The word is out and the scientific bodies of manipulation can no longer
contain the growing resistance against GMO. The more corrupt studies
that attempt to find no harm in the consumption of genetically modified
foods, the more an increasingly aware public is growing skeptical. ~ Marco Torres
largest German daily newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung
recently published a shocking article that reveals how Monsanto, the US
Military and the US government are tracking anti-GMO campaigners,
websites, and independent scientists who study the dangers of GMOs.
Does this mean your favortie anti-GMO websites are in danger? Absolutely
not, but it does mean controlled opposition and fictitious medical
specialists will be scouring the internet to plant fabricated statistics
and data with the help of reputable medical journals to sway opinion.
Many politicians and public health officials will then unknowingly use
the fabricated information to validate the GMO mandate. For each new
GMO, a study will be falsified to justify its effectiveness and
requisite belief thereof.
It’s one of the reasons prestigious science journals are rapidly declining in influence.
This junk science has allowed government agencies to approve untold
numbers of GMOs and drugs, or rubber stamp thousands of chemicals as
Since the public is catching on, Universities and prestigious scientists
are losing their credbility. The world is now savvy to the flawed process at the heart of science
and it no amount of science coming from these fraudulent sources will
satisfy the public. As for the independent scientists studying the
dangers of GMO, they are being aggressively targeted.
Attacks on Anti-GMO Camps Everywhere
The largest German daily newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung
has recently published a shocking article that reveals how Monsanto,
the US Military and the US government track both anti-GMO campaigners,
websites and independent scientists who study the dangers of GMOs.
The US not only spies on governments, authorities and private
individuals across the world with the help of their secret services;
they also understand how to push forward the global interests of their
companies with full force.
A glimpse into the world of Monsanto shows
that the company which delivered the pesticide ‘Agent Orange’ to the US
military in the Vietnam war had close connections with the central power
in Washington, with tough people from the field of the US secret
services and with private insurance companies.
If you really want to
learn about the dark history of Monsanto, review this website. When you take a moment to reflect on the history of product development at Monsanto, what do you find? See if you can spot the pattern…
Monsanto is a giant in biotechnology: and number one in the
controversial field of genetic engineering. For its opponents, many of
whom live in Europe, Monsanto is a sinister enemy. Time and again
mysterious things happen, which make the enemy seem yet more sinister.
the previous month, European environmental organization ‘Friends of the
Earth’ and the German Environmental and Nature Protection Association
(BUND) wanted to present a study on the pesticide glyphosate in the
human body. Weed killers containing glyphosate are the big seller for
The company aims for more than two billion dollars turnover
for the Roundup product alone. ‘Roundup herbicide’ has a “long history
of safe use in more than 100 countries”, Monsanto emphasizes.
Counter-Intuitive Findings Contradict Monsanto’s Claims
The promise by Monsanto and producers of genetically modified crops was
that farmers could use less chemicals and produce a greater yield.
That’s about as true as honesty in politics.
A study published by
Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook finds
that the use of herbicides in the production of three genetically
modified herbicide-tolerant crops — cotton, soybeans and corn — has actually increased.
This counterintuitive finding is based on an exhaustive analysis of
publicly available data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
National Agriculture Statistics Service.
Benbrook’s analysis is the
first peer-reviewed, published estimate of the impacts of genetically
engineered (GE) herbicide-resistant (HT) crops on pesticide use.
confirming earlier US government data showing that in the US, GM crops
have produced an overall increase, not decrease, in pesticide use
compared to conventional crops. Not only that promises of greater yields
are also unfounded.
A report that analyzed nearly two decades worth of
peer reviewed research on the yield of the primary GM food/feed crops,
soybeans and corn (maize), reveals that despite 20 years of research and
13 years of commercialization, genetic engineering has failed to
significantly increase US crop yields.
The author, former US EPA and US
FDA biotech specialist Dr Gurian-Sherman, concludes that when it comes
to yield, “Traditional breeding outperforms genetic engineering hands
Virus Disabling The Computers of Activists
Two days before the BUND study was set to be published across 18
countries, a virus disabled the computer of the main organizer, Adrian
Bepp. There was a threat that press conferences in Vienna, Brussels and
Berlin would be cancelled. “We panicked”, remembers Heike Moldenhauer
from BUND. The environmental activists were under extreme time pressure.
Moldenhauer and her colleagues have widely speculated about the motives
and identity of the mysterious attacker. The genetic engineering expert
at BUND believes the unknown virus suppliers wanted in particular to
Nothing is worse for a study than a cancelled
press conference: “we did ask ourselves at the time if we were seeing
ghosts”, said Moldenhauer.
There is no evidence that Monsanto was the ghost or had anything to do
with the virus. The company does not do things like that. It takes pride
in operating “responsibly”:
“Today, it is very easy to make and spread
all kinds of allegations,” Monsanto claims. They say that “over and over
there are also dubious and popular allegations spread, which disparage
our work and products and are in no way based on science.”
Critics of the group see things differently. This is due to the wide
network Monsanto has developed across the world. There are ties with the
US secret services, the US military, with very hard operating private
security companies and of course, with the US government.
A conspicuously large number of Monsanto critics report regular attacks
by professional hackers. The secret services and military also like to
employ hackers and programmers. These specialize in developing Trojans
and viruses in order to penetrate foreign computer networks.
Whistle-blower Edward Snowden has indicated the connection between
intelligence services actions and economic drive. However, this sinister
connection has been overshadowed by other monstrosities.
Some powerful Monsanto supporters know a lot about how to carry out a
cyber war. “Imagine the internet as a weapon, sitting on the table.
Either you use it or your opponent does, but somebody’s going to get
killed” said Jay Byrne, the former head of public relations at Monsanto,
back in 2001.
Companies regularly fight with dubious methods to uphold what they see
as their right: but friend or foe, him or me – that is fighting talk and
in a war, you need allies. Preferably professionals. Such as those from
the secret service milieu, for example.
Monsanto Closely Connected To Central Governments
contacts are known to the notorious former secret service agent Joseph
Cofer Black, who helped formulate the law of the jungle in the fight
against terrorists and other enemies.
He is a specialist on dirty work, a
total hardliner. He worked for the CIA for almost three decades, among
other things as the head of anti-terroism.
Black later became vice
president of the private security company Blackwater, which sent tens of
thousands of soldiers to Iraq and Afghanistan under US government
Investigations show how closely connected the management and the central
government in Washington are, as well as with diplomatic
representatives of the USA across the world. In many instances, Monsanto
has operationally powerful assistants.
Former Monsanto employees occupy
high offices in the USA in government authorities and ministries,
industrial associations and in universities; sometimes in almost
According to information from the American
Anti-Lobby-Organisation, Open Secrets Org, in the past year, 16 Monsanto
lobbyists have taken up sometimes high ranking posts in the US
administration and even in regulatory authorities.
For the company, it is all about new markets and feeding a rapidly
growing world population. Genetic engineering and patents on plants play
a big role here. Over 90 % of corn and soya in the USA is genetically
modified. In some parts of the rest of the world the percentage is also
Monsanto led the fight to allow the famous genetically engineered corn
plant MON810 in Europe with lots of lobbying – the group completely lost
the fight. It was even beaten out of the prestigious French and German
An alliance of politicians, farmers and clergy rejected genetic
engineering in the fields and the consumers do not want it on their
plates. But the battle is not over. The USA is hoping that negotiations
started this week for a free-trade agreement between the USA and the EU
will also open the markets for genetic engineering.
Lobbying for your own company is a civic duty in the USA. Even the
important of the 16 US intelligence services have always understood
their work as being a support for American economic interests on the
They spy on not only governments, authorities and
citizens in other countries under the name of the fight against terror,
they also support American economic interests, in their own special way.
Independent Scientists Targeted
It is already obvious that somebody makes life difficult for Monsanto
critics and an invisible hand ends careers. However, who is this
somebody? The targets of these attacks are scientists, such as the
Australian Judy Carman.
Among other things, she has made a name for
herself with studies of genetically modified plants. Her publications
were questioned by the same professors which also attacked the the
studies of other Monsanto critics.
It does not stop at skirmishes in the scientific community. Hackers
regularly target various web pages where Carman publishes her studies
and the sites are also systematically observed, at least that is the
impression Carman has.
Evaluations of IP log files show that not only
Monsanto visits the pages regularly, but also various organizations of
the U.S. government, including the military.
These include the Navy
Network Information Center, the Federal Aviation Administration and the
United States Army Intelligence Center, an institution of the US Army,
which trains soldiers with information gathering.
Monsanto’s interest in
the studies is understandable, even for Carman. “But I do not
understand why the U.S. government and the military are having me
observed,” she says.
Ever wonder why those same obnoxious, arrogant and infrequent users just
happen to appear on the heels of very controversial posts like
They monitor, wait and then pounce of the same topics to
emotionalize and antagonize legitimate users on social networking and
thousands of other websites.
Surging disinformation analysts are commenting on controversial topics such as GMO on your favorite websites to emotionalize and antagonize.
The organization GM Watch, known to be critical of gene technology, also
experiences strange events. Editor Claire Robinson reports continued
hacker attacks on the homepage since 2007.
“Every time we increase the
page security just a bit, the opposite side increases their tenacity and
following are new, worse attacks”, she says.
She also cannot believe
the coincidences that occur. When the French scientist Gilles Eric
Seralini published a controversial study on the health risks of
genetically modified maize and glyphosate in 2012, the web site of GM
Watch was hacked and blocked.
The same repeats when the opinion of the
European food inspectorate (EFSA) is added to the site. The timing was
skilfully selected in both cases. The attacks took place exactly when
the editors wanted to publish their opinion.
Marco Torres – July 30, 2013 – posted at NaturalBlaze
Marco Torres is a research
specialist, writer and consumer advocate for healthy lifestyles. He
holds degrees in Public Health and Environmental Science and is a
professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental
toxins and health policy.