Pharma-influenced researchers now claim diabetes patients should also be put on cardiovascular medications

Image: Pharma-influenced researchers now claim diabetes patients should also be put on cardiovascular medications

(Natural News)
If you are one of the 29 million Americans who has been diagnosed with diabetes, you are likely aware of the severity of the condition. Since diabetes interferes with your body’s ability to regulate insulin levels and leads to a buildup of glucose in the blood, it causes nerve, blood vessel, heart and kidney damage. In addition, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warns that adults with type 2 diabetes are twice as likely to die from heart disease. The connection between these two life-threatening conditions is so strong, in fact, that 70 percent of diabetics over the age of 65 will die from some form of heart disease.

A group of researchers from Case Western Reserve University believes it has the solution: medications which offer both glucose control and reduction in heart disease risk.

After analyzing four trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine, Professor Faramarz Ismail-Beigi and colleagues determined that some of the more modern glucose control medications have the unexpected added benefit of reducing heart disease risk.

“Based on this evidence, we propose that we must shift from our previous paradigm with its monocular focus on control of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c [a test to determine blood sugar levels over a three-month period], to one of control of blood glucose plus preventing cardiovascular disease and death from cardiovascular causes,” said Professor Ismail-Beigi, who is also a practicing endocrinologist at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center.

Each of the four trials analyzed by the researchers tested the effects of the blood sugar lowering medications pioglitazone, empagliflozin, liraglutide or semaglutide on patients who had heart disease or who had experienced strokes. The object of the study was only to determine the safety of these drugs, but unexpectedly found that they also improved cardiovascular outcomes.

The research team hopes that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will approve the use of new drugs to control both diabetes and heart disease risk.

While this might seem like a logical and positive solution to a growing problem, as is often the case with modern science, the research team’s solution totally ignores the underlying causes of both diabetes and heart disease. These types of solutions reinforce our generation’s belief that whatever your health problem might be, the solution lies in popping another pill.

The American Heart Association notes that diabetes and heart disease are not linked in a mysterious way or for no particular reason. The fact is, the underlying causes of both conditions are often the same: high blood pressure, abnormal cholesterol levels, obesity, poorly controlled blood sugar levels, lack of physical activity and smoking.

So, what is the real solution to both diabetes and heart disease prevention?

  • Maintain a healthy weight: Carrying excess weight triggers a domino effect of adverse health conditions. If you’re currently overweight (as many Americans are), you need to urgently cut out processed junk food and increase your intake of non-GMO, organic fruits and veggies. Once you’re at a healthy weight, keep it that way.
  • Cut out sugar: A Stanford University School of Medicine study found that even in people who are not obese, high sugar intake “plays a prominent role” in the development of diabetes.
  • Stop smoking: There is just no good reason to smoke, and by now pretty much everybody knows that. If you haven’t done so yet, kick this unhealthy habit as quickly as possible.
  • Incorporate exercise into your daily routine: Find a physical activity you really enjoy so that you can include it as a fun and enjoyable part of daily life. Aim to include at least 30 minutes of moderate intensity activity five days a week, or 75 minutes of aerobic activity along with two muscle strengthening sessions each week.

While an ever-increasing regimen of pills might seem like an easy solution to diabetes and heart disease, unless the underlying issues are addressed, you’re effectively just putting a band-aid on a bullet wound. Ultimately, medications can only do so much; the best solution will always involve positive lifestyle changes.

Sources include:



Source Article from

Absurd: Scientists claim new GM purple rice will save you from cancer and diabetes

Image: Absurd: Scientists claim new GM purple rice will save you from cancer and diabetes

(Natural News)
A new type of rice could soon be joining the usual brown and white varieties on the shelves of your grocery store: purple rice. Chinese scientists have developed a type of rice through genetic modification that they say can lower your risk of some types of cancer and diabetes. On the surface, this sounds like a winning proposition – and for those who sell the rice, it very well could be. However, there are a few reasons you might want to think twice before eating this colorful grain.

The science backing the benefits of the compound that colors this rice is pretty solid. The rice gets its violet hue from anthocyanins, a type of pigment that boosts antioxidants. It is naturally abundant in certain fruits and vegetables, and it has indeed been shown to have numerous health benefits. In addition to their protective effect against diabetes and cancer, anthocyanins have also been linked in studies to lower risks of cognitive decline, Alzheimer’s disease, cardiovascular disease and neurological disease. In addition, they have a strong anti-inflammatory action and can even help control or prevent obesity.

This is certainly an impressive list of benefits, but why would anyone want to eat genetically engineered rice made using a system called TransGene Stacking II when they could get the same effects from the foods that grow naturally on our earth?

This food is far from natural, and scientists have gone to great lengths to create it. Past attempts to engineer the production of anthocyanin in rice were unsuccessful because of difficulties transferring the genes into plants effectively.

Researchers are still assessing the safety of this Frankenfood, but it could end up being about as good for you as purple ketchup. No one knows what long-term effects consuming these lab-created foods could have on the human body. A similar attempt at enriching rice through genetic modification, golden rice, ended up being a huge flop that ultimately made headlines for its connection to birth defects rather than saving the world.

Lab-created rice does what lots of natural foods already do

If you really want to eat foods that can reduce your risk of cancer and diabetes, there are plenty of healthy choices that are completely natural. Instead of buying this GMO rice for its anthocyanins, consider foods that are naturally anthocyanin-rich, like organic purple carrots, blueberries, red cabbage, plums, and black rice. This is a great way to get the same beneficial compounds without taking on any of the risks that comes with lab-created foods.

There are other foods that can reduce your risk of the same ailments that purple rice aims to tackle, and they also offer other health benefits that purple rice does not. For example, red grapes not only have anthocyanins, but the polyphenols in their skin also help regulate glucose. Another useful food for diabetes prevention is cinnamon, which can help improve blood sugar regulation by boosting your glucose metabolism, providing insulin-like effects to your body. Of course, anyone who is serious about preventing diabetes also needs to cut out junk food (including extra carbs), maintain a healthy weight and exercise regularly.

When it comes to preventing cancer, nature has provided an array of great options. Breakthrough research recently confirmed that the omega-3 fatty acids found in foods like wild salmon and chia seeds can stop tumors in their tracks and boost a person’s chances of surviving cancers like colorectal cancer.

You should also consider eating cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, cauliflower, and cabbage. Their sulforaphane can help destroy cancer cells, and they also contain phytochemicals and antioxidants that help detoxify your body and get rid of carcinogens before they can harm you.

Who needs GMO purple rice when nature has already given us so many great health-enhancing foods?

Sources include:



Source Article from

Associated Press caught in fake news, retracts false claim that 17 intelligence agencies agree on Russian "interference"

Image: Associated Press caught in fake news, retracts false claim that 17 intelligence agencies agree on Russian “interference”

(Natural News)
All those lies about little green cyber Russians invading black voting boxes to sabotage the U.S. presidential election has had one crack exposed, according to Breitbart, who reports that the Associated Press (AP) has written a retraction concerning those 17 agencies who supposedly agreed that pesky Putin and friends had been busy usurping America. The AP printed this falsehood four times: April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29.

The AP, in its mea culpa issued June 30, 2017, states that the intelligence assessment was made after the three agencies — “the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency  . . .  and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence [DNI]” gathered the data. The DNI, says AP, “represents all U.S. intelligence agencies” and it was the DNI that published the information. The AP makes it clear in the retraction that “not all 17 agencies were involved in reaching the assessment.”

It’s comforting to know there was some dissent in the ranks. The news agency avoided using descriptive phrases like “deep state” and “rogue elements,” but that’s not in their vocabulary. This same false assessment was used by Mrs. Clinton in a testy exchange during the third presidential debate.

While these assessments were being crafted, the folks in charge of these three agencies included James Comey, the former and fired director of the FBI, John Brennan, an Obama appointee who ran the NSA and James Clapper, who holds the distinction of having been the fourth Director of National Intelligence. All these characters have colorful and obviously checkered pasts, but Mr. Clapper’s penchant for lying was made more obvious when he testified in front of Congress in 2013, saying that the NSA did not collect data on all Americans, well maybe “inadvertently,” but certainly not “wittingly.” Is it just a nervous tic to scratch one’s head and peer downward while speaking to a member of Congress?

As reported by Libertarian Institute, here is the transcript of that infamous exchange which is a stark example of perjury:

“Wyden: Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?

Clapper: No sir.

Wyden: It does not?

Clapper: Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect—but not wittingly.”

The security apparatus has been in place for a few decades. After September 11, 2001 the deep state’s vicious intent on destroying America was magnified a thousand fold and our current illegal and ubiquitous security system was built. It’s been growing ever since, as have the anxiety levels of many Americans. The DNI didn’t even exist before September 11, 2001. The FBI and the NSA did not openly share their information until after 9/11. Edward Snowden risked all he had to make the American people wake up to the electronic surveillance gates surrounding them shortly after James Clapper lied to Senator Wyden.

It turns out that the AP isn’t the only periodical that has retracted at least one portion of an intelligence assessment that many American believe is completely bogus. The disheveled New York Times issued its correction on June 29, 2017. Oh for the day when the sheeple will wake up and all the liars will be revealed.

Follow more on this topic at

Sources include:



Source Article from

Chile v Germany: Who will claim Confed Cup glory in St. Petersburg?

The FIFA Confederations Cup 2017 reaches its climax in St. Petersburg on Sunday night when Chile take on Germany in the final.

South American champions Chile face World Cup winners Germany for the second time at Russia 2017, with the teams having met in the group stage in Kazan, where they played out a 1-1 draw.

Both teams are contesting their first Confederations Cup final. Germany’s best previous result was a third-place finish as hosts in 2005, while Chile are tournament debutants.

Chile reached the final after a penalty shootout win in their semifinal against Portugal in Kazan, while Germany overcame Mexico 4-1 in Sochi.

Joachim Low’s young German team – who have an average age of just 24 years and four months – have claimed plaudits throughout the tournament for their exciting attacking play.

Players such as midfielder Leon Goretzka, 22, and striker Timo Werner, 21 – both of whom are in the hunt for the Golden Boot on three goals each – have shone in the absence of more established stars Low has opted to rest.

While Chile have not hit the attacking heights of the Germans, they have proved as dogged and resilient as ever throughout the tournament.

Juan Antonio Pizzi’s team have star quality in midfield general Arturo Vidal and striker Alexis Sanchez, but they also have a host of unsung heroes such as veteran defenders Gary Medel and Jean Beausejour.

Chile have the oldest average age ever seen at a Confederations Cup tournament, at 29 years and one month.

As well as being billed as a match-up between youth and experience, it could also be viewed as attack versus defense.

Germany have netted 11 times in four games at Russia 2017, conceding five goals, while Chile have let in just two goals in their four games at the Tournament of Champions, scoring four times (excluding penalty shootouts).

READ MORE: ‘We’ve loved our time in Russia!’ – Germany Confed Cup captain Draxler

The first match between the two teams in Kazan saw Chile dominate the opening stages and take the lead through Alexis Sanchez – who become his county’s record goal scorer in the process – but Germany hit back through a flowing team move finished by Lars Stindl just before half-time.

That game was seen as something of an acid test for Low’s young German team, and since then they have gone from strength to strength in Russia.

Their semifinal performance against Mexico was particularly impressive in the way they were content to allow the opposition possession but were ruthlessly efficient when on the counter-attack.

Chile looked labored in their final group game versus Australia, but were solid in their semifinal against Portugal and finished strongly in that game, having numerous chances to win in the closing stages. Claudio Bravo, the captain, was also in inspired form, saving all three Portuguese spot-kicks.

Pizzi has been consistent with his team selection throughout the tournament, and is likely to stick with the team that lined up against Portugal in the semifinal, with Bravo in goal, Beausejour, Gonzalo Jara, Medel and Isla across a back four, with Marcelo Diaz just in front of them and Vidal, Pablo Hernandez and Charles Aranguiz in midfield and Eduardo Vargas and Sanchez up front.

Low has been less predictable with his selections, particularly in defense, although Marc-Andre ter Stegen looks set to start in goal, while any three from Antonio Ruediger, Matthias Ginter, Niklas Sule and Shkodran Mustafi could start at the back.

Joshua Kimmich is in prime spot to start as right wingback, while Jonas Hector or Sebastian Rudy could line up on the left flank.

Julian Draxler will skipper the team as an attacking midfielder, and Goretzka also looks sure to start in midfield, with the other spots up for grabs. Timo Werner and Lars Stindl – on three and two goals for the tournament respectively, should start as strikers.

It’s the first time either side will have played at Saint Petersburg Stadium.

Chile have played two games in Moscow and two in Kazan thus far, while Germany have played three games in Sochi and one in Kazan.

The current World Cup winners boast the better head to head record on three wins and one draw in the four previous meetings between the two teams.

The Germans are also unbeaten since they lost to France in the semifinal at Euro 2016 almost a year ago.

Pizzi’s Chile team, though, have experience of big tournament finals, having won the last two editions of the Copa America, beating Argentina on penalties both times.

There will be a new name on the Confederations Cup trophy tonight, although it will be a close call as to whose it is.

Source Article from

Warning: Cell phone radiation is much higher than what manufacturers claim

Image: Warning: Cell phone radiation is much higher than what manufacturers claim

(Natural News)
A recent report by the Environmental Health Trust revealed that popular mobile phone brands emit radiation that is about three times higher than the manufacturer’s previously reported radiation levels, of which Samsung, Apple, Motorola, and Nokia are the main suspects. In line with this, the French Agence Nationale Des Frequences has issued a list of mobile phones — including details of make, model, and test results for each mobile phone assessed — that have higher than expected radiation emission.

French physician and prominent radiation testing expert Dr. Marc Arazi expressed concerns regarding the contents of the report. According to the physician, most mobile phones are handled very close to the body – in places like women’s bras, men’s trouser pants pockets, and even belts.

“As a physician, I am deeply concerned about what this means for our health and especially the health of our children. People have a right to know that when cell phones are tested in ways people commonly use phones – such as in direct contact with their body – the values exceed current regulatory limits. This is a first victory for transparency in this industry scandal,”Dr. Arazi was quoted as saying in

Radiation from mobile phones found to cause cancer

An animal study carried out by researchers at the National Institutes of Health‘s National Toxicology Program showed that exposure to high levels of mobile phone radiation may increase the risk of developing brain and heart cancer. As part of the study, the research team exposed rodents to carefully calibrated radio-frequency (RF) radiation levels for about nine hours a day for two years. The results showed that rats exposed to relatively high RF levels developed rare forms of brain and heart cancer compared with their non-exposed counterparts. The team also found that the increased incidence of brain and heart cancer coincided with higher RF exposure, indicating a causal relationship between the conditions.

“This is by far — far and away — the most carefully done cell phone bioassay, a biological assessment. This is a classic study that is done for trying to understand cancers in humans. There will have to be a lot of work after this to assess if it causes problems in humans, but the fact that you can do it in rats will be a big issue. It actually has me concerned, and I’m an expert,” former NTP head Christopher Portier noted in

A meta-analysis published in 2015 also showed that exposure to mobile phone radiation is associated with the onset of certain cancers. The research team cautioned that radiofrequency from mobile phones may damage the DNA, which in turn may accumulate over time and trigger the onset of various adverse conditions including headaches, fatigue, skin conditions, and even cancer. The experts also noted that the duration of radiofrequency exposure may play a role in cancer onset. According to the scientists, using mobile phones for just 20 minutes daily may lead to a threefold increased risk of developing brain tumor. The team also noted that using mobile phones for an hour daily for four years may elevate the risk of tumor development from three to five folds.

“These data are a clear sign of the real risks this kind of radiation poses for human health…[Our] data were obtained on adults who used cell phones mostly up to 10 years as adults. The situation can dramatically differ for children who use cell phones in childhood, when their biology is much more sensitive to hazardous factors, and will use it over the [course of their] life,” study author Igor Yakymenko said in

Follow more breaking news on radiation at

Sources include:



Source Article from

Iran Just Accused US of Alliance With ISIS — Claim They Have Proof to Back It Up

Deputy Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Mostafa Izadi on Sunday accused the US of supporting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), stating Tehran has evidence to back the bold allegations.

“We possess documents and information showing the direct supports by the US imperialism for this highly disgusting stream [IS] in the region which has destroyed the Islamic countries and created a wave of massacres and clashes,” Fars news agency quoted Izadi as saying.

The alleged American support for IS, according to Izadi, is an instrument of “proxy warfare in the region” which is a “new trick by the arrogant powers against the Islamic Republic.”

The statement of the Deputy Chief of Staff echoes the remarks made by Iran’s Parliamentary Speaker Ali Larijani on Friday. “The United States has aligned itself with the ISIL in the region,” Larijani said, according to the Fars news agency. Larijani’s was addressing a funeral ceremony of the victims of Wednesday terrorist attacks in Tehran.

Thousands gathered to commemorate the fallen, shouting “Death to Saudi Arabia” and “Death to America.”

“The [terrorist attacks] indicated that the terrorist groups had failed to achieve their main goal and targeted the parliament and Imam Khomeini Mausoleum, finally resorted to martyring the innocent people and the staff at the parliament,” Larijani added.

On Friday Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the attacks would only increase Tehran’s hatred against the US and its “stooges,” including Saudi Arabia.

IS has claimed responsibility for this week’s twin attack in Tehran. Seventeen people were killed when four armed assailants attacked the country’s parliament while a suicide bomber blew himself up at the Imam Khomeini Mausoleum.

Source Article from

NYT Editors Claim America Retreating Under Trump

NYT Editors Claim America Retreating Under Trump

by Stephen Lendman

The Times is a notorious mouthpeace for America’s deep state, featuring disinformation, Big Lies and fake news.

It’s part of a campaign to undermine Trump, a scheme to oust him from office for the wrong reasons.

Its latest broadside accused him of “transform(ing) America’s global image from a proud and valued leader to something more nearly resembling a whiny bully…promis(ing) the country would never again be bound by agreements and conventions…compromis(ing) its sovereignty,” adding:

His “policies and pronouncements…made the United States, and his presidency, the object of disbelief, alarm, even derision.”

Fact: Trump largely differs from his predecessors in style, not substance, along with being the first business executive to become president, despite no prior political experience.

Fact: US governance from inception has been more hypocrisy than democracy.

Fact: Its influence has been declining for decades, notably post-9/11, its aggressive wars transforming the nation into a pariah state, increasingly reviled worldwide.

Fact: The supreme law of the land deters no US president from doing what he pleases – the Clintons, Bush/Cheney, Obama, and now Trump the clearest examples.

Fact: Powerful interests run America. Vladimir Putin explained it, saying “(w)hen a person is elected (US president), they may have some ideas.” 

“Then people with briefcases arrive, well dressed, wearing dark suits, just like mine, except for the red tie, since they wear black or dark blue ones.” 

“These people start explaining how things are done. And 

instantly, everything changes. This is what happens with every (US) administration.”

Names and faces change. Deplorable US policies continue, worsening over time, nightmarish post-9/11, risking possible nuclear war.

Like it’s done throughout America’s political season, post-election and inauguration, The Times continues no-holds war on Trump, largely ignoring what warrants justifiable criticism.

Instead it’s against his TPP pullout, a good thing, claiming it cedes leadership to China in Asia. It cedes nothing.

The broadsheet claiming he “refused to reaffirm (NATO’s) mutual defense commitment…forcing America’s European allies to (deal) with threats like Russia on their own” is pure nonsense.

Trump should have abandoned NATO, a major threat to world peace. Instead he reaffirmed US support. The Times claiming a Russian threat is part of the Big Lie irresponsibly bashing its leadership.

Trump’s pulling out of the Paris climate deal changed little environmentally, despite hyped claims otherwise, including by The Times.

The Times: Before Trump’s presidency, “the world looked to America to set the tone and agenda…(US) leadership and engagement were undeniably good for this country and…a force for global peace and security.”

Fact: Before Trump, America waged naked aggression against one nonbelligerent country after another – notably North Korea, Southeast Asia, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Donbass by supporting Kiev putschists it installed, Somalia and Yemen, along with partnering in Israel’s wars on Palestine.

Fact: The Times and other media scoundrels support all US wars of aggression, making them complicit in high crimes against peace.

Fact: America is no “force for global peace and security” – just the opposite. It’s deplorable record speaks for itself.

The Times: “(T)he United States led the way in establishing institutions, rules and norms that would encourage countries to settle their differences peacefully and work together to solve problems that were beyond the capability of any one state.”

Fact: Longstanding US policy rejects peace and stability. It pursues endless wars of aggression for unchallenged global dominance – threatening humanity’s survival.

Don’t expect The NYT to explain – on the wrong side of vital issues, supporting ones benefitting privilege over populism.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at 

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Visit his blog site at 

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

Source Article from