to ill-informed extrapolation? Share your gut feelings here.

Source Article from

Dr Duke & Syrian Partisan Girl on the Zionist Destruction of Syria, Europe and America!

Dr Duke & Syrian Partisan Girl on the Zionist Destruction of Syria, Europe and America!


Today Dr. Duke had Syrian Partisan Girl as his special guest for the hour. Partisan girl gave her perspective on what is going on in Syria, which has over the past few days been subjected to intensified bombardment from the Israeli, g-d’s special children who can do wrong.

She talked about the incredible suffering that the Syrian people have faced during this so-called civil war, which was actually a foreign invasion coordinated by the Zionist coalition. Dr. Duke also played an excerpt from a powerful speech he delivered in Damascus.

This show is a powerful show. Please share it widely. And please keep us on the air and on-line. Please visit our contribution page or send your contribution to:

P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LA 70470

Thank you.

Click here and look for the show dated 4-30-18.

Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern

Hear Dr. Duke’s Liftwaffe podcasts:

Part 1

Part 2

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Here is Mark Collett’s most recent video:

Be sure to check out Mark’s Twitter feed. And follow him while you’re at it.

Source Article from

Russia ready to build Nord Stream 3 & provide Europe with as much gas as it needs

Nord Stream


Gazprom, Russia’s leading natural gas producer, says it’s ready to supply as much blue fuel as Europe wants. The company is ready to build the Nord Stream 3 pipeline, if necessary.

“We have proven reserves, we have transport, we are building new transport routes. If Europe is ready… I do not rule out new gas transportation projects – Nord Stream 3, for example,” said Gazprom Deputy Chairman of the Management Committee Aleksandr Medvedev in an interview with the Rossiya 24 TV channel.

Groningen, the largest gas field in Europe, which is located in the Netherlands, has seen a significant output slowdown, which has resulted in declining European gas production. Gazprom has said it is ready to compensate for the decline with Russian gas.

Gazprom’s exports to Europe amounted to a record high 194.4 billion cubic meters in 2017, an increase of 8.4 percent. The share of Russian gas in the European Union last year increased to 34.7 percent from 33.1 percent in 2016.

Russia has been implementing the Nord Stream 2 project, which intends to double the existing capacity of the Nord Stream pipeline from Russia to Germany. Despite the opposition of the Baltic states, some Eastern European countries and the United States, Gazprom has received permission to build the pipeline.

“Of course, there are opportunities for Russia to supply gas and increase the volume of supplies to Europe,” the head of the center for the study of global energy markets at the Russian Academy of Sciences Vyacheslav Kulagin told RT.

“The competitiveness of Russian gas is high, especially since 2014, as the ruble has strongly weakened against the dollar and the euro, and the costs of extraction and transportation are still in the Russian rubles,” added Kulagin.

Brussels has repeatedly said it wants to cut its dependence on Russian gas by building liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals. However, cheaper Russian gas has shelved most LNG projects.

Nord Stream 2


Source Article from

Why American LNG is no substitute for Russian gas in Europe

“American LNG exports have failed to become a full-fledged alternative to Gazprom’s pipeline gas in Europe, as the latter has set another record-high last year. About half of the US LNG supplied to Europe is purchased by countries that do not have long-term contracts for Russian gas (formerly Spain and Portugal),” Maria Belova, head of research at VYGON Consulting, told RT.

The analyst notes that US gas is not a viable alternative to the pipeline supplies of Gazprom, which has renewed its historical record in export volume to Europe for the second consecutive year, due to the competitive pricing.

“The current price advantage of Russian pipeline gas appeared thanks to the price formula mechanism in the supply contracts. Gazprom gas price has not yet managed to react to a significant increase in oil prices, which began in mid-2017, in contrast to spot gas prices at European gas hubs. Up to 2016 the spot prices at the EU hubs have been consistently below the price of Russian gas with oil linkage. As a result of a number of revisions to the terms of Gazprom contracts, the price correlation has increased and the differential with spot price has narrowed,” she said.

Germany has once again announced plans to build a $500 million LNG terminal on the Elbe river to diversify from Russian and Norwegian gas imports. The Brunsbuettel would be Germany’s first LNG plant and open by the end of 2022. But the expense of building the terminal and cheaper Russian gas have held up the project for years.

Belova explained to RT why American gas is more expensive than Russian: “The average Gazprom price at the Germany border in 2017 neared the average European price (weighted average price of long-term contracts and spot prices) at around $5.65 per MMBtu. The estimated Gazprom price at the Germany border in the first quarter of 2018 increased to $7.15 per MMBtu. The US LNG gas landed and regasified in Belgium (Germany doesn’t have any LNG receiving terminals) cost around $7.9 per MMBtu, $8.1 per MMBtu in the first quarter of 2018. Therefore, American LNG is the more expensive option compared to Russian gas,” she wrote. 

The US has repeatedly tried to thwart the extension of the Nord Stream pipeline from Russia to Germany, which will double the existing pipeline’s capacity. Moscow has accused Washington of trying to force-feed American LNG to Europe. Despite US efforts to block the Russian project, Gazprom has received permission to build the pipeline.

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section

Source Article from

UN admits ‘refugees’ are ‘replacement migration’ for Europe and other low-fertility countries

Press Release


NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) — The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled “Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?”. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio — i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person — will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.

Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.

Major findings of this report include:

— In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.

— Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.

— Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants — a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working-age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 — between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.

— Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number — 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

— The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.

— In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.

— The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

Source Article from