The Mystery Behind The Holes…..Why Some Buildings In Hong Kong Have Holes

If you spend more than 10 minutes in Hong Kong, you realize space is a precious commodity.  The streets are crowded, the roads are crowded, the markets are crowded.

Towering apartment blocks line the Hong Kong skyline, housing a majority of city residents in flats considered small by any standard.

A cursory glance across the skyline draws attention to gaping holes carved through the center of many buildings.

Why would a city allow such a glaring waste of space when very square inch of real estate is precious?

The answer?  Dragons.

Dragons and Feng Shui. Dismissed by Western skeptics as weirdly new-age, the art of Feng Shui is serious business in Hong Kong.  Feng Shui, translated as “wind and water” stems from the ancient art of geomancy, or connecting to the energy of the earth.

One school of Feng Shui concentrates on placing a building in an environment in relation to the mountains, sea and sky.

Another school examines the influence of shape within the built and natural environment.

Most Feng Shui practitioners combine approaches when examining the design and placement of buildings/objects to ensure they are created in an auspicious and harmonious way.

Hong Kong has naturally good Feng Shui.  It faces the water and is protected by mountains behind and across from it. Legend holds that dragons live in the mountains and hold positive and powerful energy. This energy blows through Hong Kong daily as the dragons make their way from the mountains to the sea to drink and bathe.

As Hong Kong expands, builders and architects create massive structures that potentially  “block” the dragons’ passage from the hills to the sea, creating bad Feng Shui and blocking the natural air flow through the city.  Thus, architects plan housing and office complexes with “gates” or “windows” allowing dragons to pass through the city unimpeded on  their way to the sea.

Before you dismiss Feng Shui as superstitious nonsense you should know that engineers, architects, property developers and real estate agents take Feng Shui courses before completing their training and certification.

Prominent architectural and building firms consult Feng Shui experts at every step of a project when building in Hong Kong.  Fosters + Partners incorporated Feng Shui principles when planning the iconic HSBC Hong Kong building.  Foster stated “If a building has good Feng Shui, it’s probably also a good place to be.”

Bank of China architect, I. M. Pei chose to ignore these principles at his peril.  Criticized for its harsh, knife-edged angles and screw shaped top, it supposedly “cut” into the good fortune of nearby neighbors. Coincidentally (or not), the nearby Lippo Center tenant went bankrupt and the first governor of Hong Kong refused to live or work in nearby Government House citing the bad Feng Shui.

Supposedly, the two rods that stand atop Foster’s HSBC building are a classic Feng Shui technique of deflecting negative energy back to its source. The rods point in the direction of the Bank of China building.

Things to Know About Hong Kong and Feng Shui

Disney consulted Feng Shui experts when designing Hong Kong Disney.  The consultation resulted in shifting the main entrance angle by 12 degrees to ensure maximum prosperity.  Disney also modified the main pathway from the train station to the gate to prevent the “chi” or positive energy from slipping out of the gate and into the sea.


Source Article from

The dark history behind fluoride (that the media refuses to report)

Image: The dark history behind fluoride (that the media refuses to report)

(Natural News)
Did you know that the same chemical in municipal drinking water played a key role in producing the atomic bomb? Were you aware that huge quantities of the chemical that supposedly protects teeth from cavities were needed to manufacture the bomb-grade plutonium and uranium for nuclear weapons during the Cold War? There are plenty of reasons that fluoridated drinking water is the topic of such fierce debate throughout the country – and most people don’t even know about its dark origins.

According to WWII-era documents uncovered by journalists Chris Bryson and Joel Griffiths, fluoride quickly emerged as the top chemical health hazard of the U.S. atomic bomb program. Their documents show that it posed a huge health threat to workers and the communities surrounding the manufacturing plants.

Moreover, they maintain that the initial “proof” that fluoride doesn’t harm people in low doses was actually fabricated by scientists working on the atomic bomb program after being ordered to come up with evidence that would be useful in any potential future litigation from those who were poisoned by the chemical. They also explained how the first lawsuits against the atomic bomb program were actually over fluoride damage and not radiation.

Fluoride study results mysteriously disappear

The biggest fluoride study was conducted from 1945 to 1956 in Newburgh, New York. The secret operation, which was known as Program F, saw tissue and blood samples collected from people living there through the New York State Health Department. After comparing the published version of the study and the original one, the journalists found evidence that the negative effects of fluorides were suppressed by the Atomic Energy Commission for reasons of “national security.”

Scientist’s fluoride investigations 50 years later hit roadblocks

In studies on animals carried out in the 1990s by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, fluoride was found to be a strong central nervous system toxin that could adversely affect brain functioning in humans even at low doses. Dr. Mullenix was rejected when applying for a grant to study it further by the National Institutes of Health and informed that fluorides do not affect the central nervous system.

This goes directly against a 1944 memo from the Manhattan Project which said: “Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather marked central nervous system effect…it seems most likely that the F [fluoride] component rather than the [uranium] is the causative factor.”

Dr. Harold Hodge, who was working on the Manhattan Project at the time, then requested a study on the effects of fluoride on the central nervous system. Although it was granted, the records of its results have gone missing.

It’s not a coincidence that Dr. Hodge was then called in 50 years later to “advise” Dr. Mullenix on her own investigations of the effects of fluorides. He never disclosed his past work on fluoride toxicity for the Manhattan Project to her, and she believes that he was enlisted to keep an eye on her and prevent her from sharing any damaging findings.

Dr. Hodge was also the author of a memo suggesting that fluorides be promoted as dental treatments after people started to consider lawsuits after a fluoride pollution incident that took place in New Jersey in 1944. On that occasion, the tomato and peach crops of farmers were destroyed and animals were crippled after widespread fluoride contamination downwind from the Deepwater plant where the first atomic bomb was being worked on. Declassified memos from an emergency meeting show they sought “evidence which may be used to protect the interest of the Government at the trial of the suits brought by owners of peach orchards in … New Jersey.”

So the next time someone tells you that fluoride in your drinking water is all about helping you maintain good dental health, keep in mind that there is so much more to the story.

Sources for this article include:



Source Article from

Scientists Discover Major Reason Behind Cancer, May Find Cure for the Disease


Researchers have taken a new step toward tackling the ruthless disease claiming some eight million lives annually.

Scientists came to the conclusion that changes in the immune system are a key factor that provokes cancer, along with genetic mutations.

The prevention and treatment of cancer should be based on immune-related factors rather than only genetic ones, a research team from the University of Dundee in Scotland found out.

“This is still very early days but if we are proven right then you could be talking about a whole new way to treat and prevent cancer,” Dr. Thea Newman, a senior author of the study, was quoted by MedicalExpress as saying.

As it turned out, an aging immune system plays a more significant role in cancer incidence than it was previously thought. In addition, men are more likely to develop cancer than women, the research suggests.

According to Newman, many modern studies related to cancer are based on analyzing genetic mutations and the ways to deal with them, which is insufficient.

For decades it was believed that mutations arise either as a result of a genetic predisposition, or because of lifestyle and the environment, are the main factors that cause the disease, but this is only partly true, she argued.

“Nearly all of the mainstream research into cancer is based on how we can understand genetic mutations, target them and thereby cure the disease. We’re not debating the fact that mutations cause cancer, but are asking whether mutations alone can account for the rapid rise in cancer incidence with age when ageing causes other profound changes in the body,” the scientist said.

Cancer claims lives of about eight million people each year. The research conducted by Newman’s research team could have a major impact on the global fight against cancer, if the results are proven and further explored in future studies.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Suspected Poacher Is Eaten By Lions Who Leave Only His Head Behind

By Jess Murray Truth Theory

A man has lost his life after being attacked, and eventually eaten, by a pride of lions whilst on a private game reserve.

The big cat poacher was heard screaming for help whilst on a private game reserve in South Africa, in Hoedspruit outside Phalaborwa. Reports state that despite his calls for help, he was quickly killed by the lions who then ate his entire body, leaving just the head as they were chased off.

Police in Limpopo are now trying to identify the unknown man, who was found to have a hunting rifle next to the remains of his body, causing police to investigate the possibility of him being a poacher. Police Lieutenant-Colonel Moatshe Ngoepe said, ‘The process of identifying this body has already commenced and it might be made easier as his head was amongst the remains found at the scene’, whilst the reserve owner was told not to speak to the media as the investigation was still being conducted.

A local worker added, “The head was still there but the lions had eaten most of the rest. A scream was heard and the lions were scattered by the sound of gunshots but it was too late to do anything for him. He was eaten.”

Charlie Lynham, a British wildlife photographer who live near the reserve and has spent many years photographing the resident lions, arrived at the gates just after the paramedics raced into the scene. He said, “It turns out it was not the resident pride that lives here responsible as they were on a buffalo kill at the time of the incident but a pride perhaps come over from the Kruger (National Park). It happened on the border of the Umbabat Game Reserve after dark and may have been on their reserve. Two .456 big game rifles and ammunition were found at the scene and that is the weapon of choice used by those hunting big game – especially elephant and rhino in the bush.

“I cannot say if it was poachers as the matter is under investigation but that is their weapon of choice and they usually work in groups of three and work under cover of darkness. Two sets of footprints have been found running away and obviously the dead and eaten man.”

According to Mr Lynham, there were no anti-poaching groups in the area at the time, and despite being speculation, “it would seem very possible that you have poetic justice here. Lions are not a particular danger in daylight but after dark, then that is another matter. It is purely speculation on my part but it would seem they either walked into a pride of lions in the darkness or they were stalked and attacked and a man was taken down and eaten. The other two it seems ran off and two .456 big game rifles were found and ammunition.”

He concluded, “If you go out walking in the bush in the dark then I am afraid you are fair game in the wild and there is no way that anyone can attribute any blame to those lions for this kill.”

I’m Jess Murray, wildlife conservationist, photographer and writer. Follow my Facebook page and Instagram account to be part of the journey. I like to document the natural world and create awareness through my writing so that your future can be sustainable and positive.

Source: Dailymail

Image Credit: Pixabay

Get free copy of our 33 Page Illustrated eBook- Psychology Meets Spirituality- Secrets To A Supercharged Life You Control!

Source Article from

"Vela Incident": Is Israel behind the1979’s mysterious nuclear explosion?

The ‘Vela Incident’ remains one of the genuine whodunits – and whodunwhat – of the 20th century

Nuclear explosions


There are many names for whatever happened in the South Atlantic on Sept. 22, 1979, but the most typical one is “the Vela Incident.” It is one of the genuine mysteries of 20th-century history – not a contrived mystery like “Who killed the Lindbergh baby?”, but the real deal: a whodunit, combined with a whatwuzzit. At just past midnight on the key date, an American satellite designed to detect nuclear explosions, Vela 6911, “announced” to ground stations that it was pretty sure it had just seen one.

The inferred location of the blast was about halfway between South Africa and Antarctica. This may not seem like an important clue to post-Cold War babies; people forget that South Africa is known to have had the bomb throughout the 1980s. The apartheid regime built a half-dozen warheads for tactical use and regional deterrence against such Communist-influenced neighbour states as Angola. In 1989, during the run-up to South African democracy, the republic voluntarily dismantled its nukes. Over the next decade it joined the major nonproliferation treaties, and even led the creation of a new one, the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty.

The new research paper on the Vela Incident, published in the journal Science & Global Security last month, is not a sensational novelty. Mostly I am mentioning it because it may be nice, in 2018, to imagine a rogue member of the Nuclear Club one day leaving it and becoming a leading anti-nuke sentinel.

South Africa is not necessarily the prime suspect in this whodunit

With all that said, South Africa is not necessarily the prime suspect in this whodunit. Vela 6911 was part of a global grid of satellites designed to help enforce the Partial Test Ban Treaty of 1963, which outlawed nuclear testing in the atmosphere (and in space). The satellites’ main instruments for spotting atmospheric nuke tests were arrays of light-detecting photodiodes called “bhangmeters” (whose name is a slightly complicated physicists’ joke about cannabis. Yes, really).

Nuclear explosions create an interesting double-humped or M-shaped signal on light detectors in the first second or so after they detonate. There’s an initial, brief fireball “set off” by X-rays heating the air (and anything else that might be very nearby) to hundreds of thousands of degrees. Then the mechanical shock wave of the explosion, at first opaque, conceals the first fireball.

Cooling as it expands, the shock wave becomes translucent, and there is a “second maximum” of brightness. The resulting M-shaped curve is the same for fission and fusion weapons, can be used to calculate the total energy of the explosion, and is not known to be imitated by any other natural phenomenon.

Nuclear mushroom over Bikini atoll


In the Vela Incident, two independent bhangmeters recorded an M-shaped light signal that sent the White House and the U.S. intelligence community racing madly off in all directions. Well, to be more specific, they went in two opposing ones.

The CIA studied the signal and decided that it was, in fact, the thumbprint of a low-yield nuke. President Jimmy Carter convened a blue-ribbon scientific panel to study the signal: it was led by Jack Ruina, an MIT electrical engineering prof who had once been director of the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. This is to say that Ruina had very strong science credentials, and equally impressive deep-state credentials. Ruina’s panel issued what one member called a “Scotch verdict”: it said it could not rule out a natural explanation for the signal.

The new paper by Christopher M. Wright and Lars-Erik de Geer pulls together the many shreds of public-domain knowledge about the physics of the Vela Incident. Some of them have come from material declassified piecemeal, and far from completely, over the intervening decades. The public has only been allowed to scrutinize selected items from a “zoo” of Vela false alarms cited by the Ruina panel as proof that the Incident might have been some kind of micrometeor phenomenon. Meanwhile, Vela readings from the last known atmospheric nuke tests have also been misplaced. As Wright and de Geer document, even this threadbare evidence does not leave much room to doubt that the incident was a nuke. The panel’s alternate scenarios are pretty contrived, especially given what the human species has learned since about the statistics of very tiny particles that whiz about the cosmos and occasionally smash into satellites.

Wright and de Geer do not dig into the historical literature of Vela, which has been expanding persistently as intelligence-world memoirs and diaries are published or declassified. Even president Carter wrote, not long after his panel had completed its preliminary work, of “a growing belief among our scientists that the Israelis did indeed conduct a nuclear test explosion in the ocean near the southern end of South Africa.”

A growing belief that the Israelis did conduct a nuclear test explosion


The truth about Israel’s secret nuclear arsenal

A few years later, on 22 September 1979, a US satellite, Vela 6911, detected the double-flash typical of a nuclear weapon test off the coast of South Africa. Leonard Weiss, a mathematician and an expert on nuclear proliferation, was working as a Senate advisor at the time and after being briefed on the incident by US intelligence agencies and the country’s nuclear weapons laboratories, he became convinced a nuclear test, in contravention to the Limited Test Ban Treaty, had taken place.

It was only after both the Carter and then the Reagan administrations attempted to gag him on the incident and tried to whitewash it with an unconvincing panel of enquiry, that it dawned on Weiss that it was the Israelis, rather than the South Africans, who had carried out the detonation.

“I was told it would create a very serious foreign policy issue for the US, if I said it was a test. Someone had let something off that US didn’t want anyone to know about,” says Weiss.

Israeli sources told Hersh the flash picked up by the Vela satellite was actually the third of a series of Indian Ocean nuclear tests that Israel conducted in cooperation with South Africa.

“It was a fuck-up,” one source told him. “There was a storm and we figured it would block Vela, but there was a gap in the weather – a window – and Vela got blinded by the flash.

The US policy of silence continues to this day

There is now a panoply of published remarks by top U.S. spies deriding the White House panel report as a whitewash, and there has even been some sketchy confirmation of Israeli involvement, though it is less clear that South Africa participated. Israel’s membership in the nuclear club is no longer a secret in any way, but is still an unmentionable for the U.S. executive branch.

In 1980 such talk had the potential to start a war. Students of the Vela Incident have, ever since then, been drifting pretty steadily toward the conclusion that it was a nuclear test. But if there is the equivalent of a smoking gun, we still cannot be sure which country or countries held it.

Source Article from

Dr Duke & Andy Hitchcock on How the Zio Deep State is the Driver Behind the Invasion of every White Nation!

Dr Duke & Andy Hitchcock on How the Zio Deep State is the Driver Behind the Invasion of every White Nation!


Today Dr. Duke British author and talk show host Andy Hitchcock as his guest for the show.



This show is a powerful show. Please share it widely. And please keep us on the air and on-line. Please visit our contribution page or send your contribution to:

P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LA 70470

Thank you.

Click here and look for the show dated 2-5-18.

Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern

Please watch Dr. Duke’s video “Israel: The Promised Land for Organized Crime”

Here is Mark Collett’s latest video :

Be sure to check out Mark’s Twitter feed. And follow him while you’re at it.

Source Article from

Israel’s Mossad Behind Lebanese Car-Bombing

Israel’s Mossad Behind Lebanese Car-Bombing

by Stephen Lendman ( – Home – Stephen Lendman)

Israel’s Mossad and the CIA operate like global Mafia hit squads – on the phony pretext of combating terrorism and defending national security.

Targeted killings are US and Israeli specialties, indefensible cold-blooded murder, various methods employed.

Car-bombings a favorite tactic – how Israel assassinated former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. 

Compelling video and audio evidence confirmed it, Syria falsely blamed, Hezbollah later wrongfully named responsible.

Mossad’s fingerprints were all over the incident. No evidence suggested Syrian or Hezbollah involvement. Israel and Washington alone benefitted from what happened.

CIA and Mossad assassins perfected the art of killing, blaming others for their high crimes. A mid-January car-bombing in Sidon, Lebanon wounded Hamas member Mohammed Hamdan.

Lebanon’s Interior Minister Nouhad Mashnuq blamed Israel for the incident, saying “one of the main perpetrators of the crimes…confessed to be (involved) with Israeli intelligence,” adding:

A search of his home found “very advanced communications mechanisms…and correspondence between him and his handlers.”

According to the al-Akhbar broadsheet, two of four assassins involved were Israeli agents, adding Israeli intelligence had been monitoring Hamdan’s movements for months.

A Lebanese official was cited, saying a bomb attached to his car was detonated from some distance away, believing he was inside.

The vehicle was totally demolished. Anyone in it would have been killed. 

Hamdan escaped death, sustaining a leg injury alone. He’s a marked man. Maybe next time he won’t be as lucky.

The bomb hidden under the driver’s seat used about 500 grams of explosives, according to the Lebanese National News Agency.

Hamas called Hamdan one of its Lebanese “cadres.” It accused Israel of assassinating its members in the Territories and elsewhere.

In November 2012, Israel assassinated Hamas’ military commander Ahmed al-Jabari, a member of its political leadership.

A missile struck his car. Shin Bet claimed responsibility, a statement at the time saying:

“During a joint operation of the General Security Service (Shin Bet) and the IDF today, Ahmed al-Jabari, the senior commander of the military wing of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, was targeted.”

His assassination came on the day the IDF launched naked aggression on Gaza – Operation Pillar of Cloud, conducted from November 14 – 21, 2012.

Jabari was a well-respected leader, responsible for building the Qassam Brigades into a 10,000-strong force.

Hours before his assassination, he arranged a truce agreement with Israel, including ways for establishing ceasefire in case of future flare-ups.

He was working to establish a permanent truce, assassinated to prevent his involvement in defending Gaza from Israeli aggression.

He wanted peace, not war, believing Israeli/Palestinian hostility benefitted neither side. He prevented Hamas attacks on Israel.

Assassinating him facilitated Israeli aggression. Peace and stability defeat its agenda. Violence and chaos serve it – likely why Hamdan was targeted.

VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Source Article from

Exposing the junk science behind the mental health racket: A look at the hoax behind the toxic medicines used to treat “mental disorders”

Image: Exposing the junk science behind the mental health racket: A look at the hoax behind the toxic medicines used to treat “mental disorders”

(Natural News)
Psychiatry might sound like a science, but it’s not quite as cut and dried as other areas of medicine, and that’s something you might want to think about before blindly accepting any psychiatric diagnoses a doctor gives you – and especially before you start taking any psychiatric medications.

Mental disorders can be quite subjective, after all. They can’t be diagnosed via blood tests or urine tests like other illnesses, for example. Instead, it’s entirely up to the discretion of the psychiatrist, who is supposed to use The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) – written by fellow psychiatrists – as a guide.

There are already around 300 mental disorders, and Big Pharma has gotten quite adept at coming up with toxic drugs to treat all of them. They are also front and center in the effort to create more mental health categories and therefore expand their business.

Indeed, this has been happening for quite some time, with the definitions of illnesses like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and bipolar being expanded so that more people would fall under the categories and, by extension, be convinced they need “treatment.”

Unlike other medical specialties, psychiatry can essentially concoct illnesses and relax their criteria as it sees fit, expanding diagnoses until they apply to nearly everyone. In other words, organized psychiatry can vote illnesses into existing unchecked, as Dr. Philip Hickey points out in Behaviorism and Mental Health.

Even the FDA has admitted that psychiatry is based on a consensus among those in the profession instead of provable science. In a letter sent by FDA Consumer Safety Officer Donald Dobbs to Health Canada, the Canadian FDA equivalent, he writes:

“Psychiatric disorders (as Health Canada refers) are diagnosed based on a patient’s presentation of symptoms that the larger psychiatric community has come to accept as real and responsive to treatment.”

So the notion of a chemical imbalance in the brain is just that – a notion. There is no established level of chemicals to signify a brain is balanced, so how can it be said that a person has a chemical imbalance? Yet people believe this idea by and large and go along with what their doctors say. But think about this for a moment: Would you accept a diagnosis of cancer or HIV without a test just because your doctor believed you had it and start taking dangerous meds to treat it?

It’s pretty scary to think that a profession could be powerful enough to convince people they need medications that could kill them, testify about a person’s mental state in court, or even have them placed in a psych ward lockdown on the basis of something that is simply speculative.

If you don’t have a chemical imbalance, you don’t need chemicals

All this is not to say that mental problems don’t exist, of course. People do experience all sorts of problems. They can be caused by all manner of circumstances, whether it’s a nutritional deficit, abuse, trauma, hormonal imbalances, or exposure to toxins, to name just a few. And because they are caused by these things rather than some sort of chemical imbalance, chemicals are not needed to treat them.

Perhaps that explains why antidepressants and other psych drugs have such a poor performance record – they’re being doled out without any hard numbers to prove a person had some sort of chemical imbalance in the first place. It also explains why other methods, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, and dietary changes can be so effective for people: They’re addressing the true underlying causes of the person’s problems rather than trying to change their body chemistry.

For example, a comprehensive study published in The Lancet found that 92 percent of the antidepressants examined worked no better on depression than a placebo. Moreover, antidepressants have been linked to suicides and mass shootings. So why do doctors continue to prescribe them to people for conditions that have no defining physical or lab tests to confirm? One need only look at the predictions that the global antidepressant market will reach $16.8 billion by 2020 to find the answers to that question.

See more headlines about psychiatric drugs by reading

Sources for this article include:



Source Article from