Fox Celebrates Transgenders, Transvestites, and Transsexuals on Primetime TV in ‘Rocky Horror Picture Show’

What was Fox thinking airing The Rocky Horror Picture Show: Let’s Do the Time Warp Again, a remake of the 1975 musical/comedy/horror cult classic, at 8pm eastern?

I mean, this is a musical that has its virgin character seducing a Frankenstein sex monster singing, “Toucha-toucha-toucha-touch me, I wanna be dirty.” Is that what you want to hear kids singing at school tomorrow? There is a reason the original was rated R and relegated to midnight showings for college students. But this version was brought to you by the same people kids watch all day: It’s directed by Kenny Ortega, of Disney’s High School Musical fame, and features Nickelodeon and Disney stars Victoria Justice and Ryan McCartan, respectively, as Janet and Brad. 

For those who don’t know, The Rocky Horror Picture Show is about an innocent, recently engaged couple (Janet and Brad), who knock at the door to a castle after their car breaks down in the rain, only to find a convention of gender-bending alien weirdos experimenting with their sexuality and they decide to join in. Obviously this is wildly inappropriate material for minors – and most people, really – to begin with, so I don’t know how this remake got off the drawing board at Fox.

Another crazy Fox idea: The main character is a bisexual transvestite scientist named Dr. Frank-N-Furter, played by Tim Curry in the original film, in Fox’s version, he is played by transgender actress Laverne Cox. So, audiences were subjected to watching a transgender singing, “I’m a sweet transvestite from Transsexual, Transylvania,” in lingerie with cleavage hanging out shimmying and grinding up against anyone, man or woman, who danced past.

Some things were toned town from the film, the murder was quick with little blood, the cannibalism seemed to have been overlooked, and the sexual situations didn’t go quite as far and were slightly less rapey. But there’s still the fact that you had a transgender “woman” in bed with Janet, and then with Brad, ultimately dressing him in drag, too. There was also a gratuitous tongue kiss between Frank and Brad, and Brad and Rocky make an intimate sandwich out of Janet in the pool. 

What does it say about the state of our culture that all this was considered wild and transgressive in the 1970s but is now fine for a mainstream broadcast television event in 2016? It’s just a huge jump to the left, and then no steps to the right…

Let’s NOT do the time warp again.

Source Article from

ABC’s ‘Notorious’ Takes a Pro-Life, Pro-Adoption Stance

Louise Herrick: And finally, last night’s segment on Jenna Polly’s surrogacy gone wrong went viral after her water broke live on air. Thousands of you have reached out for updates on Jenna’s delivery, and we’re happy to report that Jenna gave birth…

Mary: I don’t understand. You’re saying that the biological parents were egg and sperm donors? From Prague?

Jake: That’s right. And the surrendered all parental rights when they made their donation.

CPS Agent: I hope I’m not interrupting.

Mary: What’s going on?

CPS Agent: Mr. Gregorian, I have been instructed to return the baby to your client, Miss Polly.

Jenna: Jake, I don’t understand.

Jake: Under the law, because they surrendered their rights, you’re the de facto parent, which means…

Jenna: I can give the baby to the Gowers.

Jake: Yes, that’s right.

Mary: Oh, my God. Oh, my God. This — This is really happening? [ Laughs ] Hi, baby. Hi, there.

Arthur: Thank you. Thank you so much.

Jake: My office will prepare the paperwork, but with Jenna’s consent, the baby’s yours.

Jenna: Absolutely.

Source Article from

Megyn Kelly – Queen of Media Whores


October 21, 2016

We know that Megyn Kelly is a whore and a hypocrite based on her sleazy, uncomfortable, sexually provocative, and self- sexualization/prostitution of herself on the Howard Stern Show back in 2010, wherein she freely talked about being exploited, and her own exploitation of, her breasts, thighs, legs, ass, anus, vagina, and every other aspect of her female sexuality, and her making no complaints about having to literally sell her soul to become successful and a “presstitute” for Roger Ailes of FoxNews and the rest of the Neo-Con Zionist Establishment Deep State.


Source Article from

Are Omega-3 Fatty Acids the Key to Preventing Most Disease?

Well, in a way, omega-3-fats could be ‘the new cholesterol.’ It seems as though we hear about omega-3 fats and their apparently never-ending list of benefits so much that many people just roll their eyes whenever they’re mentioned. But some health experts, like Dr William Harris, will freely talk about them as if they are the holy grail of health.

A professor at the Sanford School of Medicine, Dr. Harris has been researching essential fatty acids (1 omega-3, 1 omega-6) and their benefits for 30 years.

“Each study clarifies what it does. It’s been shown to help brain health, depression, dementia and there is something there that omega-3 helps with. It just needs to be worked out. We’re just about to start this,” he says.

Dr. Harris is currently in Australia, helping to launch a national omega-3 testing program that is appropriately called the Omega-3 Index. Not only is an omega-3 deficiency a risk factor for heart disease that can be addressed without drugs, but he “would bet” that omega-3 levels are the most important risk factor for heart disease there is.

Once it is rolled out, the Omega-3 Index test will be a simple finger-prick blood test, which anyone could order from a doctor or naturopath. Then, the blood levels of omega-3’s would be tested and recorded as a percentage. The optimal percentage range is 8-12%, with levels under 4% considered too low.

Good Sources of Omega-3’s

Source: WHFoods. Click for larger version.

The best source of the essential omega-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), and in particular its downstream products EPA and DHA, is species of oily fish such as:

  • Salmon (with the skin on)
  • Sardines
  • Herring
  • Mackerel

There are also plant sources of ALA, such as:

  • Flax
  • Chia
  • Walnuts
  • Hemp seeds

Hemp seeds have an optimal ratio of the essential omega-6 (linoleic acid) and omega-3 fatty acids, at 2.5:1. Flax seeds have the highest ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fats, with the 6:3 ratio being 0.2:1. [1]

However, some people have a harder time converting ALA to the stronger downstream products EPA and DHA, so they must eat fish or take a supplement. Others can do it much more easily, but it also means they convert omega-6 fats into harmful (in excess) products at a higher rate, and so must avoid consuming a higher than optimal ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fats.

How Can Omega-3’s Protect Your Heart?

Source: LifeExtensionSource: LifeExtension
Source: LifeExtension

So how do omega-3 fatty acids work to protect heart health? One of the big benefits is protection against inflammation. Chronic inflammation can result in tissue damage, and some inflammatory chemicals produced by the body can dysregulate blood sugar, elevate blood lipids (such as those linked to heart disease), and raise blood pressure. In fact, chronic inflammation is argued to cause virtually all disease, making consuming inflammation-fighting foods extra important.

Omega-3 fats have been found to aid in the production of chemicals that can both stop inflammation in its tracks and resolve it. After acute inflammation, which is beneficial to the body, you are meant to produce chemicals that act as “stop signals” and mop up the pro-inflammatory ones.

These are known as lipoxins, resolvins, and protectins. Without them, low-grade, damaging, chronic inflammation marches on and can lead to all sorts of problems later. Resolvins are made from omega-3 EPA and DHA, while protectins are made from DHA. Though while lipoxins are made from the omega-6 product arachidonic acid, they need the presence of EPA and DHA.

With a growing body of evidence showing that inflammation is the driver of heart disease, the Omega-3 Index just makes sense.

Additional Sources:

[1] Wikipedia

Storable FoodStorable Food

Source Article from

Scientists are Growing Brains in the Lab, Like 100’s of Brains

British researcher Madeleine Lancaster is growing human brains in her Cambridge University lab. A few hundred of them, in fact. That’s about 2 million neurons. [1]

No, this isn’t a Halloween gag. This sci-fi experiment is intended to help scientists understand disorders like autism and schizophrenia.

It’s not just Lancaster who is invested in growing human brains outside of the body. It’s a project being undertaken by scientists around the world.

The brains are created using skin cells, but they could be made from any type of cells. Lancaster explained:

“The brains develop in the same way you would see in an embryo.”

But instead of growing inside of a womb, the brains are cultivated in giant incubators. They must be fed a nutrient-rich fluid every few days in place of a blood supply. And because there is no immune system, everything that comes into contact with the disembodied organs must be sterilized with alcohol, first.

The brains don’t look the way you’re probably envisioning them. Instead, they resemble waterlogged popcorn floating in pale pink liquid. But the “cerebral organoids” are very similar to the brains inside of people. They are divided into grey matter made of neurons, and white matter – a fatty tissue composed of their spindly “tails.”

A magnified picture of an organoidA magnified picture of an organoid
Source: Daily Mail

The cerebral organoids are also composed of specific regions, just like regular brains, complete with a wrinkled cortex (the part of the brain responsible for language and conscious thought), the hippocampus (home to emotion and memory), the muscle-coordination cerebellum, and many others.

The creations are the equivalent to the brains of 9-week-old fetuses.

Brain Building

The skin samples that Lancaster’s team uses to “build” the tiny brains are from donated skin, but as I mentioned earlier, they could be made from any of the body’s cells, even those from a toenail.

The skin cells must be turned into stem cells, as they are the only kind that can develop into all the body’s tissues. To do this, the team uses a protein serum that can turn back the clock and turn any cell back into an embryonic-like state.

Each stem cell eventually turns into a patchwork of various cell types, including brain cells.

The balls of cells are fed and well cared-for at first, until they are transferred to a new petri dish, at which point the scientists decrease their food. Most of the cells die off as they starve, leaving only the brain cells alive.



From there, the cells are enveloped in a blanket of jelly. Lancaster explained:

“It’s the opposite of normal jelly – it starts off as a liquid which you pour on and it jellifies as it warms up in the incubator.”

The jelly mimics the tissue that would normally envelope a brain within an embryo, like a sort of makeshift skull, which encourages them to develop relatively normally.

Then, it’s a waiting game. After 3 months, the resulting brain is 3 millimeters across and contains some 2 million neurons. Lancaster said:

“A fully developed, adult mouse brain only contains four million, so you can do a lot with that number.”

Nature seems to take over and make these neurons “want” to fire. Lancaster expounded:

“Even if you have a neuron by itself in a dish with no other neurons, it wants to fire so badly that it will connect to itself in order to fire.”



The lab-grown brains don’t think…or, at least, Lancaster and her team don’t think they do. It’s not widely understood how brain activity translates into thoughts, and it’s difficult to define what a thought actually is. Even if all of that was understood, the Frankenbrains couldn’t develop normally without a body, anyway.

Lancaster tried to clarify it this way:

“The neurons are working but they aren’t really organised relative to one another.”

She used the example of people who are born blind.

“Since they aren’t exposed to light, the part of the brain that [these signals] would normally connect up is actually not going to form.”

And that’s a good thing, she said, because she would “have some issues” if she “thought there was proper network formation there.”

Why Build Brains?

Lancaster wants to figure out why, for all of humankind’s intellectual superiority, the genetic difference between humans and chimpanzees is a mere 1.2% – just 12 times higher than the differences between individual humans.

To solve the riddle, the team has been taking individual genes involved in brain development and replacing them with chimpanzee genes.

In other words, the scientists are creating human-chimpanzee hybrid brains. It would be completely unethical to add a chimpanzee gene to a human, so this is the next-best thing.

At some point, Lancaster wants to try the experiment on lab-grown chimpanzee brains, but that might be much more difficult, since chimps are a protected species. So instead of taking a skin sample from a random chimp, the cells might have to come from a discarded placenta, for example.

This all sounds creepy, but there’s another reason behind the experiment, one that has more practical applications.

Understanding Neurological Conditions

Historically, it has been hard to study neurological conditions like autism and schizophrenia, because no other animal gets them. How do you study autism and schizophrenia in mice, when rodents never get them?

Last year, scientists compared brains grown from the skin of “normal” adults (I really despise that term) and autistic patients and were able to demonstrate that the disease may be the result of an imbalance between 2 main types of neurons, those which initiate signals (excitatory neurons), and those which act as a brake (inhibitory neurons).

Said Lancaster:

“In a normal brain there’s a very fine balance between those two types, so you could imagine this could have a big impact on the way the networks function.”

She went on:

“Our current interests focus on other neurodevelopmental disorders like autism and intellectual disability, by introducing mutations seen in these disorders and examining their roles in pathogenesis in the context of organoid development.” [2]

These lab-grown brains provide researchers an opportunity to not only stimulate autism and schizophrenia, but also to go back in time and work out why the autistic brains are different, which is pretty incredible. [1]

Frankenstein Comes to the Real World?



The first “brain in a bottle” was grown by stem cell scientists in 2013 who were looking for ways to treat neurological and mental diseases, including microcephaly, a severe birth defect that made headlines this year because it is known to be caused by the Zika virus. [2]

In fact, for that experiment, the brains were made using cells from connective tissue of a patient with microcephaly.

So, here’s where it gets creepier, and where good science could eventually be used for nefarious purposes: There are currently groups of scientists working to introduce a blood supply to the brains, so they are not reliant solely on oxygen and nutrients diffusing in from the surrounding liquids.

Ideally, for these researchers, the Frankenbrains would eventually function like normal brains that form neural networks, which would allow scientists to stain them, slice them up, and study them the way they do mice brains.

In August 2015, scientists at Ohio State University claimed they had created 99% of a human brain. The only thing missing was consciousness – thank goodness.

As you can imagine, the thought of a 100% functioning human brain makes the hair on some researchers’ necks stand up.

Dr. Martin Coath, from the Cognition Institute at the University of Plymouth, questions why any scientist would want to do something so, well, unethical.

“A human brain that was ‘fully working’ would be conscious, have hopes, dreams, feel pain, and would ask questions about what we were doing to it.”

He added:

“Something we have grown in the lab, but on a much simpler level than a human brain, might be hooked up to electronic eyes, ears, and hands and be taught to do something – maybe something that is as sophisticated as many simple living creatures.

That doesn’t seem so far off to me.”

Kind of makes your skin crawl, doesn’t it?


[1] BBC Future

[2] Daily Mail

Storable FoodStorable Food

About Julie Fidler:

Author ImageAuthor Image

Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Source Article from

The Shocking Reason Many Teenage Girls are Prescribed Antidepressants

A striking new study published in JAMA Psychiatry links hormonal contraceptives to depression, especially in teenage girls.

The findings aren’t surprising to many women.

A professor at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and lead supervisor of the study, Dr. Øjvind Lidegaard said:

“We have known for decades that women’s sex hormones estrogen and progesterone have an influence on many women’s mood. Therefore, it is not very surprising that also external artificial hormones acting in the same way and on the same centers as the natural hormones might also influence women’s mood or even be responsible for depression development.” [1]

Here is What the Study Found

For the study, Lidegaard and his team tracked the health of more than 1 million Danish women between the ages of 15 and 34 over the course of 14 years, using data from the National Prescription Register and the Psychiatric Central Research Register in Denmark.

Women who were diagnosed with depression before age 15 were excluded from the study.

The researchers uncovered the following:

  • Women who used birth control pills with a combination of estrogen and progestin were 23% more likely to be prescribed antidepressants than non-users.
  • Women who took progestin-only oral contraceptives had a 34% greater likelihood of being prescribed antidepressants.
  • In women who used a contraceptive patch, antidepressant use doubled.
  • The likelihood of being prescribed antidepressants increased 60% for women who used vaginal rings.
  • Women implanted with hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs) had a 40% increased risk of being prescribed antidepressants.

Perhaps the most shocking revelation was that teens age 15 to 19 who took estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives were 80% more likely to be prescribed antidepressants.

Among women who did not use hormonal birth control, an average of 1.7 out of 100 began taking antidepressants in a given year. That rate increased to 2.2 out of 100 if the women took birth control.

While mood swings are often listed as a known side effect on the labels of contraceptives, Lidegaard’s study is the first to directly tie the products to clinical depression.

In the study, Lidegaard and his team theorized the difference in rates among women taking non-oral and oral contraceptives might be attributable to a difference in dose rather than how the contraceptives are administered.

They also noted that this association doesn’t imply that birth control alone causes depression. More research is needed to find out if there’s more to the story.

The team wrote:

“Adolescents seemed more vulnerable to this risk than women 20 to 34 years old. Further studies are warranted to examine depression as a potential adverse effect of hormonal contraceptive use.”


cause and effect

cause and effect

Some experts take exception to the notion that birth control causes depression. The study did not show that depression is a direct result of contraception. [2]

They’re not surprised, though – many experts have suspected a link between the 2 for years.

Chelsea Polis, a senior research scientist at the Guttmacher Institute, which studies reproductive health, explained:

“This is really resonating with a lot of women.

Part of that has to do with women’s individual experiences. Women do feel that clinicians aren’t taking their concerns seriously sometimes. And part of this reaction is this scientific literacy gap.”

Remember this?

Among women who did not use hormonal birth control, an average of 1.7 out of 100 began taking antidepressants in a given year. That rate increased to 2.2 out of 100 if the women took birth control.

These numbers show that, yes, the risk is higher, but it’s a relatively small risk to begin with.

The rates are even closer for women being diagnosed with depression at a psychiatric hospital. According to the study, 0.3 out of every 100 birth control users were diagnosed with depression versus 0.28 percent of non-birth-control users.

This does not add up to very many more cases in the birth control group, critics of the study argue.

Keyes said:

“You can have something that is twice the risk, but it can be a very rare outcome.”


“This was a very well-conducted study. I think it’s an important piece of information. It lowers my confidence in my hypothesis, which is that hormonal contraception sort of regulates mood.”

Other Problems with Birth Control

birth control pill

birth control pill

Birth control has been linked to other serious health problems, as well. For example, combined estrogen-progestin birth control pills have long been tied to fatal blood clots.

Additionally, the permanent contraceptive device Essure, made by Bayer AG, has been blamed for injuring thousands of women.

Essure is inserted into a woman’s fallopian tubes, where it causes scar tissue to form and block a woman’s egg from becoming fertilized. Thousands of patients complained of adverse events, such as persistent pain, perforation of the uterus and/or fallopian tubes, internal abdominal bleeding, abnormal and irregular bleeding, and allergic or hypersensitivity reactions.

The device can also migrate outside of the fallopian tubes and become lodged in the uterus and other parts of the body.

In February 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) placed a “black box” warning on the Essure device’s packaging, but did not ban it, as many women had requested.


[1] CNN

[2] Today

Storable FoodStorable Food

About Julie Fidler:

Author ImageAuthor Image

Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Source Article from

Obama Says Hillary May Have Cheated During 3rd Debate


Malik Obama, Barack Obama’s brother, was invited to the debate last night in Las Vegas.

Malik was sitting with the Trump supporters during the Las Vegas debate.

This morning Malik suggested that Hillary may have cheated during the debate last night.

Malik was not the only one. Others noticed the samer thing.

Several Twitter users thought Hillary Clinton was reading a script during the debate.

For the record…

Via Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton was caught reading a script to MSNBC during a previous interview:

The same exact thing happened during the first debate:


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Madonna Promises to give Free Blow Jobs for Everyone who votes Hillary


58-year-old “pop star” Madonna is pledging to perform oral sex on voters who cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton.

The pop which, known for her shocking antics, made the remark Tuesday while opening for some fat whack job unfunny comedian Amy Schumer in New York.

The Illuminati harlot from Hell, Madonna has made a point of rooting on the former secretary of State’s White House bid, posting several pro-Clinton messages on Twitter.

“If you vote for Hillary Clinton, I will give you a blow job” Madonna told the crowd at Madison Square Garden.

“And I’m good,” the 58-year-old “Like a Virgin”, “Material Girl” singer, an outspoken supporter of the Democratic presidential nominee, said to cheers from the audience.

“I’m not a tool. I take my time, I have a lot of eye contact, and I do swallow!” Madonna added!

Can you believe this???

DISGUSTING! TRULY DISGUSTING! No outrage in the media, no outcry, no one asking Hillary to disavow this disgusting prostitute, no one is pressuring Hillary for having the support of this junk pop star! Forget about it though, lets find something to attack Trump with instead!

Even liberal garbage doesn’t label THIS ONE as a “False”, though they do pretty much label everything as fake, probably even the Moon Landing.

Madonna is such a wonderful example to all the young girls who are looking up to her as a role model! Unbelievable! Revolting!


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

Hillary Clinton Asks Trump to Give her a Presidential "PARDON"


SHOCK! Hillary Clinton “accidentally” bumped into Donald Trump at the Catholic Al Smith dinner in New York today and subtly asked him to give her a presidential pardon for her negligence/crimes. Her reply to Donald Trump after she bumped into him was “pardon me”.

Trump, a smart guy, understood her subtle message and replied to Hillary that he will think about it, telling her: “Let me talk to you about that after I get into office.”

Hillary smiled when she heard Trump’s reply.

Hillary seems to be getting scared of a potential Trump presidency, where she fears being prosecuted and brought to justice for her many crimes, with her biggest scandal being the 33.000 deleted emails from that basement server of her.

Barack Obama has already pardoned Hillary Clinton on this and Loretta Lynch also instructed Obama appointed FBI director Comey not to prosecute Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump however threatened to bring Hillary Clinton to justice during the second presidential debate after she annoyed him with a couple of personal attacks. You know, the usual Hillary attacks: “sexist, racist”.

Now if Hillary would be brought to justice she would be found guilty and undoubtedly be locked up for the rest of her life.

When Donald Trump openly talked about it during the Catholic Al Smith dinner speech, she started laughing and clapping like crazy because she was embarrassed that he would actually tell the ordeal to the public, disguised as a joke, but of course if he were to actually pardon her, he couldn’t do it secretly because then his supporters would be enraged and feel betrayed because they are actually expecting of Trump to “lock her up” as they shout at his rallies, so Trump had to tell it to the public and let his supporters know in advance that it might be possible for him to forgive Hillary Clinton, but the problem is that he should have conditioned her and make a deal.

For skeptics who might think that she just simply apologized for the bump in, it means that you are a child living inside a cartoon or something. Its not like these two candidates meet frequently and these sort of things can happen. They only met like 4 times this entire year.

And the choice of words she used is no accident as when you bump into someone, you don’t normally say “PARDON ME”, you would say “EXCUSE ME” which has a completely different meaning.

Trump gave her a very intelligent spontaneous response but he should have also conditioned her by saying: “Hillary, I will pardon you but only if you order your media off my back, order your polling agencies to stop showing fake polls with me loosing and if you don’t steal a single vote on November 8th!”

Of course he doesn’t have to actually keep his promise and give her a presidential pardon after he wins, though a promise is a promise and he should probably pardon her if she abides by his demands.

Here’s the video, see for yourself:


Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from

TV Reporter Breaks Silence: "Clinton Sexually Assaulted Me"

Home » Breaking News, Crimes, Immorality, Interviews, North America, Videos » TV Reporter Breaks Silence: “Clinton Sexually Assaulted Me”


Any time a woman comes forward to complain about Donald Trump’s behavior, the liberal media gives her hours of coverage. It doesn’t matter if Donald Trump just brushed the hand of the woman 30 years ago, CNN will run the story on a loop with the headline “Donald Trump sexual predator!”

Bias in the media has never been more obvious and this story proves it even more. Another woman has come forward to expose Bill Clinton. Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax.

She described the first alleged assault:

“…he followed me into an editing room. The first time I remember. That it was very small. There was a chair. I was sitting in a chair. He came up behind me and started rubbing my shoulders and running his hands down toward my breasts. And I was just stunned. I froze. I asked him to stop. He laughed.
“That happened on three occasions. And each time it escalated where the aggressive nature of his touch and what he was doing behind me escalated.”

Millwee says she was going to come out publicly around 1998, but she feared for her children after watching the way other Clinton sex accusers were treated by the Clintons and the news media.

Unlike Trump’s accusers, Millwee actually told friends and family who can confirm her story. Three of Millwee’s friends told Breitbart News that she told them in the late 1990’s that Clinton sexually assaulted her while she was a reporter.

This SHOULD be getting more attention than Trump’s accusers, but the liberal media will ignore it. It’s up to US to share the truth for this woman!! Lord knows she deserves it!!

Breitbart has an exclusive interview with Millwee that can be seen below.



Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Source Article from