As Public Demands Answers, Autopsy Reveals Las Vegas Shooter Died 1 Day AFTER Suicide


Las Vegas – As Americans search for answers to the questions surrounding reports of a mass shooting at a high school in Florida, the alarming autopsy results from a mass shooting in Las Vegas, which show that the suspected gunman died more than 12 hours after he reportedly committed suicide, are being ignored.

While the official timeline of the Las Vegas shooting has changed multiple times, one thing has remained the same—the claim that after opening fire out of the window of his room on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel, Stephen Paddock shot and killed himself at some point between 10:15 p.m. and 11:20 p.m. on Oct. 1, 2017.

However, the autopsy report released by the Clark County Coroner claimed that Paddock actually died at 12 p.m. on Oct. 2, 2017.


The autopsy was conducted on Oct. 6, 2017, by a team of detectives who claimed Paddock weighed 224 lbs. and was 6 feet tall. According to the report, he was wearing a brown long-sleeve shirt and black pants, which match the outfit worn in photos released from the hotel room that showed what was purported to be Paddock’s dead body after the shooting.

However, while initial photos of Stephen Paddock appeared to show that he had the number “13” tattooed on his neck, the photos of the dead man in the hotel room showed that his neck was clean, and the autopsy report’s external examination claimed that, “the neck is unremarkable.

The report confirmed that Paddock died as a result of a gunshot entering his mouth, and he was found with a bullet lodged in his brain, in between his occipital dura and occipital skull.

CAUSE OF DEATH: This 64-year-old man, Stephen Craig Paddock, died of an intraoral gunshot wound of the head,” the autopsy report concluded. “MANNER OF DEATH: Suicide.”

While the mainstream media focused on the fact that the autopsy determined Paddock was overweight and he had anti-anxiety drugs in his system—which was public knowledge within days of the shooting—the claim that Paddock died more than 12 hours after police claimed he committed suicide should raise some serious red flags.

In an updated timeline last month, the Los Angeles Times released what it referred to as “The most comprehensive look yet at how the Las Vegas concert massacre unfolded.” It was based on an 81-page investigative report from the Las Vegas Police, claiming that Paddock had died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound by the time officers entered his room at 11:20 p.m.

10:12 p.m.: Two armed Mandalay Bay security officers arrive on the 32nd floor, and the police and security officers on the 31st floor realize that the shooting is coming from one floor above them.

10:15 p.m.: Paddock fires his final shots at concertgoers.

10:16 p.m.: The two police officers on the 31st floor enter the stairwell outside the 32nd floor hallway but do not confront Paddock.

10:57 p.m.: Police breach the sealed 32nd-floor stairwell doorway.

11:20 p.m.: Police use explosives to blow open Paddock’s door, and they discover him dead.

11:26 p.m.: Police breach the interior door to Paddock’s second room, where a police officer accidentally fires three rounds into the room.

When rumors begin to spread suggesting that Paddock may have shot himself after police entered his hotel room, Sgt. Jerry MacDonald insisted, “He absolutely killed himself before anyone got into the room.”

However, while there have been a number of significant changes to the timeline of the shooting, none of them have suggested the possibility of Paddock’s death occurring the next day, hours after his name was released as the only suspect in the massacre.

As The Free Thought Project has reported, the first reports of gunfire happened at 10:08 p.m. on Oct. 1, and Paddock’s name was then released publicly at 3:30 a.m. on Oct. 2, with the claim that he committed suicide before police entered his hotel room.

It should also be noted that Paddock’s girlfriend, Marilou Danley, who was reportedly visiting family in the Philippines at the time, set her Facebook account to private at 12:38 a.m. and then deleted it entirely at 2:46 a.m.—nearly one hour before Paddock’s name was publicly released as the suspect in the shooting.

The Clark County Coroner’s Office fought the release of the autopsy report, choosing to pay more than $32,000 in legal fees instead. Now it is clear that the revelation that Stephen Paddock actually died at 12 p.m. on Oct. 2, 2017, may have been what they were trying to hide, because it calls the validity of every police officer and FBI agent involved in the investigation into question, and it opens a new host of questions about how the massacre unfolded.

Source Article from

Autopsy finds gunman who killed 58 people in Las Vegas took anti-anxiety drug

(Reuters) – The Las Vegas gunman who killed 58 people and himself in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history was found to have had anti-anxiety medication in his system, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported, citing a newly obtained autopsy report.

The autopsy also confirmed that the gunman, Stephen Paddock, a 64-year-old retired real estate investor and high-stakes gambler, died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head, the newspaper said.

The Clark County Coroner’s Office declined to immediately respond to a request from Reuters seeking a copy of the report, which the Review-Journal said it obtained after a judge ordered the medical examiner to release it last week to news organizations.

Paddock strafed a crowd of outdoor concertgoers with rapid-fire gunshots from his 32nd-floor suite at the Mandalay Bay hotel the night of Oct. 1 before police stormed his room to find him dead amid a large cache of high-powered weapons and ammunition.

Authorities said in the immediate aftermath of the rampage that the gunman had fatally shot himself but left no suicide note. No motive for the massacre, which also left several hundred people injured, has ever been established.

There was nothing in the Review-Journal’s story on Friday to suggest that the autopsy records shed any additional light on what may have driven Paddock to carry out the bloodiest U.S. shooting spree on record.

It said that the Clark County coroner, John Fudenberg, had found anti-anxiety medication in Paddock’s system, but the Review-Journal did not make clear whether further details of that finding were disclosed in the new autopsy report.

The newspaper reported several days after the killings that a local doctor had prescribed Paddock the drug diazepam, known by the brand name Valium, which is used for treating anxiety and alcohol withdrawal symptoms.

The Review-Journal also has reported that Fudenberg sent a sample of Paddock’s brain tissue to Stanford University School of Medicine in October for a neuropathological examination to look for signs of possible disorders that might have explained Paddock’s violent behavior.

(Reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

Source Article from

Autopsy Finds Gunman Who Killed 58 People in Las Vegas was taking Anti-Anxiety Psychiatric Drugs

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,872 other followers

Source Article from

Chief Pathologist Resigns to Expose Sheriff for Falsifying Autopsy Reports to Protect Killer Cops


San Joaquin, California – The resignation of a chief autopsy doctor has raised questions as he is now claiming that he chose to resign because he no longer wanted to stand by and watch the sheriff override his findings from death investigations, in order to protect law enforcement.

Former Chief Forensic Pathologist, Dr. Bennet Omalu, claimed that when he was conducting autopsies on individuals who were killed by police officers, Sheriff-Coroner Steve Moore attempted to influence his medical findings, according to a report from KQED News.

Based on a series of documents that include memos from Omalu, the report claims the doctor said some of the most alarming death investigations Moore tried to override were those of people who “died in the custody of law enforcement officers who used Tasers or other types of force.”

“The sheriff was using his political office as the coroner to protect police officers whenever someone died while in custody or during arrest. I had thought that this was initially an anomaly, but now, especially beginning in 2016, it has become routine practice.”

The resignations of both Dr. Omalu and his colleague, Dr. Susan Parson, come months after they began documenting Moore’s behavior in March. Their complaints against the sheriff include accusations that he routinely changed the labels on “homicides” to “accidents,” and he would delay the written reports pathologists needed from sheriff’s investigators in order to complete their cases for months.

The doctors also claim that on several occasions, when overseeing coroner operations, Moore would order technicians to cut the hands off bodies, without the knowledge, consent or supervision of the physicians.”

A report from the Sacramento Bee noted that according to the doctors, Moore’s staff “ordered the hands be cut off of at least five corpses this year to be sent to a forensics lab to identify the deceased.”  While the sheriff claimed that the purpose was for identification, the doctors allege that “in some instances, the victims’ identity was already known and in others, police failed to attempt to identify the dead by investigative means.”

Sheriff Steve Moore has always made calculated attempts to control me as a physician and influence my professional judgement,” Omalu wrote, noting that while he became the county’s chief forensic pathologist in 2007, the treatment has gotten worse over the last two years.

As the report from KQED noted, there were a number of deaths documents by Dr. Omalu that called Moore’s conduct into question. One of the cases occurred when Daniel Humphreys died in 2008. Initial reports claimed that the father of two young children was fleeing from police on his motorcycle when he hit a median in the freeway and died. Officers admitted that they shocked Humphreys with a Taser once or twice.

However, Omalu noted that when he went to check the automatic computer records of how many times the Taser was fired, he was told the record did not exist. It wasn’t until two years later that a deputy district attorney let him see the Taser report, which revealed that police shocked Humphreys with a Taser 31 times.

After viewing the Taser report, Omalu changed the cause of Humphreys’ death from “accident” from a head injury, to “homicide by electrocution.

Moore released a statement on the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office Facebook page, denying the allegations that he interfered with the results of the death investigations conducted by Dr. Omalu and Dr. Susan Parson.

“There have been questions recently about whether I have interfered with forensic investigations. That has never happened. I would never try to control, influence, or change the opinions of Dr. Omalu or any pathologist working on a case, but I still have the responsibility of making the final determination.”

However, Omalu is not backing down. In addition to resigning from his position, he is attempting to shed light on the ongoing problems within the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department, which has found a way to ensure that officers who murder innocent citizens will not face consequences.

“The Sheriff does whatever he feels like doing as the coroner, in total disregard of bioethics, standards of practice of medicine and the generally accepted principles of medicine,” Dr. Omalu wrote.

Source Article from

Autopsy Doctors Say Sheriff Overrode Death Findings to Protect Law Enforcement

Two San Joaquin County forensic pathologists have accused the sheriff of meddling in death investigations in order to protect officers of the law. Documents released Monday by a pathologist who announced her resignation last week raise serious questions about the integrity of investigations of people who died in the custody of law enforcement officers who used Tasers or other types of force.

Dr. Susan Parson, who performs autopsies for the county, accused Sheriff-Coroner Steve Moore of interfering with her work, and sent copies of emails, notes and other correspondence to the district attorney and the Board of Supervisors documenting her claims.

‘The sheriff was using his political office as the coroner to protect police officers whenever someone died while in custody or during arrest. … I had thought that this was initially an anomaly, but now, especially beginning in 2016, it has become routine practice.’

The documents, obtained by KQED, also include correspondence and memos written by the county’s chief forensic pathologist, Dr. Bennet Omalu.

The Nigerian-born neuropathologist rose to national prominence in 2005 after he published his discovery of a degenerative brain disease in football players he named chronic traumatic encephalopathy or CTE. His discovery was documented in the 2015 film “Concussion,” starring Will Smith.

San Joaquin County hired Omalu in 2007 to raise the standards of death investigations. But in a memo Omalu wrote on Aug. 22, 2017, he indicated it was a losing prospect.

“I have always believed that the longer I spent in the office, the better the office would become,” Omalu wrote. “I was wrong.”

In March 2017, Omalu and Parson began documenting incidents they believe show wrongdoing by Sheriff Moore. The two doctors allege the sheriff labeled certain deaths as “accidents” rather than “homicides” to shield from prosecution law enforcement officers who were involved.

Pages: 1 2

If you haven’t already, be sure to like our Filming Cops Page on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Please visit our sister site Smokers ONLY


(function(d) {
var params =
id: “3c7936d6-71e2-4cba-afb4-95ed4171941f”,
d: “ZmlsbWluZ2NvcHMuY29t”,
wid: “365543”,
cb: (new Date()).getTime()

var qs=[];
for(var key in params) qs.push(key+’=’+encodeURIComponent(params[key]));
var s = d.createElement(‘script’);s.type=’text/javascript’;s.async=true;
var p = ‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https’ : ‘http’;
s.src = p + “://” + qs.join(‘&’);

Filming Cops

  • This bastard needs to be voted out of office by the people of San Joaquin County. I say this because you, and I, both know that the state AG will never bring charges against this douche who calls himself a member of law enforcement. Can you say recalll…

Source Article from

Too Many Drug Victims to Autopsy

Too Many Drug Victims to Autopsy

September 27th, 2017

Via: Daily Mail:

The number of people dying from opioid overdoses is skyrocketing so quickly that medical examiners’ offices across the country cannot autopsy them all.

These offices are being forced to neglect suspected opioid overdose victims by giving them a watered-down version of an autopsy that provides a minimal amount of information on their death.

In doing so, they risk missing an alternative cause of death and incorrectly calculating the number of opioid overdose victims they have seen. This, in turn, could affect the way government resources dedicated to the crisis are allocated.

But if they examine every suspected victim, they could lose their National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) accreditation, which would make them appear unreliable in court.

Because of the issue, these offices are having to prioritize the types of cases they are tasked with, predicting that the worst of the opioid crisis has not even come yet.

And more and more they are choosing to focus on homicides rather than opioid overdoses, which have become predictable in recent years as they have overtaken gun violence, car crashes and HIV as a leading cause of death.




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from

Family declines autopsy for jewish student released by North Korea

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,729 other followers

Source Article from

Exposed… ‘Bullet Fragment’ Skull X-Ray of John F Kenndy Autopsy was Faked


A bullet
fragment depicted in an autopsy X-ray used to implicate Lee Harvey
Oswald in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy recently has
been found to be a faked artifact superimposed on the X-ray sometime
after JFK’s autopsy.
~ Jim Marrs – Videos

Such tampering with official evidence
could not have been accomplished without the knowledge of high-level
federal officials and adds considerable weight to the claims of
government cover-up in that tragic event.

The X-ray fabrication was the topic of a 2015 paper by Dr. David Dr. Mantik published in issue three of Medical Research Archives,
an international scientific peer-reviewed journal publishing articles
in all disciplines of medicine, with a focus on new research.

Oswald, an ex-Marine who had attempted to
defect to Russia in 1959, was identified in 1964 by President Lyndon B.
Johnson’s handpicked commission headed by Supreme Court Justice Earl
Warren as the lone assassin of President Kennedy.

The Warren Commission
concluded that Oswald had used a 6.5 mm Italian WWII carbine to shoot
Kennedy from the sixth-floor of a book depository building in downtown
Dallas on November 22, 1963.

In 1968, amid controversy over the
commission’s conclusion, the Justice Department selected four prominent
medical experts to review the JFK autopsy evidence. This became known as
the Clark Panel, named after then-Atty. General Ramsey Clark.

Although, the panels’ report was delayed
until after the New Orleans JFK conspiracy trial led by Dist. Atty. Jim
Garrison, in 1969 it concluded that the Warren Commission had been
correct in its major findings though some issues remained in question,
such as the location of the president’s head wound.

Interestingly, it was this Clark Panel
report that first mentioned a fragment said to be from a 6.5 mm bullet
found in the anterior-posterior (AP) X-ray of Kennedy’s skull.

The image
of this fragment became a critical piece of evidence, although it was
not mentioned anywhere in the 26-volumes of the Warren Commission nor in
the original autopsy report.


The most curious mystery in the history of radiology

The fragment in question has been
described as “the most curious – and unsolved – mystery in the history
of diagnostic radiology.”

Larry Sturdivan, a ballistics consultant
to the House Select Commission on Assassinations (HSCA), created by
Congress in 1976 in the midst of continuing controversy over Kennedy’s
death, studied this fragment and concluded the object could not be metal
and that he had never seen the cross-section of a bullet deposited in
such an odd fashion on a skull X-ray.

“I’m not sure just what that 6.5
mm fragment is,” reported Sturdivan. “One thing I’m sure it is NOT is a
cross-section from the interior of a bullet.

I have seen literally
thousands of bullets, deformed and un-deformed, after penetrating tissue
and tissue simulants.

Some were bent, some torn in two or more pieces,
but to have a cross-section sheared out is physically impossible. That
fragment has a lot of mystery associated with it.”

Mystery indeed, as the HSCA had relied on
the authenticity of this fragment as key evidence in connecting the 6.5
mm bullet piece to Lee Harvey Oswald.

Furthermore, the Assassination Records
Review Board (ARRB), formed by Congress in 1994 to study all government
documents relating to the assassination, the three JFK autopsy doctors
testified under oath that they had never seen such a fragment during the


Artifact was added to the X-ray with a double exposure

The mystery deepened in 2015 with the
work of Dr. David Mantik, a California physician, who along with Dr.
Cyril Wecht, a former president of the American Academy of Forensic
Science, had studied the JFK X-rays and other material for nine days at
the National Archives.

“Hundreds of optical density measurements were
made from the (supposed) original skull X-rays, with a specific focus on
the 6.5 mm object that lies within JFK’s right orbit on the AP skull
X-ray,” said Dr. Mantik.

After careful study, Dr. Mantik saw the
fragment was strangely transparent. He realized this artifact had been
added to the JFK X-ray in the darkroom. He explained it was accomplished
by means of a double exposure of a 6.5 mm aperture, such as a 6.5 mm
hole in a piece of cardboard.

“[T]he first step was to imprint the
image from the original X-ray onto a duplicate film (via a light box in
the dark room). The second step was another exposure that imprinted the
6.5 mm image onto the duplicate film (i.e., superimposing it over the
image of the original X-ray).

This duplicate film was then developed to
yield the image [as it appears in the X-ray].

This process inevitably
produces a phantom effect, whereby objects (e.g., bullet fragments in
this case) on the original film are seen separately [emphasis in
the original]from the superimposed 6.5 mm image.

On JFK’s AP skull
X-ray, the original metal fragment (that lay at the back of the skull)
can be seen separately through the 6.5 mm image.”

Dr. Mantik added that the double exposure
was so unprofessional it produced a significant overexposure of the 6.5
mm image. He even found one tiny particle of bullet metal inside the
6.5 mm object, indicating the use of a well-known Hollywood technique
using photographic double exposure.

Using studies of optical density, which
differentiates the lightness or darkness of specific points on X-ray
film, Dr. Mantik was able to determine that some time before the 1968
Clark Panel, someone in a darkroom had superimposed the fake bullet
fragment onto Kennedy’s X-ray.

Following his extensive study of this
issue, Dr. Mantik concluded, “This mysterious 6.5 mm image was
(secretly) added to the original X- ray via a second exposure.

alteration of the AP X-ray was likely completed shortly after the
autopsy. Its proximate purpose was to implicate Lee Harvey Oswald and
his supposed 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano carbine, to the exclusion of any
other suspect, and thereby to rule out a possible conspiracy.”

Dr.Mantik said while the purpose of the
X-ray alteration could only have been to “implicate the 6.5 mm
Mannlicher-Carcano carbine (supposedly owned by Oswald) in the

Its ultimate purpose, however, awaits resolution by
professional historians, who have been remarkably reticent about
accepting responsibility for their task.”


Government hospital likely carried out the X-ray fraud

In his paper, Dr. Mantik identified Dr.
John H. Ebersole, the assistant chief radiologist at Bethesda Naval
Hospital, as the one person who had the means and opportunity to devise
the X-ray forgery.

Dr. Ebersole, aided by X-ray technicians Jerrol
Custer and Edward Reed, took the X-rays of Kennedy’s head the night of
the Autopsy. At that time no one saw any evidence of a bullet in the

Custer said the next day, contrary to protocol, he burned the
page in the duty log concerning the taking of Kennedy’s X-rays on the
order of Dr. Ebersole.

Custer also recalled that after the
autopsy he was instructed by Dr. Ebersole to make X-rays of bullet
fragments taped onto skull X-rays. However, no such X-rays were ever
made public. Mantik opined that probably it was decided “alteration was
easier to perform in the darkroom via a double exposure.”

Dr. Mantik also found that several weeks
after the assassination, Dr. Ebersole was called to the Johnson White
House ostensibly to assist in preparing a bust of Kennedy.

“More likely,
in my opinion, the reason for his summons to the White House was to see
how he would react to the now-altered X-rays,” said Dr. Mantik.

on this episode then, the alteration must have occurred within several
weeks (quite possibly immediately) after the assassination.”

He added that such actions might “explain
why the radiologist, Dr. Ebersole, refused to discuss this artifact
with me. After all, he was the single individual most likely to possess
the required expertise and creativity to perform X–ray alteration.”

Ebersole died in 1993, shortly after his conversation with Dr. Mantik.



The vertical arrow on the X-ray, left, of
the anterior-posterior (AP) right side of Kennedy’s skull previously
has been identified as a fragment of a 6.5 mm carbine bullet and used to
link the wound to the rifle of Lee Harvey Oswald.

Dr. David W. Mantik,
after arduous study, found this evidence was a fabrication superimposed
on the X-ray sometime after Kennedy’s autopsy.

Also shown, at right, is
an altered X-ray that Mantik prepared to demonstrate how objects could
be superimposed on X-rays using techniques available in 1963.


“These are fake X-rays.”

In recent years, Custer has even
questioned the validity of the X-rays themselves. In 1992, after
studying the JFK X-rays in the National Archives, Custer declared,
“These are fake X-rays.”

Dr. Mantik’s conclusions have been
supported by others, including Dr, Michael Chesser, an Arkansas
neurologist, who noted,

“I viewed the original autopsy skull X-rays at
the archives this year [2015] and I confirmed his optical density
readings of the lateral skull film, which support his conclusion that
there was manipulation.

Hopefully there will come a time when better
copies of the autopsy x-rays and photographs will be made available for
review by a wider audience and the evidence will speak for itself. I
applaud Dr. David Mantik for his courage in reporting the truth.”

Douglas P. Horne, the ARRB’s chief
analyst for military records including the Bethesda autopsy,

“The fact that Dr. Mantik’s scientific paper on the forgery
indicators present in the A-P skull x-ray has survived the rigorous
gauntlet of scientific peer review is further indication that his
arguments about the three surviving JFK skull x-rays are sound, and
worthy of the most serious consideration.

[I]t is no longer possible
for others who are not radiologists, or MDs (like he is), or who do not
hold PhDs in physics (like he does), to dismiss his work as that of a
mere ‘enthusiast.'”

“[I]n the mid-1990s, I recognized the
scientific validity of his pioneering work on the JFK skull X-rays, and
at my recommendation he was requested by Jeremy Gunn, the General
Counsel for the ARRB, to prepare questions for the three JFK autopsy

The answers the three JFK pathologists provided to his
questions, under oath, corroborated Mantik’s assertions that the three
skull x-rays in the official collection are indeed copy films (not
originals), and are altered images,” said Horne.

He added,

“The problem with the medical
evidence has always been missing and tainted evidence – the destruction
of some evidence, and the alteration of much of the evidence that
remains in the record today – [and] is representative of the fact that
the U.S. government engaged in a massive cover-up of the way in which
JFK died, and therefore intentionally engaged in selling the American
people a false bill of goods in regard to how our government changed
hands in November of 1963.”







September 8, 2015 –


Source Article from