Craig Thomson asks public to help fund legal defence


April 30, 2013 17:20:45

Former Labor MP Craig Thomson has resorted to calling for public donations to fund his legal battle.

Thomson has been charged with 154 counts of fraud over accusations he used funds from the Health Services Union (HSU) to pay for prostitutes, travel and expensive meals, during his time as the HSU’s national secretary between 2002 and 2007.

Thomson has strenuously denied the accusations and is fighting them in court.

He would not say how much his legal bill is, but has said it is a “considerable amount of money”, adding that legal battles are a “costly business”.

Thomson said two of his supporters have set up a fund calling for public donations to help pay for his legal defence.

“I’m just very grateful that they’ve taken it upon themselves to set up a defence fund. The signatures of the people who have put this fund together are a couple of guys I actually haven’t met,’ he told the ABC’s Simon Cullen.

On the fund’s website, Thomson states that: ‘I know that like me, a great majority of people believe in the rights of all Australians to defend themselves in a court of law. To help me defend myself against these wrongful charges, your donations are greatly appreciated’.

He says that without public donations he will run out of money to pay for his legal representation.

“It’s a real danger,” he said.

“I mean these sorts of cases cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’m not someone who has hundreds of thousands of dollars in my bank account at all.

“Without the sort of assistance that my supporters are looking at doing through a legal defence fund, I really do face the prospect at some stage of having to self-represent.”

Questions have been raised in the past about whether the ALP has paid for Thomson’s defence but the former Labor MP says that is not the case.

“Despite some people’s conspiracy theories I’ve always said at the end of the day I pay my legal fees,” he said.

Thomson is fighting both a criminal and civil case over the allegations.

The civil case, launched by Fair Work Australia, was largely stayed by a Federal Court judge last week – a finding Thomson says was a relief.

“Just from a personal economic point of view [it was] a very good result, let alone the fact that it’s taken those issues off the table,” he said.

Thomson now sits on the crossbench as an independent MP after his membership of the Labor party was suspended in the wake of the allegations.


First posted

April 30, 2013 17:19:12

Source Article from

Catholic Church paid $30m to child abuse victims


April 30, 2013 19:56:26

The insurers of the Catholic Church say they have paid out $30 million to about 600 victims of child sexual abuse in Victoria.

The church’s insurance arm, Catholic Church Insurance (CCI), has appeared before the Victorian inquiry into child sexual abuse.

The payments relate to abuses committed mainly in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s.

A submission by the insurance group’s chief executive officer, Peter Rush, states the CCI paid compensation and the cost of counselling.

The submission also says CCI has never provided cover to any person who has committed an act of sexual abuse of a child, in either a civil or criminal context.

Earlier, the lawyer who ran the Catholic Church’s complaints system in Melbourne denied allegations he interfered in a police investigation into child sexual assault.

In evidence to the inquiry last year, police alleged the independent commissioner of the Church’s Melbourne Response, Peter O’Callaghan, tipped off a member of the clergy who was under investigation.

Mr O’Callaghan has been the lawyer in charge of the complaints system since it was set up in 1996.

At the inquiry Mr O’Callaghan defended his conduct and said the police evidence was seriously misconceived.

He told the inquiry the police submission was a farce.

“We submit that the police submission and action is in many aspects plainly wrong and seriously misconceived,” he said.

He also rejected the police submission suggesting the church never referred complaints to police.

“The fact is that I’ve facilitated the referral of complaints by speaking to victims, telling them of their right to report their complaint to the police and encouraging them to exercise the right,” he said.

We submit that the police submission and action is in many aspects plainly wrong and seriously misconceived.

Mr O’Callaghan’s independence was also questioned.

He is paid by the church but says he operates independently.

Mr O’Callaghan was asked by committee chairwoman Georgie Crozier whether officials and lawyers for the Archdiocese of Melbourne had input into his submission to the inquiry.

“Did you and your instructing solicitor and business manager assist you in putting these documents together?” the chairwoman asked.

Mr O’Callaghan replied: “Yes, certainly. But the document is mine.”


First posted

April 30, 2013 17:11:29

Source Article from

Regarding Mark Glenn of The Ugly Truth (John Friend’s Opinion Of The Clown On The Block)

As many of you know, Mark Glenn of The Ugly Truth was the first person to interview me back in late 2011.  Mark has featured many of my blog articles on The Ugly Truth, and has generally been supportive of my work in the past.  I once considered him to a righteous ally in our common struggle to expose and resist Jewish tyranny, but after his recent actions and statements, I no longer view him as a professional, honorable truth-teller he presents himself as.



Source Article from

Should I “Hate” The Jew or Just The Negro?

The personable, “conservative” Youtuber, RAMZPAUL, recently got back from the American Renaissance conference in Tennessee and put out a video telling of his experiences. He happily reports to have bonded with the few Jews who attended and bragged about accepting an invitation to do his kind of “schtick” at one of their ZIONIST JEW SPECIFIC confabs in New York. Hmmm.*

ONE OF THE things you probably noticed on the Internet, is that pretty much all of the so-called “truther” sites distinguish between doing things on NWO government-illuminati-black pope conspiracy stuff (like Alex Jones), commies or maybe black-on-White crime. But most can’t bring themselves to look at the whole puzzle, so hamstrung are they over PC and race issues. Often, they can be seen dancing carefully up to the line and jumping back, hopefully before anyone thinks they are a Nazi, KKK man, hater, or the all inclusive, “White supremacist.”

I got news for these people: You’re still going to get called that, regardless of how nice you are about it. You should have noticed this by now.




Source Article from

Calling for the Deportation of Mark Glenn

Posted on April 18, 2013 by Andrew Anglin

This image is photoshopped.

This image is photoshopped.

Recently, there has been quite a bit of emotionally-charged drama coming from an individual named Mark Glenn, a man of Arabian descent who has been awarded legal status in the nation built by my ancestors as part of the Jewish program of genocide against the White race.  The trouble started when Mike Delaney made a video addressing the fact that Glenn is lying to his supporters about the costs involved in running his website.




Source Article from

Who Is Mark Glenn?

ed note-  LMAO! He cant even get along around the Rense circles. Typical Jewish Behavior. I would REALLY like to talk to anyone who supports this clown because it will be a sure fire way expose the sick, gullible, and twisted the basement trolls who bother listening to his tripe.



Who Is Mark Glenn?
Name withheld by request

Jeff –

Reading about the attacks on your reputation made me wonder who is this Mark Glenn since I really didn’t know much about him until all these attacks. In an effort to find out more outside his web site, I began doing on line research.

If you want to use this research, please don’t use my name as I don’t want to be Mark Glenn’s next target of vicious slander simply for doing research. I have provided the links so anyone can follow up if they want. It seems to me, Mark Glenn has made a career out of attacking people.

This is a column written by Mark Glenn in 2006: Judaism is Nobody’s Friend. There is a post on Dr. Henry Makow’s site from Mark Glenn were he says they are friends. Here are a few paragraphs from Mark Glenn’s column:

Judaism is Nobody’s Friend

“Let’s face it the only reason we are allowed (not to mention willing) to talk about it these days is because it begins with the letter z, and not the letter j,. That is the single barrier demarcating the two itemsa simple issue of letters and pronunciation, despite the fact that they are basically the same animal. Stay within that safe z, zone and all will be relatively fine. You will be championed as a friend of humanity and a warrior for the truth. Venture into that other area though and bring up that dreaded j, word and suddenly the same open-minded, people who a moment before were erecting a monument in your honor start to loosen their collars and clear their throats uncomfortably.”

I take the z to be zionism and j to be jewish, which he says are the same aminal.

He concludes his column with:

“Judaism is nobody’s friend, and the sooner that the rest of usJew and non-Jew alikecome to realize this, the better off we will be. Get rid of it. It is a cancer. Cut is out and throw it away, as Jesus instructed that we do. It has never and will never be of any benefit to mankind. We cannot live in any kind of peaceful co-existence, with it. It is a declaration of war, and as long as it exists out there, mankind will never have peace.

Quite a shocking read.

The web site below shows a a multi year shouting match between Mark Glenn and the owner of site site:


I took the time to slowly read the entire first page. Have to digest all this stuff carefully because a person’s reputation should not be played with, although Mark Glenn has made a great effort at shooting his in the wrong direction.

The comments at the link above are from 2007; it states Mark Glenn has six children back then:

“Mark Glenn is a former high school teacher with five years of experience, having taught history, Latin, Italian, French, and Spanish.”

Since he has so many children to feed and raise, I believe the number now is nine, I wonder why he no longer teaches school as his career and a steady paycheck? In fact, because I know virtually nothing about him, I wonder where his income comes from? Does a talk show host on the Internet with a small listening audience really make the kind of money one would need to support such a big family?

The ‘Atheist Jew’ has the exchange between him and Mark Glenn by time line. One thing that caught my attention is:

“Your letter got one retard to email me other than yourself. And no one left any comments on my blog. I get 300 hits a day on my blog, plus countless others that read it on aggregate sites. If you read the comments on my site regarding the child abuse you have performed on your daughter, you will see what normal human beings think of you. You are vermin. And you will represent the lunatic fringe.”

And, this additional comment from the owner of the blog (Goldstein) to Glenn:

“I feel sorry for your children. You should leave them and give them a chance. You’ve already polluted your poor daughter and stolen her childhood.”

Glenn’s response:

“And as far as child abuse, well, you were raised Jewish, so I suppose you would understand something about that, now wouldn’t you?”

Does this mean Mark Glenn believes Jews are child abusers by birth?

Anyway, that led me to do more searching.

The web site below has your name listed as a tin foil person, David Duke as a prison bitch and so on; typical scorched earth stuff on the Internet. However, what caught my eye is below:

2008: As Predicted, Mark Glenn Will Only Get Nuttier As Years Go By

If you scroll down to the comments section, you’ll find this:

“It’s also interesting that Glenn lives 20 minutes north of the Former Aryan nations compound in Hayden Lake. Has anyone done research on whether he was a part of Butler’s bunch?”

This sure has an eerie resemblance to the Hal Turner episode.

I kept researching and found these posts:

That led me to hit on the link for Mark Glenn’s daughter, which took me here:

Anti-Semitism by a 14-year old: like father like daughter

I hit on another link in that post and it took me here:


After the revolting task of reading that post filled with more vile language, I clicked on another link. This took me to a letter penned by Glenn’s daughter to Mr. Goldstein who is the owner of Atheist Jew.

Settling the Score With the Goldsteins

Mark Glenn’s daughter does not distinguish between Zionism and all Jews in her letter. Children are a product of their environment and their upbringing. Where did this 14-year old learn from? Her father, Mark Glenn. After reading his daughter’s letter, it sort of ties in with the first link at the top: Judaism is Nobody’s Friend.

Mark Glenn’s daughter (at that time) was only 14 and wading into an adult world when she should be enjoying being a teen in high school.

I don’t think Mark Glenn should not have allowed his minor child to engage in blogging with Goldstein. And, as an adult, Goldstein who also should not be taking on children on his blog.

In my research, I also found this column by Mark Glenn:

Islamic Extremism May Save Western Civilization by Mark Glenn, April 18, 2003

All of this is quite distburing as well as his non-stop, unprovoked and clearly unfair attacks on your character.


Source Article from

Stop White Genocide — The Mantra

A classic on International Zionism and the Talmudic Jewish onslaught against humanity, The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed.

A book uncovering the full story of the Jewish takeover of Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution, Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina.

A thorough exposé of the Jewish nature and origins of Communism and the Soviet experiment, Behind Communism by Frank L. Britton.

A book which authenticates the infamous text ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’; Waters Flowing Eastward by Leslie Fry.

An interesting book on the ‘Holocaust’ swindle exposing the sacrosanct ‘Six Million’ holocaust© figure as a fraud, The First Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During And After World War One by Don Heddesheimer.

The Jewish plot for world domination, The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion.

Another book documenting the reality of Jewish-Bolshevism, The Rulers of Russia by Denis Fahey

One of the most important books of the 20th century, Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.

A book about Israel’s key role in 9/11 and other false flag terrorist attacks, Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed the World by Christopher Bollyn.

Source Article from

75 Watt Bulbs Now Illegal To Make Or Import In USA

(kplctv)  As 2012 becomes an afterthought, Americans can also add one other item to the past – the 75-watt incandescent light bulb.

As of Jan. 1, federal law dictates that 75-watt light bulbs can no longer be produced or imported in the United States. Retailers that still have them in stock can sell them until they run out.

By 2014, traditional 60- and 40-watt bulbs will also be phased out.

The reason for the Thomas Edison invention’s demise is energy based.

“90 percent of the energy the bulb uses is wasted,” said Celia Kuperzmid-Lehrman of Consumer Reports. “What they replaced them with are much more energy-efficient bulbs.”

Kuperzmid-Lehrman stated that the replacements for the incandescent bulb are also as bright and will save consumers more money over time.

Most screw-in bulbs must use at least 27 percent less energy by 2014.

The remaining options for consumers are Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs) and Light-Emitting Diode bulbs (LEDs).

While a reason for consumer resistance to LED bulbs is cost, prices for are dropping.

When replacing a bulb, experts at Consumer Reports suggest choosing bulbs the same size or smaller to be sure it fits the fixture. Specialized fixtures, such as dimmers, have specific bulbs for those needs, so check bulb packaging for specific details.


Source Article from

Ron Paul Release Statement On Fiscal Cliff



(Ron Paul)  Despite claims that the Administration and Congress saved America from the fiscal cliff with an early morning vote today, the fact is that government spending has already pushed Americans over the cliff.

Only serious reductions in federal spending will stop the cliff dive from ending in a crash landing, yet the events of this past month show that most elected officials remain committed to expanding the welfare-warfare state.

While there was much hand-wringing over the “draconian” cuts that would be imposed by sequestration, in fact sequestration does not cut spending at all. Under the sequestration plan, government spending will increase by 1.6 trillion over the next eight years. Congress calls this a cut because without sequestration spending will increase by 1.7 trillion over the same time frame. Either way it is an increase in spending.

Yet even these minuscule cuts in the “projected rate of spending” were too much for Washington politicians to bear. The last minute “deal” was the worst of both worlds: higher taxes on nearly all Americans now and a promise to revisit these modest reductions in spending growth two months down the road. We were here before, when in 2011 Republicans demanded these automatic modest decreases in government growth down the road in exchange for a massive increase in the debt ceiling. As the time drew closer, both parties clamored to avoid even these modest moves.

Make no mistake: the spending addiction is a bipartisan problem. It is generally believed that one party refuses to accept any reductions in military spending while the other party refuses to accept any serious reductions in domestic welfare programs. In fact, both parties support increases in both military and domestic welfare spending. The two parties may disagree on some details of what kind of military or domestic welfare spending they favor, but they do agree that they both need to increase. This is what is called “bipartisanship” in Washington.

While the media played up the drama of the down-to-the-wire negotiations, there was never any real chance that a deal would not be worked out. It was just drama. That is how Washington operates. As it happened, a small handful of Congressional and Administration leaders gathered in the dark of the night behind closed doors to hammer out a deal that would be shoved down the throats of Members whose constituents had been told repeatedly that the world would end if this miniscule decrease in the rate of government spending was allowed to go through.

While many on both sides express satisfaction that this deal only increases taxes on the “rich,” most Americans will see more of their paycheck going to Washington because of the deal. The Tax Policy Center has estimated that 77 percent of Americans would see higher taxes because of the elimination of the payroll tax cut.

The arguments against the automatic “cuts” in military spending were particularly dishonest. Hawks on both sides warned of doom and gloom if, as the plan called for, the defense budget would have returned to 2007 levels of spending! Does anybody really believe that our defense spending was woefully inadequate just five years ago? And since 2007 we have been told that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are winding down. According to the Congressional Budget Office, over the next eight years military spending would increase 20 percent without the sequester and would increase 18 percent with the sequester. And this is what is called a dangerous reduction in defense spending?

Ironically, some of the members who are most vocal against tax increases and in favor of cuts to domestic spending are the biggest opponents of cutting a penny from the Pentagon budget. Over and over we were told of the hundreds of thousands of jobs that would be lost should military spending be returned to 2007 levels. Is it really healthy to think of our defense budget as a jobs program? Many of these allegedly free-market members sound more Keynesian than Paul Krugman when they praise the economic “stimulus” created by militarism.

As Chris Preble of the Cato Institute wrote recently, “It’s easy to focus exclusively on the companies and individuals hurt by the cuts and forget that the taxed wealth that funded them is being employed elsewhere.”

While Congress ultimately bears responsibility for deficit spending, we must never forget that the Federal Reserve is the chief enabler of deficit spending. Without a central bank eager to monetize the debt, Congress would be unable to fund the welfare-warfare state without imposing unacceptable levels of taxation on the American people. Of course, the Federal Reserve’s policies do impose an “inflation” tax on the American people; however, since this tax is hidden Congress does not fear the same public backlash it would experience if it directly raised income taxes.

I have little hope that a majority of Congress and the President will change their ways and support real spending reductions unless forced to by an economic crisis or by a change in people’s attitudes toward government. Fortunately, increasing numbers of Americans are awakening to the dangers posed by the growth of the welfare-warfare state. Hopefully this movement will continue to grow and force the politicians to reverse course before government spending, taxing, and inflation destroys our economy entirely.




Source Article from