Citizen Journalist Tommy Robinson Jailed Under Secret Order From UK Government; Total Media Blackout Issued To Protect Muslim Pedophiles

UK citizen journalism Tommy Robinson, who has worked tirelessly to expose the Muslim pedophile and sex trafficking rings in the UK, has been arrested and jailed under a Soviet-style secret order from the UK government which then issued a total media blackout order to the press.

It is now a crime in the UK to report on Tommy Robinson’s arrest and imprisonment. Word is still getting out through independent media sources like InfoWars, which has interviewed Robinson’s camera man, who explained that the entire court prosecution of Robinson took “mere minutes,” after which Robinson was convicted and thrown in prison for 13 months, just hours after his arrest.

There was no time for any proper legal defense, no time to present evidence, not even time to make a counter argument. The corrupt UK court system, which turns out to be just as corrupt as the UK government, simply declared Robinson a criminal and threw him in jail. Within hours, a follow-up order went out to the media to demand a total blackout of all media coverage. Even Breitbart News pulled its stories about Robinson.

For the record, the UK government is run by criminal pedophiles who rely on Muslim pedo networks to provide a steady supply of nine and ten-year-old little girls and boys to be routinely raped, molested and sexually assaulted by high-level UK judges, legislators and bureaucrats. This is why Robinson is being so aggressively censored in a Soviet-style media blackout and secret court conviction that no media outlet is even allowed to report took place.

The UK — like mush of Western Europe — is currently in the process of being overrun by Muslims. The UK government is complicit in the scheme and has now criminalized anyone criticizing Muslims, even for running child trafficking networks that provide “fresh meat” to corrupt UK government officials.

Sign the petition to demand freedom for Tommy Robinson.

Visit for more information about Robinson, and watch these InfoWars videos for more breaking news:


Source Article from

Armed citizen in OKC stops mass shooting with a concealed weapon, proving once again that armed citizens HALT violence

Image: Armed citizen in OKC stops mass shooting with a concealed weapon, proving once again that armed citizens HALT violence

(Natural News)
Without a doubt, more than a few customers who were eating at Louie’s Bar & Grill in Oklahoma City Thursday evening are grateful to be alive after a gunman walked in and started shooting.

And no doubt more than a few of them are relieved that a good guy with a gun managed to kill the potential murderer before he was able to turn his gun on them.

As reported by local media, OKC police were also relieved that the Good Samaritan manage to put an end to what could have been just the latest mass shooting in the U.S.

“It’s a blessing this was stopped [when it was],” said Capt. Bo Matthews, according to The Daily Wire. “Who knew when this guy was going to stop shooting people.”

“ALERT: The only confirmed fatality is the suspect. He was apparently shot-to-death by an armed citizen. Three citizens were injured, two of whom were shot. A large number of witnesses are detained. There is no indication of terrorism at this point,” the OKC PD said in a tweet to citizens.

Not all patrons were unscathed. A woman and her daughter were hit by gunfire and were hospitalized, according to The Daily Caller. That’s unfortunate, of course, but the point is this incident could have been much worse.

And many others have been — and nearly all of them have occurred in so-called “gun-free zones” that were implemented by Left-wing politicians who are guarded by men and women with guns but for some reason don’t believe others should have the ability to defend themselves as otherwise permitted by the Second Amendment.

Despite little to no coverage by the media, shootings are frequently stopped by other people with guns

There have been other recent events where good people with guns stop bad people with guns:

— A man holding his baby managed to shoot one of four other men who were attempting to rob him outside of a McDonald’s restaurant in Memphis earlier this month, Fox News reported, citing local news agencies. A witness to the event, David Chase, said the father fought back when the others began robbing him. 

“They jumped out of the car and they started fighting him and trying to take his wallet and stuff,” Chase told a local news team. “He was fighting them. He dropped his baby and started fighting them and the child was just sitting on the concrete.” 

Chase said he heard three to four gunshots; police said they believe at least one of the suspects was hit.

“He was doing what any father should have did: protect his child. And I also told the police whether he had a gun license or not, it was a righteous shot,” Chase said. “He did what any man would do for his kids.”

— In April, police responded to shots fired in North Hollywood. When they arrived, they found a man suffering from a pair of gunshot wounds; police think he was shot during a robbery attempt.

— In January a man with a concealed carry permit shot another man who was pointing a sawed-off shotgun at him around 2 a.m. outside a local business in Houston. Police said the man was walking towards his vehicle when he saw the other man pointing the shotgun; they added that the owner of the vehicle pulled out a handgun he was carrying and opened fire. Robbery was the likely motive, according to cops. 

— In April 2017 a man in Cleveland shot a robber who broke into his home. Eddie Henderson III, 26, shot the suspect after he heard him opening drawers inside his house. Police said the robber was shot but managed to escape nonetheless. The robber barricaded himself inside Henderson’s bathroom; Henderson then fired several shots through the door as the robber yelled at him to stop firing. Henderson has a concealed carry permit because he used to work at a barber shop where the owner required his barbers to carry concealed for their own protection.

Read more about the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense at

J.D. Heyes is also editor-in-chief of The National Sentinel.

Sources include:



Source Article from

As Disarmed Canadians Rocked by Bombing, Armed American Citizen Stops Mass Shooting


Two unrelated tragedies—which could’ve been far worse—unfolded last night in the United States and in Canada. In Toronto, Canada, two masked men walked inside the Bombay Bhel restaurant and detonated an improvised explosive device. In another incident in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, a gunman walked into Louie’s Grill and Bar and began shooting innocent civilians. Luckily, no one was killed in either situation. However, only one of these scenarios was brought to a halt thanks to an armed citizen.

In Oklahoma, a gunman walked into the restaurant, opened fire and injured multiple people. But it could’ve been far worse. An armed civilian engaged the shooter with a legally owned handgun and killed him on the spot preventing any further injuries or deaths.

The “bystander with a pistol confronted the shooter outside the restaurant and fatally shot him,” OKCPD wrote on Twitter.

The customer was outside when the suspect walked into the restaurant and opened fire around 6:30 p.m. local time, Oklahoma City Police Public Information Officer Bo Matthews said at a press conference.

A 12-year-old girl and her mother were shot by the gunman, but they are both expected to survive.

“We have no reason to believe this is a terrorist type of incident,” Matthews said. The motive was unclear otherwise, and the investigation at the scene was expected to extend into the early morning hours as law enforcement personnel interview about 100 eyewitnesses, he said, according to the Chicago Tribune.

And just like that, a bad guy with a gun was stopped by a good guy with a gun and lives were saved.

In Canada, however, proving that taking guns out of society will not stop attempted mass murders, fifteen people—aged 23 to 69—were injured by two bad men who made a bomb in a paint can.

According to police and witnesses, two masked men walked into the Bombay Bhel Indian restaurant in Mississauga, a suburb of Toronto, with an improvised explosive device in a paint can. They set the paint can down in the middle of the restaurant before running out.

The paint can, which according to police, was filled with “projectable objects,” then exploded injuring over a dozen people. Luckily, the two parties full of children inside the restaurant were not hit with the blast.

“There is no indication that this is a terrorism act. There is no indication that this is a hate crime at this time. We haven’t ruled anything out as we start our investigation,” said police chief Jennifer Evans.

“Every police resource is being used right now to locate the people responsible for this horrendous act.”

As of Friday morning, the two men responsible for this attack remain at large.

In Canada there is no legal right to possess guns. Canadian civilians aren’t allowed to possess automatic weapons, handguns with a barrel shorter than 10.5 cm or any modified handgun, rifle or shotgun. Most semi-automatic assault weapons are also banned. But that didn’t stop these two men from attempting to murder dozens of innocent people with a homemade bomb. It also didn’t stop Alek Minassian, 25, from killing 10 people and injuring 15 others last month as he mowed them down in a rental van.

What did stop Minassian, however, was a gun.

What these two incidents prove is that crazy people who want to kill will do so with or without a gun and with or without permission from the state to have said gun. However, only one of these incidents was brought to an end with lives saved—and that was solely due to the fact that Americans refuse to give up their right to own and carry guns.

Had a similar situation—in which two attempted murderers detonated a bomb or attempted to detonate a bomb—occurred in the United States, it is entirely possible that it could’ve been prevented or the killers stopped by a person with a gun.

Indeed, as TFTP reported last week, according to a recent FBI report, good guys with guns—who are not police officers—have stopped multiple mass killings, just like the one in Oklahoma City, and the one in Santa Fe, Texas.

According to the FBI report, citizens successfully intervened in eight active shooter incidents in 2016 and 2017. These heroic citizens prevented or helped to stop what could’ve been some of the worst shooting incidents in US history.

As the report notes, citizens “safely and successfully” ended the shooting by confronting the shooter—not police.

“Their selfless actions likely saved many lives,” the report stated.

Out of those eight incidents, four of the heroic citizens were carrying legal firearms and stopped the shooters in their tracks. In two of those incidents, the citizens actually exchanged fire with the shooters, illustrating how a properly trained—and armed—citizen can be an effective deterrent in mass shootings.

In the other two incidents, the armed citizens held the shooters at gunpoint until police arrived. The two bombers in Canada could be in custody right now, had they attempted this act in an armed society. However, as most Canadians are unarmed, they are on the loose.

DASH cryptocurrency and The Free Thought Project have formed a partnership that will continue to spread the ideas of peace and freedom while simultaneously teaching people how to operate outside of the establishment systems of control like using cryptocurrency instead of dollars. Winning this battle is as simple as choosing to abstain from the violent corrupt old system and participating in the new and peaceful system that hands the power back to the people. DASH is this system.

DASH digital cash takes the control the banking elite has over money and gives it back to the people. It is the ultimate weapon in the battle against the money changers and information controllers.

If you’d like to start your own DASH wallet and be a part of this change and battle for peace and freedom, you can start right here. DASH is already accepted by vendors all across the world so you can begin using it immediately.

Source Article from

WATCH: Citizen Blows Up on Cops After Officer Threatens to Kill Him for Filming


Mesa, CA — Filming the police is entirely legal in every state. However, all too often, we will see police officers overstep their authority and arrest, attack, and assault innocent people for the constitutionally protected act of documenting their behavior in public. A video shared with the Free Thought Project this week shows just how dangerous a cop’s ignorance of the law can be.

In the video below, an entirely innocent man, doing nothing other than practicing his first amendment right to film in public, was assaulted with a deadly weapon. Because a police officer feared for his life over a camera, he chose to pull his weapon and threaten an innocent man’s life.

The man filming was simply walking down the street with a camera when he came upon the officer identified as officer Everett with the Mesa College Police Department. As was his constitutional right to do so, the man filming stopped on the public sidewalk and video recorded the officer in his official duties.

“What are you filming for?” asks the cop, clearly acknowledging that the man was holding a camera and not some other object that he was going to use to cause him harm. However, when the man filming exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, the officer escalated the situation and began to claim he feared for his life.

As illustrated by his original question, the officer knew that this man was holding a camera. However, after the man attempted to assert his rights, the officer then claimed he did not know what the object was being pointed at him.

As the man kept filming, the officer then put his hand on his pistol, causing the man to have a legitimate reason to fear for his own life.

“Do not unholster your weapon!” he screams at the officer. But the officer did not listen.

Seconds later, the officer unholsters his pistol and points it at the innocent man. The man filming becomes heavily distressed and subsequently begins yelling—a move that could’ve likely gotten him killed.

As officer Everett holds the man at gunpoint for filming, backup arrives as the man demands to see a sergeant—but, not before the other officer grabs his pistol as well.

When the sergeant arrives, logic prevails and he gives the man back his camera. However, having just been assaulted with a deadly weapon by a public servant for doing nothing wrong set the man filming off and he demanded the officer be fired.

The law to which the man keeps referring, “pc148 g,” is the California penal code which explicitly permits the filming of police and explicitly bars the officer from acting in such a manner.

The fact that a person takes a photograph or makes an audio or video recording of a public officer or peace officer, while the officer is in a public place or the person taking the photograph or making the recording is in a place he or she has the right to be, does not constitute, in and of itself, a violation of subdivision (a), nor does it constitute reasonable suspicion to detain the person or probable cause to arrest the person.

Sgt. Saludares then tires to explain to the man that he perceived the camera to be a threat, not knowing it was a camera. However, as officer Everett states in the first line of the video, we clearly know that this is not true.

Below is a video highlighting what happens when police fail to remember the law and innocent citizens suffer the price.

As TFTP has reported, it has been clearly established that all Americans have the right to record the police. For an officer of the law to remain willingly ignorant of this precedent is at best, dereliction of duty, and at worst, unlawful deprivation of rights. Either way, these cops were in the wrong.

As the ACLU points out,

Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties.

Unfortunately, law enforcement officers have been known to ask people to stop taking photographs of public places. Those who fail to comply have sometimes been harassed, detained, and arrested. Other people have ended up in FBI databases for taking innocuous photographs of public places.

The right of citizens to record the police is a critical check and balance. It creates an independent record of what took place in a particular incident, one that is free from accusations of bias, lying, or faulty memory. It is no accident that some of the most high-profile cases of police misconduct have involved video and audio records.

When police refuse to have their public service documented and this refusal morphs into assault with a deadly weapon, something has gone seriously wrong. No one should ever face persecution for their freedom of expression—especially in the land of the free.

DASH cryptocurrency and The Free Thought Project have formed a partnership that will continue to spread the ideas of peace and freedom while simultaneously teaching people how to operate outside of the establishment systems of control like using cryptocurrency instead of dollars. Winning this battle is as simple as choosing to abstain from the violent corrupt old system and participating in the new and peaceful system that hands the power back to the people. DASH is this system.

DASH digital cash takes the control the banking elite has over money and gives it back to the people. It is the ultimate weapon in the battle against the money changers and information controllers.

If you’d like to start your own DASH wallet and be a part of this change and battle for peace and freedom, you can start right here. DASH is already accepted by vendors all across the world so you can begin using it immediately.

Source Article from

New Zealand Gov’t Pledges To House Every Homeless Citizen Within 4 Weeks

by Amanda Froelich Truth Theory

In less than four weeks, New Zealand will be affected by the winter season. And within that period of time, the nation’s government will secure warm and safe housing for every homeless citizen.

The news was announced on Facebook by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and housing minister Phil Twyford. Though the emergency housing package will cost a whopping $100 million, many believe it is a worthwhile investment if every homeless person is cared for.

“We’re pulling out all the stops to support people in need and urgently increase housing supply this winter,” announced Twyford. “Our government will make sure everyone is helped to find warm, dry housing.”

According to The Guardian, there are approximately 40,000 homeless people in the country. With winter expected to begin on June 1, the government has put out an urgent call for anyone with extra accommodation to open their homes to homeless people. Shearers quarters, private rental properties, motorhomes, and Maori meeting houses are all being considered.

“We’ve really made a plea today, any marae, any seasonal housing that might be available, please contact us, we’ll work alongside you,” said Ardern. “As soon as we came into government we knew we wouldn’t be able to physically build the houses we’d need by May, when winter was really starting to bite. So we acknowledge this is emergency, this is transitional [housing], but we couldn’t stand by and see people in cars or completely unsuitable housing in the meantime.”

The Prime Minister added that her team has been in touch with “front line service providers,” such as Housing New Zealand, and has instructed them to be “supportive” and “flexible” with those in need. In the Facebook Live Video (below), Tyword asserted: “No one should be sleeping in a car this winter.” Ardern seconded: “Absolutely. No one.”

Watch the video below:

It’s a bold move by a progressive nation. If New Zealand is successful in its mission to secure housing for every homeless person, will other countries follow suit? Please comment your thoughts below and share this news!

Source: The Guardian

Image Credit: Flickr

Get free copy of our 33 Page Illustrated eBook- Psychology Meets Spirituality- Secrets To A Supercharged Life You Control! 

Source Article from

WATCH: Citizen Steps in to Defend Innocent Man Being Harassed by Cops for ‘Walking While Black’


Chicago – A man pulled over to record a police encounter after he watched an officer stop abruptly in traffic and confront a man who appeared to be walking down the street and minding his own business. The officer claimed he stopped the man because the color of his skin and his hat fit the description of a robbery suspect.

Bryan Urióstegui shared two videos on Facebook from an incident that occurred on South Cicero Avenue in Chicago on Monday. He said he was driving and decided to stop and document a police encounter when he saw an officer approaching a Black man who was walking on the sidewalk, listening to music on his headphones.

Driving down S Cicero Ave we see this cop bust a U-turn and stop this black man who was just walking down the street jamming out. I felt the need to record and have his back,” Urióstegui wrote. Unfortunately my gut was right because the only thing this man was guilty of was WWB (Walking While Black). The cop even says ‘I don’t know if you were there or not’ but still asks him for ID and to open his backpack. A clear violation of his rights. I hate that this STILL is a reality for people of color.”

On the video, an officer can be seen standing right in front of a Black man on the sidewalk, demanding to see his driver’s license. “This dude was literally just walking and this cop literally did a U-turn in the middle of traffic to stop this guy,” Urióstegui said as he watched and recorded the scene from inside his vehicle.

The man appeared to be complying as the officer looked at his license and asked him questions. A second patrol car then arrived at the scene.

That’s what happens when you walk while black,” a female voice can be heard saying on the video.

“Right. Walking while black,” Urióstegui agreed.

The officer then asked the man if he could search his backpack, and Urióstegui yelled, “You don’t have to open up your book bag for them! You don’t have to do anything … ask them for a warrant, sir!

The man proceeded to open his bag to show the officer that there was nothing illegal inside of it and he commented, “You just see a Black man walking down the street.”

“Y’all are some bogus ass people. Y’all are bogus. Look at this fucker” Urióstegui said as he turned the camera to show a second officer who had arrived and was watching the incident unfold.

The officers then decided to let the man go and he walked over to the car where Urióstegui was filming and claimed that he had initially been helping a girl who said she was locked out of a building.

“I was just walking and I saw a girl who was locked out and she was on the roof and I was just trying to help her,” the man said.

The man claimed the officer approached him and told him that he fit the description of a shoplifting suspect who was reported by a nearby Walgreens. The man insisted that there was no way he could have come from the Walgreens and he said the officer told him,Oh, well you fit the description.”

When the man asked the officer what the description of the suspect was, the officer simply said, Black man, dark hat,” and gave no explanation for why he insisted on scrutinizing the man’s license or demanding to see the contents of his backpack.

Source Article from

Hero Citizen Stops Mass Shooting in a Church, Cops Show Up and Shoot HIM—Media Silent


Amarillo, TX — As news of the tragic shooting in Parkland, Florida dominated the airwaves this week, a massive hostage situation—which was quickly turning into a mass shooting situation—was foiled by a hero in a church. That hero, however, is now in the hospital after police showed up to the scene and shot him.

The situation was well on its way to becoming one of the deadliest shootings in history as the gunman took over 100 people hostage inside the Faith City Mission church on Wednesday.

“They said there was a gun in the building everyone started running all different ways,” said Clay Murdock, a student at Faith City Mission.

According to WLOX, Murdock said he tried to get as many people inside their sound room as possible.

“We’re standing in there and everyone starts praying,” said Murdock. “I went outside to see what was going on if I could get more people in there and right when as I went outside the guy was standing right in front of me with the pistol.”

Murdock then ran outside.

According to the Amarillo police, the initial call came in around 8:45 a.m. and indicated that there was an armed suspect inside who was holding 100 people hostage.

Sergeant Brent Barbee told reporters that when officers breached the building, they encountered an individual who had a handgun.

The officers fired shots that struck the man,” said Barbee. “After some additional investigation, they’ve learned that the man that [had] the gun may have taken the firearm away from the original suspect in the call. The man who originally had the gun has been taken into custody.”

Later that day, police clarified that they indeed shot the wrong man.

“The initial investigation indicates that the man the officer shot had originally been in a struggle with the original suspect and had taken away the gun from the suspect. The initial suspect has been taken into custody and is not injured. No other persons were hit by gunfire. This is very early in the investigation and more details will be available at a later time,” read the report.

As reports, the hero of the story is a student at Faith City Mission church. After he and the private church security officers wrestled the shooter to the ground and got the gun away from him, one or more Amarillo police officers opened fire on the student.

“Members of the security team took the gunman down and one of our students was able to wrestle the gun away,” she said. “Our thoughts are with our injured student and we praise God for his protection while honoring the heroic actions of our security team, students and everyone else involved — which prevented the situation from becoming far worse.”

The student was taken to a local hospital. The gunman, Joshua Len Jones, 35, of Amarillo was taken to jail unharmed.

Faith City Mission Executive Director Jena Taylor said the student, who was not identified, had surgery Wednesday but was in stable condition and remains hospitalized, reports

“One of our staff members visited the student that was shot and he is resting well after surgery,” Taylor said.

Predictably, this story received no coverage in the mainstream media as it is showed brave citizens in a positive light while highlighting the fact that cops shot and nearly killed the hero.

Please share this story with your friends and family to spread a bit of good news in what has surely been a tragic week of reporting.

Source Article from

Citizen Films Insane Cop Threaten to Kill Innocent Man, So the Dept Doxxed Him


DeSoto, TX — A deeply disturbing video was submitted to the Free Thought Project this week showing a Desoto police officer pull out his gun and threaten an innocent man in a department store parking lot. Now, after the video has gone viral, instead of naming the cop who did it, the DeSoto police department actually doxxed the victim.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, instead of telling the citizens of DeSoto that they would fire the officer who committed a felony on camera, the department released the name of the man who filmed the cop and attempted to assassinate his character.

Illustrating everything wrong with police in America, the cops attempted to justify felonious Aggravated Assault With a Deadly Weapon by saying the person who took the video likes to film police.

“The DeSoto Police Department (Internal Affairs Division) is actively investigating a YouTube post that was authored by Mr. Charlie Dominguez,” read the post. “Mr. Dominguez is known throughout the region for recording public safety personnel while they are conducting their daily affairs.”

Recording public safety personnel is entirely legal and protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Using it in an attempt to shame a man who was the victim of an assault by a cop shows just how detached police in America have become from the Constitution to which they swore an oath to uphold.

“The Administration of our Police Department takes allegations of misconduct very seriously,” the post continued. “Once our investigation into this matter has been thoroughly completed, the Police Department will address all inquiries and concerns regarding this case. The professional men and women of our Police Department remain committed to ensuring that our community is safe, as well as protected on a daily basis.”

If the police department was actually committed to ensuring the community is safe, they would be posting the mug shot of the officer who endangered the lives of its citizens—not smearing the man who filmed it.

What’s more, the DeSoto chief of police, Joe Costa declared his admiration and faith in the cop who pulled the weapon in a now-deleted Facebook post.

“I promise you that the officer involved in this incident is a fine officer and one of
the best we have,” Costa wrote.

Luckily, according to the comments, the people aren’t buying the charade and have taken to calling out the double standard and corruption exhibited by the DeSoto police department.

“Why is it necessary to release the photographers name, and to tell us what he is “known” for? It shouldn’t matter who took the video… only that an officer pointed a weapon at a member of the public without justification… PERIOD,” wrote Sean.

Another commenter put the entire scenario into perspective and showed just how repugnant this response was.

“You were more than eager to publicly shame Mr. dominquez earlier in an attempt to discredit his character.

You called the officer “a fine officer and the best we have”

It’s pretty clear where this investigation is going.

If any person in the public drawn a weapon on someone who we didn’t like, but broke no law or wasn’t a threat, we would be in handcuffs

You don’t have the right to draw a weapon on someone who hurts your feelings.

This is why there is a clear disconnect between the police and the public. There needs to be accountability

You’ve publicly smeared this guy…. but what’s the cops name? Seems pretty one-sided,” wrote Carolann.

As TFTP reported on Monday, in the video, a person riding his bicycle is filming in a parking lot. He then videos a police SUV off in the distance and proceeded to catch up with the vehicle.

Whether the videographer’s intent was to deliberately film the cop or whether he was merely traveling in the same direction of the cop is irrelevant as neither of these scenarios is illegal and neither of them warranted the response from the cop.

As the man filming continued to travel behind the cop on his bicycle, the cop the suddenly slams on his brakes, jumps out of his SUV, and draws his pistol on the completely innocent person.

Illustrating the nature of the overreaction, the cop holds his pistol trained on the cyclist for a few seconds before jumping into his police cruiser and speeding off.

Let there be no doubt about it, this officer committed a serious crime.

Under Article 42.12, Section 3g of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Aggravated Assault With a Deadly Weapon is grouped with the most serious offenses, like murder, sexual assault, and aggravated kidnapping.

In Texas, regular assault can be committed by hurting someone, making an imminent threat to hurt someone, or causing offensive physical contact with someone. This means that the crime of “Aggravated Assault With a Deadly Weapon” can be committed without actually HURTING anyone with a weapon.

What this DeSoto police officer did is considered under Texas law to be “Aggravated Assault With a Deadly Weapon.”

Aggravated Assault is defined Texas Penal Code 22.02 and is typically a second-degree felony, punishable by 2 to 20 years in the state penitentiary and a fine up to $10,000. However, if this assault is committed against a police officer, it becomes a first-degree felony.

Nowhere in the code, however, does it mention what happens with a police officer commits Aggravated Assault against a citizen.

This officer should be arrested and charged. However, as the police response shows, that is not happening.

Had a citizen done this to another citizen, rest assured, police would be dispatched and a manhunt would be underway for the person who presented the gun.

As you watch the video below, try to imagine what would happen if anyone else but a cop behaved in this way. After you imagine that, ask yourself why it is that this officer has yet to be arrested and his mugshot published in the local news for felony aggravated assault.


A double standard, indeed.





Source Article from