Israeli High Court won’t hear case of man claiming to be ‘Messiah’

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,766 other followers

Source Article from

MSNBC airs fake news report claiming actual Nazis in the White House while CNN uses “journalist” to question Trump’s mental capacity

(INTELLIHUB) — Another weekend, another series of shocking lies published by the mainstream media, this time with MSNBC and CNN seemingly teaming up to push outright falsehoods about President Trump and the White House.

For what seems like years the mainstream media has waged a direct war for the deep state against Trump and are now trying to use the horrors in Charlottesville to push their leftist political agenda and take out a president that was legally elected to lead the country.

The latest attack includes a supposed journalist appearing on MSNBC to openly declare that “actual Nazis” are in the White House, a move that can be seen as a direct attempt at continuing to stoke the flames of racial animosity while possibly further putting Trump’s life in jeopardy.

Appearing on Saturday’s MSNBC broadcast of “AM Joy”, leftist propagandist Sarah Kendzior went off the deep end by literally claiming that the likes of Jeff Sessions, Steve Bannon, and Donald Trump himself are literal Nazis’.

“This is still a white-supremacist house,” Kendzior ludicrously claimed. “You still have actual Nazis in the house. You have Jeff Sessions, who’s a long-time antagonist against civil rights and you have policies that back up these ideas in practice.”

Kendzior then went on to laughably say that now that Bannon is out of the White House and back with Breitbart he would be working to achieve the goals of Nazism.

“And so what Bannon is probably going to do when he leaves is just support this aspect of Trump’s agenda from the outside, which could be, actually I think, more dangerous and more harmful than having him in the White House, where he was, as mentioned, somewhat contained.”

Despite claiming to be a journalist, Kendzior apparently has no problem spreading ridiculous conspiracy theories about Nazis around every corner.

Great work….for the deep state.

Next up was CNN’s resident shmuck Brian Stelter who decided to play pretend and go ahead and analyze Trump’s mental health on live TV as if he has any credibility to actually diagnose the president.

Stelter first started out by claiming that, “People are questioning the president’s fitness,” when in reality these “people” are actually just mainstream media talking heads, deep state operatives, and openly leftist doctors.

He continued, “Questions that feel out of bounds, off limits, too hot for TV. Questions like these: Is the President of the United States a racist? Is he suffering from some kind of illness? Is he fit for office? And if he’s unfit, then what?”

Basically Stelter is trying to give his allies in the media the go ahead to just straight up start claiming that Trump is mentally unfit to hold office while continuing to claim he is an actual racist. This is pure propaganda folks.

Stelter concluded, “This brings me back to the questions that are tough to ask out loud on national television. Is the President of the United States suffering from some sort of illness? Is he racist? Is he fit to be commander in chief? And one more, is it time for objective journalists, I don’t mean opinion folks I mean down the middle journalists to address these questions head on and how do they do it?”

So there you have it. CNN has decided they are now the arbitrators of mental health and have now given cover to the rest of the corrupt media to attack the president in yet another line of bullshit.

Featured Image: Disney | ABC Television Group/Flickr
Alex Thomas is an opinion journalist and editor for Intellihub News. He was a founding member of what later became and an integral part of the team that destroyed the mainstream media blockade of Bilderberg in 2012. You can contact him here.
©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

Source Article from

More than 60 women consider suing Google, claiming sexism and a pay gap

Scandal over discrimination at the company deepens as dozens of current and former staff say they have earned less than men despite equal qualifications


More than 60 current and former Google employees are considering bringing a class-action lawsuit alleging sexism and pay disparities against women, as the technology giant wrestles with a deepening crisis over alleged discrimination.

James Finberg, the civil rights attorney working on the possible legal action on behalf of the female employees, told the Guardian they contend they have earned less than men at Google despite equal qualifications and comparable positions.

Others, he said, have struggled in other ways to advance their careers at Google due to a “culture that is hostile to women”.

The Silicon Valley company is reeling from the leak over the weekend of a male software engineer’s 10-page manifesto criticizing diversity initiatives and arguing that men may occupy more leadership roles than women in tech due to “biological” differences.

The document, which was widely condemned as misogynistic and scientifically inaccurate, prompted Google to eventually fire the author, James Damore, and reignited debate about discrimination and sexual harassment that critics say is rampant in the technology industry.

A class-action gender discrimination suit would build on a case brought by the US Department of Labor (DoL), which is arguing that Google systematically underpays women and recently convinced a judge to force the company to hand over a portion of the company’s salary records.

Google is vehemently denying that its salaries are discriminatory. However, Finberg, who said he had interviewed about half of the 60 women who may be part of his lawsuit, said their testimony indicated there were clear disparities and prejudices that hurt women at the Mountain View company.

“They are concerned that women are channeled to levels and positions that pay less than men with similar education and experience,” Finberg said. Despite similar positions and qualifications, he said, some women said they made less than male counterparts in salaries, bonuses and stock options.

Several women he interviewed have said they make about $40,000 less than male colleagues doing the same work, with one woman saying she makes two-thirds of a male peer’s salary.

Of the more than 60 women who have reached out to the attorney in the last three weeks, about half still work for Google, according to Finberg, who said that more than a dozen claimed that discrimination played a role in their decision to leave the company.

One former senior manager who recently left Google told the Guardian she repeatedly learned of men at the same level as her earning tens of thousands of dollars more than her, and in one case, she said she had a male employee join her team with a higher salary despite the fact that she was his superior.

“It’s demoralizing,” said the worker, who requested anonymity for fear of retribution. “There’s something subconsciously that happens where you do start to question the value that you’re adding to the company.”

The manager said that dealing with frequent sexism in the workplace and helping other women navigate the discrimination they were facing took a toll on her and contributed to her decision to quit. “After a while, it just became exhausting,” she said. “It takes emotional energy that builds up over time.”

Finberg argued that when men get higher compensation in the form of base salary and stocks, “the big initial disparity turns into a larger and larger disparity every year”.

“I felt like I wasn’t playing the game in the ‘boys’ club’ environment,” said another woman who worked for two years as a user experience designer and recently left Google. She said she regularly dealt with sexist remarks, such as comments about her looks, and that she felt it was discriminatory when she was denied a promotion despite her achievements and large workload.

“I was watching male coworkers progress at a faster rate than myself. It was really disturbing,” said the designer, who also requested anonymity.


A Google spokesperson declined to comment on the pending class action. However, in reference to the women considering legal action, the spokesperson said: “Sixty people is a really small sample size.” He added: “There are always going to be differences in salary based on location, role and performance, but the process is blind to gender.”

The women’s stories bolster the claims of labor department officials, who have said that a preliminary analysis found that women face “extreme” pay discrimination across the company and have recently raised concerns that Google’s strict confidentiality agreements are discouraging employees from speaking up.

While the labor department has not released details of its analysis or the scale of the pay gap it claims to have uncovered, its regional solicitor recently said that the agency’s initial audit has founded six to seven standard deviations between pay rates for men and women across the company.

What that means is that there is a one in 100m chance that the observed disparity is occurring randomly or by chance, said Janice Madden, a University of Pennsylvania sociology professor who has served as an expert witness in class-action employment cases.

The former Google manager said it was upsetting to hear about the disparity. “It just makes me feel a little sick,” she said. “That’s a lot of missed income for me personally and the people on my team.”

The Google spokesperson said the company could not comment on the standard deviations because it had not seen the labor department’s analysis.

Finberg said he hoped a class-action case could have a ripple effect in the industry.

“Google is not alone in Silicon Valley,” he said. “The goal of the case is to not only get Google to change its practices, but to encourage other Silicon Valley companies to change their pay practices as well.”

Source Article from

Bogus article claiming Linkin Park frontman Chester Bennington’s death is being investigated as a murder goes viral

An unsubstantiated online article claiming that Linkin Park frontman Chester Bennington’s death is being investigated by police as a possible murder has been shared nearly 800,000 times.

The article, posted on on Friday, claimed an anonymous source with the Los Angeles Police Department said authorities were investigating the matter as a possible homicide.

Via Daily Mail

Featured Image: Chris Parker/Flickr

Source Article from

Newcomerstown Officer Charged For Falsely Claiming He Was Shot On Duty


The former Newcomerstown Police officer who claimed he was shot while on duty now faces charges for allegedly fabricating the story.

Bryan Eubanks reportedly shot himself in an apparent suicide attempt while he was on duty April 11, but said he was shot during a traffic stop in which he also saw evidence of a mobile meth lab.

The 37-year-old former officer is now charged with one count of inducing panic, one count of making false alarms, two counts of tampering with evidence, one count of forgery and one count of workers’ compensation fraud.

The inducing panic and making false alarms charges each carry two firearm specifications.

“The fictional story that this defendant is accused of concocting led to a response involving local, state, and federal authorities, and an Ohio Blue Alert was issued to put the entire state on alert,” said Attorney General DeWine. “Considerable resources were used to investigate the claims, and there must be consequences for needlessly causing such serious alarm.”

Officers from the Guernsey County Sheriff’s Office, Coshocton County Sheriff’s Office, the Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Office, Newcomerstown, Uhrichsville, Ohio State Highway Patrol, the FBI, ATF and the U.S. Marshals Service had responded to help when the incident was first reported.

For the full story visit :

Source Article from

Raw vegan bloggers go EXTREME, claiming that menstruation can be eliminated with a raw food diet

Image: Raw vegan bloggers go EXTREME, claiming that menstruation can be eliminated with a raw food diet

(Natural News)
Raw vegan bloggers have taken their health agenda a step too far, saying that losing their period as a consequence of switching to a raw vegan diet is not unhealthy at all, even claiming that amenorrhea (the absence of menstruation) for raw vegans is an indicator of a clean body and stable, well-balanced hormones. Freelee the Banana Girl, 36, and Miliany Bonet, 19, both run popular platforms that advocate the raw vegan lifestyle, and Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, says their advice is “Ignorant, irresponsible and dangerous to women.”

Freelee ran her raw vegan YouTube channel for almost decade, gaining over 750,000 subscribers. There, she posted a video in which she talks about how she lost her period within the first month of switching to a raw vegan diet. Instead of responding with alarm, Freelee said that she was “so excited to get rid of it” after having experienced heavy, painful periods in the past. She had amenorrhea for nine months.

“It felt good, it felt right,” she shared, saying that after cutting out meat and dairy, her body had more energy to balance out her hormones, causing the lost period. She also said that she believed she was still ovulating despite not having menstruation. “I just instinctively felt like I was still ovulating because I felt so good.”

“I still believe that largely menstruation is toxicity leaving the body so a lot of women are having painful periods because they have a toxic body or a toxic diet and the body is trying to eliminate that toxicity and get it out,” she said. “If you’re having a high fat diet, then your menstruation is definitely going to be heavier and more painful.”

Bonet, who runs Raw Vegan Living, shared Freelee’s beliefs, claiming that “a healthy women [sic] doesn’t need her period in order to be healthy and fertile.” She cited self-proclaimed health expert Markus Rothkranz, who described menstruation as a process of cleaning up.

“If there is nothing to clean, there’s no reason to menstruate,” she wrote. “And since a raw food diet IS clean, your period naturally becomes lighter and/or disappears altogether.”

Both women seemed to be of the idea that menstruation is a process that women can naturally opt out of. However, medical and diet experts were quick to counter the two bloggers’ beliefs.

“The raw food community has a tendency to embrace and spread a lot of misinformation because it sounds hip and cool,” warned Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, a former vegan and present-day food scientist and author of Food Forensics. “The reason menstruation disappears in some women who pursue a raw, vegan diet is because their diets are so far out of balance that their normal hormonal cycles are shutting down. These women are doing serious damage to their own bodies,” warned Adams, “and that’s something I’ve seen very frequently in the raw food community. Many raw foodies, for example, consume large quantities of toxic zeolites on a daily basis… they’re made out of brain damaging aluminum and are heavily contaminated with lead, a toxic heavy metal. Yet raw food companies like HealthForce promoted toxic zeolites as a daily supplement year after year, convincing raw food vegans to consume alarming quantities of aluminum and lead.”

“Periods are not bad or filled with toxins. This trend is alarming because it comes from someone who clearly has not understanding of periods or even biology in general and is just another form of body shaming,” gynecologist Dr. Jen Gunter said in a story on “Dieting to get rid of your period is unhealthy and anyone promoting this should be ashamed of themselves and take a first year biology course.”

In the same story, Vesanto Melina discouraged raw vegan diets, saying they lack nutrition. “These diets are low in protein and zinc. It’s not an ideal vegan diet because the nutrient intake is very insufficient,” she said. “These women believed it was a good thing. They made a mythology out of it. But it’s not a normal thing. You need different food groups.”

The raw vegan diet is limited to plant-based foods eaten raw. It follows the belief that cooking kills most nutrients and makes food more toxic. The extreme diet has gained popularity after being espoused by celebrities and social media influencers who claimed that the diet has given them more energy, better skin, and allowed them to lose weight.

However, there are real dangers to eating raw. According to, raw vegans are at risk for potentially harmful nutrient deficiencies, because certain vitamins can only be found in food they are forbidden to eat. For instance, vitamin B12, which contributes to brain function and red blood cell production, can only be found in dairy, meat, and fish. Vitamin B12 deficiency can lead to fatigue, constipation, depression, and poor memory.

Surprisingly, raw vegans are also at risk for heart problems, with a study finding that their diet leads to low levels of the good cholesterol HDL, thereby increasing their risk for heart disease. Healthy HDL levels can be promoted by fish and seafood, which are not allowed in raw vegan diets.

Bone health is also a problem that raw vegans are vulnerable to. Not eating enough calories and having enough calcium and vitamin D puts people at risk for osteoporosis, which causes brittle bones. Because the raw vegan diet is made up mostly of low-calorie foods, and does not include dairy, meat, or eggs which are great sources of calcium and vitamin D, those who follow it are in danger of having weaker bones.

Clearly, eating only raw fruits and vegetables is not as healthy as it sounds.

Get more updates on

Sources include:



Source Article from