Giorgio Fidenato, head of the Italian Federated Farmers, feels strongly about the right to grow genetically modified organisms (GMOs), prompting him to plant Monsanto’s GM corn strain Mon810 amid much protest.
Fidenato took advantage of the European Union’s decision in September 2012 to deny Italy the right to stop cultivation of Mon810. It was the only GMO permitted in the country, but Italy required cultivators to have a government-issued permit for its growth.
In 2010, Fidenato had engaged in an act of civil disobedience and planted Mon810 without a permit. His applications had been repeatedly rejected. Greenpeace activists pulled up the plants before they could contaminate surrounding fields. Fidenato was fined 25,000 euro ($32,500) for the illegal cultivation. Greenpeace activists were fined 86,250 euro ($112,350) for trespassing on agricultural land.
He planted his field in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region with even more gusto this June, having the backing of the EU decision. On July 12, however, Italy took a hardline stance against Mon810.
The Italian government successfully signed a decree forbidding the cultivation of Mon810 in Italy for 18 months, during which time more permanent measures may be put in place. Italy will have to gain approval from the EU for a permanent ban, as Mon810 is sanctioned under EU law.
The decree makes special reference to the Friuli Venezia Giulia Mon810, stating that special attention must be focused there to prevent contamination of non-GM crops.
Italian Minister of Agriculture Nunzia De Girolamo said in a statement: “Our agriculture is based on biodiversity, on quality, and we must continue to aim for these without ventures that, even from the economic point of view, wouldn’t make us competitive.”
Much of Europe requires GM food be labeled as such, and the general consensus is that the market is meager for such products.
“Today’s decree is only the first element, the most urgent of a number of additional initiatives with which we will define a new framework in the field of cultivation of GMOs in our country,” the minister said.
A new study on Mon810 was also released July 12, suggesting negative impacts on biodiversity. The study has yet to be reviewed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
While the focus is on Fidenato’s field of Mon810, Fidenato wonders how many other GM crops are being grown in Italy under the radar.
“When I went to Spain in 2011 to buy the seeds, they didn’t look surprised about an Italian wanting to buy the seeds,” he told The Epoch Times.
TED is a powerful and paradigm shattering initiative that brands itself with the slogan “Ideas worth spreading.” At this point, we have probably all heard of TED and the short talks given by inspiring people from all around the world to audiences at different conferences. These talks can range in subject and have included science, politics, entrepreneurship, consciousness, cosmology, inventions and more. As TED’s popularity grew, TEDx talks sprung up around the globe which gave a less moderated voice to inspiring people. As a result, TED has been involved in controversy as they chose to censor various talks they deemed worthy of their censorship. The issue is, these talks are of great importance and TED’s decision to censor them reveals their interest in preserving their own brand while not getting in trouble with the ‘big wigs.’ Here are the talks TED felt were ‘Ideas not worth spreading.’
‘Rich People Don’t Create Jobs’ by Nick Hanauer
About two years ago, Ted censored Nick Hanauer’s talk called ‘Rich People Don’t Create Jobs.’ Billionaire Nick Hanauer (a venture capitalist from Seattle) gave the talk at a TED conference focusing mainly on income and inequality in America. Although the talk received a standing ovation from the audience, TED didn’t feel it was “An idea worth spreading” and refused to post it to their website. Regardless of the fact that TED has featured many presentations given by high-up politicians like Bill Clinton, David Cameron and Al Gore, this talk was somehow deemed too politically controversial and “explicitly partisan.”
According to Christopher Andersen, the curator of TED, “The talk tapped into a really important and timely issue, but it framed the issue in a way that was explicitly partisan. And it included a number of arguments that were unconvincing, even to those of us who supported his overall stance.”
The Science Delusion by Rupert Sheldrake
Rupert Sheldrake is a fascinating member of the scientific world. His TED talk named “The Science Delusion” was controversially censored by the TED community after being aired. Rupert shares that humanity has become stuck in turning science into another belief or dogma vs. allowing the method to be what it is. Rupert Sheldrake outlines 10 dogmas he has found to exist within mainstream science today. He states that when you look at each of these scientifically, you see that they are not actually true.
The War on Consciousness by Graham Hancock
TED also controversially a talk by Graham Hancock called ‘The War on Consciousness‘. Graham brings light to the war on consciousness that exists in our modern society, especially in the western world. Sharing his experience of overcoming a 24 year cannabis addiction using an ecodelic drug known as Ayahuasca, he makes the argument that modern society does not allow us to truly explore our consciousness by making various these psychedelics illegal. Most people are given pharmaceutical “band aids” to cope with issues that can be cured by exploring our consciousness.
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/8IvtQzHIgok/
Source Article from http://truththeory.com/2013/07/15/thoughts-from-within-woody-harrelson/
by Christina Sarich
The National Beekeeping organizations and the National Honey Bee Advisory Board have joined forces to protect bee keepers and the food supply in an appeal against the EPA for its approval of a highly toxic pesticide called Sulfoxaflor. This toxin has been classed a fourth generation neonicotinoid which scientists worldwide have linked to colony collapse disorder (CCD), resulting in the massive andwidespread death of so many bees. Even NASA has said that this particular pesticide is ‘highly toxic’ to bees and other pollinators. Dow Chemical Company, Inc. makes this chemical and currently sprays it on cotton. It is meant to be used on other crops soon.
The appeal was filed by the American Honey Producers Association, the National Honey Bee Advisory Board, the American Beekeeping Federation, The National Pollinator Defense Fund, and three beekeepers, Bret Adee, Jeff Anderson, and Thomas R. Smith. It is to be put before the U.S. Ninth Circuit for Appeals, and it requests changes to the labeling of Sulfoxaflor. If this appeal is supported it would help to acknowledge the affect fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides and other chemicals have on the world food supply, and hopefully garner new laws in the US. Earthjustice is the public law organization that supports the beekeepers in their quest. The appeal process is the only way that the current court system could challenge the EPA’s decision to allow Sulfoxaflor to be used on thousands of acres of land annually.
Attorney Janette Brimmer of Earthjustice:
“Our country is facing widespread bee colony collapse, and scientists are pointing to pesticides like Sulfoxaflar as the cause. The effects will be devastating to our nation’s food supply and also to the beekeeping industry, which is struggling because of toxic pesticides. This lawsuit against the EPA is attempt by the beekeepers to save their suffering industry. The EPA has failed them. And the EPA’s failure to adequately consider impacts to pollinators from these new pesticides is wreaking havoc on an important agricultural industry and gives short shrift to the requirements of the law.”
In just the past seven years more than 10,000 million bee hives have been destroyed due to the use of pesticides, as stated in a report on the National Stakeholders Conference on Honey Bee health, USDA and EPA (report released May 2, 2013, page 1). A National Resources Defense Council report states that:
“Bees are one of the myriad of other animals, including birds, bats, beetles and butterflies called pollinators. Pollinators transfer pollen and seeds from one flower to another, fertilizing the plant so it can grow and produce food. Cross-pollination helps at least 30 percent of the world’s crops and 90 percent of our wild plants to thrive. Without bees to spread seeds, many plants – including food crops – would die off.”
To support the beekeepers in their quest to defeat Dow, you can sign a petition here. The more frequently this pesticide is allowed to be used, the more bees will die. This greatly threatens the world food supply.
Your future iPhone or iPad could come with its own projector.
Granted to Apple on Tuesday by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, a patent called “Projected display shared workspaces” envisions a technology that would integrate small
projectors into iOS devices and allow you to control a presentation through the use of gestures.
A camera would detect the shadows and silhouettes of gestures aimed at the projected area, giving you an easy way to manage your presentation. The system could even work with multiple displays. Again using gestures, you could swap images among the different displays included in a shared workspace.
The overall technology could also spread to laptops and desktops through a mini projector connected to the device.
As the patent describes it:
In one embodiment, electronic devices each may include a projector that produces a projected display and a camera that detects gestures made with respect to the projected displays. The electronic devices may interpret gestures on the projected displays to identify image sharing commands for sharing images between the projected displays. The electronic devices may be connected through a communication link that allows the electronic devices to share image data for producing images on any of the projected displays included within the shared workspace.
Certain gadgets on the market can turn your iPhone into a mini projector. But Apple’s integrated invention could take that a few steps further through the gesture and sharing features.
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cnet/tcoc/~3/pHIAKuPBuFs/
Intel has acquired an Israel-based gesture-recognition company, a new report claims.
Intel has paid $40 million for Omek Interactive, Geektime reported on Tuesday, citing people who claim to have knowledge of the agreement. Omek Interactive was reportedly in the crosshairs of both Samsung and Qualcomm, but it was eventually Intel that landed the firm.
The Israel-based Omek Interactive provides gesture-recognition technology for a wide array of products, including electronics,
cars, video games, and casinos. The company’s technology uses a sensor to determine a person’s movements, and then integrates that into the respective program. The company’s technologies work at long distances, similar to the way the Kinect or
Wii behaves. A new technology it developed, called “Grab,” works at close distances for use with PCs.
CNET has contacted Intel for comment on the report and what exactly the company has planned for Omek’s technology. We will update this story when we have more information.
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cnet/tcoc/~3/G2HIkCeYu70/
Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)
Google Glass, the search giant’s significant step into wearable tech, has found a home for applications.
The search company on Tuesday launched the expected redesign of its online Google Play marketplace. Early this morning, an
Android user, Nicolas Gramlich, posted a screenshot to his Google+ page showing one of the titles available in the marketplace including support for
That screenshot came just a few hours after Android and Me posted a screenshot showing Google Glass included as a supported device for Google Play applications. Upon choosing Google Glass in the dropdown, however, users find that it cannot be chosen because they “have not opened the Google Play Store app recently on this device.”
Until that functionality is included, Android users can browse the search company’s newly redesigned Play marketplace. Google announced that it was going to offer up a new Play marketplace design at its I/O Conference earlier this year. The company’s new design includes a tile-based approach to sifting through programs, and allows users to see categories, charts listing the top applications, and new releases.
(Via The Verge)
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cnet/tcoc/~3/vOf1hJTCdxg/
We’ve all been there. You’re cruising around the Sargasso Sea on your superyacht and all your guests are getting anxious. No, it’s worse than that. They’re flat-out bored. Maybe you should have dropped the extra couple million dollars on the optional air-conditioned underwater limo to take them on a tour of the sea floor.
I’m here to bat cleanup with a collection of the things we might have missed, or more likely, the ultra-decadent items that are so far out there they don’t fit neatly into any of our categories. That said, lots of the things in our gallery below could arguably be fashioned into wristwatches (for the literally heavy-handed) or Apple accessories.
See if you can scroll through the below slideshow without all the pixels melting into a shade of green. And let us know in the comments what other luxurious items we’ve missed.
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cnet/tcoc/~3/r9X4-DzYROo/