The Real ‘Secret’ Behind Manifesting Through Intention

Next Story

The idea that we actually manifest the physical world into being in every moment based on our thoughts used to be the stuff of fairy tales for most people. There was a sense that old sayings like ‘As ye think, so shall ye be,’ and ‘Everything is possible for him who believes,’ were considered to have some mysterious wisdom, but few really took them to be direct conditions of reality itself.

A little over a decade ago, however, many started to take the subject more seriously. The popularity of a movie and book entitled ‘The Secret,’ which brags 28+ million copies in print translated into 52 languages, was an important contributor to the popularization of the idea that we can manifest the things we want in our lives through the power of intention.

Has Our Belief Subsided?

I have observed over the past decade, at least in terms of the people and communities I am in contact with, that the belief and optimism in the power of intention has waned somewhat. While some people have gone forward and made the power of intention the centerpiece of their life’s activities, many who once tried to engage in such practices have since become disillusioned by the idea, a consequence of failed attempts, or have simply forgotten about it and returned their focus to strictly material processes to try and get what they want out of life.

Are you familiar with the idea? Have you made some attempts at manifesting through intention in the past, and have since shifted away from the practice? Let’s read on.

Feeling Good

To manifesting through intention is first to overcome what seems to be a logical paradox; as we try to visualize what we want  (a new car, lover, etc.), we have to somehow ‘feel good’ about the whole matter, as though we are not actually lacking what we want. As The Secret feature speaker Joe Vitale says,

It’s really important that you feel good. Because this feeling good is what goes out as a signal into the universe and starts to attract more of itself to you. So the more you can feel good, the more you will attract the things that help you feel good and that will keep bringing you up higher and higher.

But how are we supposed to feel good about what we are lacking? Even those who have been highly successful at manifesting through intention have a devil of a time explaining how they are having positive feelings in relation to the exercise of bringing towards them something they don’t have enough of or don’t have any of.

In some writings on the subject, the ‘wanting’ of something as an intention does not bring to us the thing itself but only the continued ‘wanting’ of it. We are told that the proper mindset is to feel grateful for what we ‘want’, as though we already have it. But the fact is that we don’t have it! Otherwise we wouldn’t be asking for it. How do we get around this paradox?

The Real Secret: Become ‘Service To Others’

I believe the secret to overcoming this paradox is in understanding that there are mainly two types of people in the world: those who are oriented towards service to self, and those that are oriented towards service to others.

Those who are fundamentally ‘service to self’ see themselves as separate from the rest of humanity, they see the world’s resources as scarce, and they feel they have to compete with others to get what they want. In this state of fear, manifesting from intention becomes very difficult, because their fear of lack will always be more powerful than their ‘belief’ that they can get what they want.

Those who are fundamentally ‘service to others’ see all of humanity as connected, the world’s resources as unlimited, and in getting what they want they actually inspire others to get what they want. My favorite book on the subject, ‘The Science of Getting Rich,’ written in 1910 by Wallace D. Wattles, says it this way:

You are to become a creator, not a competitor; you are going to get what you want, but in such a way that when you get it every other man will have more than he has now.


In choosing to manifest through intention in our lives this way, we can actually see our lives as modeling and inspiring others who are actively seeking their own desired manifestations. So it’s really a win-win mentality between ourselves and others. There are no ‘limits’ to what can be manifested. Wattles says that no matter how many people actively intend abundance, the material universe is compelled to bring it into being.

People who have a true service to others mentality serve others with a confidence that they will be served themselves, by universal design. When serving others authentically, there is love and lightness, and a genuine sense that we ‘have’ to give, and so we naturally feel gratitude for our own abundance. What we want is already a part of us, since we are connected to all things–so there’s no longer a contradiction in being grateful for what we want. This gratitude really embodies the amorphous ‘feel good’ of Joe Vitale, or the ‘higher vibration’ of so many other commentators.

If you have tried and given up on the process of manifesting through intention, it might be helpful to check if your intentions were always grounded in fear-based egocentric desire, as mine were in my earlier failed attempts to manifest. If you can make the move to orient your life to be in service of others—a monumental shift to be sure—you will see that manifesting through intention will become more natural, enjoyable, and ultimately successful.


Get Your FREE In Depth Numerology Reading

Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.

With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.

Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.


Source Article from

Must Read–US Jewish groups fighting, even physically, behind the scenes

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,956 other followers

Source Article from

What’s behind the deadly Gaza protests

TEL AVIV, Israel — Ongoing protests at the border between Gaza and Israel, now in their sixth week, are growing increasingly violent, as Palestinian demonstrators have reportedly begun using firebombs, burning tires and wire cutters to breach the barbed-wire border fence. Protesters who breached the barricade on April 27 attempted to cross into Israel, only to be repelled by Israeli soldiers, who fired at them with rubber bullets and live ammunition, killing three and injuring many others.

Holding Hamas accountable for breaching the fence, Israel’s Air Force struck on Friday evening several targets inside Gaza associated with Hamas, the Islamist-fundamentalist organization that governs the Gaza Strip.

The protests have been the most violent since the Israel-Gaza conflict in 2014. Since they began on March 30, more than 40 demonstrators have been killed and more than 5,500 have been injured, according to the United Nations. International organizations have criticized Israel for using live ammunition against the demonstrators. Several high-profile incidents have sparked international outrage, including the deaths of two journalists and a 15-year-old last Friday. Israel has said that its response has been proportionate and that it has a right to defend its borders from infiltrators.

Slideshow: Gaza’s bloody uprising by Fabio Bucciarelli for Yahoo News >>>

Additional protests are scheduled in upcoming weeks, and organizers have promised to continue the escalation. The protests began and will end on days that memorialize formative events in the history of Palestinian nationalism. They started on March 30, a day known as Land Day, which commemorates the anniversary of Palestinian demonstrations against an Israeli plan to confiscate land in northern Israel in 1976. And they will end on May 15, which is the start of Ramadan and the date Palestinians call Nakba Day. Nakba, an Arabic word meaning catastrophe, is the name Palestinians have given to the events of 1948, when the State of Israel was created and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were expelled from or fled from it.

That the protests — which have been dubbed the “Great Return March” — will end on Nakba Day is especially symbolic: The Great Return March takes its name from the “right of return,” the right Palestinians claim for refugees and their descendants to resettle in Israel. The protests have been billed as a way for Palestinians to assert the right of refugees to return to Israel by breaching the security barrier that encloses Gaza. Whether Palestinians have a “right of return” is one of the central issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and one of the most fraught. While Palestinians demand that all Palestinian refugees have a right to return to Israel, Israel argues that mass immigration of Palestinians into Israel would upset Israel’s Jewish demographic majority and erase its claim to being a Jewish state.

The protests have arisen against the background of a massive humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. Since 2007, Gaza has been under an economic blockade by Israel and Egypt, and conditions in the coastal enclave have become so desperate that the United Nations has predicted that Gaza will be uninhabitable by 2020. Unemployment is at more than 40 percent, infrastructure destroyed during the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict still has not been rebuilt, water supplies have been polluted with waste, electricity is limited to several hours a day and the movement of goods and people is severely restricted.

One complication is the rivalry between Hamas and Fatah, the Palestinian political party that controls the Palestinian National Authority in the West Bank. Hamas came to power in Gaza in 2007, after it drove Fatah out in a civil war. While there have been various attempts at a Fatah-Hamas reconciliation over the years, all have failed, including Egyptian-led talks in October 2017. In the past year, Fatah has tried to gain leverage over Hamas by taking actions that have further exacerbated living conditions in Gaza, such as cutting the supply of electricity to Gaza and withholding salaries to civil servants in Gaza.

U.S. policy also plays a role. This year, May 15 will coincide not only with the 70th anniversary of the Nakba, but also with the opening of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem. Ismail Haniyeh, a leader of Hamas, has said: “The Palestinian people will demonstrate throughout Ramadan to deal with the many challenges facing us, and first of all the peace plan promoted by U.S. President Donald Trump, called the ‘Deal of the Century.’” And another leader, Yahya Sinwar, has promised that Palestinians would “breach the borders and pray at Al-Aqsa,” a site in Jerusalem that is one of the holiest in Islam. If the protests intensify, the breach of the security fence in April may presage even greater violence ahead.


Ben Manson is a freelance journalist based in Tel Aviv.


Read more from Yahoo News:


Source Article from

Prominent Gaming Insider, Lay’s It All Out, On Who’s Behind The Video Game” Seduction And Destruction”, Of Youth Worldwide

Steve, I have been in the industry for a long time, and look I will tell you now, Senior Art Directors and Presidents of all and yes Steve All GAMING companies are high-level occultists, and you have got to be into the occult to qualify for the job. I work with a lot of them, with Assassin Creed they have actually Assassins from the Vatican, coming into dark rooms and reviewing what they can put in the game and what they must take out.

Actually, Blood ritual hitmen and this was told to me by the creator of 4 Assassin creed games. Now Dark Soul is made by Hidetaka Mizayaki and who is he? Lets go back to the source, he was interviewed on what books he reads and he reads about the Occult and his main focus is who? you guessed it H.P Lovecraft, now Steve when was Lovecraft alive? That’s right the same time as Alice A Baily and the same time as Alister Crowley. Now Lovecraft was very creative but he was used by the devil, Lovecraft himself never left his home and was contacted by higher powers.

Source Article from

The UN Is Behind the Deadly 5G Rollout In America

From Tumors to Tyrann. 5G technology is beneficial but not when it involves the vulnerable brain and that is what the social planners are moving towards. Brain cancer rates are going to skyrocket. Here is the story.

Sometimes we seem to live in a universe of sychronicity. On the very day, when I interviewed Virginia Farver, on The Common Sense Show, Natural News published a report about a large Italian study which conclusively proves the line between cell towers and cell phone usage and brain cancer. Before I report on the stunning revelations made by Virginia Farver, let’s explore the revelations of this landmark Italian study as reported on Natural News:

The world’s biggest animal study of cell tower radiation, which was carried out by the Ramazzini Institute in Italy, has revealed the dangers of exposure to environmental levels of cell tower radiation. In the study, researchers exposed 2,448 rats to 1.8 GHz GSM radiofrequency radiation in amounts that mimicked those that cell tower antennas give off for 19 hours a day. They found that the female rats had a higher chance of developing malignant brain tumors, while all rats had a higher chance of precancerous conditions and Schwann cell hyperplasia.

This study went the extra mile, allowing the rats to live until their natural death. Four fifths of human cancers occur after people have turned 60, so following the animals over an extended period enabled them to catch late-developing tumors.

The researchers say that their findings are enough to call on the International Agency for Research on Cancer to take another look at the carcinogenicity of radiofrequency radiation on humans.

For decades, the corporate-influenced media has characterized any links between cell towers and cancer as being a “conspiracy theory.”

Until  I met activist Virginia Farver, I thought the dangers of  cell phone use was an accidental overreach motivated by corporate profits. I no longer think that. This is deadly and deliberate.

Farver became involved in this field after her son died from cell phone use, and yes one of the doctors treating Farvers’ son made that very diagnosis. Farver learned that where her son was attending graduate school on the campus San Diego State University, the univerity had an unusual spike in a cancer cluster located on the campus after the university had entered into a devil’s deal by installing  the brain cancer causing First Net. First Net, as its called is predicated on the implementation of 5G. Farver’ attempts to bring this to the attention of the main stream media has largely fallen on deaf ears.

 FirstNet and AT&T released a plan for the proposed deployment of the nationwide public-safety broadband network (NPSBN) in all states, triggering multiple timelines associated with governors’ decisions whether to accept the plan or pursue the “opt-out” alternative, which requires the state to build the LTE radio access network (RAN) within its borders.

Virginia Farver was able to attract the attention of the Colorado State Attorney General, Cynthia Coffman and actually had a face-to-face meetingwith the AG. Amazingly, the person charged with the responsibility of protecting Colorado’s citizens from life-threatening overreach by the corporations, was asleep at the wheel as she told Farver that she had no idea what 5G and First Net were all about. This stunning ignorance, which should have constituted a malfeasance of duty allegation, took a dramatic turn for the worse. The gross ignorance of this public official turned into complicity as Coffman is now an advocate for this system and the safety of the citizens be damned.

Meet the public official, Cynthia Coffman,  who would bring you and your children life-threatening 5G and First Net. Your tax dollars at work.

Telecom executives such as the Qualcomm family can longer claim ignorant bliss and neither can Verizon and AT&T with regard to the deadly health effects.

The tech website Axios reported that it had obtained documents revealing that national security officials has convinced the Trump administration about building and operating a national 5G wireless network. This will include building cellphone towers every 1,000 feet. We will be bathed in radiation and combined with the now omnipresent smart meters, there is nowhere to run and nowhere to hide.

According to sources close to the Qualcomm family, their house is sheathed in radiation protective material to ward off the effects of 5G. Are you protected in the same manner?

John Stolz is a major player in this endeavor. I want to introduce you to his background, and you will begin to see why I appear to be so paranoid with regard to the UN’s bad intentions for the United States. There are two aspects of Stolz’ that needs to be exposed. First is his corporate biography which now has been expunged from the Internet, but Virginia Farver saved it and shared it with me. And second, Stolz wrote a piece for the United Nations that constitutes a smoking gun that the UN is ultimately behind 5G and all the bad things that come with it.

As the reader will see, Stolz is a major player in the new First Net and the accompanying deadly 5G network. However, the following makes is clear the UN is behind this lethal threat.

Excerpts From Stolz Corporate Biography

Robert Stolz founded Stolz Telecom in 2006 and has over 19 years of industry experience.  Prior to founding Stolz Telecom he held positions as Electronics Technician for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Oklahoma City Division; Communication Systems Technician for the City of Norman, Oklahoma; Team Lead Technician (Oklahoma/Arkansas/North Texas) for PageNet/Arch Wireless; and Network Administrator for the United Nations Command/Combined Forces Command/US Forces Korea (UNC/CFC/USFK) Defense Red Switch Network (DRSN), South Korea.

Mr. Stolz earned his Associates in Applied Science in General Engineering Technology from Oklahoma State University.  He also has specialized training from the US Army, National Security Agency (NSA), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).  He is also certified Emergency Number Professional (ENP) by the National Emergency Number Association (NENA).

Mr. Stolz previously served as the Federal Representative on the Oklahoma Statewide Communications Interoperability Plan (SCIP) Technical Committee, and the Central Oklahoma Urban Area Security Initiative (COUASI) Technical Subcommittee.

Mr. Stolz is a member of the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International and the National Emergency Number Association.  He is currently the Corporate Committee Advisory Member (CCAM) for hte Oklahoma Chapter of APCO International.

The APCO International association is very telling.

From APCO:

APCO International is the world’s oldest and largest organization of public safety communications professionals and supports the largest U.S. membership base of any public safety association. It serves the needs of public safety communications practitioners worldwide – and the welfare of the general public as a whole – by providing complete expertise, professional development, technical assistance, advocacy and outreach.

You have just met the command and control of the new and deadly 5G Network. Combine this with the document that Virginia Farver sent to me which is authored by John Stoltz, implicates the UN and spells out a dark future for the United States.

United Nations Directive 001, The Start of The New World Order,

In our Calendar Year of 4 July, 2025.



Convert your soon to be worthless case into gold and silver.

Source Article from

Billionaires are Behind Communism – Reece Committee


May 5, 2018


220px-B._Carroll_Reece.jpgNORMAN DODD, A YALE GRADUATE, INTELLECTUAL AND NEW YORK CITY INVESTMENT BANKER, was chosen to be the research director for the Reece Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1953. The Reece Committee was named for its creator, Rep. Carroll Reece of Tennessee, left and was formed to investigate the status of tax-exempt foundations. 


After the war, the Carnegie Endowment trustees reasoned that if they could get control of education in the United States they would be able to prevent a return to the way of life as it had been prior to the war. They recruited the Rockefeller Foundation to assist in such a monumental task. According to Dodd’s Reece Committee report: “They divided the task into parts, giving to the Rockefeller Foundation the responsibility of altering education as it pertains to domestic subjects, but Carnegie retained the task of altering our education in foreign affairs and about international relations.”

ROWAN.jpgDuring a subsequent personal meeting with Mr. Dodd, President Rowan Gaither (left) of the Ford Foundation said, “Mr. Dodd, we invited you to come here because we thought that perhaps, off the record, you would be kind enough to tell us why the Congress is interested in the operations of foundations such as ours?” Gaither answered his own rhetorical question with a startling admission:

“Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making level of the foundation have at one time or another served in the OSS [Office of Strategic Services, CIA forerunner] or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from the White House. We operate under those same directives…. The substance under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”


Related-Makow  “The Aim of Freemasonry is the Triumph of Communism” 

-How University Betrays Students & Society 

Dodd interview with Ed Griffin

Interview with Stan Monteith 

Source Article from

The Real Agenda Behind "Gay Rights"


(left, Prime Minister Castro and wife at Toronto Gay Pride Parade 2017) 

Because of the Masonic control of government and media, society is

stupidly oblivious to the hate-filled attack on our heterosexual identity, an attack more vicious, insidious, and pervasive. Do you remember any public debate and vote on this subject? The article below documents the real agenda behind “gay rights”

i.e. destroying the heterosexual character of society. 

Written 17 years ago, it is prescient.

The Other Attack on Our Manhood ( Updated from Sept. 2001) 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Since 1970, gay-feminist activists have waged a campaign to foster homosexuality among heterosexuals. They are candid about this goal. 


“The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex distinction itself,” says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11) “Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded,” says Gary kinsman.

 “The forms of sexuality considered natural have been socially created and can be socially transformed.” (The Regulation of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219) 

“In a free society, everyone will be gay,” says Allen Young, a pioneer of the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D’Emilio, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, p.322)

Unlike us, gays understand that their campaign for “equal rights” will erase the distinction between gay and straight. In the words of gay historian Jonathan Katz:


In one sense the right is right…to accuse the gay and lesbian rights movement of threatening homogenization….if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically transformative promise (or threat, depending on your values). The Invention of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.

Gay and feminist activists have found common cause because ignoring all scientific evidence, they insist male-female distinctions are artificial. While many heterosexuals consider themselves “feminists”, feminism is a homosexual movement. It believes that men and women are not only equal but the same and only social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is love of the same.

Today, gay and feminist activists want “people” to make love to “people” regardless of their sex. They depict normal heterosexual behavior as pathological. They demonize men as abusers and the heterosexual family as oppressive. The way to social justice, they believe, is to abolish heterosexuality altogether.

Gay-feminist activism is founded in Marxism and is a subversive force. Both the Gay and Woman’s liberation movements were spawned by the 1960’s Marxist “New Left” These groups transferred the Marxist analysis of class to gender. The goal is the same: the “patriarchy” (white men, capitalism, class) is the source of all evil and must be destroyed (“transformed”). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed “oppressed” (gays, certain favored minorities) must be handed position and power.


Why have straights passively endured this attack?

 1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity by asserting their victim status. Guilt, whether founded or not, is a very potent weapon. Straights can’t even defend their own sexuality for fear of accusations of “homophobia” and “sexism.” These days anyone who does not want to be gay is homophobic. 


(Current Toys R Us Ad in Sweden)

2) Typical Marxists, they practiced deceit successfully. They attracted widespread support by pretending to champion women when in fact they always had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians and media are in massive denial because they have empowered these radicals and even put them in charge of educating the young. The situation is comparable to the liberal refusal in the 1940’s and 1950’s to admit the government was riddled with Soviet Spies.

Many public schools virtually “break the ice” for gays. For example, the Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces 12-year-old children to oral and anal sex. Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary Teacher’s Federation said the union is “trying to promote a more positive [homosexual] environment in schools.” (National Post, Aug.16) This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by reading books like “Aasha’s Moms” and “Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads.”

On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo. Our children’s textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that men and women might be different, live in traditional families, or behave in “stereotypical” ways. 

As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists like D.H. Lawrence, who portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I was accused of “sexual harassment” by feminist activists and lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now defined as anything that makes a feminist uncomfortable.)


As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because homosexuals may be “uncomfortable.” This has led to the demoralization of society. We cannot celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine. We do not celebrate heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers us. This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution. It used to be ‘live and let live.’ Now gay and feminist activists will not let us live.


In a recent episode of the TV show Friends, Ross and Rachel are in a sports car. Rachel avoids paying a speeding fine by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the steering wheel and is stopped for driving too slowly. Well, if Rachel can do it, so can he. Ross tries to flirt with the male cop. I found Ross’ behavior demeaning and embarrassing. The message is that we can all go both ways — even the cop. This is the reality behind the gay activist demand for “equality”. It isn’t enough to tolerate them, we must become them. It doesn’t matter if we are comfortable, as long as they are.

There was more on the same Friends episode. Chandler’s father apparently is a drag queen. (Hypocritically, “he” is played by Kathleen Turner.) Chandler and Monica attend a drag performance by his father. Chandler reveals that he and Monica are getting married soon. There is awkwardness because dad wasn’t invited. But don’t despair. Chandler invites him to the wedding and we all enjoy a liberal “feel good” moment.

This situation would be deeply humiliating to any male who honors his own masculinity. We model ourselves on our fathers. Marriage is a heterosexual sacrament. A drag queen represents everything the son has rejected. But heterosexual values don’t matter as long as drag queens are made comfortable. It’s a wonder Chandler isn’t gay himself. Stay tuned.

Homosexual behavior makes straights uncomfortable. Most men find the sight of two men kissing deeply repulsive. Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of straight children by gays denies their differences and distorts development. Gay marriages are different from hetero marriages and should have a different status. The gay demand for “equality” deliberately distorts our perceptions of ourselves. It implies the gay experience is the same as ours. It is not. As Katz says, the “secret” purpose is to “do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division.”


In conclusion, the homosexual model does not fit heterosexuals. It’s time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality are in fierce competition. There can only be one model. The most important domestic issue of the dawning 21st Century is:

Will ours be a heterosexual society that tolerates a 4% gay minority?

Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a 96% straight majority? History is full of examples of minorities that have persecuted majorities. Take Communism for example.

If straights don’t establish the norms, gay activists will. 


Related – Gays Acknowledge their Lifestyle is Toxic

——————- Charles Socarides MD   – How America Went Gay 

Source Article from